Malaysia's E-Cigarette Regulatory Vacuum Raises Concerns; Industry Advocates for Regulation Over Ban

May.12.2025
Malaysia's E-Cigarette Regulatory Vacuum Raises Concerns; Industry Advocates for Regulation Over Ban
Malaysia’s burgeoning vaping industry remains largely unregulated, fueling widespread misuse and raising public health concerns. While several states have moved to impose sales bans, industry players are urging the federal government to establish a clear regulatory framework instead of a blanket prohibition. The sector, valued at 3.48 billion ringgit (approximately USD 800 million), supports over 30,000 jobs. Uncertainty over future policy is clouding the industry's outlook.

Key points:

 

1.The e-cigarette industry in Malaysia lacks a specialized regulatory body, leading to difficulties in verifying product quality and a high incidence of abuse.

 

2.The e-cigarette industry organization is calling on the government to establish a regulatory framework instead of a complete ban to prevent the expansion of the black market and worsening public health risks.

 

3.According to a 2023 study, the e-cigarette market in Malaysia has reached a scale of 34.8 billion ringgit (8 billion US dollars), with the industry chain covering over 7,500 stores and creating 31,500 job positions.

 

4.Several state governments have recently announced or moved forward with comprehensive bans on sales, leading to increased uncertainty in the industry.

 


 

According to a report by NST on May 11th, the Malaysian e-cigarette industry is currently facing a double pressure of regulatory vacuum and policy adjustments. Ridhwan Rosli, the Secretary General of the Malaysian Vape Chamber of Commerce (MVCC), recently stated in a media interview that there is currently no specific agency in the country regulating the ingredients and quality of e-cigarette products, leading to some products being used for illegal purposes such as drug mixing, posing a threat to public safety.

 

Reidwen emphasized that the lack of regulatory mechanisms allows e-cigarette products on the market to be unverified in terms of their legality and safety standards, further fueling abuse. In response to the government's plan to ban e-cigarettes and related products, he suggested that instead of an outright ban, it would be more effective to establish a comprehensive regulatory system to achieve better industry management and consumer protection.

 

The President of the Malaysian e-cigarette organization (MOVE), Samsul Kamal Ariffin, has also expressed concerns about the blanket ban policy. He pointed out that without compliant alternative channels, the market will inevitably be inundated with untested, uncertified products, and the country will lose potential tax revenue from the industry.

 

According to the 2023 Malaysia e-cigarette industry research report, the annual market size of the e-cigarette market in 2023 is expected to reach 3.48 billion Malaysian Ringgit (800 million US dollars), covering over 7,500 retail outlets and approximately 31,500 jobs. The study also indicates that 31% of Malaysian smokers have completely switched to e-cigarette products.

 

However, in the absence of central regulatory guidance, local governments have taken the lead. As of now, Kelantan and Johor have completely banned the sale of e-cigarette products since 2016; the Terengganu state government announced on April 24 that all stores will be banned from selling e-cigarette products starting from August 1; in early May, Kedah Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Muhammad Sanusi Md Nor also publicly stated his intention to follow Terengganu's lead, planning to raise the issue at an upcoming state executive council meeting.

 

At the same time, Health Minister Datuk Seri Dzulkefly Ahmad also stated on May 4th, encouraging more state governments to stop issuing e-cigarette sales licenses, supporting the trend of local control.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

