FAQs on Regulations for Electronic Cigarette Production in China

Jul.14.2022
FAQs on Regulations for Electronic Cigarette Production in China
Authorities work to protect e-cigarette market stakeholders, implementing policies including production scale approval and market regulation. Concerns addressed.

To safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of participants in the electronic cigarette market, tobacco monopoly administration departments at all levels are implementing the "Decision of the State Council on Amending the Regulations for the Implementation of the Tobacco Monopoly Law of the People's Republic of China," the "Management Measures for Electronic Cigarettes," the national standards for electronic cigarettes, and relevant supporting policies. They are actively soliciting input from enterprises, coordinating administrative permits, accelerating product technical reviews, strengthening market regulation and actively providing guidance services to electronic cigarette related production enterprises. These efforts have received widespread support and recognition from participants in the electronic cigarette market. Now, we will address concerns related to approved production scales and issues raised in company discussions and phone consultations regarding the electronic cigarette industry.


What progress has been made in regulating the production scale of electronic cigarettes, and what has been the outcome thus far?


Answer: According to the Guidelines for Issuing Tobacco Monopoly Production License to Electronic Cigarette Related Production Enterprises and Several Policies and Measures (Trial) for Promoting the Legalization and Standardization of the Electronic Cigarette Industry, the tobacco monopoly administrative authorities under the State Council have developed a production scale calculation method based on researching the current production scale of electronic cigarette related production enterprises. The provincial tobacco monopoly administrative authorities have organized personnel to conduct on-site verification of the nominal capacity of production equipment, the average actual sales volume over three years, and the utilization rate of industry equipment capacity. The tobacco monopoly administrative authorities under the State Council have combined relevant data and actual conditions to conduct comprehensive calculations and form the confirmed production scale for enterprises.


Based on feedback from e-cigarette manufacturers who have obtained tobacco monopoly production licenses, it appears that the approval methods are practical and effective, the approval procedures are orderly and standardized, the approved quantity is essentially reasonable, and the companies are actively cooperating.


What are the reasons why the approved production scale may not meet the demand of market orders, and how can this be addressed in standard journalistic English?


Answer: When determining production levels, the orderly growth factors of e-cigarette production companies have already been taken into consideration, so it is generally not expected that the approved annual production volume will be lower than the total annual demand for orders. However, for some companies, changes in consumer demand for different products due to differences in product quality and product development efforts, as well as uncertainties in overseas market order demands, may result in some companies either producing less than the market demand or producing more than the market demand. In response, the administrative authorities of the State Tobacco Monopoly will adhere to the requirements of total quantity management and supply-demand management, respect the market, and timely introduce relevant management regulations based on the "Regulations on the Administration of Electronic Cigarettes" and related policies and measures.


Thirdly, how should companies that are not currently qualified to proceed with scheduled plans be addressed?


Answer: Adhering to the principle of "standards not lowered, requirements not loosened, and procedures not missing" for administrative licensing, and further improving work quality and efficiency, tobacco monopoly administrative departments at all levels will make classifications for e-cigarette-related production companies that have been scheduled but do not yet meet the conditions. If companies cannot be contacted after being notified of their scheduling, express no intention to apply, or fail to submit an application within five days after notification, they will be deemed to have abandoned their scheduling. If there are any delays during the application process for product technical review, the company will also be deemed to have abandoned scheduling. If for any reason a company withdraws its application on the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology's online platform for administrative licensing after applying, it will also be deemed to have relinquished its scheduling. If a company abandons its scheduling, the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration will deal with it by postponing the scheduling, and the new scheduling time will be notified separately.


If an application does not meet the acceptance requirements or has not been corrected within 10 working days from the day after the notification to make corrections is given, and still does not meet the requirements, the provincial tobacco monopoly administrative authority can make a decision to reject the application. If an application is accepted but found to not meet legal requirements upon review, the State tobacco monopoly administrative authority can make a decision to reject approval.


Fourthly, how can the products of certified e-cigarette manufacturing companies be registered for export on trading platforms?


Answer: Electronic cigarette production companies that have obtained tobacco monopoly production licenses and engage in export businesses should file for export declaration on the trading platform. The export declaration product includes nicotine, vape juice, and electronic cigarette products for electronic cigarettes. According to the "Implementing Rules for the Technical Review of Electronic Cigarette Products," electronic cigarette products should also be filed through the electronic cigarette product technical review management system before export.


The main process for recording export business involves certified electronic cigarette production companies registering on a trade management platform and creating a primary member account. Electronic cigarette exporting companies also need to associate their products with the Export Product Authorization Application page, where they will provide export-related information and agree to the "Export Product Electronic Commitment Letter." After completing the export declaration, the company will need to verify the export information on the "relevant documents" page and upload invoices, packing lists, customs declarations, and other related documents to complete the export business registration process.


How is the scope of a production enterprise license determined and what happens when the approved product brand changes?


