Jakarta’s Smoke-Free Zone Legislation Faces Criticism – Public Health Advocate: “It Will Not Harm Small Businesses”

Aug.20.2025
Jakarta’s Smoke-Free Zone Legislation Faces Criticism – Public Health Advocate: “It Will Not Harm Small Businesses”
Jakarta’s new regulation is expected to improve public health, while experts call for collective efforts to counter misinformation, stressing that smoke-free zone policies can balance both health and economic development.

Key points:

·Public health experts in Jakarta, Indonesia are discussing the potential legislation of smoke-free zones. 

·They are refuting misleading statements and believe that the new regulations could improve the overall societal health. 

·Various sectors are urging collaboration in combating misinformation.

 


 

According to Nusantara Journal on August 20th, during the discussion of the draft local smoke-free zone ordinance (Ranperda KTR) in Jakarta, some misleading statements have come to light. Some individuals claim that such policies will have a negative impact on small and medium-sized businesses like restaurants, street vendors, and nightclubs. In response, Tubagus Haryo Karbyanto, a public health advocate involved in the legislative process of Jakarta's Ranperda KTR, stated that these accusations are baseless.

 

Tubagus Haryo Karbyanto pointed out that experiences in major cities around the world have shown that implementing smoke-free policies not only does not harm grassroots economies, but instead, a healthy and smoke-free environment makes the public more willing to shop, dine, or enjoy entertainment. He emphasized, "Diners at eateries are there for the food, not for smoking, and healthy and affordable cuisine is what they seek.

 

The Jakarta Regional Representatives Council (DPRD) is currently deliberating on the Ranperda KTR regulation, which aims to enhance the implementation of Government Regulation No. 28 of 2024 while also incorporating best practices from around the world. Some key provisions of this regulation include banning the sale of tobacco and e-cigarette products within 200 meters of educational institutions and children's playgrounds, a comprehensive ban on tobacco product advertising, promotion, and sponsorship, as well as prohibiting the sale of single cigarettes. These measures are intended to reduce opportunities for children and adolescents to purchase cheap cigarettes.

 

Tubagus Haryo Karbyanto believes that this regulation not only protects public health but also helps alleviate the high medical expenses caused by tobacco consumption. He pointed out that over 290,000 people die in Indonesia each year from smoking-related illnesses. If Jakarta implements Tobacco Control Regulations (KTR), it will effectively reduce social and health costs, while enhancing economic competitiveness.

 

Furthermore, he pointed out that opposing the Packaging of Tobacco Products Regulation (KTR) on economic grounds is actually a rehash of the old arguments from the tobacco industry. Tubagus Haryo Karbyanto called for the Regional Representative Council (DPRD), local governments, business associations, scholars, health professionals, media, and civil society to unite in resisting such false information.

 

