New Zealand Anti-Smoking Group Threatens E-Cigarettes

Dec.09.2022
New Zealand Anti-Smoking Group Threatens E-Cigarettes
ARFNZ threatens e-cigarettes, but CAPHRA says they should focus on reducing harm from combustible tobacco instead.

The Asthma and Respiratory Foundation New Zealand (ARFNZ) has carried out a scare campaign against electronic cigarettes. The Asia Pacific advocates for reducing tobacco harm (CAPHRA) described it as a "very tiresome" move.


Nancy Loucas, the coordinator of the Coalition of Asia Pacific Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocates (CAPHRA), expressed disappointment with the recent actions of the New Zealand Asthma and Respiratory Foundation against the Ministry of Health. Loucas lamented that this behavior was not surprising.


After she made her comments, ARFNZ claimed that the Ministry of Health had not achieved an appropriate balance with New Zealand's electronic cigarette regulations.


The ARFNZ's ongoing scare tactics against e-cigarettes are often unfounded. The reality is that New Zealand has successfully implemented a strategy to reduce the harm of tobacco (THR) and is on track to becoming smoke-free by 2025. According to Ms. Loucas, the attacks from ARFNZ should be directed towards combustible cigarettes.


CAPHRA was shocked to learn from the latest official statistics that ARFNZ is continuing on its path of new prohibitionism. Earlier this month, it was revealed that New Zealand's smoking rate has dropped to its lowest point in history, with only 8% of adults smoking daily, down from 9.4% a year ago.


The smoke-free environment and regulated products (tobacco) amendment is currently being passed through parliament. It aims to restrict the appeal and accessibility of cigarettes.


The Smoke-free Amendment Bill is what ARFNZ should be focusing on entirely at present. However, they seem determined to continually undermine and criticize the Ministry of Health's position on e-cigarettes. The issue is not about the need for safer nicotine alternatives to cigarettes, which could save the lives of thousands of New Zealand smokers every year," Ms. Loucas stated.


CAPHRA has stated that many other countries are studying and replicating New Zealand's smoke-free policies. Recently, a Malaysian parliamentary delegation visited New Zealand to learn how they halved smoking rates in the past decade. New Zealand's regulatory framework is also crucial to recent regulations in the Philippines, and even Thailand is considering developing their own regulations based on New Zealand's.


2FIRSTS will continue to follow and report on this issue. Updates will be available on the "2FIRSTSAPP". Scan the QR code below to download the app.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

U.S. Military Nicotine Policy Sparks Debate as Nicotine Pouches Enter Discussion
U.S. Military Nicotine Policy Sparks Debate as Nicotine Pouches Enter Discussion
An opinion article published by Stars and Stripes argued that the Pentagon’s January nicotine clinical guidelines overemphasize abstinence, fail to reflect the reality that about 30% of active-duty personnel use nicotine, and do not address nicotine pouches as potential harm-reduction products.
Industry Insight
Jun.08
Pennsylvania Updates ENDS Certification List as Chinese-Linked Manufacturers Enter State Review
Pennsylvania Updates ENDS Certification List as Chinese-Linked Manufacturers Enter State Review
Pennsylvania’s June 26 Pending ENDS Certifications list includes 23 manufacturers under review, including Shenzhen Smoore, Shenzhen IVPS, YME Technology and China-linked Boulder International. The list shows state-level vape regulation moving beyond retail brands toward manufacturer-based market access alongside FDA oversight.
Regulations
Jul.06 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Putin Signs Russia’s Tobacco and Nicotine Product Licensing Law, Banning Unlicensed Sales From 2027
Putin Signs Russia’s Tobacco and Nicotine Product Licensing Law, Banning Unlicensed Sales From 2027
Russian President Vladimir Putin has signed a law introducing mandatory licensing for wholesale and retail trade in tobacco and nicotine-containing products, with the system taking effect on October 1, 2026, and unlicensed operations banned from March 1, 2027, while vape and e-liquid retail may also face uncertainty from temporary regional sales-ban powers.
Jul.01
Canadian Court Allows Juul and Altria Vape Class Action to Move Forward Over Youth Marketing Claims
Canadian Court Allows Juul and Altria Vape Class Action to Move Forward Over Youth Marketing Claims
A Quebec Superior Court has allowed a class action lawsuit against Juul Labs and Altria Group related to vaping products to proceed, involving allegations concerning marketing practices, youth exposure and corporate responsibility. The ruling only allows the case to move forward and does not represent a finding that Juul or Altria are legally liable. The case highlights continued legal risks facing vape companies regarding product marketing, youth protection and corporate accountability.
Jul.28
Japan Health Ministry Cites Limited Evidence in Decision Not to Tighten Heated Tobacco Rules
Japan Health Ministry Cites Limited Evidence in Decision Not to Tighten Heated Tobacco Rules
Japan’s health ministry has proposed not tightening regulations on heated tobacco products to the same level as cigarettes as part of a review of passive smoking measures, with an expert panel broadly agreeing with the proposal, Jiji Press reported.
Jul.10
Germany Seizes 56 Pallets of Illegal Vapes, Probe Estimates €1.8 Million Tax Loss
Germany Seizes 56 Pallets of Illegal Vapes, Probe Estimates €1.8 Million Tax Loss
German authorities have seized dozens of pallets of illegal disposable vapes in a criminal investigation, with the products estimated to have caused at least €1.8 million in tax losses. The case has also raised concerns over cross-border supply chains linked to unauthorized nicotine products entering the European market.
Jul.14