Russian Government Initiates Strict Crackdown on E-Cigarettes Ban Substances

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
May.17.2024
Russian Government Initiates Strict Crackdown on E-Cigarettes Ban Substances
Russian government plans to begin crackdown on e-cigarettes, banning flavored liquids with additives to reduce nicotine consumption.

According to the Russian media outlet "Businessman's Gazette" on May 15, the government is planning to launch a comprehensive crackdown on e-cigarettes. The country will prohibit e-liquids containing flavors, food additives, and dietary supplements. The Ministry of Health has prepared a list of substances aimed at increasing the attractiveness of e-cigarettes. If implemented, only liquid containing nicotine will continue to be sold.

 

The list of banned substances was developed by a multi-departmental working group that includes doctors, scientists, as well as representatives from the Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Industry and Trade, and the State Duma. Sources believe that substances "aimed at increasing the attractiveness of e-cigarettes" include food additives, dietary supplements, food flavors and seasoning chemicals, natural and synthetic sugars, drugs and medicinal plant extracts, as well as additives "approved for cosmetics fragrances and dyes" that "increase nicotine addiction." The contents of this list include nicotine derivatives, tobacco alkaloids, organic acids, ethanol, cocoa beans, licorice, ammonium, ammonia, and more.

 

Therefore, only liquid containing nicotine, distilled glycerin (purity of at least 94%), and propylene glycol (purity of at least 95%) will continue to be legally sold after government approval.

 

Explanatory notes point out that the purpose of the ban is to "reduce the consumption and distribution of nicotine products among the population, particularly young people." The author of the document referenced international research indicating that the smell of aerosol inhalants is the primary factor driving young people to choose e-cigarettes. Minors tend to prefer e-cigarettes with candy, gum, coffee, mint, and cherry flavors, while adult consumers prefer tobacco-flavored liquids.

 

The use of flavorings and food additives has created a false sense of safety for electronic nicotine delivery devices. Their use is "associated with exposure to high levels of ultrafine particles and other toxins," which significantly increases the risk of cardiovascular disease and chronic lung conditions.

 

Yaroslav Nilov, the chairman of the parliamentary committee on labor, social policy, and veterans' affairs, emphasized that even nicotine-free e-liquid is harmful because it contains ingredients such as glycerin, propylene glycol, flavorings, and thickening agents.

 

Lev Grigoriev, Chairman of the Professional Alliance of Russian Electronic Nicotine Systems (PAURRENS), estimates that the e-cigarette audience in Russia is around 10 million people. Additionally, there are 5 million people who exclusively use e-cigarettes, and another 5 million who use other nicotine-containing products. These individuals are primarily young people aged 18 to 35 years old.

 

He acknowledged, "Considering we are talking about new innovative products, this is expected. Classic smokers are typically elderly." Lev Grigoryev reminded that selling nicotine-containing products to minors is prohibited, similar to tobacco and alcohol. Experts believe that by utilizing existing control and supervision mechanisms, the chances of minors using e-cigarettes can be reduced.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Retail Case Study | Wisconsin Vape Market One Year After New Regulations: Johnny Vapes Reports 80% Sales Decline as Consumers Shift Online and Across State Lines
Retail Case Study | Wisconsin Vape Market One Year After New Regulations: Johnny Vapes Reports 80% Sales Decline as Consumers Shift Online and Across State Lines
According to WNCY on August 24, 2026, some independent vape retailers in Wisconsin say they have faced significant business pressure one year after new vape regulations took effect. Johnny Vapes, a retailer operating in northeast Wisconsin, said its store count fell from seven locations to four, sales declined by about 80%, and roughly 90% of its inventory was affected. Retailers said some consumers have shifted to online purchases or traveled to neighboring Michigan to buy vape products. The case highlights how local regulations can reshape retail operations, inventory management and consumer purchasing patterns.
Aug.28
JTI’s Nordic Spirit Signs Co-op Live Partnership Ahead of New UK Nicotine Sponsorship Restrictions
JTI’s Nordic Spirit Signs Co-op Live Partnership Ahead of New UK Nicotine Sponsorship Restrictions
JTI nicotine pouch brand Nordic Spirit has entered a long-term partnership with Manchester’s Co-op Live, becoming the venue’s Official Nicotine Pouch Partner. The 23,500-capacity venue is the UK’s largest indoor live entertainment arena. Nordic Spirit will run in-venue activations for existing adult nicotine consumers and sell products at selected arena bars. The agreement was entered into before the relevant UK sponsorship restrictions were introduced, while the government intends to implement a comprehensive ban on advertising and sponsorship of vaping and nicotine products from June 1, 2027.
Sep.07
Product | BAT Expands VELO Travellers’ Collection With Mexico, Spain and Sweden Summer Edition Nicotine Pouches
Product | BAT Expands VELO Travellers’ Collection With Mexico, Spain and Sweden Summer Edition Nicotine Pouches
British American Tobacco (BAT) Global Travel Retail has expanded the VELO Travellers’ Collection with three new Summer Editions: Mexico, Spain and Sweden. Inspired by destination themes, the new nicotine pouch variants are designed for global travel-retail channels. The launch further strengthens VELO’s positioning as a travel-retail exclusive product collection.
Aug.27
China Tobacco Hubei explores staged nicotine pouch delivery, using dynamic membranes to slow early release and gradient particles to sustain later delivery
China Tobacco Hubei explores staged nicotine pouch delivery, using dynamic membranes to slow early release and gradient particles to sustain later delivery
China Tobacco Hubei Industrial Co., Ltd. disclosed several oral nicotine-related patent applications in August 2026, including two that approach staged nicotine release from different directions. One uses a high-viscosity membrane that forms inside the pouch after contact with saliva to slow rapid early release, while the other uses gradient particles with a faster-disintegrating outer layer and a slower core to create a fast-to-sustained release profile. Together, the filings explore how nicotine pouches could balance initial delivery with release later in use.
Sep.03
JTI Research Finds 31% of UK Respondents Offered Illicit Tobacco, While 63% of Ennis Packs Lack Duty Marks
JTI Research Finds 31% of UK Respondents Offered Illicit Tobacco, While 63% of Ennis Packs Lack Duty Marks
Multiple JTI-backed studies in the UK and Ireland indicate that illicit tobacco remains visible across consumer interactions and local markets. In the UK, JTI research found that 31% of respondents said they had been offered illicit tobacco products. In Ireland’s Ennis area, a JTI-commissioned empty pack survey found that 63% of sampled cigarette packs did not carry Irish duty-paid markings. The findings come from industry research rather than official government estimates of illicit tobacco market size, but highlight continued concerns among regulators, legitimate retailers and tobacco companies over illicit trade.
Aug.19
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
According to VitalLaw on August 27, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated an FDA marketing denial order (MDO) against NicQuid LLC, ruling that the agency’s comparative-efficacy standard for electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) applications had become a substantive rule requiring notice-and-comment rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The court did not reject FDA’s authority to compare the public health benefits and risks of flavored vapes, but held that the agency could not establish a broadly binding standard through informal adjudications. The case was remanded to FDA for further proceedings.
Aug.28