Connecticut Performs Poorly in Tobacco Control, Shows Latest Report

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai

Jan.25.2024

Connecticut Performs Poorly in Tobacco Control, Shows Latest Report

Connecticut's tobacco control efforts were deemed inadequate in a new report by the American Lung Association, citing poor funding and lack of flavor restrictions.

A recent report by the American Lung Association reveals that Connecticut has performed poorly in its efforts to eliminate tobacco use and enforce tobacco control laws. The report points out that the state has received failing grades for the eighth consecutive year in both tobacco prevention and cessation funding and flavored tobacco products.

Connecticut officials have announced an increase in spending on tobacco prevention, allocating a specific budget of $12 million annually towards aiding smoking cessation and curbing tobacco use. However, this funding falls short of the recommended amount by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, undermining its effectiveness. Health officials lament that this has resulted in Connecticut receiving an 'F' grade in tobacco control, highlighting a notable disparity compared to other states.

A report is calling for an increase in national funding for tobacco control programs in order to more effectively address the challenges faced by states. The report also emphasizes the urgency of a statewide ban on flavored tobacco products. However, currently, no municipal government has taken the corresponding measures, and health officials have started discussions with local authorities and lawmakers to determine if progress can be made this year, though uncertainty remains.

Connecticut's cigarette tax has received a passing grade of B, making it one of the three highest cigarette taxes in the nation. This tax policy has been somewhat successful in helping to reduce the state's smoking rate by making people price-sensitive and consequently decreasing the consumption of traditional combustible cigarettes.

References:

[1] American Lung Association: Connecticut should increase funding for tobacco control programs

Also Read:

[1] Puff City Fined for Selling Tobacco/E-Cigarette to Minors

[2] Smoke House E-cigarette Store Arrested for Illegal Marijuana Sales

#North America #United States #Traditional tobacco #Legislation #Tobacco Control Plan #Report

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn

Notice

1. This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2. The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3. This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4. Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

Copyright

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

AI Assistance Disclaimer

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Product | ELFBAR launches new “4-in-1” e-cigarette kit: 4× (1ml + 5ml) design, 4 flavors per set

ELFBAR has launched the “4 in 1 Ultra 50 VAPE KIT” through multiple online sales channels in the UK. The kit combines four 1ml prefilled pods with four 5ml refill containers. The company claims it can deliver up to around 50,000 puffs, with a retail price of approximately £13.99.

Dec.31 by 2FIRSTS.ai

Product | ON! PLUS: Breakdown of Six FDA-PMTA-Authorized Nicotine Pouches—6/9 mg Strengths, Slim Format, and Traditional Flavours

The U.S. FDA has added six ON!® PLUS nicotine pouch products to its list of Marketing Granted Order (MGO) authorizations. Based on 2Firsts’ review, the approved products feature a highly standardized configuration in terms of format, nicotine strength, and flavour portfolio, primarily focusing on 6 mg and 9 mg strengths and traditional variants such as mint, wintergreen, and tobacco—reflecting a clear compliance-oriented approach.

Dec.22 by 2FIRSTS.ai

U.S. Nicotine Pouch Sales Surge, Forcing Convenience Stores to Rethink Backbar Layouts

U.S. convenience stores are restructuring backbar displays as nicotine pouches and other modern oral products gain space amid regulatory and product-mix shifts. The New York Association of Convenience Stores reports nicotine pouch sales are up over 40% this year, while some chains are trimming cigarette facings and testing zero-nicotine and herbal alternatives.

Dec.04 by 2FIRSTS.ai

iMiracle and VPR Reach Preliminary Settlement in ‘Elf’ Trademark Dispute, Potentially Ending Three-Year Legal Battle

According to Law360, VPR Brands and iMiracle have filed a joint notice in federal court in Florida stating that they have signed a settlement term sheet and plan to finalize a global settlement within 30 days that would resolve multiple lawsuits. The dispute, which began in 2022 and centers on the “Elf” trademark, has involved injunctions, counterclaims and a key ruling by the Federal Circuit overturning a lower court’s order.