High Levels of Toxic Chemicals Found in Disposable Puff E-Cigarettes

Aug.03.2022
High Levels of Toxic Chemicals Found in Disposable Puff E-Cigarettes
One-time use Puff e-cigarettes contain high levels of unknown chemicals and synthetic coolants that are toxic to human cells.

A picture of a disposable puff electronic cigarette from Talbot Lab at the University of California, Riverside. Electronic cigarettes (EC) contain nicotine, solvents, and flavored chemicals, and are particularly popular among young people. In 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) banned flavored EC pods based on cartridges, but this ban did not extend to "disposable" flavored EC products, such as Puff EC. Unfortunately, the chemical composition and toxicity of the liquid in Puff ECs is largely unknown.


Researchers from the University of California Riverside and Portland State University have examined 16 disposable Puff devices to determine their flavor chemicals, synthetic cooling agents, and nicotine concentrations. One of the synthetic cooling agents tested is WS-23 which provides a cooling sensation.


A team used gas chromatography and mass spectrometry to identify 126 flavor chemicals in Puff EC liquid and tested their toxicity on human bronchial epithelial cells. They reported in the journal Toxicology and Chemistry that the chemical content in single-use Puff EC was high and had cytotoxicity or toxicity to living cells.


Our data supports the need to regulate the flavoring chemicals and synthetic cooling agents in Puff EC to limit their potentially harmful effects on health," said Esther Omaiye, a former graduate student in the Environmental Toxicology Graduate Program and first author of the research paper. "The levels of nicotine, flavoring chemicals, and synthetic cooling agents in Puff EC are higher than those found in other consumer products, raising concerns about the safety of Puff products.


Omaiye, a postdoctoral researcher in the Prue Talbot laboratory, stated that one of the areas of regulatory concern related to e-cigarettes is the continuous development of novel chemicals in e-liquids.


For many years, we have been aware that EC design has been continuously evolving," said Talbot, the professor of cell biology leading the research team.


Recently, it has been discovered that chemicals used in e-cigarette liquids are changing. These changes are often made to make e-cigarette products more appealing to teenagers or to avoid regulation by the FDA, such as using synthetic nicotine instead of tobacco-derived nicotine to avoid FDA restrictions.


According to Talbot, the synthetic cooling agent WS-23, developed for use in shaving cream, is now included in EC liquids, but there is little information available about its inhalation toxicity.


Our work indicates that the concentration of WS-23 used in Puff ECs is sufficient to have negative long-term health effects," she said.


Other findings of the study include:


The EC in Puff contains a much higher concentration of synthetic cooling agents and flavor chemicals than JUUL EC.


Despite the unknown risks of inhaling, EC manufacturers are increasing the use and concentration of synthetic cooling agents, which is appealing to young users.


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended only for industry exchange and learning purposes.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truth or accuracy of its contents. The compilation of this article is solely for industry exchange and research purposes.


Due to limitations in translation abilities, the compiled article may not fully express or accurately reflect the original text. Please refer to the original text for accuracy.


Regarding any domestic, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan, or international related statements and positions, 2FIRSTS fully aligns with the Chinese government.


The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us to request removal.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Malaysia Liquid Nicotine Returns to Poisons List, Leaving Vape Retail and RM354 Million Tax Collection in Legal Uncertainty
Malaysia Liquid Nicotine Returns to Poisons List, Leaving Vape Retail and RM354 Million Tax Collection in Legal Uncertainty
Malaysia’s withdrawal of its appeal in a landmark liquid-nicotine case has left a High Court ruling that struck down the 2023 nicotine exemption in force, bringing liquid and gel nicotine used in vaping products back under the Poisons Act 1952. At the same time, the Control of Smoking Products for Public Health Act 2024 continues to provide a regulatory framework for vaping products, creating uncertainty over retail sales, taxation and existing inventory. MPs are calling for nicotine vape sales and excise collection to stop, including refunds of more than RM354 million collected since 2023, while industry and consumer groups are asking the government to clarify the current legal position.
Sep.04
STIIIZY Redesign Fails to Escape PAX Labs Patent Import Ban as Section 337 Case Also Involves China ALD
STIIIZY Redesign Fails to Escape PAX Labs Patent Import Ban as Section 337 Case Also Involves China ALD
U.S. Customs and Border Protection ruled that STIIIZY had not shown that the redesigned cannabis-vape products covered by its latest request fall outside an ITC limited exclusion order tied to PAX Labs patents. CBP accepted some of STIIIZY’s claim-construction and non-infringement arguments, but the company did not address two additional claims in the same patent. Earlier STIIIZY redesigned cartridges and certain associated components imported with them had received separate CBP clearance.
Sep.16
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
Private antitrust litigation stemming from Altria's 2018 $12.8 billion investment for a 35% economic interest in JUUL is advancing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Direct purchasers, indirect purchasers and indirect resellers of JUUL products filed answering briefs this week seeking to preserve class certifications granted by a California federal court in February. Altria and JUUL argue that individual consumers and large distributors differ too much in purchasing terms to remain in a single direct-purchaser class, while a separate dispute concerns whether California antitrust law can apply to indirect purchasers across 27 jurisdictions. A September trial has been put on hold during the appeal.
Sep.23
Product | JT Refreshes Ploom CUBE Design and Expands Japan Retail Distribution, Targeting Younger Men and Female Users
Product | JT Refreshes Ploom CUBE Design and Expands Japan Retail Distribution, Targeting Younger Men and Female Users
Japan Tobacco (JT) launched a refreshed Ploom CUBE design in Japan on September 8, 2026, with broader convenience-store and tobacco-retail distribution planned from October 13. The updated device retains the existing Rounded Cube form and heating platform while replacing four previous body colors with Pebble White and Cobalt Black. JT is also introducing new Front Panels and Fabric Back Covers, although the new accessories are not compatible with the previous Ploom CUBE design. The company says the update is intended to broaden appeal among younger male and female users.
Sep.09
Juul Sublicense Reshapes Vuse Alto Patent Bill as Court Ends R.J. Reynolds’ 5.25% Royalty Obligation to Altria
Juul Sublicense Reshapes Vuse Alto Patent Bill as Court Ends R.J. Reynolds’ 5.25% Royalty Obligation to Altria
According to Law360 on August 31, 2026, a federal judge in North Carolina ruled that a patent sublicense between R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co. and Juul Labs Inc. relieves Reynolds of its obligation to continue paying royalties to Altria Client Services LLC over Vuse Alto. A jury had previously found that Vuse Alto infringed three Altria patents and awarded approximately $95.2 million in past damages, after which Reynolds was ordered to pay an ongoing royalty equal to 5.25% of positive net sales. The new ruling finds that a valid sublicense can eliminate future infringement, potentially ending what Altria described as hundreds of millions of dollars in future royalties.
Sep.01
Product | JT to Launch MEVIUS Tropical Option in Japan, Expanding Ploom Tobacco Stick Lineup to 32
Product | JT to Launch MEVIUS Tropical Option in Japan, Expanding Ploom Tobacco Stick Lineup to 32
Japan Tobacco (JT) will launch MEVIUS Tropical Option, a new tobacco stick for Ploom, nationwide in Japan from October 6, 2026. The capsule-format product combines mango-oriented sweetness with menthol cooling, adding a tropical flavor to the MEVIUS Ploom tobacco-stick lineup for the first time. Each pack contains 20 sticks and will launch at JPY 590. The product is compatible with all Ploom devices, and its addition will expand the Ploom tobacco-stick portfolio to 32 variants.
Sep.08