ELFBAR's Trademark Cancellation: Latest Update and Future Plans.

Elfbar by 2FIRSTS.ai
Feb.27.2023
ELFBAR's Trademark Cancellation: Latest Update and Future Plans.
ELFBAR's "Elf" trademark under VPR faces revocation proceedings in the US, with a ruling expected in September 2024.

There is a new development in the trademark infringement case involving the e-cigarette brand "ELFBAR," owned by the company IQIYI. According to a search on the United States Patent and Trademark Office website by 2FIRSTS, ELFBAR's distributor in the US, DemandVape, has filed a request on February 24th to revoke the "ELF" trademark under the VPR brand.


Request for 'Revocation' page | Image source: USPTO


Under review status | Image source: USPTO


Below is the timetable extracted from the public documents of the Trademark Office (translated and compiled by 2FIRSTS):


Case Update | Image source: 2FIRSTS


It is expected that the evidence collection process for this case will take place in May of this year, and the earliest preliminary ruling from the trademark office will be obtained in September 2024.


2FIRSTS will continue to monitor the developments in the case of ELFBAR's loss in the trademark lawsuit in the United States. Stay tuned for updates.


Reference:


Original text: 美国商标局“Cancellation” Translation: The United States Patent and Trademark Office's "Cancellation" process.


Additional reading:


A regional court in the United States has ruled that the ELFBAR trademark has committed plagiarism and ordered it to cease all marketing activities across the country.


The brand name "ELFBAR" has been discontinued and a new brand name, "EB design," will be launched in March.


The new brand E.B. Desig by ELFBAR is now available. It may have first hit the market as early as December last year.


Click on the topic to read more:


Reviewing the Event of the ELFBAR600 Being Removed from Shelves in the UK Due to Non-Compliance with Standards


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

Charlie’s Holdings Signs Licensing Agreement with IKE Tech to Commercialize Age-Gated Vape Technology in the U.S.
Charlie’s Holdings Signs Licensing Agreement with IKE Tech to Commercialize Age-Gated Vape Technology in the U.S.
Charlie’s Holdings has signed a licensing agreement with IKE Tech to commercialize an age-gated vape activation system in the U.S. The technology combines biometric authentication, BLE hardware, and a mobile app for continuous device-level age verification. The company plans to test-market the system with SBX nicotine analogue products this spring and may later apply it to PACHA-branded ENDS.
News
Jan.06
Interpreting FDA’s on! PLUS Authorization: What the Agency’s Press Release Reveals About Its Nicotine Pouch Review Model
Interpreting FDA’s on! PLUS Authorization: What the Agency’s Press Release Reveals About Its Nicotine Pouch Review Model
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has confirmed that six on! PLUS nicotine pouch products have received Marketing Granted Orders (MGO) through the PMTA pathway. The authorizations were completed under the agency’s nicotine pouch review pilot program in “record time,” with the FDA citing lower levels of harmful constituents while stressing that the decision applies only to the specified products and does not mean they are safe or FDA approved.
Regulations
Dec.20
Lawmakers Push to Include E-Cigarettes in Vietnam’s Revised Investment Law Ban
Lawmakers Push to Include E-Cigarettes in Vietnam’s Revised Investment Law Ban
Vietnam’s National Assembly has debated amendments to the Investment Law that would include e-cigarettes, heated tobacco, and nitrous oxide (N₂O) in the list of prohibited business activities. Lawmakers supported a total ban consistent with WHO recommendations and previous National Assembly resolutions, citing rising youth addiction rates. Finance Minister Nguyễn Văn Thắng confirmed that the ban would apply comprehensively, with a short transition period for foreign factories.
Nov.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai
KT&G Revises Partnership Terms with PMI, Secures Overseas Commercialization Rights for Multiple Heated Tobacco Platforms
KT&G Revises Partnership Terms with PMI, Secures Overseas Commercialization Rights for Multiple Heated Tobacco Platforms
KT&G has revised the terms of its 15-year partnership agreement with Philip Morris International (PMI), securing overseas commercialization rights for multiple heated tobacco platforms and adjusting the minimum guaranteed sales volume for lil-exclusive heated tobacco sticks from 16 billion units to 11 billion units.
Dec.12 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Melaka Cracks Down on Unlicensed Vape Retailers with Fines and Seizures
Melaka Cracks Down on Unlicensed Vape Retailers with Fines and Seizures
Melaka’s local authorities are intensifying enforcement against unlicensed e-cigarette retailers by issuing notices, imposing fines, and seizing illegal products. State executive councillor Datuk Ngwe Hee Sem said only premises meeting the required conditions will be granted trading licences under the Licensing of Trades (Local Authorities) By-Laws 2010.
Dec.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai
AG Miyares Argues Vape Ban Consistent with Federal Law, Seeks Dismissal
AG Miyares Argues Vape Ban Consistent with Federal Law, Seeks Dismissal
Virginia Attorney General Jason Miyares and Tax Commissioner James J. Alex have asked a federal court to dismiss a lawsuit challenging the state’s ban on flavored e-cigarettes. They argue plaintiffs lack standing because the products are already illegal under federal law. The state denies claims of federal preemption and asserts sovereign immunity, maintaining that its ban aligns with its authority to protect public health.
Nov.24 by 2FIRSTS.ai