California Flavored Tobacco Ban Faces Lawsuit by Tobacco Companies

Nov.10.2022
California Flavored Tobacco Ban Faces Lawsuit by Tobacco Companies
California faces a lawsuit over its ban on flavored tobacco products, including e-cigarettes, brought by tobacco companies.

Renowned tobacco companies, along with other tobacco corporations, filed a lawsuit against the state of California on Wednesday in a federal court regarding the state's ban on flavored tobacco, just a day after the state's voters overwhelmingly approved a referendum on the ban. This information was compiled by 2FIRSTS.


It has been over two years since Governor Gavin Newsom signed Senate Bill 793, which prohibits the sale of flavored tobacco products, including flavored e-cigarette cartridges and minty cigarettes. Tobacco companies quickly collected signatures to force a referendum on the law - asking voters whether they approve or reject the ban. While more than half of the state's ballots have yet to be counted, the media has already declared that the referendum will pass (leading by 24% currently).


California is just one of over 300 jurisdictional areas in the United States that have banned flavored tobacco products in some way. Many of these bans have been challenged in court, with most of these challenges ultimately failing. In 2021, a lawsuit was brought against California's flavor ban by tobacco companies, but a federal judge dismissed the case, telling the plaintiffs to wait for voters to weigh in before pursuing legal action.


According to the lawsuit, the damage faced by the plaintiff is no longer theoretical, but concrete and urgent since the referendum has already taken place. Unless a judge intervenes, the injunction will take effect no later than December 21, 2022.


In their lawsuit, tobacco companies argued that the 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (TCA) allowed state and local governments to regulate tobacco products but not to prohibit their use or sale.


The ban is an explicit priority clause of the TCA that "'takes precedence over' any [state] requirement," which means it is "different from or in addition to" federal requirements regarding tobacco product standards, states the lawsuit. "The flavor ban is typical of tobacco product standards.


In 2020, Reynolds Tobacco filed a lawsuit to block the ban on flavored tobacco in Los Angeles County, using the same argument. The lawsuit was dismissed, and in March 2022, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the decision with a split 2-1 ruling.


The TCA explicitly allows local authorities to enact regulations that are stricter than those set by the TCA itself, wrote Circuit Judge Lawrence VanDyke, who was appointed by Donald Trump, in a majority decision. The law grants the federal government sole authority to establish tobacco product standards, while also preserving the power of states, municipalities, and tribes to regulate or completely prohibit the sale of some or all tobacco products, carefully balancing federal and local power.


The latest lawsuit against the tobacco company doesn't bode well. Their lawyer, Steven Geise, did not respond to requests for comment via phone and email.


A spokesperson for California Attorney General Rob Bonta stated in a written declaration, "Big tobacco companies have repeatedly attempted to push states to work towards protecting our youngest residents from the destructive impact of tobacco use. While we have not officially received the lawsuit, we look forward to vigorously defending this important law in court.


Opponents of flavored tobacco claim that it serves as a gateway drug and has a seductive effect on teenagers, regardless of whether it is purposely designed or not. While some argue that electronic cigarettes offer a less harmful form of nicotine ingestion, others believe that nicotine addiction, especially among young people, can be detrimental. According to the Center for Disease Control, nicotine "damages adolescent brain development" and "young people who use e-cigarettes may be more likely to smoke in the future.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended for industry communication and education purposes only.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the authenticity and accuracy of the content. The translation of this article is intended for internal industry exchange and research only.


Due to the limitations of the translator's proficiency, the translated article may not fully capture the original meaning. Please refer to the original text for accuracy.


2FIRSTS is fully aligned with the Chinese government on any domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and foreign-related issues and positions.


