Philippines Tightens Rules on E-Cigarette Use in Public Places

Dec.23.2022
Philippines Tightens Rules on E-Cigarette Use in Public Places
The Philippines will capture and punish e-cigarette users in public places, with fines ranging from ₱5,000 to ₱20,000.

The Philippine capital Manila will be apprehending individuals who use electronic cigarettes in indoor public places such as government offices, schools, airports, and churches. The offenders will be subjected to a strict penalty ranging from 5,000 to 20,000 Philippine pesos (approximately 631-2528 Chinese yuan).


The Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) in the Philippines issued a department administrative order implementing the rules and regulations (IRR) of Republic Act No. 11900, also known as the "Vaporized Nicotine and Non-Nicotine Products Regulation Act.


The FDA will set the minimum age requirement for purchasing, selling or using e-cigarettes to 18 years old. Legal critics have previously warned that the e-cigarette market will expand to include more young people of high school age.


According to data from the Department of Education (DepEd), for the academic year 2020-2021, there are approximately 1.1 million students aged between 18 and 20 years old. The DepEd released a warning statement opposing the measure, stating that "under the e-cigarette law, it is legally allowed to sell harmful products to students aged 18-20.


The IRR will come into effect 15 days after its publication in the Official Gazette or at least two widely circulated newspapers.


According to Rule 8 of the IRR, all indoor public areas are prohibited from using vaporization and non-nicotine products, with the exception of designated electronic cigarette areas or selling points for product demonstrations.


Shopping mall kiosks will be allowed to conduct electronic cigarette product demonstrations in designated testing areas.


Public places where electronic cigarettes are prohibited include youth activity centers such as gaming schools, high school preparatory programs, colleges, universities, youth dormitories, and entertainment facilities for individuals under the age of 18.


The IRR also includes elevators, stairwells, and gas stations that are designated as non-electronic smoking areas.


Buildings and premises of public and private hospitals, medical, dental and optical clinics, healthcare centers, nursing homes, pharmacies and laboratories are also considered public spaces.


Public transportation and facilities such as airports, cruise terminals, train and bus stations, restaurants, conference halls, churches and other places of worship, as well as government buildings and offices, are also included on the list.


First-time offenders will be fined 5,000 Philippine pesos (approximately 631 yuan), while those caught using e-cigarettes indoors in public places for a second time will be fined 10,000 Philippine pesos (approximately 1,264 yuan).


The third offense will result in a fine of 20,000 pesos (approximately 2,528 yuan) being imposed.


Electronic cigarette businesses or entities that engage in wrongdoings also face the risk of having their business license revoked.


According to the court's discretionary ruling for first-time offenses, enterprises and retailers selling to minors will be fined 10,000 pesos (approximately 1,264 yuan) or face a maximum of 30 days in prison.


Criminals will face the same fines, but the business entities involved will have their licenses or permits revoked.


Brick-and-mortar and online retailers must also register with the government to sell e-cigarette products. Those who fail to comply will be fined 100,000 Philippine pesos (approximately 1,264 USD) for the first offense and 200,000 Philippine pesos (approximately 2,528 USD) for the second offense.


Any third party that violates the regulations will face a fine of 400,000 pesos (approximately 50,559 yuan in Chinese currency) and will also have their commercial license revoked.


Manufacturers, importers, distributors or retailers found to be in violation of product packaging requirements, which require health warning labels to be included, will face fines ranging from 2 to 5 million pesos (approximately 250,000 to 630,000 RMB) and imprisonment of two to six years.


The regulation known as RA 11900, or the Vaporized Nicotine and Non-Nicotine Products Regulation Act, became law on July 25th of last year after 30 days had passed without the president signing or vetoing the document.


According to data from the Department of Health (DOH), a law was approved by the previous Congress in January last year which is deemed to have significant trade implications for the Philippines. It is estimated that 16.6 million Filipino adults smoke.


Mr. Marcos has decided to allow the e-cigarette bill to become law, much to the disappointment of its critics. Senator and staunch opponent of the bill, Pia Cayetano, a public health advocate, places most of the blame on the previous administration.


She stated, "I am disappointed by the 18th Congress for passing this bill and also disappointed in the president for not vetoing it, as it will prevent justice for the millions of lives harmed by the electronic cigarette law.


