Charlie’s Says 30 PACHA Vape SKUs Tentatively Identified for FDA’s Non-Priority Enforcement Public List

Aug.25
Charlie’s Says 30 PACHA Vape SKUs Tentatively Identified for FDA’s Non-Priority Enforcement Public List
Charlie’s Holdings said the U.S. Food and Drug Administration notified the company on June 23, 2026, that 30 PACHA vape SKUs with submitted PMTAs had been tentatively identified for inclusion on a planned public-facing FDA webpage. Under enforcement guidance issued by FDA in May, the webpage is intended to identify certain unauthorized products for which the agency generally does not intend to prioritize enforcement of premarket authorization requirements. Charlie’s disclosed the development alongside second-quarter revenue of $3.8 million, up 116% year over year.

Key Points

  • Charlie’s said FDA notified the company on June 23, 2026, that 30 PACHA vape SKUs had been tentatively identified for inclusion on a planned public-facing FDA webpage.
  • The webpage stems from FDA’s May 2026 enforcement guidance covering certain unauthorized ENDS and oral nicotine pouch products.
  • Inclusion on the webpage does not constitute PMTA marketing authorization; the products remain unauthorized unless FDA grants marketing orders.
  • Reuters previously reported that hundreds of vape and nicotine pouch products could be affected by the policy, with one official estimating that around 100 to 200 products could benefit immediately.
  • Charlie’s reported Q2 revenue of $3.8 million, up 116% year over year, while its operating loss widened to $1.2 million.

2Firsts

August 24, 2026

Charlie’s Holdings said in its second-quarter results released on August 17 that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had notified the company that 30 PACHA vape SKUs with submitted premarket tobacco product applications (PMTAs) had been tentatively identified for inclusion on a planned public-facing FDA webpage of products for which the agency generally does not intend to prioritize enforcement of premarket authorization requirements.

The company said it received the FDA notification on June 23, 2026.

The development is directly related to FDA enforcement guidance issued in May covering certain new tobacco products marketed without premarket authorization, including certain electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and oral nicotine pouch products.

Charlie’s 30 PACHA SKUs have only been “tentatively identified for inclusion” on the planned webpage. The development does not mean the products have received PMTA marketing authorization from FDA.

30 PACHA SKUs Tentatively Identified for Public Webpage

Charlie’s President and CEO Henry Sicignano said:

“We are pleased to announce that the FDA recently notified us that certain of our PACHA products - 30 SKUs - for which PMTAs have been submitted have been tentatively identified for inclusion on the FDA's public-facing webpage of products for which the FDA generally does not intend to prioritize enforcement of PMTA requirements. This is a highly promising development.”

The company did not identify the individual PACHA products covered by the notification and did not state that any of the 30 SKUs had received PMTA marketing authorization.

Charlie’s Says 30 PACHA Vape SKUs Tentatively Identified for FDA’s Non-Priority Enforcement Public List
Charlie’s President and CEO Henry Sicignano|Image source:Charlie’s Holdings

Public List Stems From FDA’s May Enforcement Guidance

In May 2026, FDA issued its final guidance, Enforcement Priorities for Certain New Tobacco Products Marketed Without Premarket Authorization, setting out enforcement policies for certain unauthorized ENDS and oral nicotine pouch products.

Under the policy, FDA generally does not intend to prioritize enforcement of premarket authorization requirements against certain products that meet conditions described in the guidance while their applications remain under review.

FDA also outlined plans for a public-facing webpage intended to help retailers, distributors, consumers and other stakeholders identify products covered by the relevant enforcement policy.

The 30 PACHA SKUs disclosed by Charlie’s are tied to that planned webpage mechanism.

FDA has also stressed that its guidance documents describe the agency’s current thinking and do not themselves establish legally enforceable responsibilities.

Inclusion Does Not Equal PMTA Marketing Authorization

A key regulatory distinction in Charlie’s disclosure is the difference between FDA’s enforcement priorities and formal PMTA marketing authorization.

Under the U.S. tobacco regulatory framework, new tobacco products generally require premarket authorization from FDA to be legally marketed. FDA’s decision not to prioritize enforcement against certain unauthorized products does not grant those products marketing authorization.

As a result, even if the 30 PACHA SKUs are ultimately included on FDA’s public-facing webpage, their inclusion should not be characterized as FDA “approval,” “authorization” or “endorsement.”

Charlie’s itself notes in its risk disclosures that there remains uncertainty over whether PMTAs for its nicotine-containing products will ultimately be authorized by FDA.

Reuters Previously Reported Hundreds of Products Could Be Affected

Following the May policy change, Reuters examined the potential impact of FDA’s new enforcement approach.

As previously reported by 2Firsts citing Reuters, three current and former U.S. administration officials said the policy could affect hundreds of vape and nicotine pouch products in the following weeks and months.

One official estimated that around 100 to 200 products could immediately benefit from the policy shift. Another source familiar with FDA’s review process said approximately 1,000 applications had reached scientific review, indicating that manufacturers had submitted sufficient information to potentially qualify under the new policy.

Reuters also reported that major tobacco companies could emerge as significant beneficiaries of the regulatory shift, while public health experts and groups raised concerns about its potential consequences.

Charlie’s latest disclosure provides a specific company- and SKU-level development under the policy. FDA has not granted PMTA marketing authorization to the 30 PACHA SKUs based on the information disclosed by the company.

