SEATCA Urges Reconsideration of E-Cigarette Regulation in Philippines

Aug.07.2024
SEATCA Urges Reconsideration of E-Cigarette Regulation in Philippines
SEATCA urges Philippine lawmakers to reconsider E-cigarette regulation following Supreme Court ruling favoring FDA oversight.

According to a report by Vera Files on August 7, the Southeast Asia Tobacco Control Alliance (SEATCA) has called on Philippine legislators to reconsider the "Vaporized Nicotine and Non-Nicotine Products Regulation Act," which gives the Department of Trade and Industry regulatory power over electronic smoking devices (ESDs). This call comes following a Supreme Court ruling which clearly stated that such products should be regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).


It has been reported that on January 26, 2022, the Philippine Congress passed the "Vaporized Nicotine and Non-Nicotine Products Regulation Act" (Republic Act No. 11900). The newly elected President, Ferdinand Marcos Jr., allowed the law to automatically take effect on July 25, despite calls from health organizations and medical groups to veto the bill in order to protect youth from the dangers of tobacco and other e-cigarette products.


The law will lower the age restriction for the use of e-cigarettes from 21 to 18, allowing online advertising and sales of new types of e-cigarette products, and placing regulation under the Department of Commerce and Industry instead of the FDA. The Department of Commerce and Industry issued a temporary suspension of online sales of e-cigarette products on July 20, stating the need to "protect youth and prioritize public health.


In a decision announced on July 23, the Supreme Court stated:


All products that affect health, including tobacco products, should fall under the jurisdiction of the FDA to ensure their safety, efficacy, purity, and quality.


The Philippines Department of Health welcomed the decision on July 30, stating that it is an important step in preventing the tobacco industry from bypassing existing policies and enhancing the ability of enforcement agencies to reduce health risks associated with tobacco consumption.


The Executive Director of SEATCA, Dr. Ulysses Dorotheo, pointed out:


Due to the harmful effects of e-cigarettes on health, the FDA is the appropriate agency regulating these products. We must actively protect the authority of the health department to regulate the tobacco industry and reject any attempts to weaken or question this authority.


The former Health Minister Jaime Galvez Tan stated:


This is a milestone victory in our fight to reduce tobacco consumption and its deadly impact on Filipinos, especially young people.


In the latest ruling written by Supreme Court Associate Justice Marvic Leonen, the Court reiterated its 2021 decision affirming the FDA's authority to regulate tobacco products. The Court rejected the motion for reconsideration filed by the Philippine Tobacco Institute (PTI) and Albay 1st District Representative Edcel Lagman, and further dismissed the Tobacco Inter-Agency Committee's claim of exclusive authority over tobacco products.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

FDA Authorizes Four More Nicotine Pouches as Review Pilot Expands Beyond Initial Decisions
FDA Authorizes Four More Nicotine Pouches as Review Pilot Expands Beyond Initial Decisions
The FDA has authorized four additional on! nicotine pouches, bringing the U.S. total to 30. The decision marks another outcome of the agency’s nicotine pouch review pilot, whose communication and review practices are now being applied more broadly across the category. It also extends Helix’s authorized portfolio from on! PLUS to the earlier on! line. Yet all FDA-authorized nicotine pouches still come from subsidiaries of PMI or Altria, underscoring how concentrated U.S. regulatory access remains.
Aug.05
Elf Bar Vape Explosion and Amputation Claim Spurs Coverage Suit, U.S. Insurer MUSIC Seeks Ruling It Owes No Duty to Defend or Indemnify Distributor i5
Elf Bar Vape Explosion and Amputation Claim Spurs Coverage Suit, U.S. Insurer MUSIC Seeks Ruling It Owes No Duty to Defend or Indemnify Distributor i5
Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company has asked a federal court in Washington to declare that it has no duty to defend or indemnify vape distributor i5 Distribution in a product liability case involving an Elf Bar BC5000. The plaintiff alleges that the disposable vape caught fire and exploded in his pocket, causing severe burns and ultimately requiring an above-the-knee amputation of his left leg. MUSIC is relying on a tobacco, nicotine or nicotine replacement products exclusion and a premises limitation endorsement. The court has not ruled on the coverage dispute.
News
Sep.10
Exclusive Analysis | Smoore H1 Revenue Rises 19.9% Amid Growth Concentration, Profit Pressure and Slowing Momentum
Exclusive Analysis | Smoore H1 Revenue Rises 19.9% Amid Growth Concentration, Profit Pressure and Slowing Momentum
Smoore’s first-half 2026 revenue rose 19.9%, but the results revealed growing structural risks beneath the headline growth. Heat-not-burn contributed about 61% of incremental revenue and remains driven largely by one core customer, while traditional vaping markets diverged, own-brand growth slowed and China enterprise revenue declined further. Gross profit and adjusted profit lagged revenue growth, while second-quarter revenue growth slowed to about 1.9%, putting greater focus on the quality, concentration and sustainability of Smoore’s expansion.
Capital Markets
Aug.20
Australia’s TGA Places Nicotine Pouches Under Therapeutic Goods Rules From July 24, Blocking Imports of Unapproved Products
Australia’s TGA Places Nicotine Pouches Under Therapeutic Goods Rules From July 24, Blocking Imports of Unapproved Products
Australia is strengthening controls on nicotine pouches under its existing therapeutic goods regulatory framework. According to the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), nicotine pouch products must meet regulatory requirements, and unapproved products cannot be legally imported. The move follows Australia’s broader approach of maintaining strict oversight of nicotine products, including nicotine-containing vapes. As nicotine pouches expand globally, Australia’s regulatory approach highlights growing differences in how countries manage emerging smoke-free nicotine products.
Regulations
Jul.27
Research | Swedish Study Finds Oral Lesions in 79% of Examined Nicotine Pouch Users, With Distinct Tissue Responses
Research | Swedish Study Finds Oral Lesions in 79% of Examined Nicotine Pouch Users, With Distinct Tissue Responses
A new Swedish study found oral mucosal lesions in 79% of examined nicotine pouch users and 89% of tobacco-derived snus users, with different tissue-response patterns between the two categories. For manufacturers and regulators, the findings shift attention toward product formulation, flavouring, pouch materials and local oral exposure, not only whether a product contains tobacco. The study found no higher prevalence of caries or periodontal disease, but it could not establish causality, long-term outcomes or differences between individual products or designs.
Special Report
Jul.27
U.S. Appeals Court Says BAT Must Face Class Action Over Cigarette Labels
U.S. Appeals Court Says BAT Must Face Class Action Over Cigarette Labels
A U.S. appeals court ruled that British American Tobacco (BAT) must continue facing a consumer class action lawsuit over cigarette labels. The ruling allows the case to proceed but does not determine that BAT violated the law or is liable for damages. The case highlights ongoing legal risks facing major tobacco companies related to product labeling, consumer disclosures and product liability claims.
Jul.31