During the Senate deliberations, the bill was introduced by Ralph Recto, the former Senate President and current representative of Batangas.


A new law has granted the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) regulatory jurisdiction over electronic cigarettes and other new tobacco products, rather than the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which had previously claimed to be the "legitimate authority with the professional knowledge, capacity, and manpower to establish standards, regulate, and monitor new tobacco products.


The U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the Department of Health, and the Department of Education are all urging the President to veto the measure.


Earlier, the Philippine Standards Authority (PSA), a subsidiary of the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), included electronic cigarettes and heated tobacco products (HTP) on the list of consumer goods that require mandatory certification in order to ensure compliance with national standards in the Philippines.


According to Series 22-06 of the DTI department in 2022, electronic cigarettes, electronic liquids, HTP, and tobacco heating devices will be subjected to mandatory certification starting on January 4, 2024.


According to the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), including electronic cigarettes and heated tobacco products (HTP) in the list of consumer goods that require mandatory certification will ensure the quality of these products and prevent illegal trade.


BPS has announced that the mandatory certification will cover equipment and systems, including the e-liquid used in e-cigarettes.


The Bureau of Philippine Standards (BPS) has announced that before mandatory certification takes effect in 2024, importers and manufacturers will have the option to voluntarily apply for the Philippine Standard Mark or import commodity clearance.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

New York Says Seized Illegal Vape Shipment Had Retail Value of USD 2.2 Million to USD 3.5 Million
New York Says Seized Illegal Vape Shipment Had Retail Value of USD 2.2 Million to USD 3.5 Million
New York state health officials said a joint operation last week involving the State Department of Health, Nassau County police and local health officials intercepted about 14 tons of illegal vape products that were intended for local distributors and smoke shops.
Mar.20 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Dalton, Georgia considers new licensing rules and caps for vape shops
Dalton, Georgia considers new licensing rules and caps for vape shops
Dalton, Georgia is weighing a proposal to require city licenses for vape shops, limit how many can operate within city limits, and impose a 1,000-foot buffer for new shops from schools and other community facilities. City officials say the ordinance would not eliminate existing vape shops outright, though some may be impacted if ownership changes or licenses expire.
Feb.05 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Belarus opts for stricter regulation instead of full e-cigarette ban
Belarus opts for stricter regulation instead of full e-cigarette ban
Belarus rejects full e-cigarette ban, opts for stricter regulation. Officials plan to restrict wholesaling and strengthen import and production permits.
Mar.04 by 2FIRSTS.ai
FDA Says Flavored ENDS Must Show “Added Benefit” as Small Manufacturers Seek Clearer Switching Benchmarks
FDA Says Flavored ENDS Must Show “Added Benefit” as Small Manufacturers Seek Clearer Switching Benchmarks
During the FDA PMTA roundtable session on “Studies of Adult Benefit,” officials said flavored ENDS must demonstrate “added benefit” over tobacco-flavored products under the APPH standard, including sustained complete switching evidence. Small manufacturers questioned switching benchmarks, study duration, and bridging expectations.
Feb.11
France’s HAS to Address Role of E-Cigarettes in Updated Smoking-Cessation Guidelines, Tells 2Firsts
France’s HAS to Address Role of E-Cigarettes in Updated Smoking-Cessation Guidelines, Tells 2Firsts
2Firsts has learned that France’s national health authority, the Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS), confirmed the role of e-cigarettes will be addressed in updated national smoking-cessation guidelines expected by the end of 2026. HAS said the recommendations will focus on clinical and public-health considerations, will not set technical standards for vaping products, and that current studies are insufficient to clearly assess risks and benefits across different product categories.
Mar.10
PMTA Roundtable Opens with Industry Questioning Product Characterization Standards, FDA Defends Regulatory Boundaries
PMTA Roundtable Opens with Industry Questioning Product Characterization Standards, FDA Defends Regulatory Boundaries
At the opening of FDA’s PMTA roundtable, small ENDS manufacturers warned that unclear product characterization standards are limiting their ability to invest and raise capital. FDA officials acknowledged industry concerns but said regulatory flexibility is constrained by statutory and procedural boundaries.
Feb.11