Impact of Increased Tobacco Tax on Smoking Rates in Indonesia

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
May.16.2024
Impact of Increased Tobacco Tax on Smoking Rates in Indonesia
Despite Indonesia's efforts to reduce smoking rates by raising tobacco taxes, statistics show a stagnant 28% of smokers.

According to a report by Bisnis on May 15th, despite the Indonesian government's policy of increasing tobacco taxes aimed at reducing smokers, statistics show that the current proportion of smokers remains stagnant at 28%. Heri Susianto, the chairman of the Indonesian Tobacco Industry Forum (Formasi), stated that despite the increase in tobacco tax rates, it has not effectively reduced the number of smokers in Indonesia.

 

According to Heri, based on the National Mid-Term Development Plan 2020-2024, the government's goal is to reduce the smoking rate among children aged 10-18 from 9.1% to 8.7% by 2024. However, achieving this goal is influenced by various factors.

 

Raising tobacco taxes has not effectively lowered smoking rates to meet the goals of the national mid-term development plan," said Harry.

 

The Minister of Finance has clearly stated that despite increasing tobacco taxes to raise prices, the number of smokers in Indonesia remains high, with a rising trend. Even with continuous implementation of policies to raise tobacco tax rates and retail prices, Indonesia's smoking rate remains stagnant at around 28%.

 

The proportion of smokers in the early age group in 2013 was around 7.2%, in 2016 it was around 8.8%, and in 2018 it was around 9.1%. This clearly indicates that raising tobacco taxes did not effectively reduce the proportion of smokers in the early age group.

 

The government needs to take additional non-financial measures to reduce the proportion of smokers, such as implementing large-scale supervision and education. The main factors affecting smoking rates include environmental factors such as family, school, and peer environments, as well as social culture, psychological education, cognitive factors, and economic factors. All of these factors are interconnected, so the government should start changing its beliefs and methods to reduce the smoking rates among 10-18 year old children.

 

Helen believes that the tobacco industry should not be responsible for reducing smoking rates, as it already bears a significant financial burden and must comply with other regulations. The tobacco industry indirectly contributes to reducing smoking rates through taxes paid, such as tobacco tax, value-added tax, local tobacco tax, and corporate income tax.

 

It must be remembered that the tobacco industry is the largest contributor to tax revenue, accounting for 96% of total tax revenue," he said. Therefore, the Treasury Department is adjusting fund allocation to facilitate the implementation of regulations called DBH CHT.

 

According to Regulation 206 of 2020, 25% of DBH CHT funding will be used for healthcare, including reducing the rate of stunting. He stated that the establishment of a country is to manage the distribution of power. Considering that the tobacco industry has already contributed significantly to the fiscal economy and has complied with relevant regulations, such as placing health warnings and information on tobacco packaging, it should no longer be required to bear the responsibility of reducing smoking rates.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Russia’s Vape Device Labeling Regime Enters Force: Registration Starts in September, Mandatory Coding in December
Russia’s Vape Device Labeling Regime Enters Force: Registration Starts in September, Mandatory Coding in December
Russia's digital labeling regime for reusable e-cigarettes and similar personal vaping devices entered its first mandatory phase in September 2026. From September 1, manufacturers, importers and other market participants must register with the national Chestny ZNAK tracking system. From December 1, newly manufactured and imported covered devices will be required to carry digital identification codes and be reported as entering circulation. Russia has also issued new operational guidance for imports, marking the transition from a voluntary pilot to phased mandatory implementation.
Sep.15
Special Report | Altria Subsidiaries Sue FDA to Vacate 2021 PMTA Rule as Agency Moves to Speed Reviews
Special Report | Altria Subsidiaries Sue FDA to Vacate 2021 PMTA Rule as Agency Moves to Speed Reviews
2Firsts reviewed the original federal court complaint filed by Altria subsidiaries Helix Innovations and NJOY on Sept. 2 challenging FDA’s 2021 PMTA rule. The lawsuit questions whether FDA’s review process complies with the Tobacco Control Act’s 180-day timeline, even as the agency moves to accelerate PMTA reviews and issues more marketing orders. Drawing on the complaint, FDA records, government audits and recent court rulings, 2Firsts examines the legal arguments, supporting evidence and potential implications for the U.S. tobacco review system.
Regulations
Sep.03
BAT CFO Dragos Constantinescu Takes Office, Returning After Seven Years and Former Asahi Europe Leadership Role
BAT CFO Dragos Constantinescu Takes Office, Returning After Seven Years and Former Asahi Europe Leadership Role
Dragos Constantinescu has officially taken up his role as Chief Financial Officer and Executive Director at British American Tobacco (BAT). He previously spent 16 years at BAT across finance and general management roles in Europe before joining Asahi in 2019 and becoming CEO of Asahi Europe & International in 2025. His return comes as BAT continues to advance its “A Better Tomorrow” transformation.
BAT
Sep.01
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
According to VitalLaw on August 27, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated an FDA marketing denial order (MDO) against NicQuid LLC, ruling that the agency’s comparative-efficacy standard for electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) applications had become a substantive rule requiring notice-and-comment rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The court did not reject FDA’s authority to compare the public health benefits and risks of flavored vapes, but held that the agency could not establish a broadly binding standard through informal adjudications. The case was remanded to FDA for further proceedings.
Aug.28
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
Private antitrust litigation stemming from Altria's 2018 $12.8 billion investment for a 35% economic interest in JUUL is advancing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Direct purchasers, indirect purchasers and indirect resellers of JUUL products filed answering briefs this week seeking to preserve class certifications granted by a California federal court in February. Altria and JUUL argue that individual consumers and large distributors differ too much in purchasing terms to remain in a single direct-purchaser class, while a separate dispute concerns whether California antitrust law can apply to indirect purchasers across 27 jurisdictions. A September trial has been put on hold during the appeal.
Sep.23
EU Trade Department Faces Scrutiny Over Contacts With Tobacco Industry
EU Trade Department Faces Scrutiny Over Contacts With Tobacco Industry
European Ombudswoman Teresa Anjinho has opened an inquiry into how the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Trade handles interactions with the tobacco industry. The case follows a complaint from a civil society organisation that alleges regular, unnecessary and non-transparent contacts between DG TRADE and tobacco industry representatives, raising questions over compliance with the EU’s obligations under the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. The inquiry remains ongoing, and the Ombudswoman has not reached any finding of maladministration.
Aug.24