Johannesburg Cabinet Approves Tobacco Control Bill

Sep.26.2022
Johannesburg Cabinet Approves Tobacco Control Bill
The Johannesburg cabinet approved a tobacco control act that may ban indoor smoking and strengthen health measures.

The Johannesburg cabinet has approved the submission of a tobacco product control bill to parliament, which may entail a ban on smoking indoors.


Image credit: RATTANAKUN TONGBUN/123rf.com.


If passed, the bill will replace the current Tobacco Control Act.


The proposed amendment was put forward amidst an ongoing battle between the government and some major tobacco industry companies.


Despite opposition from major corporations, the government is redoubling its efforts to revise legislation related to the tobacco industry.


The proposed bill suggests implementing a 100% smoke-free environment in indoor and limited outdoor areas, banning cigarette sales through vending machines, and placing greater emphasis on warning labels on cigarette packaging.


The latest bill submitted to parliament aims to reduce tobacco-related illnesses, disabilities, and deaths.


The cabinet stated that the bill aims to enhance the country's public health measures and align them with the World Health Organization's (WHO) Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.


According to a government statement, the bill has been extensively discussed and negotiated with the tobacco industry and civil society.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information solely for the purpose of industry exchange and learning.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the authenticity or accuracy of the article's content. The translation of this article is only intended for industry-related communication and research purposes.


Due to limitations in translation proficiency, the translated article may not fully reflect the original text. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains full alignment with the Chinese government on any domestic, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan or foreign-related views and positions.


The copyright of compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for deletion.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

Russia’s St. Petersburg Sets Up Working Group to Consider Citywide Vape Sales Ban
Russia’s St. Petersburg Sets Up Working Group to Consider Citywide Vape Sales Ban
Russia’s St. Petersburg legislature has formed a working group to explore tougher controls on vape trade and sales, including the option of a citywide sales ban. The group is set to convene on Jan. 26 with participation from lawmakers, civil society and law enforcement. The move comes as Russia’s federal authorities continue to debate legislation that could allow regions to impose their own restrictions on vapes.
Jan.26 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Poland to ban “characterising flavours” in heated tobacco sticks from Jan. 18, 2026
Poland to ban “characterising flavours” in heated tobacco sticks from Jan. 18, 2026
Poland will implement an amended health protection law on January 18, 2026, restricting the availability of tobacco inserts used in heated tobacco devices. The new rules prohibit products with a “characterising flavour,” meaning a clearly noticeable taste or smell other than tobacco, derived from additives and detectable before or during use.
Jan.20 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Fiscal benefit, not health, strongest indicator for vape bans – Contributed by Samrat Chowdhery
Fiscal benefit, not health, strongest indicator for vape bans – Contributed by Samrat Chowdhery
Data shows 75% of nations with state stakes in tobacco trade ban modern substitutes compared to 10% in the free-market group. What is driving these divergent regulations?
Feb.04
DTI drafts administrative order proposing an open-pod and e-liquid ban and opens it for public consultation
DTI drafts administrative order proposing an open-pod and e-liquid ban and opens it for public consultation
Department of Trade and Industry’s (DTI) proposed move to restrict harmful vape products to protect young people, but said only a total ban on all vaping and novel tobacco products would effectively safeguard public health. The group warned that limiting rules to certain products such as open pods and e-liquids could create a “dangerous behavioral loophole,” leading users—especially youth—to switch to disposable or closed-system alternatives instead of quitting.
Feb.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Altria Reports Full-Year 2025 Results: Revenue Down 3.1%, Cigarette Volumes Slide 10% as NJOY Takes Impairment Hit
Altria Reports Full-Year 2025 Results: Revenue Down 3.1%, Cigarette Volumes Slide 10% as NJOY Takes Impairment Hit
Altria has released its full-year 2025 results, reporting full-year net revenues of $23.279 billion, down 3.1% year over year. Domestic cigarette shipment volume fell 10% for the year. on! nicotine pouches reached a 7.7% share of the U.S. oral tobacco category in the fourth quarter. NJOY posted $21 million in net revenues in Q4, while full-year net revenues were negative $13 million (mainly due to returns and related factors).
Jan.30 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Vape sellers sue to block Texas law banning e-liquids from China and other “foreign adversaries”
Vape sellers sue to block Texas law banning e-liquids from China and other “foreign adversaries”
A group of vape distributors and retailers has sued to block enforcement of a Texas law that criminalizes selling or marketing vape products containing e-liquids made wholly or partly in China or in countries designated as “foreign adversaries” by the U.S. Commerce Secretary. The plaintiffs argue the law violates the U.S. Constitution because only Congress may regulate foreign commerce.
Feb.03 by 2FIRSTS.ai