FAQs on Regulations for Electronic Cigarette Production in China

Jul.14.2022
FAQs on Regulations for Electronic Cigarette Production in China
Authorities work to protect e-cigarette market stakeholders, implementing policies including production scale approval and market regulation. Concerns addressed.

To safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of participants in the electronic cigarette market, tobacco monopoly administration departments at all levels are implementing the "Decision of the State Council on Amending the Regulations for the Implementation of the Tobacco Monopoly Law of the People's Republic of China," the "Management Measures for Electronic Cigarettes," the national standards for electronic cigarettes, and relevant supporting policies. They are actively soliciting input from enterprises, coordinating administrative permits, accelerating product technical reviews, strengthening market regulation and actively providing guidance services to electronic cigarette related production enterprises. These efforts have received widespread support and recognition from participants in the electronic cigarette market. Now, we will address concerns related to approved production scales and issues raised in company discussions and phone consultations regarding the electronic cigarette industry.


What progress has been made in regulating the production scale of electronic cigarettes, and what has been the outcome thus far?


Answer: According to the Guidelines for Issuing Tobacco Monopoly Production License to Electronic Cigarette Related Production Enterprises and Several Policies and Measures (Trial) for Promoting the Legalization and Standardization of the Electronic Cigarette Industry, the tobacco monopoly administrative authorities under the State Council have developed a production scale calculation method based on researching the current production scale of electronic cigarette related production enterprises. The provincial tobacco monopoly administrative authorities have organized personnel to conduct on-site verification of the nominal capacity of production equipment, the average actual sales volume over three years, and the utilization rate of industry equipment capacity. The tobacco monopoly administrative authorities under the State Council have combined relevant data and actual conditions to conduct comprehensive calculations and form the confirmed production scale for enterprises.


Based on feedback from e-cigarette manufacturers who have obtained tobacco monopoly production licenses, it appears that the approval methods are practical and effective, the approval procedures are orderly and standardized, the approved quantity is essentially reasonable, and the companies are actively cooperating.


What are the reasons why the approved production scale may not meet the demand of market orders, and how can this be addressed in standard journalistic English?


Answer: When determining production levels, the orderly growth factors of e-cigarette production companies have already been taken into consideration, so it is generally not expected that the approved annual production volume will be lower than the total annual demand for orders. However, for some companies, changes in consumer demand for different products due to differences in product quality and product development efforts, as well as uncertainties in overseas market order demands, may result in some companies either producing less than the market demand or producing more than the market demand. In response, the administrative authorities of the State Tobacco Monopoly will adhere to the requirements of total quantity management and supply-demand management, respect the market, and timely introduce relevant management regulations based on the "Regulations on the Administration of Electronic Cigarettes" and related policies and measures.


Thirdly, how should companies that are not currently qualified to proceed with scheduled plans be addressed?


Answer: Adhering to the principle of "standards not lowered, requirements not loosened, and procedures not missing" for administrative licensing, and further improving work quality and efficiency, tobacco monopoly administrative departments at all levels will make classifications for e-cigarette-related production companies that have been scheduled but do not yet meet the conditions. If companies cannot be contacted after being notified of their scheduling, express no intention to apply, or fail to submit an application within five days after notification, they will be deemed to have abandoned their scheduling. If there are any delays during the application process for product technical review, the company will also be deemed to have abandoned scheduling. If for any reason a company withdraws its application on the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology's online platform for administrative licensing after applying, it will also be deemed to have relinquished its scheduling. If a company abandons its scheduling, the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration will deal with it by postponing the scheduling, and the new scheduling time will be notified separately.


If an application does not meet the acceptance requirements or has not been corrected within 10 working days from the day after the notification to make corrections is given, and still does not meet the requirements, the provincial tobacco monopoly administrative authority can make a decision to reject the application. If an application is accepted but found to not meet legal requirements upon review, the State tobacco monopoly administrative authority can make a decision to reject approval.


Fourthly, how can the products of certified e-cigarette manufacturing companies be registered for export on trading platforms?


Answer: Electronic cigarette production companies that have obtained tobacco monopoly production licenses and engage in export businesses should file for export declaration on the trading platform. The export declaration product includes nicotine, vape juice, and electronic cigarette products for electronic cigarettes. According to the "Implementing Rules for the Technical Review of Electronic Cigarette Products," electronic cigarette products should also be filed through the electronic cigarette product technical review management system before export.


The main process for recording export business involves certified electronic cigarette production companies registering on a trade management platform and creating a primary member account. Electronic cigarette exporting companies also need to associate their products with the Export Product Authorization Application page, where they will provide export-related information and agree to the "Export Product Electronic Commitment Letter." After completing the export declaration, the company will need to verify the export information on the "relevant documents" page and upload invoices, packing lists, customs declarations, and other related documents to complete the export business registration process.


How is the scope of a production enterprise license determined and what happens when the approved product brand changes?


Answer: After receiving license applications from electronic cigarette production companies, the tobacco monopoly administrative authority will conduct initial review, verification and approval in accordance with license conditions, combined with the application materials and on-site inspections. The production scope of the company's license will be strictly verified in accordance with legal regulations.


