Oregon County's Ban on Flavored Tobacco Products Temporarily Halted

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai

Jan.02.2024

Oregon County's Ban on Flavored Tobacco Products Temporarily Halted

Oregon's Multnomah County's ban on flavored tobacco products has been temporarily suspended by the state's appeals court.

According to recent reports from local American media outlet OPB, the Oregon Court of Appeals has temporarily suspended the enforcement of Multnomah County's ban on retail flavored tobacco and nicotine products. The ban was originally scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2024.

Earlier this month, a judge from the Mutonomah County Circuit Court rejected the tobacco industry's attempt to block the implementation of the regulation. However, these businesses have appealed against this ruling.

In court documents, tobacco retailers argue that the ban would cause irreparable harm to their sales, resulting in employee layoffs and significant loss of revenue. They state that once the regulation comes into effect, some businesses will be forced to shut down.

Multnomah County becomes the second area in Oregon to implement a ban on flavored tobacco products. Washington County, its neighbor, was the first to enact such a regulation, but its ordinance was overturned by different circuit court judges last year.

The purpose of these retail bans is to prevent the use of tobacco by children and adolescents, as health officials suggest it may lead to lifelong nicotine addiction.

References:

[1] Judge halts Multnomah County ban on flavored tobacco, nicotine products

Also Read:

[1] Oregon Court Urged to Delay Implementation of Tobacco Ban

#North America #United States #Traditional tobacco #Legislation #Products #Flavored tobacco and nicotine products #Flavored tobacco #Various tobacco products #E-cigarettes with Flavors #Product #Products of Tobacco

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn

Notice

1. This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2. The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3. This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4. Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

Copyright

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

AI Assistance Disclaimer

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Feature | Vape Politics in Russia: Local Governments Push Forward Despite Legislative Deadlock

As Russia’s federal vape policy stalls, regional governors are racing to implement local bans—now with the backing of President Vladimir Putin. The divide between swift local action and delayed national legislation is fueling debate over health, regulation, and the country’s broader approach to nicotine control.

Oct.28

Canada’s B.C. Passes First Vaping Cost-Recovery Framework, Allowing Government to Sue Manufacturers Over Health Expenses

According to the Nelson Star, British Columbia has passed the Vaping Product Damages and Health Care Costs Recovery Act by a 49–42 vote. The legislation enables the provincial government to seek recovery of future public health costs from vape manufacturers, following models used in opioid and tobacco litigation.

Dec.03

Tajikistan Signals Plan to Ban Use, Production and Circulation of E-Cigarettes

According to Kazinform, Tajikistan addressed the issue of electronic cigarettes during the fourth session of the Majlisi Milli, stating a position to prohibit the use, production, and circulation of e-cigarettes. Chairman Rustam Emomali emphasized that the position aims to protect public health and prevent negative impacts on youth and adolescents.

Dec.16 by 2FIRSTS.ai

UK Peer Seeks to Weaken “Generational Smoking Ban” – Report Reveals Discussions with BAT Executive Relative

Lord Strathcarron, a member of the UK House of Lords, has admitted to discussing the government’s Tobacco and Vapes Bill with a relative who holds a senior role at British American Tobacco (BAT). He is advocating amendments to scrap the bill’s core “generational smoking ban” provision, raising questions of potential conflict of interest.