Irish Court Approves Challenge to EU Tobacco Directive

Jan.13.2023
Irish Court Approves Challenge to EU Tobacco Directive
Irish high court permits tobacco companies to challenge EU directive on flavored tobacco in e-cigarettes.

The Irish High Court has allowed two tobacco companies to challenge a new EU directive that prohibits the use of flavored heated tobacco products in electronic cigarettes.


The state is set to adopt new EU laws by July next year. However, the country's oldest tobacco manufacturer, PJ Carroll and Co Ltd, and UK marketing and sales company, Nicoventures Trading Ltd, are claiming that the EU directive is invalid. They are challenging Ireland's Minister of Health and Minister of Justice.


Under previous regulations, flavoring tobacco products during heating was not prohibited, but the European Commission has made changes to this and is hoping that member states will implement the ban before July 23.


These products require smokers to consume half the amount of tobacco compared to traditional cigarettes. They are electronic devices powered by batteries and are used to inhale heated tobacco instead of burning it. This process produces an aerosol containing nicotine, which the user then inhales.


They come in various flavors such as bubble gum, chocolate, and marshmallow. Critics argue that these flavors attract young users, while proponents believe they can help those trying to quit smoking.


In 2021, PJ Carroll, which holds a 10% market share in the Irish electronic cigarette market, announced that it is taking steps to commercialize heated tobacco products in the country, including flavored products.


However, the company stated that the EU ban on these products severely impairs its ability to "fully leverage unique opportunities and become the first company to launch heated tobacco products for adult smokers in the Irish market, otherwise they will continue to smoke.


Simon Carroll, director and trade manager of PJ Carroll, has stated in a sworn affidavit that the ban will also harm significant investments by British American Tobacco (BAT) group, which owns Irish and British companies, in developing "products". Such products would reduce health risks compared to traditional cigarettes while still meeting the preferences of Irish adult smokers, he said, adding that otherwise they will continue to smoke.


He stated that the restriction also has significant effects on the implementation of public health policies and anti-smoking campaigns, as traditional cigarettes have acceptable alternatives.


Tobacco companies PJ Carroll and Nicoventures have written a letter to the Minister for Health and the Attorney General, but have been informed that it is too early to challenge in any Irish court as many applicants, including PJ Carroll and Nicoventures, have already initiated a direct European Union challenge in the European Court of Justice (CJEU).


PJ Carroll and Nicoventures submitted an application to challenge the upcoming implementation of a directive in Ireland, which was confirmed by the Health Minister to take effect in July next year. The application was submitted to Judge Charles Meenan on Wednesday. As the application was unilaterally filed, only the plaintiff's representative appeared in court. The purpose of the application is to challenge the directive's intention to be converted into Irish law.


PJ Carroll and Margaret Gray SC of Nicoventures argue that their case is based on the accusation that the European Commission illegally extended the directive to cover their clients' products, without providing proper reasoning.


These companies claim that, among other things, the new directive is invalid because it constitutes an illegal exercise of power under the previous Tobacco Products Directive (TPD).


They also stated that the committee's assessment of "significant changes in circumstances" (when introducing a new ban) goes beyond the scope of the TPD's authority.


The court also learned that these companies will request to bring this matter before the European Union court for an initial ruling.


The judge expressed satisfaction with the approval but stated that he believed the mention of the CJEU must be dealt with first before addressing any other matter. He said that the case may return next month.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

