Federal Judge Temporarily Blocks Utah E-cigarette Flavor Ban

Dec.31.2024
Federal Judge Temporarily Blocks Utah E-cigarette Flavor Ban
Federal judge in Utah temporarily blocks flavor e-cigarette restrictions, delaying implementation until court rules on complaints.

According to a report from ABC News on December 30th, a federal judge recently issued a temporary restraining order delaying Utah's implementation of restrictions on flavored e-cigarettes, pending a ruling on complaints against the state and other entities.


Judge David Barlow approved the injunction on December 30, temporarily delaying the enforcement of restrictions that were originally set to take effect on January 1, 2025. This delay is in accordance with Senate Bill 61, the "E-Cigarette Amendment Act," which was passed during the 2024 legislative session and signed by Governor Spencer Cox in March.


Amendment to e-cigarette Act" prohibits the sale of flavored e-cigarette products, as well as the sale of any e-cigarette products not authorized by federal officials.


According to one provision of the injunction, Utah is prohibited from implementing the provisions of S.B. 61 until a ruling on the December 12 litigation. Another provision specifically states that it is not illegal to manufacture, distribute, or sell e-cigarette products that are not authorized by the regulations before the ruling is issued.


The Utah Vapor Business Association and The Smoke House have been named as plaintiffs in a complaint filed on December 12th. The lawsuit involves the state of Utah, Governor Cox, Attorney General Sean Reyes, the Utah Department of Health and Public Service, and other entities in the state.


The lawsuit claims that flavored e-cigarettes are "limited and closely monitored" in supply, as they are only legally sold in retail tobacco specialty stores. The plaintiffs argue that banning the sale of flavored e-cigarettes will lead to people in Utah "inhaling more harmful combustible cigarettes, or being forced to obtain flavored e-cigarettes from out of state or through the black market," in addition, tobacco retailers will lose "the vast majority" of their business.


The plaintiff also argues that the injunction not only conflicts with federal law, but may also violate the constitutional rights of citizens.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Rethinking Nicotine Harm Reduction: A Neuroscientist’s Perspective on Scientific Gaps and Future Directions — By Dr. Xin-an Liu
Rethinking Nicotine Harm Reduction: A Neuroscientist’s Perspective on Scientific Gaps and Future Directions — By Dr. Xin-an Liu
After France’s ANSES report on nicotine products and harm reduction, Dr. Xin-an Liu wrote to 2Firsts reassessing the field’s foundations. She argues the debate reveals gaps in evidence on long-term behavioral substitution, addiction pathways and neurobiological impacts, and calls for longitudinal research, integrated behavioral science and neuroimaging, clearer risk assessment and stronger transparency to ensure policy and next-generation product development rest on solid evidence.
Industry Insight
Feb.24
Malaysia moves ahead with vape sales ban plan; PMI urges Japan-style differentiated excise taxes
Malaysia moves ahead with vape sales ban plan; PMI urges Japan-style differentiated excise taxes
Malaysia plans to implement a ban or restrictions on e-cigarettes and vaping products as early as mid-2026 and no later than year-end. The head of Philip Morris Malaysia and Singapore said the government should look to Japan’s approach of regulating and taxing different tobacco and nicotine products differently, warning that an outright ban could push demand into illicit channels.
Feb.02
Texas college data show rapid shifts in top vaping brands, with Geek Bar/Vape surging by 2025
Texas college data show rapid shifts in top vaping brands, with Geek Bar/Vape surging by 2025
A short communication in Drug and Alcohol Dependence examined changes in the most commonly used nicotine vaping brands among Texas college students from 2023 to 2025. The study analyzed 6,049 students aged 18–25 who reported past-30-day nicotine vaping across three repeated cross-sectional spring surveys. The report found that use of Esco Bar, Elf Bar, JUUL, and Puff Bar declined from 2023 to 2025, while Geek Bar/Vape increased.
Feb.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Russia’s Kirov seizes unmarked vape liquids worth over  $13,000
Russia’s Kirov seizes unmarked vape liquids worth over $13,000
Police in Kirov, Russia, seized unmarked nicotine e-liquids for vapes worth more than 1 million rubles (about $13,000, using 1 ruble = $0.013) in a case involving a 27-year-old entrepreneur. Officers confiscated over 700 bottles from five retail outlets and found more than 8,000 additional units at a warehouse.
Feb.03 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Report: 43% of 546 Canadian specialty vape shops found non-compliant in federal inspections
Report: 43% of 546 Canadian specialty vape shops found non-compliant in federal inspections
Health Canada’s vaping compliance and enforcement report covering inspections from April 2024 to March 2025 found 43% of 546 specialty vaping businesses were not compliant with the Tobacco and Vaping Products Act and the Canada Consumer Product Safety Act, according to the report cited. Health inspectors seized vaping products at 235 specialty vaping establishments.
Feb.26 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Fourth Circuit weighs federal preemption challenge to North Carolina’s vape sales restrictions
Fourth Circuit weighs federal preemption challenge to North Carolina’s vape sales restrictions
Vape manufacturers and sellers urged the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to find that the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) preempts North Carolina’s new law restricting the sale of certain e-cigarette/ENDS products.
Feb.03 by 2FIRSTS.ai