Potential Ban on Flavored Tobacco Products in Oregon Upheld

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Dec.18.2023
Potential Ban on Flavored Tobacco Products in Oregon Upheld
Oregon's ban on flavored tobacco products may take effect in January 2024, despite ongoing appeals from the tobacco industry.

A ruling by a circuit judge in Multnomah County, Oregon, this week stated that a ban on the sale of flavored tobacco products may go into effect in January 2024, despite the ongoing appeal by the tobacco industry against a previous decision upholding the ban, which is being heard by the Oregon Court of Appeals.

 

Judge Ben Souede ruled on December 13 that the Oregon Tobacco and E-Cigarette Retailers Association, No Moke Daddy, and Paul Bates have a very low likelihood of winning their appeal and that their appeal lacks factual or legal support. As a result, the ban passed by the Commissioner of Multnomah County in December 2022 can now go into effect.

 

The ruling in Suede is a significant victory for anti-tobacco advocates, who welcome the court's decision.

 

The tobacco industry targets its audience with candy-flavored tobacco products. We commend the judge's decision to protect future generations in Oregon," said Brittany Grant, Regional Director of the Western region for the Smoke-Free Kids movement. "Big tobacco companies know that candy, fruit, and mint-flavored tobacco products can be addictive for children. We appreciate the courageous leadership of policy-makers and community leaders in Sonoma County.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Russian consumer group urges Kremlin administration to reject regional vape sales bans
Russian consumer group urges Kremlin administration to reject regional vape sales bans
A Russian consumer organization has urged the Presidential Administration to block proposals that would let regions ban ENDS and e-liquid sales, warning it would create fragmented regulation and turbocharge the illicit market. The group cites WHO statistics and overseas experiences to argue for a more targeted regulatory model.
Feb.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Dalton, Georgia considers new licensing rules and caps for vape shops
Dalton, Georgia considers new licensing rules and caps for vape shops
Dalton, Georgia is weighing a proposal to require city licenses for vape shops, limit how many can operate within city limits, and impose a 1,000-foot buffer for new shops from schools and other community facilities. City officials say the ordinance would not eliminate existing vape shops outright, though some may be impacted if ownership changes or licenses expire.
Feb.05 by 2FIRSTS.ai
India Tobacco Board urges Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman to revisit cigarette duty hike
India Tobacco Board urges Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman to revisit cigarette duty hike
The Tobacco Board, under the administrative control of India’s Department of Commerce, has written to Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman (Nirmala Sitharaman) flagging the adverse impact of an “unprecedented” increase in cigarette excise duties on the industry and on millions of farmers and workers, and urging a revision of duty rates.
Feb.11 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Denver’s Flavored Tobacco Ban Faces Constitutional Challenge From Vape Trade Group
Denver’s Flavored Tobacco Ban Faces Constitutional Challenge From Vape Trade Group
A Colorado vape industry trade group says Denver’s voter-approved flavored tobacco sales ban is unconstitutional and too vague to enforce. The group is asking a state court for a permanent injunction blocking enforcement of Ordinance 24-1765 and for a declaration allowing flavored tobacco and vape sales, citing state constitutional vagueness concerns and multiple U.S. constitutional issues.
Jan.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Two Florida Bills Move: One Restricts Vape Advertising, Another Rewrites Cigarette Tax Treatment for Heated Tobacco
Two Florida Bills Move: One Restricts Vape Advertising, Another Rewrites Cigarette Tax Treatment for Heated Tobacco
The Florida Senate Industries Committee advance SB 980, the “Florida Age-Gate Act,” which would restrict advertising, promotion, and open displays of certain nicotine dispensing devices that lack FDA marketing authorization, with escalating penalties. Separately, the Florida House Ways and Means Committee advance HB 377, which would exclude heated tobacco products from being taxed like cigarettes.
Jan.28 by 2FIRSTS.ai
DTI drafts administrative order proposing an open-pod and e-liquid ban and opens it for public consultation
DTI drafts administrative order proposing an open-pod and e-liquid ban and opens it for public consultation
Department of Trade and Industry’s (DTI) proposed move to restrict harmful vape products to protect young people, but said only a total ban on all vaping and novel tobacco products would effectively safeguard public health. The group warned that limiting rules to certain products such as open pods and e-liquids could create a “dangerous behavioral loophole,” leading users—especially youth—to switch to disposable or closed-system alternatives instead of quitting.
Feb.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai