Irish Court Approves Challenge to EU Tobacco Directive

Jan.13.2023
Irish Court Approves Challenge to EU Tobacco Directive
Irish high court permits tobacco companies to challenge EU directive on flavored tobacco in e-cigarettes.

The Irish High Court has allowed two tobacco companies to challenge a new EU directive that prohibits the use of flavored heated tobacco products in electronic cigarettes.


The state is set to adopt new EU laws by July next year. However, the country's oldest tobacco manufacturer, PJ Carroll and Co Ltd, and UK marketing and sales company, Nicoventures Trading Ltd, are claiming that the EU directive is invalid. They are challenging Ireland's Minister of Health and Minister of Justice.


Under previous regulations, flavoring tobacco products during heating was not prohibited, but the European Commission has made changes to this and is hoping that member states will implement the ban before July 23.


These products require smokers to consume half the amount of tobacco compared to traditional cigarettes. They are electronic devices powered by batteries and are used to inhale heated tobacco instead of burning it. This process produces an aerosol containing nicotine, which the user then inhales.


They come in various flavors such as bubble gum, chocolate, and marshmallow. Critics argue that these flavors attract young users, while proponents believe they can help those trying to quit smoking.


In 2021, PJ Carroll, which holds a 10% market share in the Irish electronic cigarette market, announced that it is taking steps to commercialize heated tobacco products in the country, including flavored products.


However, the company stated that the EU ban on these products severely impairs its ability to "fully leverage unique opportunities and become the first company to launch heated tobacco products for adult smokers in the Irish market, otherwise they will continue to smoke.


Simon Carroll, director and trade manager of PJ Carroll, has stated in a sworn affidavit that the ban will also harm significant investments by British American Tobacco (BAT) group, which owns Irish and British companies, in developing "products". Such products would reduce health risks compared to traditional cigarettes while still meeting the preferences of Irish adult smokers, he said, adding that otherwise they will continue to smoke.


He stated that the restriction also has significant effects on the implementation of public health policies and anti-smoking campaigns, as traditional cigarettes have acceptable alternatives.


Tobacco companies PJ Carroll and Nicoventures have written a letter to the Minister for Health and the Attorney General, but have been informed that it is too early to challenge in any Irish court as many applicants, including PJ Carroll and Nicoventures, have already initiated a direct European Union challenge in the European Court of Justice (CJEU).


PJ Carroll and Nicoventures submitted an application to challenge the upcoming implementation of a directive in Ireland, which was confirmed by the Health Minister to take effect in July next year. The application was submitted to Judge Charles Meenan on Wednesday. As the application was unilaterally filed, only the plaintiff's representative appeared in court. The purpose of the application is to challenge the directive's intention to be converted into Irish law.


PJ Carroll and Margaret Gray SC of Nicoventures argue that their case is based on the accusation that the European Commission illegally extended the directive to cover their clients' products, without providing proper reasoning.


These companies claim that, among other things, the new directive is invalid because it constitutes an illegal exercise of power under the previous Tobacco Products Directive (TPD).


They also stated that the committee's assessment of "significant changes in circumstances" (when introducing a new ban) goes beyond the scope of the TPD's authority.


The court also learned that these companies will request to bring this matter before the European Union court for an initial ruling.


The judge expressed satisfaction with the approval but stated that he believed the mention of the CJEU must be dealt with first before addressing any other matter. He said that the case may return next month.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore and four authorized U.S. CCELL distributors are asking a California federal court to permanently dismiss a core antitrust claim brought by direct purchasers. Plaintiffs allege that Smoore coordinated minimum wholesale prices, customer allocation and limits on price competition among distributors, amounting to a per se unlawful horizontal conspiracy. The defendants say the alleged conduct reflects ordinary vertical relationships between a manufacturer and its distributors. The court previously dismissed a similar claim, and the latest dispute centers on whether the second amended complaint adds sufficient facts to establish a horizontal agreement.
Sep.14
Product | SnowPlus Launches Nicotine-Free DASH in South Korea, Localising an Established Disposable Platform
Product | SnowPlus Launches Nicotine-Free DASH in South Korea, Localising an Established Disposable Platform
SnowPlus has introduced a nicotine-free version of DASH in South Korea, adapting an existing overseas disposable platform for the local market. The Korean version retains the series’ flat duckbill-style mouthpiece, ceramic heating architecture and disposable form factor while reducing nicotine content to 0%. By comparison, the overseas DASH 4000 platform typically features 7.5ml of prefilled e-liquid, up to 4,000 puffs and a 530mAh rechargeable battery, with nicotine-containing variants available in some markets. The product update centers on formulation localisation rather than a new hardware generation.
Aug.31
Australia Tobacco Tax Debate Spreads Within Labor as NSW Premier Minns Reaffirms Support for a Cut
Australia Tobacco Tax Debate Spreads Within Labor as NSW Premier Minns Reaffirms Support for a Cut
Australia’s tobacco excise debate is increasingly exposing differences within the governing Labor Party. New South Wales Labor Premier Chris Minns reaffirmed on September 8 that he supports reducing tobacco excise, arguing that current tax settings are pushing consumers toward cheaper black-market cigarettes. Federal Health Minister Mark Butler continues to oppose an excise cut, while Treasurer Jim Chalmers and Assistant Treasurer Daniel Mulino have recently stopped short of ruling out future changes. The divergence follows the opposition Coalition’s proposal to cut tobacco excise by 80%.
Sep.08
UK HMRC Launches Vape Duty Stamps on October 1, Ushering in Supply-Chain Traceability as Chinese Exporters Face New Compliance Hurdles
UK HMRC Launches Vape Duty Stamps on October 1, Ushering in Supply-Chain Traceability as Chinese Exporters Face New Compliance Hurdles
HM Revenue & Customs put the UK's Vaping Products Duty and Vaping Duty Stamps Scheme into effect on October 1. All vaping liquids manufactured in or imported into the UK are now subject to duty at £2.20 per 10ml, regardless of nicotine content. The stamp regime will introduce digital functionality designed to provide traceability throughout the supply chain, with approved manufacturers, importers and warehousekeepers required to report product movements and retailers and consumers eventually able to scan stamps to verify authenticity. China exported $177 million of vape-related products to the UK in August, up 51.4% year over year, increasing the significance of the new compliance regime for China's Shenzhen-centered vape supply chain.
Regulations
Oct.04
JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
Less than a week after JUUL2 received U.S. FDA marketing authorization on August 28, 2026, JUUL Labs was sued for patent infringement in federal court in Delaware. AJ Marketing LLC filed the complaint on September 3, alleging that both JUUL 1 and JUUL2 infringe U.S. Patent No. 8,851,068 B2. The patent covers aspects of programmable electronic vaporization devices, including controls over dose delivery, usage frequency and operating parameters. The plaintiff is seeking reasonable royalties and ongoing royalties tied to the remaining life of the patent. JUUL has not yet publicly responded to the case.
Sep.10
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
According to VitalLaw on August 27, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated an FDA marketing denial order (MDO) against NicQuid LLC, ruling that the agency’s comparative-efficacy standard for electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) applications had become a substantive rule requiring notice-and-comment rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The court did not reject FDA’s authority to compare the public health benefits and risks of flavored vapes, but held that the agency could not establish a broadly binding standard through informal adjudications. The case was remanded to FDA for further proceedings.
Aug.28