Controversial Proposal: Tax and Regulation on E-Cigarette Products

Feb.27
Controversial Proposal: Tax and Regulation on E-Cigarette Products
Tennessee lawmakers propose 10% tax on certain e-cigarette products, stirring controversy and potential impact on industry.

Core content:


A Tennessee lawmaker has proposed a 10% tax on certain e-cigarette products and requiring FDA approval before they can be sold.


The Senate Committee on Commerce and Labor passed the bill by a vote of 7 to 1, despite strong opposition.


The proposal has sparked controversy and may have an impact on the e-cigarette industry within the state.


According to The Tennessean on February 26th, lawmakers in Tennessee have proposed for the first time a 10% tax on certain e-cigarette products, including e-cigarette pens, e-cigarette molds, vaping products, and pods, and require approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can be sold.


On Tuesday (the 25th), the Republican Party proposed a 10% tax on e-cigarette products and additional consumer safety regulations. It is estimated that about 400,000 residents of Tennessee regularly use e-cigarette devices. According to data from the Tax Policy Center, Tennessee is one of approximately 20 states in the US that have not taxed e-cigarette products, many of which are located in the Southeast region.


Despite facing opposition, the Senate Commerce and Labor Committee passed Senate Bill 763 with a 7-1 vote. The bill was introduced by Republican Senator Ken Yager of Kingston and Senate Finance Chairman Bo Watson of Hixon.


In addition to imposing new taxes on e-cigarette products, Senate Bill 763 also requires e-cigarette manufacturers to register within the state and pay an annual fee of $25 to ensure that only products approved by the FDA are sold.


The bill also requires consumers to present proof of age when purchasing tobacco, e-cigarettes, marijuana, and smokeless nicotine products.


Danny Gillis, president of the Tennessee Smoke-Free Association and owner of three e-cigarette stores, has criticized the bill as an attempt by big tobacco companies to take over efforts to reduce harm in our industry.


Gillis warned that the bill could "force 99% of e-cigarette products out of the market" and "create an unfair tax structure," potentially leading to the closure of up to 700 e-cigarette companies statewide.


According to financial analysis, the new tax is expected to bring in nearly $16.5 million in new tax revenue for the state government each year.


Currently, Tennessee levies a consumption tax of $0.62 per pack on cigarettes, a 6.6% tax on other tobacco products, and still does not impose state taxes on smokeless nicotine products.


Notice

1. This article is provided exclusively for professional research purposes related to industry, technology and policy. Any reference to brands or products is made solely for the purpose of objective description and does not constitute an endorsement, recommendation, or promotion of any brand or product.

2. The use of nicotine products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and heated tobacco products, is associated with significant health risks. Users are required to comply with all relevant laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3. This article is strictly restricted from being accessed or viewed by individuals under the legal age.

Copyright

This article is either an original work by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with the original source clearly indicated. The copyright and usage rights of this article belong to 2Firsts or the original source. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other unauthorized use of this article by any entity or individual is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally responsible. For copyright-related matters, please contact: info@2firsts.com

AI Assistance Disclaimer

This article may have utilized AI to enhance translation and editing efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, errors may occur. Readers are advised to refer to the sources provided for more accurate information.

This article should not be used as a basis for any investment decisions or advice, and 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any errors in the content.