South Dakota Receives $6.18 Million Settlement from Juul

Sep.08.2022
South Dakota Receives $6.18 Million Settlement from Juul
South Dakota receives $6.18 million in settlement from Juul's intentional targeting of youth with e-cigarettes.

South Dakota Attorney General Mark Vargo has announced that the state will receive a grant of $6,181,829.70 as part of a settlement with Jull.


For young people in South Dakota, this is an important "holiday" and a wonderful day," said South Dakota Attorney General Mark Vargo. "It is well known that e-cigarettes are dangerous for young people, and this action helps to ensure they stay away from such products.


A survey has revealed that Juul has become the dominant player in the e-cigarette market by intentionally promoting its products to young people, despite them being illegal and unhealthy for this demographic. The investigation found that Juul marketed to underage users through events, ads featuring young and trendy models, social media posts, and free samples.


Juul marketed a tech-centric fashion design that easily concealed and sold its products with flavors appealing to underage users. Furthermore, Juul adjusted the chemical composition of its products to decrease the throat irritation caused by vapor for young and inexperienced consumers.


A new investigation has found that JUUL relies on ineffective age-verification technology in order to protect its young customer base. The study also revealed that JUUL's original packaging is misleading, as it does not explicitly disclose the presence of nicotine and suggests a lower nicotine concentration than is actually present. Consumers are also being misled to believe that consuming a single Juulpod is equivalent to smoking one combustible cigarette.


The company also falsely claimed that its product was a smoking cessation device, without obtaining FDA approval for such a statement.


States and territories are finalizing and implementing settlement agreements, with the process expected to take approximately 3-4 weeks. A total of $438.5 million will be paid over the course of 6 to 10 years, with the amount increasing as the company continues to make payments over a longer period. If JUUL chooses to extend the payment period to ten years, the final settlement amount will reach $476.6 million.


Disclaimer: 1. The content of this article is compiled from third-party information and is intended for communication and learning purposes within the industry. 2. This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the authenticity and accuracy of the article content. The compilation of this article is only intended for communication and research within the industry. 3. Due to limitations in compiling skills, the compilation may not fully convey the original meaning of the source. Please refer to the original article for accuracy. 4. 2FIRSTS fully aligns with the Chinese government on any domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, or foreign-related statements and positions. 5. The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and authors. If there is any infringement, please contact us for removal.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

AP Questions FDA Rationale as Glas Fruit-Flavored Vapes Won Authorization Without Added Cessation Benefit
AP Questions FDA Rationale as Glas Fruit-Flavored Vapes Won Authorization Without Added Cessation Benefit
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently authorized two fruit-flavored vaping products from Glas, but a newly released agency memo shows the products did not demonstrate greater smoking-cessation benefits than tobacco-flavored e-cigarettes. The Associated Press said the findings are likely to raise further questions about the FDA’s regulatory rationale and standards for flavored vaping products.
Jun.12
Bloomberg: Zyn’s Dry-Mouth Problem Threatens Its Hold on Nicotine Pouch Market
Bloomberg: Zyn’s Dry-Mouth Problem Threatens Its Hold on Nicotine Pouch Market
According to Bloomberg, Philip Morris International’s Zyn is facing growing competition in the U.S. nicotine pouch market as consumers shift toward moister alternatives such as British American Tobacco’s Velo Plus.
BATPMI
May.22
EU Launches Online Feedback as TPD Revision Enters New Milestone
EU Launches Online Feedback as TPD Revision Enters New Milestone
The European Commission has opened an online call for evidence on revising EU tobacco products and advertising rules, marking a new phase in the TPD/TAD review. Policy options may cover novel products, flavours, packaging, digital marketing and advertising. A 2Firsts review of 855 early submissions shows rapid engagement and recurring debate over differentiated regulation, harm reduction, youth protection, illicit trade and economic impact.
Special Report
May.21
WHO’s First Global Report on Nicotine Pouches: Harm Reduction Questions Remain Amid Global Regulatory Warning
WHO’s First Global Report on Nicotine Pouches: Harm Reduction Questions Remain Amid Global Regulatory Warning
Ahead of World No Tobacco Day 2026, WHO released its first global report on nicotine pouches, warning that rapid market growth, youth-oriented marketing and weak regulation are converging. 2Firsts views the report as an important warning, but not a complete risk assessment, with harm-reduction questions still unresolved.
Special Report
May.17
Imperial Brands Explains What the UK Tobacco and Vapes Act 2026 Means for Retailers
Imperial Brands Explains What the UK Tobacco and Vapes Act 2026 Means for Retailers
Imperial Brands has outlined what the newly approved UK Tobacco and Vapes Act 2026 means for retailers. The legislation received Royal Assent on April 29, 2026, and gives the Government powers to extend tobacco-style regulation to a wider range of products, including vaping products, heated tobacco, nicotine pouches and cigarette papers. Imperial Brands emphasized that most measures will be introduced in phases rather than taking effect immediately.
May.11 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Malaysian Court Rules Liquid Nicotine Exemption Irrational, Renewing Vape Regulation Debate
Malaysian Court Rules Liquid Nicotine Exemption Irrational, Renewing Vape Regulation Debate
Malaysia’s High Court ruled that the government’s earlier decision to remove liquid nicotine from the country’s Poisons List was “irrational,” reigniting debate over vape regulation, illicit trade, and youth protection.
Regulations
May.18