Italian Government Defies Court Ruling, Lists CBD as Narcotic

Jul.15.2024
Italian Government Defies Court Ruling, Lists CBD as Narcotic
Italy defies EU law, listing CBD as narcotic. Italy's move sparks backlash from hemp industry, threatens 10,000 jobs.

According to a report from Hemptoday on July 12, the Italian government has ignored a ruling from a regional administrative court and violated EU law by placing CBD on the country's list of narcotic drugs.


The Italian Ministry of Health stated that this regulation complies with Italian Presidential Decree 309/1990, which forms the cornerstone of Italy's drug legislation. However, this contradicts a ruling from a regional court last year, which was based on legally binding judgments within the European Union.


This is the latest move by the Italian government against CBD. In October 2020, the Ministry of Health classified CBD as a narcotic drug for the first time and banned it from the market, but soon after revoked the order.


In another attempt in early 2022, the national-regional conference updated the language in the 2018 regulation, officially categorizing marijuana as a medicinal plant.


In that scenario, four major cannabis associations filed a lawsuit and the Lazio Regional Administrative Court overturned the regulation a year later, ruling that it violated European law. The European Commission announced in 2020 that CBD is not a narcotic drug and can be legally traded between member states. This decision was based on a landmark ruling by the European Court of Justice the same year.


The Italian Farmers' Association, Cia-Agricoltori Italiani, criticized the government in a statement for not consulting producers before listing CBD as a dangerous drug, stating that this move "has insulted farmers who have invested money and work in the industrial hemp supply chain in recent years".


The farmer's organization stated that


This is not only a controversial measure from legal, health, and scientific perspectives, but also an intervention that could potentially make the already heavily strained supply chain even more complicated.


According to CIA-Agricoltori Italiani, these prejudices are further reflected in a current amendment in the Italian parliament, which aims to ban CBD and all other products derived from hemp flowers.


The group's chairman, Cristiano Fini, stated that


We are facing potential ideological interference that could paralyze a high-value-added supply chain that attracts young people. This supply chain has huge production potential in cosmetics, herbs, green construction, floriculture, and textiles, with an annual turnover of 500 million euros and providing over 10,000 jobs.


Currently circulating in parliament is a proposed amendment that would completely ban cannabis flowers, affecting various aspects of production and trade. The leading cannabis industry organization, Federcanapa, has expressed that the provisions would effectively shut down the sub-industry of cannabis extracts, affecting the use of CBD and other non-psychoactive cannabinoids in herbal remedies, cosmetics, and dietary supplements.


Some lawmakers and other experts have stated that the amendment would result in the closure of 3,000 businesses and the unemployment of 15,000 workers.


Finney stated that Cia-Agricoltori Italiani has invited government representatives to discuss with CBD operators.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Wisconsin Vape Directory One Year On: Retailer Reports Four Store Closures and 70% Staff Cuts
Wisconsin Vape Directory One Year On: Retailer Reports Four Store Closures and 70% Staff Cuts
Wisconsin's electronic vaping device directory has been fully enforced for more than a year, and local vape retailers say the reduced range of eligible products has contributed to declining sales, store closures and layoffs. Johnny Vapes owner Ben Hall said he has closed four of seven locations and cut about 70% of his staff. State law bars the sale of vaping devices not listed on the Wisconsin Department of Revenue directory and allows penalties of $1,000 per day for each unlisted device sold or offered for sale. In April 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit allowed enforcement of the law to continue.
Regulations
Oct.10
India Duty-Free Nicotine Pouch Sales Face Regulatory Test as ZYN, FOX Classification Remains Open
India Duty-Free Nicotine Pouch Sales Face Regulatory Test as ZYN, FOX Classification Remains Open
The Bombay High Court has ruled that airport duty-free shops are not exempt from India's domestic regulatory laws merely because they operate beyond the customs barrier, leaving in place a sales halt covering ZYN and FOX nicotine pouches at Mumbai's international airport. The court, however, did not determine that the products necessarily qualify as "drugs" under India's Drugs and Cosmetics Act. The retailers have four weeks to submit product information to the appropriate authorities, including CDSCO, which must complete its review within 30 days of receiving the submissions.
Sep.24
From Border-Logistics Insiders to Retail Service Stations, Australia Mounts a Sweeping Crackdown on the Illicit Nicotine Trade as iGET Vapes Surface in A$80 Million Crime Networks
From Border-Logistics Insiders to Retail Service Stations, Australia Mounts a Sweeping Crackdown on the Illicit Nicotine Trade as iGET Vapes Surface in A$80 Million Crime Networks
Australian authorities have disclosed two major enforcement actions that go beyond product seizures and retail closures to examine how illicit tobacco and vape networks operate. On Aug. 14, the Multi Agency Strike Team said seven people had been charged and two criminal networks were valued by authorities at a combined A$80 million, or about US$56.8 million. Investigators allege the groups used bonded warehouses, freight businesses and “trusted insiders” in legitimate industries to circumvent border controls. In a separate operation on Aug. 11, more than 100 service stations were targeted as authorities sought information on illicit tobacco importation, distribution networks and the movement of sales proceeds.
Aug.17
South Korea Constitutional Court Upholds Volume-Based E-Liquid Tax, With Challenged Rates at KRW 370 and KRW 628 per Milliliter
South Korea Constitutional Court Upholds Volume-Based E-Liquid Tax, With Challenged Rates at KRW 370 and KRW 628 per Milliliter
South Korea's Constitutional Court has upheld fixed taxes on nicotine-containing e-cigarette liquids based on solution volume, ruling that challenged provisions imposing KRW 370 per milliliter in individual consumption tax and KRW 628 per milliliter in tobacco consumption tax do not violate the Constitution. The cases stemmed from historical disputes involving importers that reported nicotine as being extracted from tobacco stems rather than leaves. South Korea has since broadened its tobacco definition to include synthetic nicotine, while current tax laws provide reduced rates for certain products not derived from tobacco.
Sep.18
JTI Research Finds 31% of UK Respondents Offered Illicit Tobacco, While 63% of Ennis Packs Lack Duty Marks
JTI Research Finds 31% of UK Respondents Offered Illicit Tobacco, While 63% of Ennis Packs Lack Duty Marks
Multiple JTI-backed studies in the UK and Ireland indicate that illicit tobacco remains visible across consumer interactions and local markets. In the UK, JTI research found that 31% of respondents said they had been offered illicit tobacco products. In Ireland’s Ennis area, a JTI-commissioned empty pack survey found that 63% of sampled cigarette packs did not carry Irish duty-paid markings. The findings come from industry research rather than official government estimates of illicit tobacco market size, but highlight continued concerns among regulators, legitimate retailers and tobacco companies over illicit trade.
Aug.19
STIIIZY Redesign Fails to Escape PAX Labs Patent Import Ban as Section 337 Case Also Involves China ALD
STIIIZY Redesign Fails to Escape PAX Labs Patent Import Ban as Section 337 Case Also Involves China ALD
U.S. Customs and Border Protection ruled that STIIIZY had not shown that the redesigned cannabis-vape products covered by its latest request fall outside an ITC limited exclusion order tied to PAX Labs patents. CBP accepted some of STIIIZY’s claim-construction and non-infringement arguments, but the company did not address two additional claims in the same patent. Earlier STIIIZY redesigned cartridges and certain associated components imported with them had received separate CBP clearance.
Sep.16