Study finds e-cigarette users may unknowingly fail sobriety tests

Sep.09.2022
Study finds e-cigarette users may unknowingly fail sobriety tests
Researchers found that vaping with e-liquids containing 20% ethanol can impact initial breathalyzer tests but waiting 15-20 minutes before testing should provide an accurate reading.

Five years ago, researchers led by Dr. Michelle Peace, a forensic science professor at Virginia Commonwealth University, revealed that electronic cigarette liquids - the flavored nicotine solutions used in e-cigarettes - often contain ethanol or alcohol as an undisclosed ingredient.


The presence of ethanol in e-cigarette liquid raises an important concern for public safety and law enforcement: can inadvertently consuming alcohol through vaping cause a sober individual to fail a breathalyzer test?


To answer this question, Peace and Dr. Alison Breland, Chief Research Officer at United Health, teamed up with a professor from the College of Humanities and Sciences' psychology department and the VCU Tobacco Products Research Center to conduct a human clinical study, in collaboration with the Virginia Department of Forensic Science and the VCU Police Department.


Researchers had 13 participants use e-cigarette oils with either 20% ethanol or 0% ethanol concentrations. Prior to and after vaping, Lieutenant Edgar Greer from the VCU Police Department conducted preliminary and evidential breath tests, as well as standardized field sobriety tests - including horizontal gaze nystagmus (HGN), walk-and-turn, and one-leg stand - to replicate roadside procedures used by law enforcement in suspected DUI cases.


They discovered that after inhaling e-liquid containing 20% ethanol, a preliminary breath test can immediately (in less than a minute) detect the concentration of exhaled ethanol.


However, when the police waited the standard 15 to 20 minutes (waiting time for roadside breath testing) the individual had consumed electronic cigarette oil containing 20% ethanol, as predicted, resulting in an inconclusive preliminary breath test. Researchers also found that consuming ethanol did not affect standardized field sobriety testing, evidence that breath testing is completely unaffected by ethanol consumption.


We have reported negative results, and we are very excited about this," said Peace. "During our study, we found that a waiting time of 15 to 20 minutes was consistent. We need to include this in the literature because some lawyers are trying to use e-cigarette use as a defense for avoiding driving under the influence charges. What we can now say is that if a state or jurisdiction maintains a 15 to 20 minute waiting period, e-cigarette use will not affect preliminary breath tests.


Wait for 15 to 20 minutes to allow the ethanol to be reabsorbed and disappear from the mouth. The waiting period is crucial because e-cigarette liquid is sticky and often stays in the mouth shortly after use. We are concerned that the sticky nature may make it more difficult for ethanol to disappear from the mouth," said Peace.


The researchers' findings will have an impact beyond law enforcement. Alaina Holt, a doctoral student in the VCU Integrated Life Sciences program who worked with Peace, explained that these discoveries should be taken into consideration in other contexts of alcohol testing, including workplace screening test sites.


According to Holt, some institutions and industries use preliminary breath testing devices to indicate alcohol consumption. If they are not within a waiting period of 5 to 20 minutes, in this situation, individuals who continuously vape may test positive.


The results of this research will be presented at the annual meeting of the International Association of Forensic Toxicologists in France this week. The study was funded by the National Institute of Justice, a branch of the US Department of Justice, for a project called "Vaping Ethanol on DUI: Investigating the Effects.


In 2018 and 2019, the National Institute of Justice provided two grants totaling approximately $1.8 million to Peace and her collaborators for research on the effects of consuming ethanol.


These experiments are being conducted at the Tobacco Product Research Center, which brings together multidisciplinary faculty from VCU, the American University of Beirut, Johns Hopkins University, the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, the Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, the University of Southern California, as well as other American and international universities and organizations focused on regulating tobacco products.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended for industry exchange and learning purposes only.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truthfulness and accuracy of the article's contents. The compilation of this article is solely for communication and research within the industry.


Due to limitations in translation proficiency, the translated article may not fully express the same meaning as the original text. Please refer to the original text for accuracy.


2FIRSTS is fully aligned with the Chinese government's positions and statements on any domestic, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan, or foreign-related issues.