From Nicotine Pouches to Soft Candy Forms: China Tobacco Hubei explores adjustable-release oral nicotine products
From Nicotine Pouches to Soft Candy Forms: China Tobacco Hubei explores adjustable-release oral nicotine products
China-based China Tobacco Hubei Industrial Co., Ltd. has filed a patent application covering an oral nicotine product and its preparation method. The patent proposes a soft candy-shaped oral nicotine product containing nicotine ingredients, gelling agents, sweeteners and alkaline pH regulators. Through formulation adjustments and homogeneous or dual-layer structures, the technology aims to achieve different nicotine release profiles. The filing reflects exploration of new oral nicotine product formats and controlled nicotine delivery approaches.
Aug.06
Germany Probes 7.6 Million Illegal Vape Case With Estimated €33.3 Million Tax Loss; Four Chinese Manufacturer Employees Under Investigation, Some Packaging in Enforcement Images Resembles FUMOT Products
Germany Probes 7.6 Million Illegal Vape Case With Estimated €33.3 Million Tax Loss; Four Chinese Manufacturer Employees Under Investigation, Some Packaging in Enforcement Images Resembles FUMOT Products
German prosecutors and customs authorities are conducting a criminal investigation into an alleged cross-border organised vape network. Authorities say that between January 2024 and March 2025, four employees of an unnamed Chinese e-cigarette manufacturer allegedly built a network of sales agents and wholesalers that brought more than 7.6 million nicotine disposable vapes into Germany, causing an estimated €33.3 million in excise-tax losses. The manufacturer has not been named. Some products visible in enforcement images have packaging resembling products from FUMOT’s portfolio. European regulatory records from 2024, FUMOT’s public overseas-sales materials and records involving German vape importer and distribution company Zamu-Pro GmbH also show FUMOT/RandM products and German distribution activity during the period covered by the investigation.
Sep.21
German Tobacco Tax Revenue Falls 10.8% Through August as Tax-Paid Cigarette Volume Drops 12.6%
German Tobacco Tax Revenue Falls 10.8% Through August as Tax-Paid Cigarette Volume Drops 12.6%
Germany collected €9.789 billion in total tobacco tax revenue from January through August 2026, down 10.8% from a year earlier, according to the Federal Ministry of Finance. Germany's tobacco tax base covers not only cigarettes and fine-cut tobacco but also heated tobacco and vaping liquids taxed as tobacco substitutes. The German Association of the Tobacco Industry and Novel Products, or BVTE, citing federal statistical data, said tax-paid cigarette volume fell 12.6% to 40.6 billion sticks. BVTE is using the latest figures to argue against further tax increases planned from 2027 through 2030, while Germany's parliament is scheduled to hold a first reading of the bill on September 24.
Sep.23
JT’s Ploom Volumes Rise 43.5% as Cigarettes Anchor Its Transition
JT’s Ploom Volumes Rise 43.5% as Cigarettes Anchor Its Transition
JT’s Ploom heated-tobacco volumes rose 43.5% in the first half of 2026, while combustibles still represented about 97% of its tobacco volume and remained the main earnings base. In Japan, reduced-risk products now account for 48.7% of industry shipments, shifting competition from category adoption towards brand share, pricing and consumer retention. JT’s results offer a revealing case of a traditional tobacco company pursuing a prolonged, dual-track transformation.
JTI
Jul.30
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore and four authorized U.S. CCELL distributors are asking a California federal court to permanently dismiss a core antitrust claim brought by direct purchasers. Plaintiffs allege that Smoore coordinated minimum wholesale prices, customer allocation and limits on price competition among distributors, amounting to a per se unlawful horizontal conspiracy. The defendants say the alleged conduct reflects ordinary vertical relationships between a manufacturer and its distributors. The court previously dismissed a similar claim, and the latest dispute centers on whether the second amended complaint adds sufficient facts to establish a horizontal agreement.
Sep.14
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
Private antitrust litigation stemming from Altria's 2018 $12.8 billion investment for a 35% economic interest in JUUL is advancing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Direct purchasers, indirect purchasers and indirect resellers of JUUL products filed answering briefs this week seeking to preserve class certifications granted by a California federal court in February. Altria and JUUL argue that individual consumers and large distributors differ too much in purchasing terms to remain in a single direct-purchaser class, while a separate dispute concerns whether California antitrust law can apply to indirect purchasers across 27 jurisdictions. A September trial has been put on hold during the appeal.
Sep.23