Oregon County's Ban on Flavored Tobacco Products Temporarily Halted

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai

Jan.02.2024

Oregon County's Ban on Flavored Tobacco Products Temporarily Halted

Oregon's Multnomah County's ban on flavored tobacco products has been temporarily suspended by the state's appeals court.

According to recent reports from local American media outlet OPB, the Oregon Court of Appeals has temporarily suspended the enforcement of Multnomah County's ban on retail flavored tobacco and nicotine products. The ban was originally scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2024.

Earlier this month, a judge from the Mutonomah County Circuit Court rejected the tobacco industry's attempt to block the implementation of the regulation. However, these businesses have appealed against this ruling.

In court documents, tobacco retailers argue that the ban would cause irreparable harm to their sales, resulting in employee layoffs and significant loss of revenue. They state that once the regulation comes into effect, some businesses will be forced to shut down.

Multnomah County becomes the second area in Oregon to implement a ban on flavored tobacco products. Washington County, its neighbor, was the first to enact such a regulation, but its ordinance was overturned by different circuit court judges last year.

The purpose of these retail bans is to prevent the use of tobacco by children and adolescents, as health officials suggest it may lead to lifelong nicotine addiction.

References:

[1] Judge halts Multnomah County ban on flavored tobacco, nicotine products

Also Read:

[1] Oregon Court Urged to Delay Implementation of Tobacco Ban

#North America #United States #Traditional tobacco #Legislation #Products #Flavored tobacco and nicotine products #Flavored tobacco #Various tobacco products #E-cigarettes with Flavors #Product #Products of Tobacco

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn

Notice

1. This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2. The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3. This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4. Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

Copyright

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

AI Assistance Disclaimer

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Samsung's battery explosion case proceeds as court finds manufacturer maintained “sufficient contacts” with the state

The Minnesota Court of Appeals has ruled that Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., a South Korean battery manufacturer, is subject to Minnesota jurisdiction in a product-liability case involving a vape battery explosion. The court found the company had “sufficient minimum contacts” with the state through extensive business activity.

Oct.20 by 2FIRSTS.ai

1,200 Health Leaders Urge UK Parliament to Pass Tobacco and Vapes Bill Swiftly

Over 1,200 UK health leaders urged Parliament to pass the Tobacco and Vapes Bill quickly, calling it vital to protect future generations. The bill would ban tobacco sales to anyone born after Jan 1, 2009, and restrict vape packaging and flavours. Health groups warned delays risk undermining “gamechanging” public health reforms.

Oct.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai

U.S. FDA Includes Cytisinicline for Vaping Addiction in National Priority Voucher Program, Shortens Review to 1–2 Months

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has added Cytisinicline, a plant-based therapy developed by Achieve Life Sciences for nicotine vaping addiction, to its new National Priority Voucher (CNPV) program. The initiative shortens drug review timelines from 10–12 months to just 1–2 months, expediting approval for treatments that address major public health needs.

Oct.20 by 2FIRSTS.ai

PMI Launches VEEV E-Cigarette in South Africa, Expanding Access to Smoke-Free Alternatives

Philip Morris International's South Africa branch launches e-cigarette product Veev, making South Africa one of 20 countries with PMI's smoke-free products.