Dismissal of NJOY Lawsuit Against Disposable Manufacturers in California

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Jan.24.2024
Dismissal of NJOY Lawsuit Against Disposable Manufacturers in California
NJOY's lawsuit against disposable e-cigarette manufacturers, distributors, and retailers in California was dismissed, except for IMiracle.

According to a report by Vaping360 on January 23rd, the lawsuit filed by NJOY, a subsidiary of the American tobacco company Achia, against dozens of disposable e-cigarette manufacturers, distributors, and retailers was dismissed by a federal court in California. However, the court did not dismiss the lawsuit against iMiracle, the manufacturer of ELFBAR.

 

The lawsuit was filed in October of last year, accusing these companies of selling illegal products in California and the United States. It seeks a nationwide injunction to prevent future imports and sales of these products and demands compensatory and punitive damages to be awarded to NJOY.

 

The accused companies include Breeze, ELFBAR, Esco Bar, Flum, Juice Box, Lava Plus, Loon, Lost Mary, Mr. Fog, and Puff Bar, among others. These brands collectively constitute a significant portion of the disposable e-cigarette market in the United States.

 

Federal Judge Terry J. Hatter Jr., of the Central District of California, signed a dismissal order on January 18. The court ruled that the defendants were erroneously included in the lawsuit as they were not involved in the same transaction, event, or series of transactions or events. Consequently, Judge Hatter dismissed all parties except for the first defendant, iMiracle, from the litigation.

 

According to reports, NJOY was once a pioneer in the independent e-cigarette industry, but it is now a subsidiary of Ochsia, the manufacturer of Marlboro cigarettes in the United States. Last year, this tobacco company acquired NJOY for a price of $2.75 billion, after previously giving up its 35% stake in Juul Labs. Currently, NJOY's two e-cigarette devices are among the six devices authorized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

 

The judge made these rulings in a manner that "does not harm the plaintiff's rights," which means that NJOY can refile the lawsuits against the dismissed defendants, possibly as separate or related groups. The court also dismissed NJOY's allegations of unfair competition and rejected its motion to impose a preliminary injunction on the defendants' sales and distribution.

 

In the case of the Hong Kong-based ELFBAR manufacturer, iMiracle, the court has rejected NJOY's request to serve legal documents via email, stating that there is an established international procedure (the Hague Convention) for serving legal notices to foreign defendants. As a result, NJOY's lawsuit against iMiracle remains valid, and iMiracle will be unable to proceed with the litigation until formal notification is received from the court.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Indonesia’s Vape Excise Revenue Rises 7.38% in 2025 to $170.4M Amid Broader Tobacco Excise Decline
Indonesia’s Vape Excise Revenue Rises 7.38% in 2025 to $170.4M Amid Broader Tobacco Excise Decline
Indonesia’s customs data show vape (REL) excise revenue reached Rp 2.84 trillion in 2025 (≈$170.4 million), up 7.38% year over year. The gain came even as overall tobacco excise revenue declined. Minimum retail price benchmarks (HJE) for vape products rose in 2025, while excise rates remained unchanged from 2024; open-system e-liquids accounted for the largest share of revenue.
Jan.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Iowa urges Eighth Circuit to allow enforcement of challenged e-cigarette directory law
Iowa urges Eighth Circuit to allow enforcement of challenged e-cigarette directory law
At the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, Iowa asked judges to allow enforcement of a challenged 2024 state law that penalizes manufacturers selling e-cigarette products not listed on a state-run directory. Products are listed only when a manufacturer or retailer meets certain premarket requirements established under the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA).
Jan.19 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Mexico Passes Law Banning Commercial Sale and Advertising of Vapes and E-Cigarettes
Mexico Passes Law Banning Commercial Sale and Advertising of Vapes and E-Cigarettes
Mexico’s Chamber of Deputies approved a constitutional reform prohibiting the production, import, export, transport, distribution, sale, and advertising of vapes and e-cigarettes nationwide. The law does not ban personal use of such products. Backed by President Claudia Sheinbaum, the amendment to the General Health Law imposes penalties of one to eight years in prison and fines between 11,314 and 226,280 pesos (approximately USD 621–12,430).
Dec.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Korea’s MFDS sets 2026 plan to manage and disclose harmful constituents in tobacco products
Korea’s MFDS sets 2026 plan to manage and disclose harmful constituents in tobacco products
South Korea’s Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) said it has established its 2026 work plan to systematically manage harmful constituents in tobacco products and disclose related information under the Tobacco Harmfulness Management Act, which took effect in November 2025.
Jan.16 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Morocco rolls out compulsory rules for e-cigarettes, muassel and nicotine pouches
Morocco rolls out compulsory rules for e-cigarettes, muassel and nicotine pouches
Starting February 2026, Morocco will apply its first mandatory standard governing “smoke-free” products—covering e-cigarettes, muassel and nicotine pouches. Drafted by IMANOR, the standard introduces detailed requirements on composition, labelling, traceability and safety, and will apply to imported products. Consumer advocates say clear labelling and traceability are essential, while urging stronger public-awareness efforts and resources.
Feb.03 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Virginia Seeks to Dismiss E-Cigarette Ban Challenge, Citing Lack of Legal Standing
Virginia Seeks to Dismiss E-Cigarette Ban Challenge, Citing Lack of Legal Standing
The Virginia Attorney General and tax commissioner have urged a federal court to dismiss a lawsuit challenging the state’s ban on unapproved e-cigarettes, arguing that the companies behind the suit lack legal standing since their products are federally illegal. The state contends the plaintiffs, Novo Distro Inc. and Tobacco Hut and Vape Fairfax Inc., have no lawful right to sell unapproved vapes and cannot show irreparable harm.
Dec.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai