Recently, according to Forbes, the town of Brookline, Massachusetts, made headlines by passing a remarkable ordinance at a November 2020 town meeting. This ordinance prohibits the sale of tobacco products to anyone born after 1999. Referred to as the "Generation Ban," this law was enacted two years ago but has yet to be formally implemented, pending the outcome of a legal dispute challenging its validity. This legal battle began on November 6th in the Massachusetts Supreme Court and has garnered statewide attention.
Fahd Iqbal, owner of the Brookline Sunoco station, has filed a lawsuit aiming to overturn the "generational ban," arguing that state laws should take precedence over the ban.
Iqbal's lawyer informed the court news services that "the regulation sets both a lower and upper limit for tobacco sales statewide." The plaintiff's lawyer further added, "The governor has made it abundantly clear that now is the time to establish uniform standards across the state." He pointed out that proponents of the ban believe that "the governor fails to comprehend the legislation he is signing.
Massachusetts has become a cautionary example in recent years when it comes to bans. Following the implementation of a ban on flavored tobacco and e-cigarette products statewide, the sales of taxed tobacco products, often referred to as "sin products," have declined in Massachusetts. However, this decrease seems to have simply shifted to other states, particularly New Hampshire and Rhode Island, rather than resulting in a reduction in smoking and e-cigarette usage rates. This information is based on a report from 2021.
According to a report by the nonpartisan Tax Foundation, sales in Massachusetts have experienced a significant decline. However, this drop is not due to people quitting smoking but rather due to these sales diverting to other locations. The report also indicates that the cost of the flavor ban in the 2021 fiscal year could amount to approximately $120 million, excluding losses from sales taxes.
The "Generational Ban" implemented by Brookline and the spice ban in Massachusetts have both hindered the state's tax revenue.
Some individuals argue that the ban is an exemplification of modern Massachusetts politicians adhering to their Puritan roots. Critics anticipate that if the court upholds the "generational ban," it will likely result in tobacco sales shifting to other areas rather than curbing consumption.
Even if the Massachusetts Supreme Court overturns the "generational ban," the proposal may resurface in other parts of the United States and around the world. Earlier this year, lawmakers in California proposed a similar generational tobacco ban that, if ultimately passed, would become a significant regulation nationwide.
Notice
1. This article is provided exclusively for professional research purposes related to industry, technology and policy. Any reference to brands or products is made solely for the purpose of objective description and does not constitute an endorsement, recommendation, or promotion of any brand or product.
2. The use of nicotine products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and heated tobacco products, is associated with significant health risks. Users are required to comply with all relevant laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.
3. This article is strictly restricted from being accessed or viewed by individuals under the legal age.
Copyright
This article is either an original work by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with the original source clearly indicated. The copyright and usage rights of this article belong to 2Firsts or the original source. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other unauthorized use of this article by any entity or individual is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally responsible. For copyright-related matters, please contact: info@2firsts.com
AI Assistance Disclaimer
This article may have utilized AI to enhance translation and editing efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, errors may occur. Readers are advised to refer to the sources provided for more accurate information.
This article should not be used as a basis for any investment decisions or advice, and 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any errors in the content.
