Controversy over E-cigarette Sales in Australian Pharmacies

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Jun.26.2024
Controversy over E-cigarette Sales in Australian Pharmacies
Australian pharmacy lobby groups express shock at agreement allowing over-the-counter e-cigarette sales, as government defends decision.

According to a report by The Guardian on June 25th, a lobbying group representing Australian pharmacy owners expressed shock at an agreement between the Green Party and the Labor Party, which would allow e-cigarettes to be sold over-the-counter in pharmacies without a prescription. The group stated that they only learned of this change through a media press release after the deal was already completed.

 

However, Health Minister Mark Butler downplayed concerns from the pharmacy association, stating that pharmacies are already selling e-cigarettes and assured store owners that it will be up to each individual pharmacy to decide whether or not to sell e-cigarettes under the new model.

 

I believe that this is a wise compromise between obtaining and implementing serious reforms to restore e-cigarettes to their original purpose as therapeutic devices.

 

Butler stated at a press conference in Canberra on Tuesday (25th).

 

The pharmacy has been selling e-cigarettes for a long time, and there have always been suggestions that they will continue to sell e-cigarettes under the government's reforms.

 

The vice president of the association, Anthony Tassone, claimed that they were not involved in the discussion.

 

We are shocked and we question why we have not been invited to participate in the discussion on this very, very important issue.

 

No one wants e-cigarettes to end up in the hands of children or teenagers, but this policy was rushed into place. These are not therapeutic products - we do not know the long-term effects of these products on health and safety. How can pharmacists make wise decisions about their clinical applicability? We were not consulted, consumers did not ask for it, patients did not ask for it.

 

But Butler said that the Australian government proposed this option last year and pointed out that the Pharmacy Guild did not submit any opinions or participate in the Senate inquiry hearings on e-cigarette regulations.

 

I do not acknowledge that this option has not been clearly included on the agenda for a considerable period of time.

 

Pharmacists across the country have always engaged in careful and professional discussions with customers about smoking cessation support. They are doing so now, as they have done for a long time. This is an additional tool for quitting smoking.

 

When asked if pharmacists will be forced to stock e-cigarettes, Butler stated that it will be up to individual pharmacies to decide and the government will not mandate it.

 

Opposition shadow health minister Anne Ruston claimed that the government's plan could lead to e-cigarette users still being exposed to the black market. The opposition believes that the issue could be addressed by expanding regulatory access.

 

The Pharmaceutical Society of Australia is the highest authority for practicing pharmacists, with its national president, Associate Professor Fei Sim, stating that members also support the original legislation. She expressed that the amendment "weakens the role of pharmacists as healthcare professionals.

 

If the amendment is passed in its current form by the Senate, it would require pharmacists to prescribe to the public unapproved, unregulated, and untested e-cigarette products. This is not in line with the health paradigm.

 

Steve Robson, President of the Australian Medical Association, believes that requiring pharmacists to discuss health options with purchasers is a "wise" compromise. He stated that the Australian Medical Association strongly supports plans to restrict access to pharmacies. Robson criticized the Pharmacy Guild for "complaining about helping young Australians.

 

The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) has been preparing prescription guidelines for general practitioners for the past few months, including providing them with clinical guidance on prescribing medications.

 

"In an ideal scenario, we would completely ban e-cigarettes," said Dr. Nicole Higgins, president of RACGP. "But in reality, we need to take them away from children.

 

If pharmacists want to play an increasingly important role in managing healthcare conditions, smoking cessation and nicotine withdrawal are important public health issues.

 

She said that general practitioners will continue to provide e-cigarette and smoking cessation support for patients in need.

 

Patient and disability rights advocacy organization "Better Access Australia's" Felicity McNeill is concerned that the new system will send a message to children that these unregulated and unproven products are safe medical products.

 

Associate Professor Emily Stockings of the Matilda Centre at the University of Sydney stated that the revised legislation is unlikely to curb the supply of drugs to children.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

