Juul Labs Sues FDA for Withholding Ban Documents

Sep.22.2022
Juul Labs Sues FDA for Withholding Ban Documents
Juul Labs sues FDA for disclosure of documents regarding their product's ban, citing unfair scientific review and violation of information freedom law.

According to a report by Reuters, Juul Labs is suing the FDA in order to force the agency to disclose the documents behind its order banning the company's products.


On June 23, the FDA ordered Juul Labs to pull its electronic cigarettes from U.S. stores, stating that the evidence provided by the e-cigarette manufacturer was insufficient to demonstrate that they are "appropriate for protecting public health.


The federal appeals court subsequently granted Juul Labs an emergency stay to allow judges time to assess the company's appeal. The e-cigarette company requested that the FDA maintain its order during the appeal period.


E-cigarette maker Juul has filed a lawsuit against the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for allegedly withholding important scientific materials relating to the ban on flavored e-cigarette products. The lawsuit, filed on September 21 in a federal court in Washington, accuses the FDA of using exemption privileges to unfairly withhold the materials, which are crucial to understanding the basis for the ban imposed on June 23.


Juul stated that these materials will demonstrate whether the FDA has appropriately balanced the public health benefits and risks of its product, including claims of aiding smokers in quitting and the scientific rationale of the agency's reasoning, as legally required.


Juul stated that the public should have a comprehensive understanding of the scientific facts behind one of the most controversial and closely watched decisions by the FDA in recent years.


Juul has accused the FDA of violating the Federal Freedom of Information Act by withholding most of the "scientific and regulatory discipline review" behind the sales ban.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended for industry exchange and learning purposes only.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truthfulness or accuracy of its content. The translation of this article is for industry exchange and research purposes only.


Due to limitations in translation abilities, the translated article may not exactly reflect the original wording. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


Regarding any domestic, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan, or foreign-related statements and positions, 2FIRSTS maintains complete consistency with the Chinese government.


The copyright for compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for deletion.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

New York’s Lawsuit Against Puff Bar and Other Flavored Vape Companies Survives Key Court Challenge
New York’s Lawsuit Against Puff Bar and Other Flavored Vape Companies Survives Key Court Challenge
According to Law360, a federal judge ruled that makers and distributors of flavored vape brands such as Puff Bar cannot escape New York’s lawsuit seeking to hold them responsible for the youth vaping epidemic. The court found that the state had adequately alleged the companies misrepresented how safe vaping is.
Apr.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai
FDA Defines Enforcement Focus for Unauthorized E-Cigarettes and Nicotine Pouches
FDA Defines Enforcement Focus for Unauthorized E-Cigarettes and Nicotine Pouches
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued guidance on May 8, 2026, titled “Enforcement Priorities for Certain New Tobacco Products Marketed Without Premarket Authorization.” The document describes FDA enforcement policies for certain electronic nicotine delivery system products and nicotine pouch products marketed without premarket authorization.
May.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Spanish Congress Health Committee Approves Motion to Restrict Vape and Nicotine Pouch Sales to Authorized Channels
Spanish Congress Health Committee Approves Motion to Restrict Vape and Nicotine Pouch Sales to Authorized Channels
Spain’s Congress Health Committee has approved a non-binding motion calling for the sale of vapes, nicotine pouches, and related products to be limited to regulated authorized channels, excluding internet sales and non-specialized stores. The motion was introduced by the Socialist Parliamentary Group and approved after a negotiated text with the Popular Party.
Apr.15 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Kentucky Governor Signs Tobacco, Nicotine, and Vapor Product Licensing Bill Into Law
Kentucky Governor Signs Tobacco, Nicotine, and Vapor Product Licensing Bill Into Law
A Kentucky bill relating to tobacco, nicotine, and vapor product licensing was signed by the governor on April 10, 2026, and enacted as Acts Chapter 70. The measure sets application requirements for tobacco, nicotine, and vapor product licenses, governs batch licensing, renewals, ownership changes, and denial grounds, and requires the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control to publish application forms and related regulations within 30 days of the law’s effective date.
Apr.14 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Russian Vape Industry Proposes State Monopoly on E-Liquid Production as Alternative to Ban
Russian Vape Industry Proposes State Monopoly on E-Liquid Production as Alternative to Ban
Russian business groups are trying to persuade the authorities to abandon plans to ban the sale of e-cigarettes and related liquids at both the federal and regional levels.
Apr.03 by 2FIRSTS.ai
RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
The Texas Supreme Court issued a case summary on May 8, 2026, describing its decision in Hancock v. RJR Vapor Co. LLC. The dispute centered on whether RJR Vapor’s VELO oral nicotine pouches are taxable as “tobacco products” under the Texas Tax Code. Lower courts had held that the pouches were not taxable tobacco products, but the Texas Supreme Court reversed, concluding that VELO pouches are taxable because they are made of “a tobacco substitute.”
May.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai