Minnesota Health Department Seeks Public Input on JUUL Settlement

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Feb.19.2024
Minnesota Health Department Seeks Public Input on JUUL Settlement
Minnesota Health Department seeks public input on $60.5M JUUL settlement for nicotine prevention and cessation efforts.

Last May, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison announced a $60.5 million settlement agreement with JUUL Labs over deceptive marketing of e-cigarettes. Now, the Minnesota Department of Health is seeking public input on how to use this money.

 

Parker Smith from the state health department stated, "The purpose of these opinion surveys is to truly engage with the community, understand what solutions community members would like to see. There is no one-size-fits-all solution. Therefore, it is important for us to listen to the public, understand their realities, and tailor our ongoing efforts in prevention and smoking cessation according to their needs." He also mentioned that a portion of the funding will be used to repay legal fees.

 

In the past, we have collaborated with the community to gather opinions on various strategies and business tobacco prevention and control initiatives. But with this funding, we have the opportunity to do some new things, some innovative things for nicotine control.

 

The next public consultation will be held at the St. Claude River District Library this Wednesday, February 21st, from 2:00 to 3:30 in the afternoon.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Research Brief | Altria Study Finds Limited Impact of Massachusetts Flavor Ban on Adult Smoking Rates
Research Brief | Altria Study Finds Limited Impact of Massachusetts Flavor Ban on Adult Smoking Rates
A replication study by Altria scientists published in AJPM Focus evaluated the effect of Massachusetts’ comprehensive flavored‐tobacco ban,the study found that while Massachusetts’ smoking rate continued to decline after the ban, it did not fall faster than in comparison states without flavor bans. Overall, Massachusetts fell from about 14.1% to 10.7%, while comparison states fell from 18.5% to 14.8%. The authors conclude that, for adult smoking prevalence, no additional net decline attributable
Sep.24 by 2FIRSTS.ai
South Korea Plans Unified Regulation for Synthetic and Look-Alike Nicotine Products
South Korea Plans Unified Regulation for Synthetic and Look-Alike Nicotine Products
South Korea Parliament discusses including "nicotine" in Tobacco Business Act; synthetic nicotine testing method established, awaiting legislation approval.
Oct.22 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Company | British American Tobacco launches "Vapers Deserve Better" campaign in the UK, calling for mandatory testing and retail licensing
Company | British American Tobacco launches "Vapers Deserve Better" campaign in the UK, calling for mandatory testing and retail licensing
British American Tobacco UK (BAT UK) announced the launch of its "Vapers Deserve Better" campaign this week, emphasizing the need for a responsible regulatory framework to combat non-compliant operators who ignore regulations and quality standards. The campaign advocates for mandatory pre-market testing, a national retail licensing system, and stricter penalties for offenders.
Sep.29 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Baltimore Moves to Zone Smoke Shops, Set Minimum Distance From Schools
Baltimore Moves to Zone Smoke Shops, Set Minimum Distance From Schools
Baltimore’s City Council in Maryland, building on recently enacted restrictions on “small box” dollar-store chains, has proposed a package of regulations for tobacco and vape retailers. The measures would create a standalone land-use category for “smoke shops,” establish distance buffers from schools and parks, limit exterior signage brightness, and schedule an informational hearing.
Oct.29 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Arizona’s New Law Takes Effect: Minimum Age to Purchase and Possess Tobacco Products Raised to 21
Arizona’s New Law Takes Effect: Minimum Age to Purchase and Possess Tobacco Products Raised to 21
A new Arizona law effective Sept. 26 raises the minimum age to buy or possess tobacco and related products to 21. The law aligns state enforcement with the 2019 federal “Tobacco 21” standard and sets penalties for supplying to or possession by those under 21. An exception for military personnel ages 18–20 remains subject to individual service branch and base regulations.
Sep.28 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Germany OLG Cologne: Touchscreen Vape Use Violates Driving “Phone Ban”
Germany OLG Cologne: Touchscreen Vape Use Violates Driving “Phone Ban”
Germany’s OLG Cologne ruled that adjusting an e-cigarette touchscreen while driving violates the “phone ban” under road traffic law. The driver, caught changing vape settings on the highway, was fined €150 and received one penalty point, as the court said such actions pose significant distraction risks.
Oct.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai