FAQs on Regulations for Electronic Cigarette Production in China

Jul.14.2022
FAQs on Regulations for Electronic Cigarette Production in China
Authorities work to protect e-cigarette market stakeholders, implementing policies including production scale approval and market regulation. Concerns addressed.

To safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of participants in the electronic cigarette market, tobacco monopoly administration departments at all levels are implementing the "Decision of the State Council on Amending the Regulations for the Implementation of the Tobacco Monopoly Law of the People's Republic of China," the "Management Measures for Electronic Cigarettes," the national standards for electronic cigarettes, and relevant supporting policies. They are actively soliciting input from enterprises, coordinating administrative permits, accelerating product technical reviews, strengthening market regulation and actively providing guidance services to electronic cigarette related production enterprises. These efforts have received widespread support and recognition from participants in the electronic cigarette market. Now, we will address concerns related to approved production scales and issues raised in company discussions and phone consultations regarding the electronic cigarette industry.


What progress has been made in regulating the production scale of electronic cigarettes, and what has been the outcome thus far?


Answer: According to the Guidelines for Issuing Tobacco Monopoly Production License to Electronic Cigarette Related Production Enterprises and Several Policies and Measures (Trial) for Promoting the Legalization and Standardization of the Electronic Cigarette Industry, the tobacco monopoly administrative authorities under the State Council have developed a production scale calculation method based on researching the current production scale of electronic cigarette related production enterprises. The provincial tobacco monopoly administrative authorities have organized personnel to conduct on-site verification of the nominal capacity of production equipment, the average actual sales volume over three years, and the utilization rate of industry equipment capacity. The tobacco monopoly administrative authorities under the State Council have combined relevant data and actual conditions to conduct comprehensive calculations and form the confirmed production scale for enterprises.


Based on feedback from e-cigarette manufacturers who have obtained tobacco monopoly production licenses, it appears that the approval methods are practical and effective, the approval procedures are orderly and standardized, the approved quantity is essentially reasonable, and the companies are actively cooperating.


What are the reasons why the approved production scale may not meet the demand of market orders, and how can this be addressed in standard journalistic English?


Answer: When determining production levels, the orderly growth factors of e-cigarette production companies have already been taken into consideration, so it is generally not expected that the approved annual production volume will be lower than the total annual demand for orders. However, for some companies, changes in consumer demand for different products due to differences in product quality and product development efforts, as well as uncertainties in overseas market order demands, may result in some companies either producing less than the market demand or producing more than the market demand. In response, the administrative authorities of the State Tobacco Monopoly will adhere to the requirements of total quantity management and supply-demand management, respect the market, and timely introduce relevant management regulations based on the "Regulations on the Administration of Electronic Cigarettes" and related policies and measures.


Thirdly, how should companies that are not currently qualified to proceed with scheduled plans be addressed?


Answer: Adhering to the principle of "standards not lowered, requirements not loosened, and procedures not missing" for administrative licensing, and further improving work quality and efficiency, tobacco monopoly administrative departments at all levels will make classifications for e-cigarette-related production companies that have been scheduled but do not yet meet the conditions. If companies cannot be contacted after being notified of their scheduling, express no intention to apply, or fail to submit an application within five days after notification, they will be deemed to have abandoned their scheduling. If there are any delays during the application process for product technical review, the company will also be deemed to have abandoned scheduling. If for any reason a company withdraws its application on the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology's online platform for administrative licensing after applying, it will also be deemed to have relinquished its scheduling. If a company abandons its scheduling, the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration will deal with it by postponing the scheduling, and the new scheduling time will be notified separately.


If an application does not meet the acceptance requirements or has not been corrected within 10 working days from the day after the notification to make corrections is given, and still does not meet the requirements, the provincial tobacco monopoly administrative authority can make a decision to reject the application. If an application is accepted but found to not meet legal requirements upon review, the State tobacco monopoly administrative authority can make a decision to reject approval.


Fourthly, how can the products of certified e-cigarette manufacturing companies be registered for export on trading platforms?


Answer: Electronic cigarette production companies that have obtained tobacco monopoly production licenses and engage in export businesses should file for export declaration on the trading platform. The export declaration product includes nicotine, vape juice, and electronic cigarette products for electronic cigarettes. According to the "Implementing Rules for the Technical Review of Electronic Cigarette Products," electronic cigarette products should also be filed through the electronic cigarette product technical review management system before export.


The main process for recording export business involves certified electronic cigarette production companies registering on a trade management platform and creating a primary member account. Electronic cigarette exporting companies also need to associate their products with the Export Product Authorization Application page, where they will provide export-related information and agree to the "Export Product Electronic Commitment Letter." After completing the export declaration, the company will need to verify the export information on the "relevant documents" page and upload invoices, packing lists, customs declarations, and other related documents to complete the export business registration process.


How is the scope of a production enterprise license determined and what happens when the approved product brand changes?


Answer: After receiving license applications from electronic cigarette production companies, the tobacco monopoly administrative authority will conduct initial review, verification and approval in accordance with license conditions, combined with the application materials and on-site inspections. The production scope of the company's license will be strictly verified in accordance with legal regulations.


During the validity period of their license, e-cigarette manufacturers should conduct business activities in accordance with their approved product brands. In response to possible changes to product brands during a company's business operations, tobacco monopoly administrative departments are currently studying and developing relevant management regulations to adapt to market demand.


