Rising Tobacco and Alcohol Prices in Belarus

Feb.27.2023

Belarus raises tobacco and alcohol taxes, leading to price increases and plans to align with Russian rates by 2028.

On February 26th, according to reports from Belarusian media, the average price of tobacco products in January increased by 14.2% compared to December 2022 due to an increase in consumption tax on January 1st of this year. The price of vodka also rose by 4.7%.

According to the agreement on indirect taxes between Belarus and Russia, Belarus will increase its excise tax rates on cigarettes and alcohol for the next three years.

As per the plan, the tax rate for the second category of cigarettes will be aligned with Russia's consumption tax rate in October this year.

By the end of this year, the tax rate for the first category of cigarettes will be approximately 35% lower than that of Russia, and by the end of 2024, it will decrease by about 25%. According to the regulations outlined in this document, the tax rate will balance with Russia by 2028.

Starting from March 1st, Tabak-Invest company will increase the prices of many cigarette brands. For example, Camel Blue and Camel Yellow will rise by 30 kopecks to reach 4.65 Russian rubles (approximately 12.8 Chinese yuan), Winston Classic and Winston Blue will also increase by 30 kopecks to reach 5.5 Russian rubles (approximately 15.5 Chinese yuan), and Winston XS Purple Mix will increase by 25 kopecks to reach 5.25 Russian rubles (approximately 14.5 Chinese yuan).

Reference(s):

At the beginning of this year, prices for cigarettes and vodka skyrocketed. Walmart explained how this is related to the closer ties with Russia.

#Belarus #USA

This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

Special Report｜With Charlie’s US Line Online, the US-Filled Vape Supply Chain Model Enters a New Phase

Charlie’s Holdings has activated its first US-based manufacturing and filling line, enabling the company’s Pachamama 25K vape series to meet Texas’ new domestic manufacturing requirements. As state-level rules tighten, the move signals a broader industry shift toward US-filled supply chains and marks an inflection point for brands historically reliant on China-based prefilled production.

Industry Insight

Dec.02

Elf Bar Parent iMiracle to Pull Flavored Vapes From California, Ending Altria Unit NJOY Lawsuit

China’s e-cigarette maker iMiracle, parent company of the Elf Bar brand, has agreed to halt sales of all flavored vaping products in California as part of a settlement with Altria Group’s e-cigarette unit, NJOY LLC, marking the end of a nearly two-year legal dispute.

Oct.13

Samsung's battery explosion case proceeds as court finds manufacturer maintained “sufficient contacts” with the state

The Minnesota Court of Appeals has ruled that Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., a South Korean battery manufacturer, is subject to Minnesota jurisdiction in a product-liability case involving a vape battery explosion. The court found the company had “sufficient minimum contacts” with the state through extensive business activity.

Oct.20 by 2FIRSTS.ai

5th Circuit Reviews FDA’s Compliance on Small-Business Impact of Vape Rule

A Fifth Circuit panel expressed doubts about whether the U.S. Food and Drug Administration complied with the Regulatory Flexibility Act when issuing its 2021 final rule on premarket tobacco product applications. Vape companies argued the FDA relied on outdated and inaccurate economic data, while the government said the challenged requirements stem from the Tobacco Control Act.