Federal Court Rules Against Fantasia Distribution in Trademark Dispute

Aug.29.2024
Federal Court Rules Against Fantasia Distribution in Trademark Dispute
Federal judge rules against e-cigarette distributor in trademark lawsuit, allowing industry to freely use "ice" and "iced" descriptors.

According to a report from Vaping 360 on August 29, a federal judge in the United States ruled against e-cigarette distributor Fantasia Distribution in a lawsuit where the company had sued multiple e-cigarette manufacturers for using words like "ice" and "iced" to describe their products. Fantasia had claimed to have protected trademark rights over the terms "ice" and "iced".


Today, on the 29th, Judge Kiyo Matsumoto of the Eastern District Federal Court in New York ruled that the terms "ice" and "iced" are considered generic when used to describe smoking products such as e-cigarettes or vaping devices. Many manufacturers of e-cigarette liquids and disposable e-cigarettes use these words to indicate a cool flavor.


The judge wrote in the ruling that,


Ultimately, Fantasia did not provide any evidence to suggest that 'ice' or 'iced' are specific terms in tobacco products and smoking products such as e-cigarettes, so any rational jury would not support Fantasia.


The judge approved the defendant's motion to cancel the two "Ice" trademarks of Fantasia, allowing e-cigarette manufacturers and retailers to freely use the term without fear of legal action from Fantasia.


Fantasia, based in California, USA, primarily sells hookah products and obtained the "Ice" trademark in 2011 and 2014.


Last year, lawyers claiming to represent Fantasia contacted e-cigarette retailers across the country, threatening legal action if the shops did not cease selling products described as "ice." The cease-and-desist letters sent by these lawyers requested detailed information on past sales of "ice" products, and in some cases, advised settling out of court through cash payments to avoid litigation. It is currently unclear if any e-cigarette stores have agreed to Fantasia's demands.


This trademark lawsuit was filed in 2020, initially listing six defendants: Access Vapor, Cool Clouds Distribution, Limitless Trading Co., Myle Vape, Pop Vapor Co., and Romeo Vapors. The final ruling did not include Myle Vape and Cool Clouds.


Notice

1. This article is provided exclusively for professional research purposes related to industry, technology and policy. Any reference to brands or products is made solely for the purpose of objective description and does not constitute an endorsement, recommendation, or promotion of any brand or product.

2. The use of nicotine products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and heated tobacco products, is associated with significant health risks. Users are required to comply with all relevant laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3. This article is strictly restricted from being accessed or viewed by individuals under the legal age.

Copyright

This article is either an original work by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with the original source clearly indicated. The copyright and usage rights of this article belong to 2Firsts or the original source. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other unauthorized use of this article by any entity or individual is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally responsible. For copyright-related matters, please contact: info@2firsts.com

AI Assistance Disclaimer

This article may have utilized AI to enhance translation and editing efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, errors may occur. Readers are advised to refer to the sources provided for more accurate information.

This article should not be used as a basis for any investment decisions or advice, and 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any errors in the content.