US ITC Judge Finds Glas Infringed Two JUUL Vape Patents, Recommends Restrictions on Related Imports——Glas Received FDA Marketing Authorization for Four Vape Pods in May 2026; Proposed Restrictions Remain Under Commission Review
US ITC Judge Finds Glas Infringed Two JUUL Vape Patents, Recommends Restrictions on Related Imports——Glas Received FDA Marketing Authorization for Four Vape Pods in May 2026; Proposed Restrictions Remain Under Commission Review
A U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) administrative law judge issued an initial determination on October 20, 2026, finding that certain Glas vaping devices, cartridges and components infringed 12 claims across two patents asserted by JUUL, constituting a violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The judge recommended a limited exclusion order and a cease and desist order against the Glas respondents. Five months earlier, the FDA authorized four Glas e-cigarette pods, including mango, blueberry and two menthol variants. The patent investigation concerns device and cartridge structures and is separate from FDA premarket review. The proposed import restrictions have not become final, and their product-level scope remains unresolved.
company
Nov.05
Swedish Match Faces Broader Labeling Order After ZYN Inspection, Documents Obtained by 2Firsts Show
Swedish Match Faces Broader Labeling Order After ZYN Inspection, Documents Obtained by 2Firsts Show
Documents obtained by 2Firsts show that Sweden's Public Health Agency ordered Swedish Match to revise ingredient labels beyond the five ZYN products inspected. The dispute centers on whether flavoring ingredients must be individually disclosed, with Swedish Match citing trade-secret protection and the regulator insisting on full ingredient disclosure. The company faces a conditional penalty of SEK 2 million per month for noncompliance. As of October 22, the agency had received no appeal, despite the company's stated intention to challenge the decision.
Oct.22
South Korea's Tobacco Plan Excludes 6-Methyl Nicotine as Customs Tightens Import Controls and Analog Liquid Imports Fall 83%
South Korea's Tobacco Plan Excludes 6-Methyl Nicotine as Customs Tightens Import Controls and Analog Liquid Imports Fall 83%
South Korea's government unveiled its first Tobacco Harm Management Basic Plan for 2027–2031 on October 29, 2026, proposing broader testing of vaping and heated tobacco products while excluding nicotine analogs such as 6-methyl nicotine. Synthetic nicotine came under tobacco regulation on April 24, and a June investigation found 6-methyl nicotine in 12 liquid inhalation products marketed as nicotine-free. Customs data released in September showed that imports of nicotine analog solutions fell 83.3%, from 12 metric tons in January–April to 2 metric tons in May–August. By September 20, imports had reached approximately 15 metric tons for the year, with 99.99% originating from China. Customs authorities have tightened pre-clearance testing and supply-chain documentation requirements, while the MFDS expects to complete its assessment of nicotine analog hazards by the end of 2026.
Regulations
Nov.04
JTI Proposes 25-Cent Irish Cigarette Tax Increase, Says It Could Raise €45 Million
JTI Proposes 25-Cent Irish Cigarette Tax Increase, Says It Could Raise €45 Million
Japan Tobacco International's Irish business has proposed a €0.25 tax increase on a pack of 20 cigarettes in its pre-Budget 2027 submission, below the €0.50-or-more increases typically imposed in recent Irish budgets. JTI says the proposal could generate around €45 million in additional Exchequer revenue while limiting further movement toward illicit and non-Irish-tax-paid tobacco. Revenue's existing estimate for a comparable €0.25 increase, including pro-rata rises on other tobacco products, is about €18 million for a full year.
JTI
Sep.18 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Canada Considers Easing Pharmacy-Only Nicotine Pouch Sales Rules, Potentially Reopening Convenience Store Channel
Canada Considers Easing Pharmacy-Only Nicotine Pouch Sales Rules, Potentially Reopening Convenience Store Channel
Canada's federal government is considering changes to current restrictions on where nicotine pouches can be sold, potentially allowing authorized products to return to convenience stores and other general retail channels, although no decision has been made. Since 2024, emerging nicotine replacement therapy products such as nicotine pouches have been largely restricted to behind-the-counter pharmacy sales. Health Canada, meanwhile, continues to recall unauthorized and higher-strength nicotine pouches, indicating that the current discussion concerns retail access for authorized products rather than a broad relaxation of nicotine pouch regulation.
Sep.14
Australia Extends Illicit Tobacco Crackdown From Tougher Penalties to Customs and Logistics Supply Chains
Australia Extends Illicit Tobacco Crackdown From Tougher Penalties to Customs and Logistics Supply Chains
Australia's federal government introduced a new illicit tobacco enforcement bill on September 10 that would strengthen evidentiary presumptions, representative sampling, seizure and forfeiture procedures, proceeds-of-crime powers and obligations for customs and logistics operators. The proposal follows the Combatting Illicit Tobacco Act 2026, which took effect in August and increased penalties while expanding investigative and asset-recovery tools. Together, the reforms extend Australia's crackdown from tougher criminal sanctions into import, logistics and evidentiary enforcement.
Sep.14