SEATCA Urges Reconsideration of E-Cigarette Regulation in Philippines

Aug.07.2024
SEATCA Urges Reconsideration of E-Cigarette Regulation in Philippines
SEATCA urges Philippine lawmakers to reconsider E-cigarette regulation following Supreme Court ruling favoring FDA oversight.

According to a report by Vera Files on August 7, the Southeast Asia Tobacco Control Alliance (SEATCA) has called on Philippine legislators to reconsider the "Vaporized Nicotine and Non-Nicotine Products Regulation Act," which gives the Department of Trade and Industry regulatory power over electronic smoking devices (ESDs). This call comes following a Supreme Court ruling which clearly stated that such products should be regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).


It has been reported that on January 26, 2022, the Philippine Congress passed the "Vaporized Nicotine and Non-Nicotine Products Regulation Act" (Republic Act No. 11900). The newly elected President, Ferdinand Marcos Jr., allowed the law to automatically take effect on July 25, despite calls from health organizations and medical groups to veto the bill in order to protect youth from the dangers of tobacco and other e-cigarette products.


The law will lower the age restriction for the use of e-cigarettes from 21 to 18, allowing online advertising and sales of new types of e-cigarette products, and placing regulation under the Department of Commerce and Industry instead of the FDA. The Department of Commerce and Industry issued a temporary suspension of online sales of e-cigarette products on July 20, stating the need to "protect youth and prioritize public health.


In a decision announced on July 23, the Supreme Court stated:


All products that affect health, including tobacco products, should fall under the jurisdiction of the FDA to ensure their safety, efficacy, purity, and quality.


The Philippines Department of Health welcomed the decision on July 30, stating that it is an important step in preventing the tobacco industry from bypassing existing policies and enhancing the ability of enforcement agencies to reduce health risks associated with tobacco consumption.


The Executive Director of SEATCA, Dr. Ulysses Dorotheo, pointed out:


Due to the harmful effects of e-cigarettes on health, the FDA is the appropriate agency regulating these products. We must actively protect the authority of the health department to regulate the tobacco industry and reject any attempts to weaken or question this authority.


The former Health Minister Jaime Galvez Tan stated:


This is a milestone victory in our fight to reduce tobacco consumption and its deadly impact on Filipinos, especially young people.


In the latest ruling written by Supreme Court Associate Justice Marvic Leonen, the Court reiterated its 2021 decision affirming the FDA's authority to regulate tobacco products. The Court rejected the motion for reconsideration filed by the Philippine Tobacco Institute (PTI) and Albay 1st District Representative Edcel Lagman, and further dismissed the Tobacco Inter-Agency Committee's claim of exclusive authority over tobacco products.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Fiscal benefit, not health, strongest indicator for vape bans – Contributed by Samrat Chowdhery
Fiscal benefit, not health, strongest indicator for vape bans – Contributed by Samrat Chowdhery
Data shows 75% of nations with state stakes in tobacco trade ban modern substitutes compared to 10% in the free-market group. What is driving these divergent regulations?
Feb.04
USITC Issues Final Ruling in 337-TA-1392 Investigation, Imposes Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders
USITC Issues Final Ruling in 337-TA-1392 Investigation, Imposes Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders
USITC issues final ruling on oil vaporizing devices, components violating tariff law, with limited exclusion order and cease-and-desist orders.
Jan.21 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Guam names retailers fined for selling tobacco to under-21 customers; penalties range from $2,000 to $4,000
Guam names retailers fined for selling tobacco to under-21 customers; penalties range from $2,000 to $4,000
Guam disclosed enforcement details for its 2025 tobacco retail compliance program, showing a 97.1% compliance rate among 277 inspected retailers. Nine violations were recorded, including eight underage sales cases and one signage violation, with fines ranging from $500 to $4,000.
Feb.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Thai Health Authorities: Nicotine Pouches Classified as Tobacco; Sales Must Comply with 2017 Act
Thai Health Authorities: Nicotine Pouches Classified as Tobacco; Sales Must Comply with 2017 Act
Thailand’s Disease Control Department has warned that nicotine pouches (“Snus”) are classified as tobacco products and must comply with the Tobacco Products Control Act B.E. 2560 (2017). Officials said they have received complaints about sales and promotional activities, and stressed that these products must not be displayed or promoted at points of sale.
Feb.02 by 2FIRSTS.ai
California federal judge certifies direct purchaser class in Juul–Altria antitrust litigation
California federal judge certifies direct purchaser class in Juul–Altria antitrust litigation
A California federal judge has certified a class of direct purchasers of Juul products in antitrust litigation alleging Juul and Altria conspired to have Altria exit the e-cigarette market.
Mar.02 by 2FIRSTS.ai
UK Court Sentences Shrewsbury Retailer for Illegal Vape and Counterfeit Tobacco Sales
UK Court Sentences Shrewsbury Retailer for Illegal Vape and Counterfeit Tobacco Sales
A UK local authority has secured convictions against a Shrewsbury retailer and its former director for selling illegal disposable vapes, counterfeit tobacco and a nicotine vape to a minor, highlighting continued enforcement against non-compliant nicotine products.
Feb.05 by 2FIRSTS.ai