Dismissal of NJOY Lawsuit Against Disposable Manufacturers in California

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Jan.24.2024
Dismissal of NJOY Lawsuit Against Disposable Manufacturers in California
NJOY's lawsuit against disposable e-cigarette manufacturers, distributors, and retailers in California was dismissed, except for IMiracle.

According to a report by Vaping360 on January 23rd, the lawsuit filed by NJOY, a subsidiary of the American tobacco company Achia, against dozens of disposable e-cigarette manufacturers, distributors, and retailers was dismissed by a federal court in California. However, the court did not dismiss the lawsuit against iMiracle, the manufacturer of ELFBAR.

 

The lawsuit was filed in October of last year, accusing these companies of selling illegal products in California and the United States. It seeks a nationwide injunction to prevent future imports and sales of these products and demands compensatory and punitive damages to be awarded to NJOY.

 

The accused companies include Breeze, ELFBAR, Esco Bar, Flum, Juice Box, Lava Plus, Loon, Lost Mary, Mr. Fog, and Puff Bar, among others. These brands collectively constitute a significant portion of the disposable e-cigarette market in the United States.

 

Federal Judge Terry J. Hatter Jr., of the Central District of California, signed a dismissal order on January 18. The court ruled that the defendants were erroneously included in the lawsuit as they were not involved in the same transaction, event, or series of transactions or events. Consequently, Judge Hatter dismissed all parties except for the first defendant, iMiracle, from the litigation.

 

According to reports, NJOY was once a pioneer in the independent e-cigarette industry, but it is now a subsidiary of Ochsia, the manufacturer of Marlboro cigarettes in the United States. Last year, this tobacco company acquired NJOY for a price of $2.75 billion, after previously giving up its 35% stake in Juul Labs. Currently, NJOY's two e-cigarette devices are among the six devices authorized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

 

The judge made these rulings in a manner that "does not harm the plaintiff's rights," which means that NJOY can refile the lawsuits against the dismissed defendants, possibly as separate or related groups. The court also dismissed NJOY's allegations of unfair competition and rejected its motion to impose a preliminary injunction on the defendants' sales and distribution.

 

In the case of the Hong Kong-based ELFBAR manufacturer, iMiracle, the court has rejected NJOY's request to serve legal documents via email, stating that there is an established international procedure (the Hague Convention) for serving legal notices to foreign defendants. As a result, NJOY's lawsuit against iMiracle remains valid, and iMiracle will be unable to proceed with the litigation until formal notification is received from the court.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Derbyshire,UK officials seize nearly 2500 illegal disposable e-cigarettes
Derbyshire,UK officials seize nearly 2500 illegal disposable e-cigarettes
UK's Derbyshire county enforces e-cigarette ban, seizing 2418 illicit products, with retailers unaware, intentionally flouting law, or selling old stock.
Aug.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Vuse Ultra Enters Travel Retail for the First Time, Starting from Frankfurt Airport and Expanding to the UK
Vuse Ultra Enters Travel Retail for the First Time, Starting from Frankfurt Airport and Expanding to the UK
British American Tobacco’s Vuse Ultra has entered the global travel retail channel for the first time, being sold at Frankfurt Airport from August to September and planning to expand to certain airports in the UK.
Aug.13 by 2FIRSTS.ai
EU Rejects “Royal Smoke” Trademark Application Over Similarity to BAT’s “Royals”
EU Rejects “Royal Smoke” Trademark Application Over Similarity to BAT’s “Royals”
The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) Opposition Division has rejected Latvian company Baltic Trade Solutions’ application for the “Royal Smoke” trademark, intended for use on e-cigarettes and related products. The decision found the mark too similar to British American Tobacco’s “Royals” cigarette brand, creating a likelihood that average consumers would mistakenly believe the two are connected. Both marks cover products within the “smokers’ articles” category.
Aug.14 by 2FIRSTS.ai
On the Global Tobacco Battlefield: The Clash Between Science and Misinformation — A Tobacco Harm Reduction Expert’s Contribution to 2Firsts
On the Global Tobacco Battlefield: The Clash Between Science and Misinformation — A Tobacco Harm Reduction Expert’s Contribution to 2Firsts
In this in-depth contribution to 2Firsts, harm reduction expert Harry Shapiro exposes the misinformation and bias in global tobacco control, calling for evidence-based safer nicotine alternatives to protect public health and save lives.
Jul.08
Polish Joint Operation Seizes Nearly 1,000 Untaxed E-Cigarettes, Tax Evasion Totals Around $14,000
Polish Joint Operation Seizes Nearly 1,000 Untaxed E-Cigarettes, Tax Evasion Totals Around $14,000
Polish Lublin police successfully seized nearly 1,000 untaxed e-cigarettes, with the total tax evasion amounting to approximately 50,000 PLN (around $14,000). Those involved may face up to three years in prison.
Aug.05 by 2FIRSTS.ai
[2Firsts Special Report] EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal Issues Key Decision: China YTI Gains Procedural Advantage in Heated Tobacco Patent Dispute with Philip Morris
[2Firsts Special Report] EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal Issues Key Decision: China YTI Gains Procedural Advantage in Heated Tobacco Patent Dispute with Philip Morris
The EPO’s Enlarged Board of Appeal has issued decision G 1/24, confirming that claims must always be interpreted with reference to the description and drawings. This standard supports the position of China YTI in its heated tobacco patent dispute with Philip Morris, giving the Chinese company a procedural advantage. The case now returns to the Technical Board of Appeal for further review.
Jun.19