The copyright of compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for deletion.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

JTI Research Finds 31% of UK Respondents Offered Illicit Tobacco, While 63% of Ennis Packs Lack Duty Marks
JTI Research Finds 31% of UK Respondents Offered Illicit Tobacco, While 63% of Ennis Packs Lack Duty Marks
Multiple JTI-backed studies in the UK and Ireland indicate that illicit tobacco remains visible across consumer interactions and local markets. In the UK, JTI research found that 31% of respondents said they had been offered illicit tobacco products. In Ireland’s Ennis area, a JTI-commissioned empty pack survey found that 63% of sampled cigarette packs did not carry Irish duty-paid markings. The findings come from industry research rather than official government estimates of illicit tobacco market size, but highlight continued concerns among regulators, legitimate retailers and tobacco companies over illicit trade.
Aug.19
Canada Health Minister Says She Is Not Considering Looser Nicotine Pouch Retail Rules as PMI-Linked Group Pushes for Wider Access
Canada Health Minister Says She Is Not Considering Looser Nicotine Pouch Retail Rules as PMI-Linked Group Pushes for Wider Access
Canadian Health Minister Marjorie Michel says she is not considering loosening retail restrictions on nicotine pouches. Canada regulates pouches containing 4 mg or less of nicotine per unit as non-prescription nicotine replacement therapy and requires newer NRT formats such as pouches to be sold from behind pharmacy counters. Meanwhile, Unsmoke Canada, linked to Philip Morris International's Canadian business, is pushing to allow pouches in convenience stores and other general retail outlets. Health Canada also acknowledges continued unauthorized sales, while recent research shows rising pouch use among Canadian youth aged 16 to 19.
Sep.24
How Many Nicotine Pouch Factories Does Europe Need? 2Firsts Interviews AIRSCREAM on the OEM Market
How Many Nicotine Pouch Factories Does Europe Need? 2Firsts Interviews AIRSCREAM on the OEM Market
At InterTabac 2026, nicotine pouch growth was visible not only in brands but across equipment, raw materials and OEM manufacturing. 2Firsts interviewed AIRSCREAM commercial head Steve Moore on how many pouch factories Europe may ultimately need and where manufacturers can differentiate, from formulation and flavour to pouch materials, production consistency and customer service. The category continues to expand, but questions remain over future capacity, consolidation and the long-term structure of the supply chain.
Sep.18
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
Private antitrust litigation stemming from Altria's 2018 $12.8 billion investment for a 35% economic interest in JUUL is advancing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Direct purchasers, indirect purchasers and indirect resellers of JUUL products filed answering briefs this week seeking to preserve class certifications granted by a California federal court in February. Altria and JUUL argue that individual consumers and large distributors differ too much in purchasing terms to remain in a single direct-purchaser class, while a separate dispute concerns whether California antitrust law can apply to indirect purchasers across 27 jurisdictions. A September trial has been put on hold during the appeal.
Sep.23
China Tobacco Zhejiang files patent for pressure-triggered, on-demand oral nicotine release
China Tobacco Zhejiang files patent for pressure-triggered, on-demand oral nicotine release
China Tobacco Zhejiang Industrial Co., Ltd. has filed a patent application for an oral nicotine delivery product designed to let users actively adjust nicotine release. The product embeds two types of nicotine reservoirs with different wall thicknesses and positions inside a deformable matrix. Pressure applied with the tongue or lips can rupture the reservoirs and accelerate nicotine release. In simulated oral tests, several patent examples showed sharply higher peak nicotine release rates as applied force increased from 0 N to 1 N and 3 N. The filing explores a shift from preset release profiles toward user-triggered nicotine delivery.
Sep.01
Product | VAPORESSO Launches PRIX MTL Pod, With NFC Version Linking Interchangeable Panels to On-Screen Animations
Product | VAPORESSO Launches PRIX MTL Pod, With NFC Version Linking Interchangeable Panels to On-Screen Animations
VAPORESSO introduced the PRIX MTL pod system in August 2026 in two versions, Filter and NFC. The Filter version allows users to switch between a conventional drip tip and a filter tip, while the NFC version links interchangeable panels to matching on-screen animations. PRIX features a 2,600mAh battery, a 5.5ml pod, a 0.87-inch TFT display and a maximum output of 40W, alongside Dual Mesh Impact Pods capable of operating at two resistance and power configurations. VAPORESSO's French website lists MSRP at $39.99 for the Filter version and $49.90 for the NFC version.
Market
Aug.24 by 2Firsts Perspectives