Answer: After receiving license applications from electronic cigarette production companies, the tobacco monopoly administrative authority will conduct initial review, verification and approval in accordance with license conditions, combined with the application materials and on-site inspections. The production scope of the company's license will be strictly verified in accordance with legal regulations.


During the validity period of their license, e-cigarette manufacturers should conduct business activities in accordance with their approved product brands. In response to possible changes to product brands during a company's business operations, tobacco monopoly administrative departments are currently studying and developing relevant management regulations to adapt to market demand.


How to Obtain Samples of the National Standard Product for Electronic Cigarettes


Answer: Electronic cigarette manufacturers can contact the provincial tobacco monopoly administrative department where their residence (primary place of business, operating location) is located to obtain reference samples that meet the flavor requirements of the national standard for electronic cigarettes. The product technology evaluation agency will continue to guide and service electronic cigarette manufacturers who have submitted and submitted products for inspection and review, helping their products meet the national standards for electronic cigarettes as soon as possible.


Reprint statement


This article has extracted or reprinted content from third-party sources whose copyrights belong to the original media and authors. If there is any infringement, please kindly contact us for deletion. Any individuals or organizations that intend to reproduce this content must first contact the author and refrain from direct reproduction.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Australia Extends Illicit Tobacco Crackdown From Tougher Penalties to Customs and Logistics Supply Chains
Australia Extends Illicit Tobacco Crackdown From Tougher Penalties to Customs and Logistics Supply Chains
Australia's federal government introduced a new illicit tobacco enforcement bill on September 10 that would strengthen evidentiary presumptions, representative sampling, seizure and forfeiture procedures, proceeds-of-crime powers and obligations for customs and logistics operators. The proposal follows the Combatting Illicit Tobacco Act 2026, which took effect in August and increased penalties while expanding investigative and asset-recovery tools. Together, the reforms extend Australia's crackdown from tougher criminal sanctions into import, logistics and evidentiary enforcement.
Sep.14
Why AIRSCREAM Built its European Production Hub for Regulated Market Growth
Why AIRSCREAM Built its European Production Hub for Regulated Market Growth
AIRSCREAM’s production hub in the Czech Republic brings nicotine pouch manufacturing, e-liquid bottling, product documentation, warehousing and international logistics into one operation, giving brands and commercial partners a practical platform from which to launch, expand and enter new markets.
Market
Sep.16 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
The Ohio Supreme Court is hearing a case involving flavored vape sales and whether state authorities can use consumer protection laws to take action against retailers selling unauthorized vape products. Ohio officials argue that selling unauthorized flavored vapes may constitute consumer deception, while retailers argue that tobacco product regulation falls under federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authority and that states cannot impose additional restrictions through consumer laws. The case could affect the scope of state-level vape regulation across the United States.
Aug.06
Gallery | InterTabac 2026 Opens as VAPORESSO, SKE, GREENTANK, GEEK BAR and Other Brands Take the Floor
Gallery | InterTabac 2026 Opens as VAPORESSO, SKE, GREENTANK, GEEK BAR and Other Brands Take the Floor
InterTabac 2026 opened in Dortmund, Germany, on September 15 alongside NUBIZ and InterSupply. According to the latest figures released by the organizer, the three trade shows bring together around 750 exhibitors from 64 countries. On site, 2Firsts observed vaping and related brands including VAPORESSO, DOJO, SKE, GREENTANK, GEEK BAR, HQD and ELUX.
Special Report
Sep.15
Product | RELX Partners With UK E-Liquid Brand T-Juice for Prime Pro × Red Astaire Bundle in France
Product | RELX Partners With UK E-Liquid Brand T-Juice for Prime Pro × Red Astaire Bundle in France
RELX and UK e-liquid brand T-Juice have launched the Prime Pro × Red Astaire bundle in France, combining the RELX Prime Pro open-system pod device with T-Juice’s signature Red Astaire nicotine salt e-liquid. The collaboration retains the existing Prime Pro hardware platform while using an established flavor brand to create a complete open-system offering. The product appeared in French retail and distribution channels in August 2026 and represents a co-branded retail bundle rather than a new device launch.
Aug.27
Product | DOJO Launches 0+6ml BLAST7K Fresh in UK in September, Retaining 2+8ml Pod Compatibility Ahead of October Per-Milliliter Vaping Duty
Product | DOJO Launches 0+6ml BLAST7K Fresh in UK in September, Retaining 2+8ml Pod Compatibility Ahead of October Per-Milliliter Vaping Duty
DOJO officially launched the BLAST7K Fresh on September 17, 2026, introducing a UK-market prefilled pod product with 6ml of e-liquid and a manufacturer-rated capacity of up to 7,000 puffs. The device features a 1000mAh rechargeable battery, the INSTA-JUICED structure and COREX BLAST dual-mesh technology, while retaining compatibility with existing BLAST pods. The launch comes less than two weeks before the UK's Vaping Products Duty takes effect on October 1. At the new duty rate, 6ml of vaping liquid would correspond to £1.32 in VPD. DOJO has not stated that the product's 6ml format was designed in response to the new duty.
Sep.20