Russia Implements New Regulations on Tobacco Production and Sales

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Apr.01.2024
Russia Implements New Regulations on Tobacco Production and Sales
Russian authorities enforce new law penalizing unauthorized production and sale of tobacco products, with fines ranging from $32 to $10800.

According to a report from TASS on April 1, Russia has implemented new regulations as of April 1, imposing administrative penalties on those who produce and sell tobacco and related products without a license.

 

According to Article 14.67 of the new Administrative Violations Code of the Russian Federation, individuals involved in the production and sale of tobacco, tobacco products, products containing nicotine, and related materials without a license are subject to fines ranging from 150,000 (1620 USD) to 300,000 rubles (3240 USD), or disqualification for up to three years, with the possibility of confiscation of products, equipment, and materials. Legal entities may face fines of 300,000 (3240 USD) to 1,000,000 rubles (10,800 USD), or suspension of activities for 60 to 90 days, with the potential for confiscation of finished products, equipment, and materials.

 

Additionally, individuals or businesses using unregistered or improperly stored primary production equipment for manufacturing the aforementioned products will also be fined.

 

Citizens face fines ranging from 3000 (32.4 USD) to 5000 rubles (54 USD) and may have their devices confiscated; individual employees may be fined from 20,000 (216 USD) to 50,000 rubles (540 USD); legal entities may be fined from 100,000 (1080 USD) to 150,000 rubles (1620 USD). In both cases, confiscation of the device is possible. Additionally, the regulations also stipulate penalties for individuals involved in the illegal manufacture or sale of tobacco, tobacco products, nicotine-containing products, and raw materials. Fines in this case range from 30,000 (324 USD) to 50,000 rubles (540 USD) and entail confiscation of products, equipment, and raw materials.

 

According to the regulations, individuals who fulfill their duties under a labor contract, provide services to licensed enterprises or individual businesses under civil contracts, or have legal sales rights as retailers, are not subject to penalties.

 

For the aforementioned illegal activities, the maximum look-back period for administrative penalties is one year.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

CNIPA Targets E-Cigarettes as Key Focus in Crackdown on Trademark Violations
CNIPA Targets E-Cigarettes as Key Focus in Crackdown on Trademark Violations
National Intellectual Property Office issued a notice to strengthen management of illegal use of trademarks, promoting fair competition.
Nov.25 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Thai Police Raid Three Vape Warehouses in Chiang Mai, Seize 36,555 Items Worth US$200,000
Thai Police Raid Three Vape Warehouses in Chiang Mai, Seize 36,555 Items Worth US$200,000
Thai police raided three vape storage sites in Chiang Mai, arresting two women and seizing 36,555 vape items worth over ฿6.6 million(US$200,000). Authorities estimate annual turnover at about ฿30 million(US$920,000) and are pursuing financial backers.
Oct.28 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Special Report|With Charlie’s US Line Online, the US-Filled Vape Supply Chain Model Enters a New Phase
Special Report|With Charlie’s US Line Online, the US-Filled Vape Supply Chain Model Enters a New Phase
Charlie’s Holdings has activated its first US-based manufacturing and filling line, enabling the company’s Pachamama 25K vape series to meet Texas’ new domestic manufacturing requirements. As state-level rules tighten, the move signals a broader industry shift toward US-filled supply chains and marks an inflection point for brands historically reliant on China-based prefilled production.
Industry Insight
Dec.02
BAT Japan opens Glo flagship store in Tokyo's Ginza district, offering glo devices and tobacco sticks,
BAT Japan opens Glo flagship store in Tokyo's Ginza district, offering glo devices and tobacco sticks,
BAT Japan's flagship store in Tokyo's Ginza district opens, offering glo products, personalization services, and a VIP lounge.
Oct.20 by 2FIRSTS.ai
EUIPO Rejects Imiracle’s Opposition to ‘Crystal’ Trademark, Citing Lack of Proof of Actual Use in Slovakia
EUIPO Rejects Imiracle’s Opposition to ‘Crystal’ Trademark, Citing Lack of Proof of Actual Use in Slovakia
The EUIPO has ruled that Imiracle failed to demonstrate actual commercial use of its “Elfbar Crystal” brand in Slovakia, and therefore rejected in full the company’s opposition to Shenzhen SKE Technology’s application to register the “Crystal” trademark. The EUIPO noted that the sales records submitted by Imiracle were limited in scope and that the product packaging was in Ukrainian, which it found insufficient to prove that the products had been placed on the Slovak market.
Dec.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Malaysia CID Endorses Nationwide Vape Ban Amid Rising Drug-Laced Vape Cases
Malaysia CID Endorses Nationwide Vape Ban Amid Rising Drug-Laced Vape Cases
Malaysia’s Federal Criminal Investigation Department (CID) has voiced support for a nationwide ban on vaping, particularly targeting drug-laced vape devices, to address rising abuse cases.
Oct.23 by 2FIRSTS.ai