California Lawmakers Pass Disposable Nicotine Vape Ban, With Sales Prohibition Set for 2028
California Lawmakers Pass Disposable Nicotine Vape Ban, With Sales Prohibition Set for 2028
According to CBS Los Angeles on August 27, 2026, California lawmakers have passed Assembly Bill 762, which would phase out disposable, battery-embedded nicotine vapes in the state. If signed by Governor Gavin Newsom, manufacturing and importation of the covered products would be prohibited beginning January 1, 2027, followed by a sales ban on January 1, 2028. Driven primarily by concerns over electronic waste, lithium-battery fires and environmental pollution, the legislation would further shift California’s legal vape market toward rechargeable, refillable or replaceable-pod devices.
Aug.28
Yinghe-Controlled Vape Maker SKE Ordered to Post £569,039 Security as It Pursues Crystal Bar Design Infringement Case in UK
Yinghe-Controlled Vape Maker SKE Ordered to Post £569,039 Security as It Pursues Crystal Bar Design Infringement Case in UK
The UK High Court has ordered Chinese vape manufacturer Shenzhen SKE Technology to provide £569,039 ($776,000) in security for costs in its design infringement proceedings against Vapepen London and other defendants over its Crystal Bar vape product. The court did not accept the defendants’ main argument that recovering costs from a China-based company would face significant enforcement obstacles, but found that SKE had not sufficiently disclosed its own financial position. The order is procedural and does not determine the underlying infringement claims.
News
Aug.21
Product | RELX Partners With UK E-Liquid Brand T-Juice for Prime Pro × Red Astaire Bundle in France
Product | RELX Partners With UK E-Liquid Brand T-Juice for Prime Pro × Red Astaire Bundle in France
RELX and UK e-liquid brand T-Juice have launched the Prime Pro × Red Astaire bundle in France, combining the RELX Prime Pro open-system pod device with T-Juice’s signature Red Astaire nicotine salt e-liquid. The collaboration retains the existing Prime Pro hardware platform while using an established flavor brand to create a complete open-system offering. The product appeared in French retail and distribution channels in August 2026 and represents a co-branded retail bundle rather than a new device launch.
Aug.27
GAO Audit Finds Nearly 132,000 FDA Tobacco Applications Waiting an Average 1,266 Days as Nicotine Pouch Pilot Practices Move Into Vape PMTA Reviews
GAO Audit Finds Nearly 132,000 FDA Tobacco Applications Waiting an Average 1,266 Days as Nicotine Pouch Pilot Practices Move Into Vape PMTA Reviews
A U.S. Government Accountability Office audit found that 131,915 tobacco product applications submitted to the FDA since 2018 remained without a final review as of December 31, 2025, with pending applications waiting an average of 1,266 days. GAO also found FDA lacks the data needed to systematically determine whether scientific reviews meet applicable timelines. HHS agreed to upgrade the agency's tracking systems. At the same time, FDA has begun applying lessons from its nicotine pouch PMTA pilot to e-cigarette reviews, while changes to enforcement policy and electronic submissions are making the specific stage of a PMTA increasingly relevant to market access.
FDA
Oct.03
U.S. Rep. Krishnamoorthi Questions FDA Over Planned PMTA Rewrite, Seeks Communications With Altria and Reynolds
U.S. Rep. Krishnamoorthi Questions FDA Over Planned PMTA Rewrite, Seeks Communications With Altria and Reynolds
U.S. Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi on Oct. 6 questioned the FDA over its plan to reassess and potentially replace the 2021 PMTA regulatory framework, asking the agency to identify provisions it may change or eliminate, state whether current scientific evidentiary standards will be maintained, and disclose communications with Altria, Reynolds and other parties challenging the rule. Krishnamoorthi led a congressional investigation into JUUL and youth vaping in 2019 and has since remained active on e-cigarette regulation and enforcement.
Regulations
Oct.08
2Firsts Data|China’s Vape-Related Exports Rose 3.3% in August 2026 as UK Shipments Jumped 51.4% and U.S. Exports Fell 12.4%
2Firsts Data|China’s Vape-Related Exports Rose 3.3% in August 2026 as UK Shipments Jumped 51.4% and U.S. Exports Fell 12.4%
China exported $979 million of vape-related products in August 2026, up 3.3% from a year earlier but down 6.4% from July. The UK replaced the U.S. as the main source of growth: UK-bound shipments jumped 51.4% to a 2026 high of $177 million, while exports to the U.S. fell 12.4% to $339 million. Shipments to markets outside the U.S. increased 14.2%, broadening growth beyond the market that had driven July’s rebound.
News
Sep.23 by 2Firsts Perspectives