Research shows limited impact of ban on flavored e-cigarettes

Dec.01.2022
Research shows limited impact of ban on flavored e-cigarettes
The US ban on flavored e-cigarettes has had limited effectiveness, as users turn to alternative products and flavors.

On February 6, 2020, the United States Food and Drug Administration banned the sale of several flavors of electronic cigarettes, with some significant exceptions.


According to a survey published in the journal "Tobacco Control," out of 3500 adult users of electronic cigarettes who were surveyed, less than 5% of them stopped using electronic cigarettes due to the ban on flavored e-cigarettes. The remaining respondents switched to other types or flavors of electronic cigarettes or other tobacco products that were not covered by the ban.


More and more literature suggests that the flavorings in e-cigarettes can cause harm when inhaled, making a ban on these flavorings reasonable, according to tobacco research expert and Professor of Public Health Sciences and Community Center Deborah J. Ossip. "But bans don't seem to be effective. People, including young people, can still access flavored products and are still using them," she added. This statement was made at the University of Rochester Medical Center's Department of Public Health and Prevention.


According to Dongmei Li, the lead author of the study and associate professor of clinical and translational research, obstetrics and gynecology, and public health sciences, a significant part of the problem is that the ban does not cover newer products such as disposable e-cigarette pods and e-cigarette pods that use canisters instead of cartridges/boxes.


Other forms of flavored electronic cigarettes, particularly disposable ones, have become very popular after FDA policies were implemented," said Li. "The FDA's policies did not prohibit products with mint or tobacco flavors - our research indicates that many people switched to mint-flavored e-cigarettes after the ban. It seems that many people find menthol to be a favorable taste.


According to this study, nearly 30% of the survey respondents switched to canned or disposable flavored e-cigarettes, and another 30% switched to mint or tobacco flavored pods. Some reported turning to traditional tobacco products: 14% switched to combustible products like cigarettes, and 5% switched to smokeless products such as chewing or dipping tobacco. Less than 5% of respondents stopped using e-cigarettes after the FDA ban.


Researchers used statistical models to identify factors related to changes in e-cigarette usage behavior. They found a close correlation between using tank system e-cigarettes and switching to other flavors not regulated by the FDA's flavor law enforcement policies.


The use of mint-flavored electronic cigarettes over the past 30 days is associated with switching to mint-flavored electronic cigarettes. Those who reported smoking every day or every few days were more likely to switch to tobacco-flavored electronic cigarettes or combustible tobacco products.


On the other hand, people who use flavored electronic cigarettes without nicotine are more likely to quit smoking. Although the study was not intended to establish a causal relationship, the association supports previous research showing that reducing nicotine levels in cigarettes can help smokers quit. However, further research is needed to better understand the relationship between the use of low-nicotine electronic cigarettes and smoking cessation.


Looking towards the future, Li Dongmei believes that if this policy covers all flavors of electronic cigarettes (including mint and all types of electronic cigarettes) and actively monitors the implementation and compliance of the policy, then the policy may be effective. "Both are important in reducing the popularity of electronic cigarettes among young people in the United States," she said.


2FIRSTS will continue to cover this topic, with updates available on the "2FIRSTS APP". Scan the QR code below to download the app.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Russian Strikes Destroy JTI and Imperial Brands Ukraine Warehouses, With Losses Reaching Tens of Millions of Hryvnias
Russian Strikes Destroy JTI and Imperial Brands Ukraine Warehouses, With Losses Reaching Tens of Millions of Hryvnias
According to Ukrainska Pravda, Russian strikes on the Kyiv region during the night of Aug. 4-5, 2026, damaged warehouses storing products of Japan Tobacco International (JTI) and Imperial Brands Ukraine. JTI said a finished goods warehouse in Kyiv Oblast was destroyed, with no employees injured, and that it did not expect disruptions to retail supplies. Imperial Brands Ukraine said products stored at warehouses of distributors and retail partners were affected and estimated losses from the strikes at “tens of millions of Ukrainian hryvnias” (roughly hundreds of thousands of U.S. dollars).
JTI
Aug.07
Kantar Study Finds More Than 93% of Vape Products in Ukraine Fail Regulatory Requirements
Kantar Study Finds More Than 93% of Vape Products in Ukraine Fail Regulatory Requirements
According to Interfax-Ukraine, a study conducted by market research firm Kantar Ukraine at the request of major tobacco companies found that more than 93% of vape products in Ukraine did not fully comply with regulatory requirements. The research examined product categories, brand distribution and consumer purchasing channels, showing that pod systems and disposable vapes represent major segments of the market, while offline retail remains the dominant purchasing channel. The findings highlight ongoing compliance challenges in Ukraine’s vape market.
Aug.26
Juul Sublicense Reshapes Vuse Alto Patent Bill as Court Ends R.J. Reynolds’ 5.25% Royalty Obligation to Altria
Juul Sublicense Reshapes Vuse Alto Patent Bill as Court Ends R.J. Reynolds’ 5.25% Royalty Obligation to Altria
According to Law360 on August 31, 2026, a federal judge in North Carolina ruled that a patent sublicense between R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co. and Juul Labs Inc. relieves Reynolds of its obligation to continue paying royalties to Altria Client Services LLC over Vuse Alto. A jury had previously found that Vuse Alto infringed three Altria patents and awarded approximately $95.2 million in past damages, after which Reynolds was ordered to pay an ongoing royalty equal to 5.25% of positive net sales. The new ruling finds that a valid sublicense can eliminate future infringement, potentially ending what Altria described as hundreds of millions of dollars in future royalties.
Sep.01
InterTabac 2026: Further Sessions on Regulation, Market Access and Innovation Confirmed; 2FIRSTS to Host China Market Forum
InterTabac 2026: Further Sessions on Regulation, Market Access and Innovation Confirmed; 2FIRSTS to Host China Market Forum
InterTabac 2026 will bring together international experts to discuss European regulation, tax policy, Track & Trace, market access, retail impacts, consumer behavior and innovation. Sessions will also examine Poland’s tobacco-growing perspective and the growing fragmentation of Europe’s tobacco and nicotine market. Media partner 2FIRSTS will host the second “2FIRSTS Connect at InterTabac” on September 16, focusing on developments in China’s tobacco and nicotine industry.
Aug.06
2Firsts Exclusive Analysis | RLX Q2 Revenue Rises 14.8%, Company Takes Control of Western European Distributor and Expands Multi-Category Strategy
2Firsts Exclusive Analysis | RLX Q2 Revenue Rises 14.8%, Company Takes Control of Western European Distributor and Expands Multi-Category Strategy
business accounting for 68.5% of sales. A new controlling investment in a Western European distributor and plans to scale modern oral nicotine pouches point to a broader international strategy spanning channels and multiple product categories.
Special Report
Aug.14
China Tobacco Zhejiang files patent for pressure-triggered, on-demand oral nicotine release
China Tobacco Zhejiang files patent for pressure-triggered, on-demand oral nicotine release
China Tobacco Zhejiang Industrial Co., Ltd. has filed a patent application for an oral nicotine delivery product designed to let users actively adjust nicotine release. The product embeds two types of nicotine reservoirs with different wall thicknesses and positions inside a deformable matrix. Pressure applied with the tongue or lips can rupture the reservoirs and accelerate nicotine release. In simulated oral tests, several patent examples showed sharply higher peak nicotine release rates as applied force increased from 0 N to 1 N and 3 N. The filing explores a shift from preset release profiles toward user-triggered nicotine delivery.
Sep.01