How to Obtain Samples of the National Standard Product for Electronic Cigarettes


Answer: Electronic cigarette manufacturers can contact the provincial tobacco monopoly administrative department where their residence (primary place of business, operating location) is located to obtain reference samples that meet the flavor requirements of the national standard for electronic cigarettes. The product technology evaluation agency will continue to guide and service electronic cigarette manufacturers who have submitted and submitted products for inspection and review, helping their products meet the national standards for electronic cigarettes as soon as possible.


Reprint statement


This article has extracted or reprinted content from third-party sources whose copyrights belong to the original media and authors. If there is any infringement, please kindly contact us for deletion. Any individuals or organizations that intend to reproduce this content must first contact the author and refrain from direct reproduction.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

F1 Faces Renewed Pressure Over Tobacco and Nicotine Sponsorships as 67 Groups Target ZYN and VELO Ahead of Madrid Race
F1 Faces Renewed Pressure Over Tobacco and Nicotine Sponsorships as 67 Groups Target ZYN and VELO Ahead of Madrid Race
Ahead of the Formula 1 race in Madrid, 67 Spanish and international public-health, medical and consumer organizations have sent an open letter to F1 President and CEO Stefano Domenicali calling for an end to sponsorships linked to the tobacco and nicotine industry, including nicotine pouches, vaping products and heated tobacco. The letter focuses on Philip Morris International’s ZYN partnership with Ferrari and British American Tobacco’s long-running partnership with McLaren and exposure for VELO. The campaign follows a March letter in which more than 160 organizations worldwide made a similar request to Formula 1.
Sep.10
South Korea's Tobacco Plan Excludes 6-Methyl Nicotine as Customs Tightens Import Controls and Analog Liquid Imports Fall 83%
South Korea's Tobacco Plan Excludes 6-Methyl Nicotine as Customs Tightens Import Controls and Analog Liquid Imports Fall 83%
South Korea's government unveiled its first Tobacco Harm Management Basic Plan for 2027–2031 on October 29, 2026, proposing broader testing of vaping and heated tobacco products while excluding nicotine analogs such as 6-methyl nicotine. Synthetic nicotine came under tobacco regulation on April 24, and a June investigation found 6-methyl nicotine in 12 liquid inhalation products marketed as nicotine-free. Customs data released in September showed that imports of nicotine analog solutions fell 83.3%, from 12 metric tons in January–April to 2 metric tons in May–August. By September 20, imports had reached approximately 15 metric tons for the year, with 99.99% originating from China. Customs authorities have tightened pre-clearance testing and supply-chain documentation requirements, while the MFDS expects to complete its assessment of nicotine analog hazards by the end of 2026.
Regulations
Nov.04
JTI Proposes 25-Cent Irish Cigarette Tax Increase, Says It Could Raise €45 Million
JTI Proposes 25-Cent Irish Cigarette Tax Increase, Says It Could Raise €45 Million
Japan Tobacco International's Irish business has proposed a €0.25 tax increase on a pack of 20 cigarettes in its pre-Budget 2027 submission, below the €0.50-or-more increases typically imposed in recent Irish budgets. JTI says the proposal could generate around €45 million in additional Exchequer revenue while limiting further movement toward illicit and non-Irish-tax-paid tobacco. Revenue's existing estimate for a comparable €0.25 increase, including pro-rata rises on other tobacco products, is about €18 million for a full year.
JTI
Sep.18 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Swedish-Founded Nicotine Pouch Retailer GotPouches Shifts to U.S.-Based Operations, Reaching Over 25 States
Swedish-Founded Nicotine Pouch Retailer GotPouches Shifts to U.S.-Based Operations, Reaching Over 25 States
Swedish-founded online nicotine pouch retailer GotPouches has completed the localization of its U.S. operations under UpNorth Retail LLC, with corporate operations in Franklin, Tennessee, domestic fulfillment from Nashville and U.S.-based customer support. The company says its catalog covers more than 20 nicotine pouch brands and it currently serves customers in more than 25 U.S. states.
Sep.18
2Firsts Interview | Cigarette Sales Fall as Smokeless Alternatives Gain in U.S. Convenience Stores, NACS Says
2Firsts Interview | Cigarette Sales Fall as Smokeless Alternatives Gain in U.S. Convenience Stores, NACS Says
Ahead of the 2026 NACS Show, 2Firsts interviewed Chris Rapanick, NACS managing director of research, on changes reshaping the U.S. convenience-store tobacco and nicotine market. NACS data show cigarette sales declining while smokeless alternatives, including nicotine pouches, continue to grow. The interview also examines higher OTP margins, shifting backbar space, weaker store traffic, regulatory uncertainty and NACS’ outlook for 2027, offering a retailer-side view of one of the world’s largest nicotine markets.
Interview
Oct.03
Italian Financial Police Seize 4.3 Million E-Cigarettes and Smoking Accessories; 28 Reported to Judicial Authorities Across Operations
Italian Financial Police Seize 4.3 Million E-Cigarettes and Smoking Accessories; 28 Reported to Judicial Authorities Across Operations
Italy's Guardia di Finanza announced on October 28 that officers in Latina province had seized approximately 4.3 million e-cigarettes and smoking accessories at an unauthorized warehouse in an operation involving restrictions on the possession and sale of tobacco-related products. Another 300,000 suspected counterfeit or unsafe items were confiscated during separate inspections, bringing total seizures across the operations to more than 4.6 million products. Twenty-eight people were reported to judicial authorities over suspected smuggling and counterfeiting offenses. Officials did not disclose separate vape quantities, the value of the merchandise or alleged violations associated with individual brands.
Enforcement
Oct.29