Potential Ban on Flavored Tobacco Products in Oregon Upheld

Regulations by { "type": "", "title": "", "logo": "", "description": "", "auth": "", "seo_url": "" }

Dec.18.2023

Potential Ban on Flavored Tobacco Products in Oregon Upheld

Oregon's ban on flavored tobacco products may take effect in January 2024, despite ongoing appeals from the tobacco industry.

A ruling by a circuit judge in Multnomah County, Oregon, this week stated that a ban on the sale of flavored tobacco products may go into effect in January 2024, despite the ongoing appeal by the tobacco industry against a previous decision upholding the ban, which is being heard by the Oregon Court of Appeals.

Judge Ben Souede ruled on December 13 that the Oregon Tobacco and E-Cigarette Retailers Association, No Moke Daddy, and Paul Bates have a very low likelihood of winning their appeal and that their appeal lacks factual or legal support. As a result, the ban passed by the Commissioner of Multnomah County in December 2022 can now go into effect.

The ruling in Suede is a significant victory for anti-tobacco advocates, who welcome the court's decision.

The tobacco industry targets its audience with candy-flavored tobacco products. We commend the judge's decision to protect future generations in Oregon," said Brittany Grant, Regional Director of the Western region for the Smoke-Free Kids movement. "Big tobacco companies know that candy, fruit, and mint-flavored tobacco products can be addictive for children. We appreciate the courageous leadership of policy-makers and community leaders in Sonoma County.

References:

[1] Judge Greenlights Multnomah County Flavored Tobacco Ban for January

Also Read:

[1] Ohio House Rejects Governor's Veto on Flavored Tobacco Ban

[2] Falmouth City Council Bans Sale of Flavored Tobacco Products

[3] San Francisco Attorney Files Lawsuit Against Online Retailers for Illegal Sales of Flavored E-cigs and Tobacco Products

#North America #United States #Traditional tobacco #Legislation #Products #Flavored tobacco and nicotine products #Flavored tobacco #Various tobacco products #E-cigarettes with Flavors #Product #Products of Tobacco

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn

Notice

1. This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2. The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3. This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4. Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

Copyright

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

AI Assistance Disclaimer

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Expert Warns in 2Firsts Op-ed: Proposed COP11 Ban on Nicotine Pouches Would Be a Global Public Health Mistake

As global delegates prepare for COP11, a leaked EU position paper has sparked fresh debate over the future of nicotine pouch regulation. In an exclusive op-ed submitted to 2Firsts, Dr. Nveed Chaudhary, Chair of GINN’s Scientific Committee, argues that banning nicotine pouches would be a profound public health mistake—one that ignores harm reduction science and risks reversing global progress in smoking cessation.

Nov.03 by { "username": "", "position": "", "avatar": "", "auth": "", "seo_url": "" }

U.S. Lawmakers Seek to Empower HHS to Destroy Counterfeit Chinese Tobacco Products

Bipartisan members of the U.S. Congress have introduced the “Ensuring the Necessary Destruction of Illicit Chinese Tobacco Act” (END Act), seeking to amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to authorize the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to directly destroy adulterated, misbranded, or counterfeit imported tobacco products.Major tobacco companies, including Altria, along with several public health organizations, have announced their support for the bill.

Nov.11 by { "username": "", "position": "", "avatar": "", "auth": "", "seo_url": "" }

U.S. Chicago CBP Seizes $358,000 Worth of Illegal Vapes

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers in Chicago seized 43,200 illicit vaping products valued at over $358,000 for violating the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The shipment originated from China and was destined for Mississippi.

Nov.07 by { "username": "", "position": "", "avatar": "", "auth": "", "seo_url": "" }

iMiracle and VPR Reach Preliminary Settlement in ‘Elf’ Trademark Dispute, Potentially Ending Three-Year Legal Battle

According to Law360, VPR Brands and iMiracle have filed a joint notice in federal court in Florida stating that they have signed a settlement term sheet and plan to finalize a global settlement within 30 days that would resolve multiple lawsuits. The dispute, which began in 2022 and centers on the “Elf” trademark, has involved injunctions, counterclaims and a key ruling by the Federal Circuit overturning a lower court’s order.