Florida Environmental Committee Supports Measures to Regulate Smoking in State Parks

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Jan.22.2024
Florida Environmental Committee Supports Measures to Regulate Smoking in State Parks
Florida's Environment and Natural Resources Committee supports fines of $100 for first-time violations of smoking and vaping bans in state parks.

According to a report by WUSF, the Environmental and Natural Resources Commission of the state of Florida has given its support to a proposal put forth by Chairperson Ana Maria Rodriguez. Under this measure, a first-time violation will be subject to a fine of $100, with subsequent violations incurring fines of $500.

 

On Wednesday, a Senate committee approved a proposal to ban smoking and vaping e-cigarettes in state parks.

 

Most state park systems in Florida follow the Clean Indoor Air Act, which prohibits smoking inside buildings. However, Ellie R. Schiller Homosassa Springs Wildlife State Park stands as an exception, as smoking is prohibited within the premises. The park is regarded as a "congested area" due to its layout and high number of visitors.

 

The bill will next be presented to the Committee on Agriculture, Environment, and General Government Appropriations. A similar bill (HB 495) in the House has not yet undergone committee hearings. In 2022, lawmakers passed a measure allowing municipalities to restrict smoking on their owned beaches and parks.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

UPC Court of Appeal refuses to revive VMR’s European vape patent, upholding lack of inventiveness
UPC Court of Appeal refuses to revive VMR’s European vape patent, upholding lack of inventiveness
The Unified Patent Court’s Court of Appeal declined on Dec. 29 to revive a European patent held by VMR Products LLC, upholding a finding that the patent is not inventive over earlier devices. The decision said adding a window in the vape’s outer shell to reveal the internal cartridge holding vape liquid was an obvious, routine adaptation based on an earlier U.S. patent and general knowledge.
Jan.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai
U.S. Fifth Circuit judges question FDA’s claim it has no de facto ban on flavored refillable e-cigarettes
U.S. Fifth Circuit judges question FDA’s claim it has no de facto ban on flavored refillable e-cigarettes
Law360 reports that a Fifth Circuit panel expressed skepticism about the FDA’s claim that it has no de facto ban on flavored refillable e-cigarette products, noting that only six applications had been approved out of hundreds of thousands and that near-100% denials look like a ban.
Jan.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Product | VOZOL Mega 50K Launches in UK Channels: 18ml, 50,000-Puff Claim, Compliance Info Not Yet Public
Product | VOZOL Mega 50K Launches in UK Channels: 18ml, 50,000-Puff Claim, Compliance Info Not Yet Public
VOZOL's Vozol Mega 50K disposable e-cigarette debuts in UK, featuring 18ml e-liquid and 50,000 puff claim. Two versions available.
Dec.24 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Kazakhstan’s Astana Baikonur District Fines Illegal Smokeless Tobacco Sales Over USD 5,800
Kazakhstan’s Astana Baikonur District Fines Illegal Smokeless Tobacco Sales Over USD 5,800
Authorities in Astana’s Baikonur District have intensified enforcement against illegal smokeless tobacco and related products in 2025. Police conducted 59 inspection raids, identifying 63 cases of illegal sales of smokeless tobacco (nasvay). Total fines imposed reached KZT 3,096,450(approximately USD 5,880). Officials said inspections and preventive outreach will continue.
Dec.29 by 2FIRSTS.ai
NielsenIQ Data Shows UK Tobacco Market Decline of 12.7% with E-Cigarettes Dropping GBP 225 Million
NielsenIQ Data Shows UK Tobacco Market Decline of 12.7% with E-Cigarettes Dropping GBP 225 Million
According to NielsenIQ data published on December 7, 2025, overall tobacco and nicotine product sales in the UK dropped 12.7% in the 12 months ending September 6, representing more than £1 billion in lost sales.
Dec.15 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Virginia Seeks to Dismiss E-Cigarette Ban Challenge, Citing Lack of Legal Standing
Virginia Seeks to Dismiss E-Cigarette Ban Challenge, Citing Lack of Legal Standing
The Virginia Attorney General and tax commissioner have urged a federal court to dismiss a lawsuit challenging the state’s ban on unapproved e-cigarettes, arguing that the companies behind the suit lack legal standing since their products are federally illegal. The state contends the plaintiffs, Novo Distro Inc. and Tobacco Hut and Vape Fairfax Inc., have no lawful right to sell unapproved vapes and cannot show irreparable harm.
Dec.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai