Juul Labs Sues FDA for Withholding Ban Documents

Sep.22.2022
Juul Labs Sues FDA for Withholding Ban Documents
Juul Labs sues FDA for disclosure of documents regarding their product's ban, citing unfair scientific review and violation of information freedom law.

According to a report by Reuters, Juul Labs is suing the FDA in order to force the agency to disclose the documents behind its order banning the company's products.


On June 23, the FDA ordered Juul Labs to pull its electronic cigarettes from U.S. stores, stating that the evidence provided by the e-cigarette manufacturer was insufficient to demonstrate that they are "appropriate for protecting public health.


The federal appeals court subsequently granted Juul Labs an emergency stay to allow judges time to assess the company's appeal. The e-cigarette company requested that the FDA maintain its order during the appeal period.


E-cigarette maker Juul has filed a lawsuit against the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for allegedly withholding important scientific materials relating to the ban on flavored e-cigarette products. The lawsuit, filed on September 21 in a federal court in Washington, accuses the FDA of using exemption privileges to unfairly withhold the materials, which are crucial to understanding the basis for the ban imposed on June 23.


Juul stated that these materials will demonstrate whether the FDA has appropriately balanced the public health benefits and risks of its product, including claims of aiding smokers in quitting and the scientific rationale of the agency's reasoning, as legally required.


Juul stated that the public should have a comprehensive understanding of the scientific facts behind one of the most controversial and closely watched decisions by the FDA in recent years.


Juul has accused the FDA of violating the Federal Freedom of Information Act by withholding most of the "scientific and regulatory discipline review" behind the sales ban.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended for industry exchange and learning purposes only.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truthfulness or accuracy of its content. The translation of this article is for industry exchange and research purposes only.


Due to limitations in translation abilities, the translated article may not exactly reflect the original wording. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


Regarding any domestic, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan, or foreign-related statements and positions, 2FIRSTS maintains complete consistency with the Chinese government.


The copyright for compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for deletion.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

Jordan Reduces HTP and Vape Tax Burden as National Smoking Rate Hits 51.6%
Jordan Reduces HTP and Vape Tax Burden as National Smoking Rate Hits 51.6%
Jordan has published amendments to its special tax system reducing taxes on heated tobacco products, electronic cigarettes and e-liquids, with some reductions reaching 50%. Under the revised rules, taxes on devices and liquids have been lowered, prompting concern among medical and parliamentary circles. The government has not issued an official explanation for the move.
Dec.24 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Mexican Senate Approves Nationwide Ban on E-Cigarettes and Vapes
Mexican Senate Approves Nationwide Ban on E-Cigarettes and Vapes
Mexico’s Senate passed a reform to the General Health Law banning the production, importation, sale, and advertising of e-cigarettes and vape products nationwide. The bill passed with 76 votes in favor, 37 against, and one abstention.
Dec.12 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Special Report| Vuse Gains as U.S. Cracks Down on Illegal Vapes, But a $590 Million China Export Shadow Looms
Special Report| Vuse Gains as U.S. Cracks Down on Illegal Vapes, But a $590 Million China Export Shadow Looms
The payoff is here: BAT’s Vuse has seized a rare regulatory vacuum to reverse its U.S. slide, capitalizing on a crackdown that seemingly compressed the illicit market to 54%. But the victory is fragile. A record $590 million export shock in October signals the gray market is striking back—pitting a fleeting compliance dividend against a massive inventory wall.
BAT
Dec.09
Smoore International Donates $5 Million Hong Kong Dollars to Big Fire Disaster Area for Medical Aid and Relief
Smoore International Donates $5 Million Hong Kong Dollars to Big Fire Disaster Area for Medical Aid and Relief
Smoore International donates HK$5 million to aid Big Bay fire victims, marking its first charity donation in 2025.
Nov.28 by 2FIRSTS.ai
China to Cancel VAT Export Rebates on E-Cigarette Products from April 1, 2026
China to Cancel VAT Export Rebates on E-Cigarette Products from April 1, 2026
China’s Ministry of Finance and State Taxation Administration have announced adjustments to export tax rebate policies, placing nicotine-containing non-combustible inhalation products within the scope of items subject to rebate cancellation. The measures will take effect from April 1, 2026.
Regulations
Jan.10
UPC Court of Appeal refuses to revive VMR’s European vape patent, upholding lack of inventiveness
UPC Court of Appeal refuses to revive VMR’s European vape patent, upholding lack of inventiveness
The Unified Patent Court’s Court of Appeal declined on Dec. 29 to revive a European patent held by VMR Products LLC, upholding a finding that the patent is not inventive over earlier devices. The decision said adding a window in the vape’s outer shell to reveal the internal cartridge holding vape liquid was an obvious, routine adaptation based on an earlier U.S. patent and general knowledge.
Jan.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai