Impact of Increased Tobacco Tax on Smoking Rates in Indonesia

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
May.16.2024
Impact of Increased Tobacco Tax on Smoking Rates in Indonesia
Despite Indonesia's efforts to reduce smoking rates by raising tobacco taxes, statistics show a stagnant 28% of smokers.

According to a report by Bisnis on May 15th, despite the Indonesian government's policy of increasing tobacco taxes aimed at reducing smokers, statistics show that the current proportion of smokers remains stagnant at 28%. Heri Susianto, the chairman of the Indonesian Tobacco Industry Forum (Formasi), stated that despite the increase in tobacco tax rates, it has not effectively reduced the number of smokers in Indonesia.

 

According to Heri, based on the National Mid-Term Development Plan 2020-2024, the government's goal is to reduce the smoking rate among children aged 10-18 from 9.1% to 8.7% by 2024. However, achieving this goal is influenced by various factors.

 

Raising tobacco taxes has not effectively lowered smoking rates to meet the goals of the national mid-term development plan," said Harry.

 

The Minister of Finance has clearly stated that despite increasing tobacco taxes to raise prices, the number of smokers in Indonesia remains high, with a rising trend. Even with continuous implementation of policies to raise tobacco tax rates and retail prices, Indonesia's smoking rate remains stagnant at around 28%.

 

The proportion of smokers in the early age group in 2013 was around 7.2%, in 2016 it was around 8.8%, and in 2018 it was around 9.1%. This clearly indicates that raising tobacco taxes did not effectively reduce the proportion of smokers in the early age group.

 

The government needs to take additional non-financial measures to reduce the proportion of smokers, such as implementing large-scale supervision and education. The main factors affecting smoking rates include environmental factors such as family, school, and peer environments, as well as social culture, psychological education, cognitive factors, and economic factors. All of these factors are interconnected, so the government should start changing its beliefs and methods to reduce the smoking rates among 10-18 year old children.

 

Helen believes that the tobacco industry should not be responsible for reducing smoking rates, as it already bears a significant financial burden and must comply with other regulations. The tobacco industry indirectly contributes to reducing smoking rates through taxes paid, such as tobacco tax, value-added tax, local tobacco tax, and corporate income tax.

 

It must be remembered that the tobacco industry is the largest contributor to tax revenue, accounting for 96% of total tax revenue," he said. Therefore, the Treasury Department is adjusting fund allocation to facilitate the implementation of regulations called DBH CHT.

 

According to Regulation 206 of 2020, 25% of DBH CHT funding will be used for healthcare, including reducing the rate of stunting. He stated that the establishment of a country is to manage the distribution of power. Considering that the tobacco industry has already contributed significantly to the fiscal economy and has complied with relevant regulations, such as placing health warnings and information on tobacco packaging, it should no longer be required to bear the responsibility of reducing smoking rates.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
Private antitrust litigation stemming from Altria's 2018 $12.8 billion investment for a 35% economic interest in JUUL is advancing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Direct purchasers, indirect purchasers and indirect resellers of JUUL products filed answering briefs this week seeking to preserve class certifications granted by a California federal court in February. Altria and JUUL argue that individual consumers and large distributors differ too much in purchasing terms to remain in a single direct-purchaser class, while a separate dispute concerns whether California antitrust law can apply to indirect purchasers across 27 jurisdictions. A September trial has been put on hold during the appeal.
Sep.23
Australian Coalition Taskforce Calls for 80% Tobacco Tax Cut to Combat Illicit Market
Australian Coalition Taskforce Calls for 80% Tobacco Tax Cut to Combat Illicit Market
According to SGST on August 26, 2026, Australia’s Coalition Illegal Tobacco Taskforce released a report recommending an up to 80% cut in tobacco excise to reduce the appeal of the illicit tobacco market. The report claimed organised crime groups now control about 80% of Australia’s tobacco market and argued that high excise rates have widened the price gap between legal and illegal products. The recommendation remains a policy proposal and has not been adopted by the Australian government, which said its focus remains on enforcement, compliance and additional resources.
Aug.27
Cochrane 2026 Update Adds Nine Trials, Keeps High-Certainty Finding That Nicotine E-Cigarettes Improve Quit Rates Over NRT
Cochrane 2026 Update Adds Nine Trials, Keeps High-Certainty Finding That Nicotine E-Cigarettes Improve Quit Rates Over NRT
Cochrane’s 2026 update of its living review on electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation included 80 randomized controlled trials involving 29,861 adult smokers, with nine trials added in this update. The review retained its high-certainty conclusion that nicotine e-cigarettes increase smoking cessation rates compared with nicotine replacement therapy. In absolute terms, about 10 in 100 people using nicotine e-cigarettes may quit smoking for at least six months, compared with about 6 in 100 using NRT. The review found no clear difference in serious adverse event rates between the two groups, while longer-term safety and the relative effectiveness of newer device types remain less certain.
Sep.07
Product | Juul Labs Launches Upgraded JUUL2 Kit in UK With Four Pods at £9.99 and USB-C Charging
Product | Juul Labs Launches Upgraded JUUL2 Kit in UK With Four Pods at £9.99 and USB-C Charging
Juul Labs UK has introduced an upgraded JUUL2 Starter Kit for the UK market in October 2026, retaining a recommended retail price of £9.99 while doubling the number of included pods from two to four. The kit contains Crisp Menthol, Virginia Tobacco, Mango and Watermelon pods. The updated device replaces the previous proprietary charging dock with a USB-C port and offers longer battery life. The kit also features reduced packaging and retains a two-year limited warranty. Distribution is scheduled through major UK retailers, wholesalers, convenience stores and the JUUL UK website.
product
Oct.15
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore and four authorized U.S. CCELL distributors are asking a California federal court to permanently dismiss a core antitrust claim brought by direct purchasers. Plaintiffs allege that Smoore coordinated minimum wholesale prices, customer allocation and limits on price competition among distributors, amounting to a per se unlawful horizontal conspiracy. The defendants say the alleged conduct reflects ordinary vertical relationships between a manufacturer and its distributors. The court previously dismissed a similar claim, and the latest dispute centers on whether the second amended complaint adds sufficient facts to establish a horizontal agreement.
Sep.14
Juul Sublicense Reshapes Vuse Alto Patent Bill as Court Ends R.J. Reynolds’ 5.25% Royalty Obligation to Altria
Juul Sublicense Reshapes Vuse Alto Patent Bill as Court Ends R.J. Reynolds’ 5.25% Royalty Obligation to Altria
According to Law360 on August 31, 2026, a federal judge in North Carolina ruled that a patent sublicense between R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co. and Juul Labs Inc. relieves Reynolds of its obligation to continue paying royalties to Altria Client Services LLC over Vuse Alto. A jury had previously found that Vuse Alto infringed three Altria patents and awarded approximately $95.2 million in past damages, after which Reynolds was ordered to pay an ongoing royalty equal to 5.25% of positive net sales. The new ruling finds that a valid sublicense can eliminate future infringement, potentially ending what Altria described as hundreds of millions of dollars in future royalties.
Sep.01