Ireland Considers Raising Age Limit and Flavor Controls for Tobacco and Nicotine Products

Aug.25.2022
Ireland Considers Raising Age Limit and Flavor Controls for Tobacco and Nicotine Products
The Royal College of Physicians of Ireland recommends age limit of 21 for tobacco and nicotine products, flavor control and ad restrictions for e-cigarettes.

Professor Des Cox, Chairman of the Tobacco Policy Group at the Royal College of Physicians of Ireland (RCPI), has suggested that Ireland should consider raising the age limit for purchasing tobacco and nicotine vaping products to 21. He also recommends a ban on flavored e-cigarettes and restrictions on e-cigarette advertising.


Professor Des Cox, Chair of the Tobacco Policy Group of the Royal College of Physicians of Ireland (RCPI), has suggested that Ireland consider raising the legal age for purchasing tobacco and nicotine inhalation products to 21 years old.


In addition to age restrictions on tobacco, Cox also suggested regulating the flavors of electronic cigarettes and limiting advertising for e-cigarette products. In a discussion of the Public Health (Tobacco and Nicotine Inhaling Products) Bill in the Oireachtas Health Committee, Cox explained why he believes "flavor control" is a way forward.


Compared to other age groups, teenagers are more likely to start using nicotine inhalation products through flavorings. While adults may also enjoy flavors, the risk of teenagers inhaling nicotine products outweighs the benefits of former smokers using flavorings," he said.


Cox added that e-cigarettes lead to teenage smoking, a theory that has been refuted countless times by science. "Studies also show that teenagers who have used nicotine inhalation products in the past are three to five times more likely to start smoking than those who have never used them.


Flavor is crucial.


On the contrary, renowned cardiologist and smoking cessation researcher Dr. Konstantinos Farsalinos emphasizes why flavors are crucial in helping adult smokers quit. "Everyone likes flavors, from the smallest to the biggest. That's human nature. You want something interesting," the doctor said.


A recent study titled "Case Study of Spice Reduction in Tobacco Harm" details the relationship between flavored nicotine products and successful smoking cessation. The report emphasizes that flavor bans only serve to fuel the growth of a large black market and ultimately lead to an increase in smoking rates, as many e-cigarette users may revert back to traditional smoking.


In a recent regulatory watch, Farsalinos discussed a report that examined Health Canada's proposed ban. According to Farsalinos, the reasoning behind implementing such a ban may be falling apart as evidence continues to suggest potential negative impacts on public health.


The so-called teenage e-cigarette trend.


In the past, Farsalinos opposed the so-called youth e-cigarette trend, explaining why considering an increase in e-cigarette use is a flawed premise. He explained that the risks associated with nicotine dependence and e-cigarette use cannot and should not be equated with the risks of smoking. He added that the responsibility of public health officials is to weigh the benefits and adverse effects of any intervention and examine where the balance lies.


Farsalinos added that with regards to electronic cigarettes, the benefits outweigh the negative impacts, which should be taken into consideration.


Even if there is a causal relationship between e-cigarettes and subsequent smoking (which has not yet been proven, and common liability may be a more reasonable explanation), the contribution of e-cigarettes to the prevalence of smoking is minimal. We should not forget that in recent years, the use of e-cigarettes by young people has been increasing while smoking rates have significantly declined. This is why, as he explained, when providing data, smoking rates should be mentioned.


Sorry, I cannot complete this task without the text or context to be translated. Can you please provide more information?



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

German Customs Seize 115,800 Vapes in €1.4 Million Tax Case
German Customs Seize 115,800 Vapes in €1.4 Million Tax Case
Germany's Magdeburg Main Customs Office seized 115,800 untaxed e-cigarettes containing a combined 4.366 million mL of e-liquid during four truck inspections between August 10 and September 4, 2026. The seizures prevented an estimated €1.397 million in tax losses and set a record for the customs office's jurisdiction. Criminal proceedings have been initiated against four truck drivers. The case follows a separate German investigation involving more than 7.6 million illicit vapes and an estimated €33.3 million in excise-tax losses.
Enforcement
Oct.13
Indiana Halts Sales of Elf Bar, Lost Mary, MR FOG and iJOY Vapes Under Foreign-Adversary Rules; Some Products Return After Compliance Filings
Indiana Halts Sales of Elf Bar, Lost Mary, MR FOG and iJOY Vapes Under Foreign-Adversary Rules; Some Products Return After Compliance Filings
Indiana's Alcohol and Tobacco Commission (ATC) ordered tobacco certificate holders in September to remove certain vaping products marketed under Elf Bar, Lost Mary, MR FOG, iJOY and other brands from inventory under the state's foreign-adversary product law. The agency later listed 257 MR FOG products and 77 Lost Mary product entries as lawful for sale. The Lost Mary revision expressly stated that compliance evidence had been received for 20 additional products. 2Firsts compliance expert Kurt said potential filings could include e-liquid and ingredient-origin records, U.S. nicotine-analog supply-chain documentation and FDA premarket application status.
Regulations
Oct.08
Special Report | Altria's NACS Booth Raises Questions Over U.S. Tobacco Advertising Warnings
Special Report | Altria's NACS Booth Raises Questions Over U.S. Tobacco Advertising Warnings
During its coverage of Altria's booth at NACS Show 2026, 2Firsts documented product displays that prompted questions about U.S. tobacco advertising warning requirements. Following public comments from a former FDA official, 2Firsts sought responses from Altria and independently consulted U.S. regulatory lawyer Azim Chowdhury. Altria maintained that its B2B communications complied with applicable laws, while Chowdhury explained that federal warning rules provide no general trade-show exemption for e-cigarettes and nicotine pouches. The special report examines the broader regulatory implications.
Nov.04
IVG Parent Secures HMRC Excise Warehouse and Duty Stamp Approvals Ahead of UK Vape Tax
IVG Parent Secures HMRC Excise Warehouse and Duty Stamp Approvals Ahead of UK Vape Tax
Acme Vape Ltd, the company behind UK vaping brand IVG, has received HM Revenue & Customs approval to operate an excise warehouse for vaping products and participate in the Vaping Duty Stamps Scheme. The UK's Vaping Products Duty will take effect on October 1, 2026, at a flat rate of £2.20 per 10ml of vaping liquid. Acme Vape Ltd says its approved warehouse in Preston will become operational under the new regime on the same date.
Regulations
Sep.18 by 2Firsts Perspectives
From Product Innovation to Integrated Solutions: NEXTECH Expands Its Global Heated Tobacco Solutions
From Product Innovation to Integrated Solutions: NEXTECH Expands Its Global Heated Tobacco Solutions
NEXTECH launched its NEXE Pro circumferential-heating tobacco stick globally at InterTabac 2026, as the company expands from product innovation into broader heated tobacco solutions. Amid intensifying competition across global HTP markets, NEXTECH is strengthening its R&D, manufacturing and pre-launch support capabilities to serve different types of business customers.
Industry Insight
Sep.15
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
Private antitrust litigation stemming from Altria's 2018 $12.8 billion investment for a 35% economic interest in JUUL is advancing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Direct purchasers, indirect purchasers and indirect resellers of JUUL products filed answering briefs this week seeking to preserve class certifications granted by a California federal court in February. Altria and JUUL argue that individual consumers and large distributors differ too much in purchasing terms to remain in a single direct-purchaser class, while a separate dispute concerns whether California antitrust law can apply to indirect purchasers across 27 jurisdictions. A September trial has been put on hold during the appeal.
Sep.23