SEATCA Urges Reconsideration of E-Cigarette Regulation in Philippines

Aug.07.2024
SEATCA Urges Reconsideration of E-Cigarette Regulation in Philippines
SEATCA urges Philippine lawmakers to reconsider E-cigarette regulation following Supreme Court ruling favoring FDA oversight.

According to a report by Vera Files on August 7, the Southeast Asia Tobacco Control Alliance (SEATCA) has called on Philippine legislators to reconsider the "Vaporized Nicotine and Non-Nicotine Products Regulation Act," which gives the Department of Trade and Industry regulatory power over electronic smoking devices (ESDs). This call comes following a Supreme Court ruling which clearly stated that such products should be regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).


It has been reported that on January 26, 2022, the Philippine Congress passed the "Vaporized Nicotine and Non-Nicotine Products Regulation Act" (Republic Act No. 11900). The newly elected President, Ferdinand Marcos Jr., allowed the law to automatically take effect on July 25, despite calls from health organizations and medical groups to veto the bill in order to protect youth from the dangers of tobacco and other e-cigarette products.


The law will lower the age restriction for the use of e-cigarettes from 21 to 18, allowing online advertising and sales of new types of e-cigarette products, and placing regulation under the Department of Commerce and Industry instead of the FDA. The Department of Commerce and Industry issued a temporary suspension of online sales of e-cigarette products on July 20, stating the need to "protect youth and prioritize public health.


In a decision announced on July 23, the Supreme Court stated:


All products that affect health, including tobacco products, should fall under the jurisdiction of the FDA to ensure their safety, efficacy, purity, and quality.


The Philippines Department of Health welcomed the decision on July 30, stating that it is an important step in preventing the tobacco industry from bypassing existing policies and enhancing the ability of enforcement agencies to reduce health risks associated with tobacco consumption.


The Executive Director of SEATCA, Dr. Ulysses Dorotheo, pointed out:


Due to the harmful effects of e-cigarettes on health, the FDA is the appropriate agency regulating these products. We must actively protect the authority of the health department to regulate the tobacco industry and reject any attempts to weaken or question this authority.


The former Health Minister Jaime Galvez Tan stated:


This is a milestone victory in our fight to reduce tobacco consumption and its deadly impact on Filipinos, especially young people.


In the latest ruling written by Supreme Court Associate Justice Marvic Leonen, the Court reiterated its 2021 decision affirming the FDA's authority to regulate tobacco products. The Court rejected the motion for reconsideration filed by the Philippine Tobacco Institute (PTI) and Albay 1st District Representative Edcel Lagman, and further dismissed the Tobacco Inter-Agency Committee's claim of exclusive authority over tobacco products.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Russia’s Volgograd fines retailer 300,000 rubles for unlabelled nicotine products, orders confiscation and destruction
Russia’s Volgograd fines retailer 300,000 rubles for unlabelled nicotine products, orders confiscation and destruction
Volgograd, Russia say a retailer was caught selling unlabelled nicotine products, including electronic nicotine delivery devices flagged in the national “Honest Sign” tracking system as already withdrawn from circulation. A local court fined the entrepreneur 300,000 rubles and ordered 41 confiscated items to be destroyed, with the decision now in effect.
Feb.05 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Ireland’s Tobacco and Vape Retail Licensing Regime Takes Effect; BAT Says It Should Cover Nicotine Pouches
Ireland’s Tobacco and Vape Retail Licensing Regime Takes Effect; BAT Says It Should Cover Nicotine Pouches
Ireland’s retail licensing system took effect on Feb. 2, 2026, charging annual fees per point of sale and enforced by the Health Service Executive (HSE). British American Tobacco’s local unit, BAT Ireland, said excluding nicotine pouches could leave a regulatory gap.
Feb.04 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Bangladesh High Court rule targets vape-ban clause; fines up to about $1,635 cited
Bangladesh High Court rule targets vape-ban clause; fines up to about $1,635 cited
Bangladesh’s High Court issued a rule asking why Section 6(G) of the Smoking and Tobacco Products Usage (Control) Act, 2005 — which bans the import, supply and sale of vapes and e-cigarettes — should not be declared unconstitutional and illegal.
Mar.02 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Kazakhstan’s Almaty crackdown: Telegram channels used to sell banned vapes, six face charges
Kazakhstan’s Almaty crackdown: Telegram channels used to sell banned vapes, six face charges
Authorities in Almaty have uncovered a large illegal vape distribution scheme, seizing and destroying more than 180,000 vapes. Prosecutors said potential revenue from sales could have exceeded 1 billion tenge. Suspects allegedly sold the banned products through Telegram channels and social media, storing inventory in warehouses and covert locations.
Feb.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Report says illegal vapes “threaten UK high streets” as 55% of councils seized thousands last year
Report says illegal vapes “threaten UK high streets” as 55% of councils seized thousands last year
The latest annual Illegal Vapes and Nicotine Product Report says nearly 5 million illegal vapes have been seized over the last three years—equivalent to three seized every minute—with a street value of £39m (USD equivalent not provided in the source; exchange-rate basis not stated). It says 1.3 million were seized last year and that 55% of UK council areas seized thousands of illegal products over the year.
Feb.26 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Guam names retailers fined for selling tobacco to under-21 customers; penalties range from $2,000 to $4,000
Guam names retailers fined for selling tobacco to under-21 customers; penalties range from $2,000 to $4,000
Guam disclosed enforcement details for its 2025 tobacco retail compliance program, showing a 97.1% compliance rate among 277 inspected retailers. Nine violations were recorded, including eight underage sales cases and one signage violation, with fines ranging from $500 to $4,000.
Feb.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai