Russian Lawmakers Propose Criminalizing E-Cigarette Manufacture and Distribution, Citing Health Risks

Oct.14.2025
Russian Lawmakers Propose Criminalizing E-Cigarette Manufacture and Distribution, Citing Health Risks
Russian lawmakers propose criminalizing e-cigarette manufacturing, storage, sales, and use, citing drug crime model for penalties.

Key Points:

 

A member of the Russian State Duma's "A Just Russia - For Truth" (SRZP) party has written to the Minister of Internal Affairs proposing amendments to the Criminal Code to include the manufacture, storage, sale, and use of e-cigarettes in the criminal penalty system, following the model of drug offenses. 

 

The proposal states that criminalizing e-cigarettes will help unify the qualitative standards for illegal behavior, eliminate enforcement gray areas, and limit the risk of abuse as a potential "dangerous substance distribution medium." 

 

The lawmaker believes that e-cigarettes are transitioning from "fashion accessories" to channels for spreading harmful substances and that a clear system of criminal responsibility is urgently needed to protect public health, especially that of minors. 

 

The party previously drafted legislation defining "e-cigarette devices" and "nicotine-containing liquids" for the first time, and it proposes fines for illegal sales: individuals face fines of 50,000 to 200,000 rubles, officials 300,000 to 500,000 rubles, and legal entities 1 million to 2 million rubles.

 


 

On October 14, 2025, according to the Russian news agency RIA Novosti, a member of the State Duma of Russia from the "A Just Russia - For Truth" party (SRZP) submitted a proposal to Minister of Internal Affairs Vladimir Kolokoltsev suggesting that the manufacturing, storage, distribution, and use of e-cigarettes should be included in criminal liability, with penalties similar to those for drug crimes.

 

The proposal was put forward by Dmitry Gusev, the deputy chairman of the SRZP parliamentary group in the State Duma, and Elena Drapeko, a member of the group. The letter stated:

 

There is a suggestion to consider amending the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation to establish specific criminal responsibility for the manufacture, storage, distribution, and use of e-cigarettes and their e-liquids, based on the criminal definitions in the drug trafficking field.

 

The lawmakers believe that this move will help to standardize law enforcement standards, eliminate legal loopholes, and prevent abuse. Gu Xie expressed that "e-cigarettes are gradually transitioning from fashion accessories to tools for spreading dangerous substances, and a clear system of responsibility must be established to protect the health of the public, especially young people.

 

The report highlighted that the SRZP party had previously introduced an administrative penalty bill, which for the first time defined "e-cigarette devices" and "nicotine-containing liquids" and established fines for retail and wholesale sales violations: individuals up to 200,000 rubles (approximately $2,476), officials up to 500,000 rubles (approximately $6,190), and legal entities up to 2 million rubles (approximately $24,753).

 

Image source: RIA Novosti

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
Private antitrust litigation stemming from Altria's 2018 $12.8 billion investment for a 35% economic interest in JUUL is advancing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Direct purchasers, indirect purchasers and indirect resellers of JUUL products filed answering briefs this week seeking to preserve class certifications granted by a California federal court in February. Altria and JUUL argue that individual consumers and large distributors differ too much in purchasing terms to remain in a single direct-purchaser class, while a separate dispute concerns whether California antitrust law can apply to indirect purchasers across 27 jurisdictions. A September trial has been put on hold during the appeal.
Sep.23
As JUUL2 Wins FDA Authorization, Harm Reduction Journal Highlights the Role of Real-World Evidence in Nicotine Product Regulation
As JUUL2 Wins FDA Authorization, Harm Reduction Journal Highlights the Role of Real-World Evidence in Nicotine Product Regulation
A commentary published in the international open-access, peer-reviewed Harm Reduction Journal argues that randomized controlled trials remain central to evaluating smoking cessation efficacy but cannot alone capture real-world uptake, complete switching, longer-term use and population impact of non-combustible nicotine products such as e-cigarettes, heated tobacco and nicotine pouches. The authors frame impact as “reach × efficacy” and call for real-world evidence to complement RCTs. Three days after publication, the FDA authorized three JUUL2 products and highlighted complete switching among adult smokers in explaining its decision, providing a timely regulatory backdrop to the debate.
Sep.08
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
The Ohio Supreme Court is hearing a case involving flavored vape sales and whether state authorities can use consumer protection laws to take action against retailers selling unauthorized vape products. Ohio officials argue that selling unauthorized flavored vapes may constitute consumer deception, while retailers argue that tobacco product regulation falls under federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authority and that states cannot impose additional restrictions through consumer laws. The case could affect the scope of state-level vape regulation across the United States.
Aug.06
China Tobacco Zhejiang files patent for pressure-triggered, on-demand oral nicotine release
China Tobacco Zhejiang files patent for pressure-triggered, on-demand oral nicotine release
China Tobacco Zhejiang Industrial Co., Ltd. has filed a patent application for an oral nicotine delivery product designed to let users actively adjust nicotine release. The product embeds two types of nicotine reservoirs with different wall thicknesses and positions inside a deformable matrix. Pressure applied with the tongue or lips can rupture the reservoirs and accelerate nicotine release. In simulated oral tests, several patent examples showed sharply higher peak nicotine release rates as applied force increased from 0 N to 1 N and 3 N. The filing explores a shift from preset release profiles toward user-triggered nicotine delivery.
Sep.01
Kuwait Tightens Tobacco and Nicotine Rules, Bans Under-21 Sales and Extends Public Smoking Restrictions to Vapes and Heated Tobacco
Kuwait Tightens Tobacco and Nicotine Rules, Bans Under-21 Sales and Extends Public Smoking Restrictions to Vapes and Heated Tobacco
Kuwait has issued a comprehensive new regulatory framework covering tobacco, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco and other nicotine products. Ministerial Decision No. 237 of 2026, signed by Health Minister Ahmad Al-Awadhi, will take effect on January 1, 2027. The rules prohibit sales to people under 21 and ban sales through websites, apps, social media and delivery services. E-cigarettes and heated tobacco products will also be treated as smoking in public and enclosed places where smoking is prohibited. Nicotine pouches and other oral nicotine products not registered as medicines are banned.
Regulations
Aug.17 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Philip Morris Romania Executive on Smoke-Free Strategy: How IQOS Spaces Are Moving Beyond Retail to Consumer Connection
Philip Morris Romania Executive on Smoke-Free Strategy: How IQOS Spaces Are Moving Beyond Retail to Consumer Connection
In an interview with Romanian marketing publication IQads, Marek Gębski, Director of Smoke-Free Products at Philip Morris Romania, said IQOS experience spaces are evolving from traditional retail locations into platforms for consumer engagement and brand connection. Through locations such as IQOS Boutique Victoriei, PMI aims to use design, culture and consumer experiences to strengthen communication with adult consumers about smoke-free products. The interview highlights how tobacco companies are expanding smoke-free strategies beyond products toward experiential marketing and consumer relationships.
Aug.11