During the validity period of their license, e-cigarette manufacturers should conduct business activities in accordance with their approved product brands. In response to possible changes to product brands during a company's business operations, tobacco monopoly administrative departments are currently studying and developing relevant management regulations to adapt to market demand.


How to Obtain Samples of the National Standard Product for Electronic Cigarettes


Answer: Electronic cigarette manufacturers can contact the provincial tobacco monopoly administrative department where their residence (primary place of business, operating location) is located to obtain reference samples that meet the flavor requirements of the national standard for electronic cigarettes. The product technology evaluation agency will continue to guide and service electronic cigarette manufacturers who have submitted and submitted products for inspection and review, helping their products meet the national standards for electronic cigarettes as soon as possible.


Reprint statement


This article has extracted or reprinted content from third-party sources whose copyrights belong to the original media and authors. If there is any infringement, please kindly contact us for deletion. Any individuals or organizations that intend to reproduce this content must first contact the author and refrain from direct reproduction.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

China’s Jinhua Tobacco Launches CNY 2.7 Million Procurement for E-Cigarette Violation Lead Monitoring Services
China’s Jinhua Tobacco Launches CNY 2.7 Million Procurement for E-Cigarette Violation Lead Monitoring Services
Jinhua Tobacco, a municipal tobacco company in China’s Zhejiang province, has launched a public tender for e-cigarette-related violation lead monitoring and consulting services. The project is valued at CNY 2.7 million and covers data resource integration and analytical consulting services for 36 months from contract signing. The procurement reflects the use of external data and analysis services to support local tobacco companies’ market oversight activities related to e-cigarettes.
Aug.07
South Korean Lawmaker Jeong Jin-wook Pushes Synthetic Nicotine Vape Probe, Highlighting Supply Chain and Tax Concerns
South Korean Lawmaker Jeong Jin-wook Pushes Synthetic Nicotine Vape Probe, Highlighting Supply Chain and Tax Concerns
South Korean lawmaker Jeong Jin-wook has again called for stronger government action against liquid synthetic nicotine vape manufacturers and sellers, alleging that some businesses may have avoided regulation through product labeling changes and corporate restructuring. According to Newsworks, JNILBO and other Korean reports, Jeong has held his third press conference on the issue, calling for a government-wide investigation. The dispute involves whether synthetic nicotine products should fall under tobacco regulations, tax implications and supply-chain transparency. South Korean government agencies have previously said some estimates of potential tax losses cannot be verified due to limited sales data.
Jul.27
UK PM Andy Burnham Reshapes Vape Retail Rules as Licensing Could Raise Barriers for New Shops
UK PM Andy Burnham Reshapes Vape Retail Rules as Licensing Could Raise Barriers for New Shops
UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham is pushing a high street reform agenda that could give local authorities greater powers over commercial activity, including vape retail. The reforms could involve expanded planning powers and a potential vape retail licensing system, allowing councils to play a larger role in store locations and market access. The measures are part of the UK’s broader shift toward tighter vape regulation, although no nationwide vape retail restrictions have yet been implemented.
Aug.11
Australia’s One Nation Proposes 75% Tobacco Tax Cut, Says Lower Prices Could Hit Illicit Market
Australia’s One Nation Proposes 75% Tobacco Tax Cut, Says Lower Prices Could Hit Illicit Market
Australia’s One Nation party has proposed cutting tobacco excise by 75%, arguing that lower legal cigarette prices could narrow the gap with illicit tobacco and reduce demand for black-market products. The proposal comes as Australia continues expanding enforcement against illicit tobacco supply chains through border controls, retail inspections and organised-crime investigations. Supporters argue high taxes have contributed to illicit-market growth, while opponents warn that lower tobacco prices could undermine public-health goals. The proposal is a party policy position and has not been adopted by the Australian government.
Aug.18
UK-Listed Consumer Goods Group Supreme Sees Vape Duty as Potential Consolidation Opportunity, Holds FY27 Outlook
UK-Listed Consumer Goods Group Supreme Sees Vape Duty as Potential Consolidation Opportunity, Holds FY27 Outlook
UK-listed consumer goods group Supreme plc says it continues to expect FY27 trading to meet market expectations as the Vaping Products Duty takes effect on October 1, while maintaining a comparatively positive view of the new tax and compliance regime. Supreme has said the framework could increase compliance complexity for smaller operators and contribute to market consolidation, while its manufacturing, compliance and distribution scale may allow it to gain share. Its 88Vape brand will retain its value positioning.
Sep.18
PMI's IQOS Extends ZAMNA Electronic-Music Partnership to Spain as Vogue España Publishes Branded Content
PMI's IQOS Extends ZAMNA Electronic-Music Partnership to Spain as Vogue España Publishes Branded Content
Philip Morris International's IQOS has extended its partnership with electronic-music event brand ZAMNA to Spain, setting up a House of IQOS at ZAMNA Madrid. Vogue España and Time Out Madrid subsequently published branded content clearly labeled as collaborations with IQOS. PMI has also expanded its company-owned IQOS boutique network in Spain to seven cities this year. The company says IQOS's adjusted heated-tobacco market share in Europe reached 12.6% in the first quarter of 2026, with Spain among its stronger-performing European markets.
Sep.20