Irish Court Approves Challenge to EU Tobacco Directive

Jan.13.2023
Irish Court Approves Challenge to EU Tobacco Directive
Irish high court permits tobacco companies to challenge EU directive on flavored tobacco in e-cigarettes.

The Irish High Court has allowed two tobacco companies to challenge a new EU directive that prohibits the use of flavored heated tobacco products in electronic cigarettes.


The state is set to adopt new EU laws by July next year. However, the country's oldest tobacco manufacturer, PJ Carroll and Co Ltd, and UK marketing and sales company, Nicoventures Trading Ltd, are claiming that the EU directive is invalid. They are challenging Ireland's Minister of Health and Minister of Justice.


Under previous regulations, flavoring tobacco products during heating was not prohibited, but the European Commission has made changes to this and is hoping that member states will implement the ban before July 23.


These products require smokers to consume half the amount of tobacco compared to traditional cigarettes. They are electronic devices powered by batteries and are used to inhale heated tobacco instead of burning it. This process produces an aerosol containing nicotine, which the user then inhales.


They come in various flavors such as bubble gum, chocolate, and marshmallow. Critics argue that these flavors attract young users, while proponents believe they can help those trying to quit smoking.


In 2021, PJ Carroll, which holds a 10% market share in the Irish electronic cigarette market, announced that it is taking steps to commercialize heated tobacco products in the country, including flavored products.


However, the company stated that the EU ban on these products severely impairs its ability to "fully leverage unique opportunities and become the first company to launch heated tobacco products for adult smokers in the Irish market, otherwise they will continue to smoke.


Simon Carroll, director and trade manager of PJ Carroll, has stated in a sworn affidavit that the ban will also harm significant investments by British American Tobacco (BAT) group, which owns Irish and British companies, in developing "products". Such products would reduce health risks compared to traditional cigarettes while still meeting the preferences of Irish adult smokers, he said, adding that otherwise they will continue to smoke.


He stated that the restriction also has significant effects on the implementation of public health policies and anti-smoking campaigns, as traditional cigarettes have acceptable alternatives.


Tobacco companies PJ Carroll and Nicoventures have written a letter to the Minister for Health and the Attorney General, but have been informed that it is too early to challenge in any Irish court as many applicants, including PJ Carroll and Nicoventures, have already initiated a direct European Union challenge in the European Court of Justice (CJEU).


PJ Carroll and Nicoventures submitted an application to challenge the upcoming implementation of a directive in Ireland, which was confirmed by the Health Minister to take effect in July next year. The application was submitted to Judge Charles Meenan on Wednesday. As the application was unilaterally filed, only the plaintiff's representative appeared in court. The purpose of the application is to challenge the directive's intention to be converted into Irish law.


PJ Carroll and Margaret Gray SC of Nicoventures argue that their case is based on the accusation that the European Commission illegally extended the directive to cover their clients' products, without providing proper reasoning.


These companies claim that, among other things, the new directive is invalid because it constitutes an illegal exercise of power under the previous Tobacco Products Directive (TPD).


They also stated that the committee's assessment of "significant changes in circumstances" (when introducing a new ban) goes beyond the scope of the TPD's authority.


The court also learned that these companies will request to bring this matter before the European Union court for an initial ruling.


The judge expressed satisfaction with the approval but stated that he believed the mention of the CJEU must be dealt with first before addressing any other matter. He said that the case may return next month.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Illegal Vape Sellers Still Use TikTok and Other Platforms to Drive Sales Despite Australia’s Ad Ban
Illegal Vape Sellers Still Use TikTok and Other Platforms to Drive Sales Despite Australia’s Ad Ban
Illegal vape sellers are still promoting nicotine products on TikTok, Instagram and YouTube despite Australia’s 2024 advertising ban, while illicit tobacco sales are increasingly moving from physical stores to online marketplaces.
Jul.15
China’s Jiangsu Tobacco Monopoly Bureau and Drug Regulator Target Illegal Vape Sales Disguised as Medical Devices, Define Six Violations
China’s Jiangsu Tobacco Monopoly Bureau and Drug Regulator Target Illegal Vape Sales Disguised as Medical Devices, Define Six Violations
China’s Jiangsu Tobacco Monopoly Bureau and Jiangsu Provincial Medical Products Administration have issued a joint notice targeting illegal production and sales of vape products disguised as medical devices. The notice identifies six categories of violations, including obtaining medical licenses through false materials, misusing medical device credentials, expanding production beyond approved scopes, and using medical device-related online platforms to promote or sell vape products. The action is based on China’s tobacco and medical device regulations and aims to strengthen vape oversight and consumer protection.
Aug.04
Scottish Vape Display Rules Could Cost Businesses £61 Million, Affecting More Than 11,000 Retail Outlets
Scottish Vape Display Rules Could Cost Businesses £61 Million, Affecting More Than 11,000 Retail Outlets
A Scottish government impact assessment estimates that proposed vape display and packaging rules could create up to £61 million ($82 million) in compliance costs for businesses, affecting more than 11,000 retail outlets. The estimated costs are mainly linked to inventory adjustments, retail storage changes and the resources required for businesses to understand and implement the new requirements. The measures form part of the UK’s broader efforts to tighten vape regulation, particularly around product displays, packaging and sales practices.
Aug.10
Vape Vending Machine Concerns Rise in German-Speaking Europe as Schools and Age Checks Come Into Focus
Vape Vending Machine Concerns Rise in German-Speaking Europe as Schools and Age Checks Come Into Focus
Recent reports from Germany and Switzerland show growing concern over vape and tobacco vending machines near schools or in public settings, with parents, teachers and residents questioning youth access, age-verification controls and the sale of vapes alongside snacks and drinks.
Jul.06
Supreme Vape Revenue Rises 15% Despite UK Disposable Vape Ban
Supreme Vape Revenue Rises 15% Despite UK Disposable Vape Ban
UK consumer goods group Supreme said its vaping revenue rose 15% to £148.1 million in the year to March 31, 2026, despite the UK disposable vape ban taking effect during the period, while the company identified the Vaping Products Duty due in October as the next major industry milestone.
Regulations
Jul.03 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Sesh touts independence, 8VC backing and retail reach as it challenges tobacco-owned pouch brands
Sesh touts independence, 8VC backing and retail reach as it challenges tobacco-owned pouch brands
U.S. nicotine pouch brand Sesh has emphasized its independence from Altria, Philip Morris International and British American Tobacco, along with backing from investors including 8VC, celebrity supporters and a retail footprint of more than 7,500 stores, as it seeks to differentiate itself in a market where major pouch brands are owned by large tobacco companies.
Regulations
Jul.07 by 2Firsts Perspectives