Italian Government Defies Court Ruling, Lists CBD as Narcotic

Jul.15.2024
Italian Government Defies Court Ruling, Lists CBD as Narcotic
Italy defies EU law, listing CBD as narcotic. Italy's move sparks backlash from hemp industry, threatens 10,000 jobs.

According to a report from Hemptoday on July 12, the Italian government has ignored a ruling from a regional administrative court and violated EU law by placing CBD on the country's list of narcotic drugs.


The Italian Ministry of Health stated that this regulation complies with Italian Presidential Decree 309/1990, which forms the cornerstone of Italy's drug legislation. However, this contradicts a ruling from a regional court last year, which was based on legally binding judgments within the European Union.


This is the latest move by the Italian government against CBD. In October 2020, the Ministry of Health classified CBD as a narcotic drug for the first time and banned it from the market, but soon after revoked the order.


In another attempt in early 2022, the national-regional conference updated the language in the 2018 regulation, officially categorizing marijuana as a medicinal plant.


In that scenario, four major cannabis associations filed a lawsuit and the Lazio Regional Administrative Court overturned the regulation a year later, ruling that it violated European law. The European Commission announced in 2020 that CBD is not a narcotic drug and can be legally traded between member states. This decision was based on a landmark ruling by the European Court of Justice the same year.


The Italian Farmers' Association, Cia-Agricoltori Italiani, criticized the government in a statement for not consulting producers before listing CBD as a dangerous drug, stating that this move "has insulted farmers who have invested money and work in the industrial hemp supply chain in recent years".


The farmer's organization stated that


This is not only a controversial measure from legal, health, and scientific perspectives, but also an intervention that could potentially make the already heavily strained supply chain even more complicated.


According to CIA-Agricoltori Italiani, these prejudices are further reflected in a current amendment in the Italian parliament, which aims to ban CBD and all other products derived from hemp flowers.


The group's chairman, Cristiano Fini, stated that


We are facing potential ideological interference that could paralyze a high-value-added supply chain that attracts young people. This supply chain has huge production potential in cosmetics, herbs, green construction, floriculture, and textiles, with an annual turnover of 500 million euros and providing over 10,000 jobs.


Currently circulating in parliament is a proposed amendment that would completely ban cannabis flowers, affecting various aspects of production and trade. The leading cannabis industry organization, Federcanapa, has expressed that the provisions would effectively shut down the sub-industry of cannabis extracts, affecting the use of CBD and other non-psychoactive cannabinoids in herbal remedies, cosmetics, and dietary supplements.


Some lawmakers and other experts have stated that the amendment would result in the closure of 3,000 businesses and the unemployment of 15,000 workers.


Finney stated that Cia-Agricoltori Italiani has invited government representatives to discuss with CBD operators.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

FDA Authorizes Four More Nicotine Pouches as Review Pilot Expands Beyond Initial Decisions
FDA Authorizes Four More Nicotine Pouches as Review Pilot Expands Beyond Initial Decisions
The FDA has authorized four additional on! nicotine pouches, bringing the U.S. total to 30. The decision marks another outcome of the agency’s nicotine pouch review pilot, whose communication and review practices are now being applied more broadly across the category. It also extends Helix’s authorized portfolio from on! PLUS to the earlier on! line. Yet all FDA-authorized nicotine pouches still come from subsidiaries of PMI or Altria, underscoring how concentrated U.S. regulatory access remains.
Aug.05
Philippines BIR Steps Up Illicit Vape Enforcement Ahead of Christmas Shopping
Philippines BIR Steps Up Illicit Vape Enforcement Ahead of Christmas Shopping
The Philippines’ Bureau of Internal Revenue is intensifying enforcement against illicit vape and tobacco products ahead of the Christmas shopping season, directing regional and enforcement offices to strengthen monitoring of production sites, warehouses, distribution channels and retail outlets. The BIR destroyed 240,550 illicit vape products in August with an estimated tax liability of about PHP1.53 billion. A nationwide tax-compliance operation in July also inspected 3,590 businesses involved in tobacco and vapor products.
Regulations
Sep.17 by 2Firsts Perspectives
UK-Listed Consumer Goods Group Supreme Sees Vape Duty as Potential Consolidation Opportunity, Holds FY27 Outlook
UK-Listed Consumer Goods Group Supreme Sees Vape Duty as Potential Consolidation Opportunity, Holds FY27 Outlook
UK-listed consumer goods group Supreme plc says it continues to expect FY27 trading to meet market expectations as the Vaping Products Duty takes effect on October 1, while maintaining a comparatively positive view of the new tax and compliance regime. Supreme has said the framework could increase compliance complexity for smaller operators and contribute to market consolidation, while its manufacturing, compliance and distribution scale may allow it to gain share. Its 88Vape brand will retain its value positioning.
Sep.18
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
The Ohio Supreme Court is hearing a case involving flavored vape sales and whether state authorities can use consumer protection laws to take action against retailers selling unauthorized vape products. Ohio officials argue that selling unauthorized flavored vapes may constitute consumer deception, while retailers argue that tobacco product regulation falls under federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authority and that states cannot impose additional restrictions through consumer laws. The case could affect the scope of state-level vape regulation across the United States.
Aug.06
UK Directors Banned After 352,688 Vapes Imported From China Were Misdeclared as Medical Nebulizers in £15 Million Tax Case
UK Directors Banned After 352,688 Vapes Imported From China Were Misdeclared as Medical Nebulizers in £15 Million Tax Case
The UK Insolvency Service said YSK Enterprises imported large quantities of vapes from China in 2023, with a shipment addressed to the company declared as medical nebulizers before Border Force found 352,688 vaping products. HMRC calculated nearly £15 million ($20.3 million) in unpaid VAT and customs duty, alongside about £437,000 in corporation tax. Two directors were disqualified for nine years. The case predates the UK's Vaping Products Duty, which will introduce vape-specific excise and duty-stamp requirements from October 2026.
Regulations
Sep.11
China’s Jiangsu Tobacco Monopoly Bureau and Drug Regulator Target Illegal Vape Sales Disguised as Medical Devices, Define Six Violations
China’s Jiangsu Tobacco Monopoly Bureau and Drug Regulator Target Illegal Vape Sales Disguised as Medical Devices, Define Six Violations
China’s Jiangsu Tobacco Monopoly Bureau and Jiangsu Provincial Medical Products Administration have issued a joint notice targeting illegal production and sales of vape products disguised as medical devices. The notice identifies six categories of violations, including obtaining medical licenses through false materials, misusing medical device credentials, expanding production beyond approved scopes, and using medical device-related online platforms to promote or sell vape products. The action is based on China’s tobacco and medical device regulations and aims to strengthen vape oversight and consumer protection.
Aug.04