Federal Judge Temporarily Blocks Utah E-cigarette Flavor Ban

Dec.31.2024
Federal Judge Temporarily Blocks Utah E-cigarette Flavor Ban
Federal judge in Utah temporarily blocks flavor e-cigarette restrictions, delaying implementation until court rules on complaints.

According to a report from ABC News on December 30th, a federal judge recently issued a temporary restraining order delaying Utah's implementation of restrictions on flavored e-cigarettes, pending a ruling on complaints against the state and other entities.


Judge David Barlow approved the injunction on December 30, temporarily delaying the enforcement of restrictions that were originally set to take effect on January 1, 2025. This delay is in accordance with Senate Bill 61, the "E-Cigarette Amendment Act," which was passed during the 2024 legislative session and signed by Governor Spencer Cox in March.


Amendment to e-cigarette Act" prohibits the sale of flavored e-cigarette products, as well as the sale of any e-cigarette products not authorized by federal officials.


According to one provision of the injunction, Utah is prohibited from implementing the provisions of S.B. 61 until a ruling on the December 12 litigation. Another provision specifically states that it is not illegal to manufacture, distribute, or sell e-cigarette products that are not authorized by the regulations before the ruling is issued.


The Utah Vapor Business Association and The Smoke House have been named as plaintiffs in a complaint filed on December 12th. The lawsuit involves the state of Utah, Governor Cox, Attorney General Sean Reyes, the Utah Department of Health and Public Service, and other entities in the state.


The lawsuit claims that flavored e-cigarettes are "limited and closely monitored" in supply, as they are only legally sold in retail tobacco specialty stores. The plaintiffs argue that banning the sale of flavored e-cigarettes will lead to people in Utah "inhaling more harmful combustible cigarettes, or being forced to obtain flavored e-cigarettes from out of state or through the black market," in addition, tobacco retailers will lose "the vast majority" of their business.


The plaintiff also argues that the injunction not only conflicts with federal law, but may also violate the constitutional rights of citizens.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
The Texas Supreme Court issued a case summary on May 8, 2026, describing its decision in Hancock v. RJR Vapor Co. LLC. The dispute centered on whether RJR Vapor’s VELO oral nicotine pouches are taxable as “tobacco products” under the Texas Tax Code. Lower courts had held that the pouches were not taxable tobacco products, but the Texas Supreme Court reversed, concluding that VELO pouches are taxable because they are made of “a tobacco substitute.”
May.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Bulgarian Police Seize More Than 56,500 Heated Tobacco Sticks in Sofia Operation
Bulgarian Police Seize More Than 56,500 Heated Tobacco Sticks in Sofia Operation
Bulgaria’s Interior Ministry said two men aged 48 and 50 were detained during a specialised police operation in Sofia’s Krasna Polyana district for distributing e-cigarettes and tobacco without excise stamps.
Mar.17 by 2FIRSTS.ai
South Korea Moves Against Synthetic Nicotine Regulatory Gap as Three Companies Face Tobacco Business Act Probe
South Korea Moves Against Synthetic Nicotine Regulatory Gap as Three Companies Face Tobacco Business Act Probe
South Korea’s Ministry of Finance and Economy said on May 4 that it requested the Daejeon Metropolitan Police Agency and Gyeonggi Nambu Provincial Police Agency to investigate three sales companies on suspicion of violating the Tobacco Business Act.
May.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Swedish Politicians Ask European Commission to Clarify Legality of France’s Nicotine Pouch Ban
Swedish Politicians Ask European Commission to Clarify Legality of France’s Nicotine Pouch Ban
France’s ban on oral nicotine pouches has triggered an immediate response in Sweden. Swedish Minister for Foreign Trade Benjamin Dousa said Sweden had mobilized strongly against the ban and argued that it constitutes a clear obstacle to the free movement of goods within the EU single market. Swedish officials say the measure affects a strategically important domestic industry and conflicts with Sweden’s harm-reduction approach to public health.
Apr.14 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Russian Lawmaker Says Bill on Full Vape Sales Ban Is Before State Duma
Russian Lawmaker Says Bill on Full Vape Sales Ban Is Before State Duma
Yaroslav Nilov, chair of the State Duma Committee on Labour, Social Policy and Veterans’ Affairs, said a bill proposing a full ban on vape sales is currently before the State Duma, though no final decision has yet been made. He said the initiative has been signed by representatives of almost all factions and noted that support for a full ban has also been voiced at the regional governor level. Nilov also said vape use in Russia is increasing while the age of consumers is declining.
Mar.12 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Smoore International Q1 Results: Enterprise-Focused Business Up 48.6% Year-on-Year, Proprietary E-Vapor Brand Business Up 14.3%
Smoore International Q1 Results: Enterprise-Focused Business Up 48.6% Year-on-Year, Proprietary E-Vapor Brand Business Up 14.3%
Smoore International reported its Q1 financial results, with revenue for the period reaching RMB3.856 billion, up 41.7% year-on-year, and net profit (profit for the period) totaling RMB262.5 million, up 36.6% year-on-year. Revenue from its enterprise-focused business was RMB3.2674 billion, representing a 48.6% increase from RMB2.1989 billion in the same period last year. Revenue from its proprietary brand business was RMB588.6 million, up 12.6% from RMB522.6 million a year earlier.
Apr.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai