Research shows limited impact of ban on flavored e-cigarettes

Dec.01.2022
Research shows limited impact of ban on flavored e-cigarettes
The US ban on flavored e-cigarettes has had limited effectiveness, as users turn to alternative products and flavors.

On February 6, 2020, the United States Food and Drug Administration banned the sale of several flavors of electronic cigarettes, with some significant exceptions.


According to a survey published in the journal "Tobacco Control," out of 3500 adult users of electronic cigarettes who were surveyed, less than 5% of them stopped using electronic cigarettes due to the ban on flavored e-cigarettes. The remaining respondents switched to other types or flavors of electronic cigarettes or other tobacco products that were not covered by the ban.


More and more literature suggests that the flavorings in e-cigarettes can cause harm when inhaled, making a ban on these flavorings reasonable, according to tobacco research expert and Professor of Public Health Sciences and Community Center Deborah J. Ossip. "But bans don't seem to be effective. People, including young people, can still access flavored products and are still using them," she added. This statement was made at the University of Rochester Medical Center's Department of Public Health and Prevention.


According to Dongmei Li, the lead author of the study and associate professor of clinical and translational research, obstetrics and gynecology, and public health sciences, a significant part of the problem is that the ban does not cover newer products such as disposable e-cigarette pods and e-cigarette pods that use canisters instead of cartridges/boxes.


Other forms of flavored electronic cigarettes, particularly disposable ones, have become very popular after FDA policies were implemented," said Li. "The FDA's policies did not prohibit products with mint or tobacco flavors - our research indicates that many people switched to mint-flavored e-cigarettes after the ban. It seems that many people find menthol to be a favorable taste.


According to this study, nearly 30% of the survey respondents switched to canned or disposable flavored e-cigarettes, and another 30% switched to mint or tobacco flavored pods. Some reported turning to traditional tobacco products: 14% switched to combustible products like cigarettes, and 5% switched to smokeless products such as chewing or dipping tobacco. Less than 5% of respondents stopped using e-cigarettes after the FDA ban.


Researchers used statistical models to identify factors related to changes in e-cigarette usage behavior. They found a close correlation between using tank system e-cigarettes and switching to other flavors not regulated by the FDA's flavor law enforcement policies.


The use of mint-flavored electronic cigarettes over the past 30 days is associated with switching to mint-flavored electronic cigarettes. Those who reported smoking every day or every few days were more likely to switch to tobacco-flavored electronic cigarettes or combustible tobacco products.


On the other hand, people who use flavored electronic cigarettes without nicotine are more likely to quit smoking. Although the study was not intended to establish a causal relationship, the association supports previous research showing that reducing nicotine levels in cigarettes can help smokers quit. However, further research is needed to better understand the relationship between the use of low-nicotine electronic cigarettes and smoking cessation.


Looking towards the future, Li Dongmei believes that if this policy covers all flavors of electronic cigarettes (including mint and all types of electronic cigarettes) and actively monitors the implementation and compliance of the policy, then the policy may be effective. "Both are important in reducing the popularity of electronic cigarettes among young people in the United States," she said.


2FIRSTS will continue to cover this topic, with updates available on the "2FIRSTS APP". Scan the QR code below to download the app.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

South Korea Constitutional Court Upholds Volume-Based E-Liquid Tax, With Challenged Rates at KRW 370 and KRW 628 per Milliliter
South Korea Constitutional Court Upholds Volume-Based E-Liquid Tax, With Challenged Rates at KRW 370 and KRW 628 per Milliliter
South Korea's Constitutional Court has upheld fixed taxes on nicotine-containing e-cigarette liquids based on solution volume, ruling that challenged provisions imposing KRW 370 per milliliter in individual consumption tax and KRW 628 per milliliter in tobacco consumption tax do not violate the Constitution. The cases stemmed from historical disputes involving importers that reported nicotine as being extracted from tobacco stems rather than leaves. South Korea has since broadened its tobacco definition to include synthetic nicotine, while current tax laws provide reduced rates for certain products not derived from tobacco.
Sep.18
U.S. Health Groups Seek to Overturn FDA Enforcement Discretion for Pending PMTAs as Altria's Helix, NJOY and AVM Move to Intervene
U.S. Health Groups Seek to Overturn FDA Enforcement Discretion for Pending PMTAs as Altria's Helix, NJOY and AVM Move to Intervene
American Vapor Manufacturers (AVM) and Altria subsidiaries Helix Innovations and NJOY filed separate motions on October 7, 2026, seeking to intervene on the FDA's side in a lawsuit challenging its enforcement guidance for certain e-cigarette and nicotine pouch products with pending premarket tobacco product applications (PMTAs). Seven public health and tobacco-control organizations, including the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, sued the agency in July to overturn the policy. AVM argues that vacating the guidance could disrupt orders, inventory, retail distribution and investments in regulatory submissions.
Regulations
Oct.09
Australia Tobacco Tax Debate Spreads Within Labor as NSW Premier Minns Reaffirms Support for a Cut
Australia Tobacco Tax Debate Spreads Within Labor as NSW Premier Minns Reaffirms Support for a Cut
Australia’s tobacco excise debate is increasingly exposing differences within the governing Labor Party. New South Wales Labor Premier Chris Minns reaffirmed on September 8 that he supports reducing tobacco excise, arguing that current tax settings are pushing consumers toward cheaper black-market cigarettes. Federal Health Minister Mark Butler continues to oppose an excise cut, while Treasurer Jim Chalmers and Assistant Treasurer Daniel Mulino have recently stopped short of ruling out future changes. The divergence follows the opposition Coalition’s proposal to cut tobacco excise by 80%.
Sep.08
Arizona Turns to a 50% Retail Vape Tax as Tobacco Tax Revenue Falls 47% From 2008
Arizona Turns to a 50% Retail Vape Tax as Tobacco Tax Revenue Falls 47% From 2008
Arizona's First Things First is pushing for an excise tax equal to 50% of the retail price of vaping products, estimating that the measure could generate about $100 million annually. The agency says its tobacco-tax revenue has fallen 47% from 2008 levels. Arizona has attempted to broaden its nicotine tax base in each of the past two years: a 2025 bill proposed a 50% wholesale-price tax, while a 2026 measure shifted to a 50% retail-price tax covering alternative nicotine products and vapor products. Separately, the state enacted HB 4001 this year to establish a new licensing and sales framework for alternative nicotine products.
Sep.21
On-Site Report | After FDA Announces Review of PMTA Framework, CTP Director Details Reform Priorities
On-Site Report | After FDA Announces Review of PMTA Framework, CTP Director Details Reform Priorities
FDA CTP Director Bret Koplow used his FDLI keynote in Washington to outline how the agency is rethinking the PMTA framework. He discussed category-specific review, nicotine pouch and sPMTA pilots, AI-assisted review, a 70% reduction in pending applications, and a major staffing constraint: CTP currently has only nine scientific review teams. He also reaffirmed tobacco harm reduction while stressing youth protection, flavored products, risk communication, and the challenge of unauthorized e-cigarettes.
Regulations
Oct.06
India Duty-Free Nicotine Pouch Sales Face Regulatory Test as ZYN, FOX Classification Remains Open
India Duty-Free Nicotine Pouch Sales Face Regulatory Test as ZYN, FOX Classification Remains Open
The Bombay High Court has ruled that airport duty-free shops are not exempt from India's domestic regulatory laws merely because they operate beyond the customs barrier, leaving in place a sales halt covering ZYN and FOX nicotine pouches at Mumbai's international airport. The court, however, did not determine that the products necessarily qualify as "drugs" under India's Drugs and Cosmetics Act. The retailers have four weeks to submit product information to the appropriate authorities, including CDSCO, which must complete its review within 30 days of receiving the submissions.
Sep.24