Finally, Tubagus Haryo Karbyanto suggested that the special committee of the DPRD and the draft drafting committee should not weaken the standards set by the central government, as the Jakarta provincial government is expected to establish a cross-agency implementation and oversight mechanism. At the same time, he called on business associations, such as the Indonesian Hotel and Restaurant Association, restaurant communities, and night entertainment associations, to see this regulation as a long-term investment in creating a healthy and sustainable business environment. He concluded that smoke-free areas are not only health regulations, but also sustainable economic policies. Reducing tobacco consumption will improve public health, increase productivity and purchasing power, which means that customers for small and medium-sized enterprises will increase, not decrease.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Elf Bar Vape Explosion and Amputation Claim Spurs Coverage Suit, U.S. Insurer MUSIC Seeks Ruling It Owes No Duty to Defend or Indemnify Distributor i5
Elf Bar Vape Explosion and Amputation Claim Spurs Coverage Suit, U.S. Insurer MUSIC Seeks Ruling It Owes No Duty to Defend or Indemnify Distributor i5
Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company has asked a federal court in Washington to declare that it has no duty to defend or indemnify vape distributor i5 Distribution in a product liability case involving an Elf Bar BC5000. The plaintiff alleges that the disposable vape caught fire and exploded in his pocket, causing severe burns and ultimately requiring an above-the-knee amputation of his left leg. MUSIC is relying on a tobacco, nicotine or nicotine replacement products exclusion and a premises limitation endorsement. The court has not ruled on the coverage dispute.
News
Sep.10
Australian Coalition Unveils Illicit Tobacco Plan With 80% Excise Cut and Legal, Taxed Vapes and Nicotine Pouches
Australian Coalition Unveils Illicit Tobacco Plan With 80% Excise Cut and Legal, Taxed Vapes and Nicotine Pouches
Australia’s Coalition has unveiled a national illicit-tobacco policy that would cut tobacco excise by 80% and create legal, regulated and taxed adult markets for vaping products and nicotine pouches if it wins government. The plan proposes an excise of A$0.50 per millilitre of e-liquid and A$0.025 per milligram of nicotine in pouches, alongside A$200 million in additional enforcement and a A$60 million three-year public-awareness campaign. The Coalition says the package would narrow the price advantage of illicit products and undermine organised crime, while Labor and public-health groups warn that dramatically cheaper cigarettes could reverse long-term declines in smoking.
Sep.03
Australia’s Victoria Steps Up Illegal Tobacco Enforcement With Store Closures and Penalties of Up to A$2.5 Million
Australia’s Victoria Steps Up Illegal Tobacco Enforcement With Store Closures and Penalties of Up to A$2.5 Million
Australia’s state of Victoria has activated new powers allowing Tobacco Licensing Victoria and police to shut premises suspected of selling, supplying or possessing illicit tobacco for up to 90 days. Longer closures can be ordered by a magistrates’ court. Businesses subject to closure orders must generally cease all trading and will be placed on a public list. Breaching a closure order can carry penalties of up to A$2.5 million and 20 years in prison.
Sep.10
South Korea Extends Vape Rules to Unmanned Stores After Bringing Synthetic Nicotine Under Tobacco Law
South Korea Extends Vape Rules to Unmanned Stores After Bringing Synthetic Nicotine Under Tobacco Law
South Korea's Ministry of Gender Equality and Family said on September 14 that it plans to designate unmanned e-cigarette stores as businesses where minors are prohibited from entering or working. Operators would be required to verify customers' ages and display notices restricting access by minors. The proposal is open for public comment through October 6. The move follows an April expansion of South Korea's statutory tobacco definition that brought products made with natural or synthetic nicotine under the Tobacco Business Act. Nicotine-free liquids and products using nicotine analogues such as 6-methylnicotine, however, remain an emerging regulatory issue.
Sep.21
Product | FOGER Introduces Switch Pro 30K Nixodine Pod in U.S. Retail, Bringing 6-MN Related Formulation to High-Capacity Pod Platform
Product | FOGER Introduces Switch Pro 30K Nixodine Pod in U.S. Retail, Bringing 6-MN Related Formulation to High-Capacity Pod Platform
FOGER has introduced the Switch Pro 30K Nixodine Pod in U.S. retail channels, bringing a 6-methylnicotine (6-MN)-related formulation into its reusable Switch Pro 30K pod ecosystem. The product retains the existing reusable dock and magnetic replacement pod architecture, featuring a 19ml prefilled pod, dual-mesh heating and Normal/Boost modes. The Nixodine version is labeled nicotine-free in terms of conventional nicotine but uses a 5% Nixodine-related formulation. The product has appeared in U.S. retail and wholesale channels, with some listings indicating Kentucky-only availability.
Aug.28
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
The Ohio Supreme Court is hearing a case involving flavored vape sales and whether state authorities can use consumer protection laws to take action against retailers selling unauthorized vape products. Ohio officials argue that selling unauthorized flavored vapes may constitute consumer deception, while retailers argue that tobacco product regulation falls under federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authority and that states cannot impose additional restrictions through consumer laws. The case could affect the scope of state-level vape regulation across the United States.
Aug.06