Charlie’s Q2 Revenue Rises to $3.8 Million, Operating Loss Widens

Charlie’s also reported financial results for the three months ended June 30, 2026.

Second-quarter revenue increased 116% to $3.8 million from $1.8 million a year earlier. Gross profit increased 130% to $1.1 million, while gross margin improved to 29.4% from 27.6%.

The company attributed the revenue increase to higher sales of nicotine-based products and nicotine alternative products. It also said sales of SBX, a non-nicotine disposable vapor product, increased significantly in 2026.

Total operating expenses increased 63% to $2.4 million. The company recorded an operating loss of $1.2 million, compared with a $1.0 million operating loss a year earlier.

Charlie’s ended the quarter with $0.5 million in cash, compared with $1.3 million at the end of 2025. Total assets stood at $12.8 million and shareholders’ equity at $3.1 million.

Company Plans Test Market for Age-Gated Flavored Disposable Vape

Charlie’s also said it is preparing to test-market what it describes as America’s first age-gated flavored disposable vape at hundreds of what it called compliance-minded retail stores.

Sicignano said the company views the initiative and its potential regulatory implications as a significant future opportunity. Statements regarding future market performance and company valuation were identified in the announcement as forward-looking statements and remain subject to regulatory decisions, market acceptance and other risks.

Follow 2Firsts for the latest developments in U.S. FDA vape regulation, PMTA reviews and the global next-generation tobacco industry.

Cover Image Source: Charlie’s Holdings


Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

U.S. Ninth Circuit Upholds FDA Denial of MH Global’s Flavored Vape PMTA Applications
U.S. Ninth Circuit Upholds FDA Denial of MH Global’s Flavored Vape PMTA Applications
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the FDA’s denial of MH Global LLC’s applications to market flavored electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). The court ruled that FDA’s comparative-efficacy framework, which requires applicants to show that flavored products provide greater cessation or switching benefits than tobacco-flavored alternatives, is consistent with the Tobacco Control Act’s “appropriate for the protection of the public health” standard. The court also found that FDA was not required to establish the framework through notice-and-comment rulemaking.
Aug.26
China’s Jiangsu Tobacco Monopoly Bureau and Drug Regulator Target Illegal Vape Sales Disguised as Medical Devices, Define Six Violations
China’s Jiangsu Tobacco Monopoly Bureau and Drug Regulator Target Illegal Vape Sales Disguised as Medical Devices, Define Six Violations
China’s Jiangsu Tobacco Monopoly Bureau and Jiangsu Provincial Medical Products Administration have issued a joint notice targeting illegal production and sales of vape products disguised as medical devices. The notice identifies six categories of violations, including obtaining medical licenses through false materials, misusing medical device credentials, expanding production beyond approved scopes, and using medical device-related online platforms to promote or sell vape products. The action is based on China’s tobacco and medical device regulations and aims to strengthen vape oversight and consumer protection.
Aug.04
JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
Less than a week after JUUL2 received U.S. FDA marketing authorization on August 28, 2026, JUUL Labs was sued for patent infringement in federal court in Delaware. AJ Marketing LLC filed the complaint on September 3, alleging that both JUUL 1 and JUUL2 infringe U.S. Patent No. 8,851,068 B2. The patent covers aspects of programmable electronic vaporization devices, including controls over dose delivery, usage frequency and operating parameters. The plaintiff is seeking reasonable royalties and ongoing royalties tied to the remaining life of the patent. JUUL has not yet publicly responded to the case.
Sep.10
As JUUL2 Wins FDA Authorization, Harm Reduction Journal Highlights the Role of Real-World Evidence in Nicotine Product Regulation
As JUUL2 Wins FDA Authorization, Harm Reduction Journal Highlights the Role of Real-World Evidence in Nicotine Product Regulation
A commentary published in the international open-access, peer-reviewed Harm Reduction Journal argues that randomized controlled trials remain central to evaluating smoking cessation efficacy but cannot alone capture real-world uptake, complete switching, longer-term use and population impact of non-combustible nicotine products such as e-cigarettes, heated tobacco and nicotine pouches. The authors frame impact as “reach × efficacy” and call for real-world evidence to complement RCTs. Three days after publication, the FDA authorized three JUUL2 products and highlighted complete switching among adult smokers in explaining its decision, providing a timely regulatory backdrop to the debate.
Sep.08
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
The Ohio Supreme Court is hearing a case involving flavored vape sales and whether state authorities can use consumer protection laws to take action against retailers selling unauthorized vape products. Ohio officials argue that selling unauthorized flavored vapes may constitute consumer deception, while retailers argue that tobacco product regulation falls under federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authority and that states cannot impose additional restrictions through consumer laws. The case could affect the scope of state-level vape regulation across the United States.
Aug.06
JTI Research Finds 31% of UK Respondents Offered Illicit Tobacco, While 63% of Ennis Packs Lack Duty Marks
JTI Research Finds 31% of UK Respondents Offered Illicit Tobacco, While 63% of Ennis Packs Lack Duty Marks
Multiple JTI-backed studies in the UK and Ireland indicate that illicit tobacco remains visible across consumer interactions and local markets. In the UK, JTI research found that 31% of respondents said they had been offered illicit tobacco products. In Ireland’s Ennis area, a JTI-commissioned empty pack survey found that 63% of sampled cigarette packs did not carry Irish duty-paid markings. The findings come from industry research rather than official government estimates of illicit tobacco market size, but highlight continued concerns among regulators, legitimate retailers and tobacco companies over illicit trade.
Aug.19