The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for deletion.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Indiana Halts Sales of Elf Bar, Lost Mary, MR FOG and iJOY Vapes Under Foreign-Adversary Rules; Some Products Return After Compliance Filings
Indiana Halts Sales of Elf Bar, Lost Mary, MR FOG and iJOY Vapes Under Foreign-Adversary Rules; Some Products Return After Compliance Filings
Indiana's Alcohol and Tobacco Commission (ATC) ordered tobacco certificate holders in September to remove certain vaping products marketed under Elf Bar, Lost Mary, MR FOG, iJOY and other brands from inventory under the state's foreign-adversary product law. The agency later listed 257 MR FOG products and 77 Lost Mary product entries as lawful for sale. The Lost Mary revision expressly stated that compliance evidence had been received for 20 additional products. 2Firsts compliance expert Kurt said potential filings could include e-liquid and ingredient-origin records, U.S. nicotine-analog supply-chain documentation and FDA premarket application status.
Regulations
Oct.08
As Regulators Focus on Nicotine Pouch Child Safety, Safeguard Pursues an External Packaging Route
As Regulators Focus on Nicotine Pouch Child Safety, Safeguard Pursues an External Packaging Route
As regulators pay closer attention to child safety in nicotine pouches, manufacturers face a practical challenge: how to strengthen child-resistant packaging without unnecessarily reworking products, production lines and regulatory submissions already in place. In a written interview with 2Firsts, Chemular detailed Safeguard’s external packaging approach, its customer-specific testing requirements and possible PMTA pathways. The model remains early-stage, but it offers a new way to think about an increasingly important regulatory and manufacturing issue.
Industry Insight
Sep.19
China Tobacco Hubei explores staged nicotine pouch delivery, using dynamic membranes to slow early release and gradient particles to sustain later delivery
China Tobacco Hubei explores staged nicotine pouch delivery, using dynamic membranes to slow early release and gradient particles to sustain later delivery
China Tobacco Hubei Industrial Co., Ltd. disclosed several oral nicotine-related patent applications in August 2026, including two that approach staged nicotine release from different directions. One uses a high-viscosity membrane that forms inside the pouch after contact with saliva to slow rapid early release, while the other uses gradient particles with a faster-disintegrating outer layer and a slower core to create a fast-to-sustained release profile. Together, the filings explore how nicotine pouches could balance initial delivery with release later in use.
Sep.03
Reynolds Puts Nearly 183,000 U.S. Contracted Outlets Under Age-Verification Rules, Covering 94% of Volume — Can It Shift an Unauthorized Vape Market?
Reynolds Puts Nearly 183,000 U.S. Contracted Outlets Under Age-Verification Rules, Covering 94% of Volume — Can It Shift an Unauthorized Vape Market?
Reynolds American says nearly 183,000 U.S. retail outlets are under contract, with its Retail Marketing Plan Contract covering about 94% of company volume and requiring point-of-sale age verification. The company combines those contracts with We Card, TruAge, NACS-linked infrastructure and POS integration, while enhanced Vuse Pro retail rules add ID scanning, purchase limits and stronger underage-sales accountability. The initial Vuse Pro rollout targets about 50,000 stores. The system is taking shape as unauthorized vapor products remain dominant in parts of the U.S. market: a 2026 study estimated they accounted for 69.4% of tracked brick-and-mortar e-cigarette dollar sales in December 2025.
Special Report
Oct.15
Special Report|CrossBar's High-Puff Vapes Draw Attention on Pennsylvania's 163-Product Directory as Link Between Earlier 1.3mL PMTA Filings and New 13mL Products Remains Unclear
Special Report|CrossBar's High-Puff Vapes Draw Attention on Pennsylvania's 163-Product Directory as Link Between Earlier 1.3mL PMTA Filings and New 13mL Products Remains Unclear
Pennsylvania began enforcing its electronic nicotine delivery system directory restrictions on October 19, 2026. Among 163 product listings recorded before enforcement, four CrossBar 20K disposables stood out with 13mL capacity, advertised puff counts of up to 20,000 and a flattened design distinct from conventional pod systems and compact disposables. Historical records identify earlier 1.3mL CrossBar products associated with Romo LLC, while newer 13mL products appeared in several state directories beginning in 2025 under entities including Blue Nine LLC. PMTA compliance expert Mr. K identified amendments and application ownership transfers as possible regulatory mechanisms, although neither has been confirmed in this case. Separately, Reynolds' $7.5 million acquisition of 16 PACHA products and related assets illustrates the commercial value of products linked to historic PMTA submissions.
Special Report
Oct.22
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore and four authorized U.S. CCELL distributors are asking a California federal court to permanently dismiss a core antitrust claim brought by direct purchasers. Plaintiffs allege that Smoore coordinated minimum wholesale prices, customer allocation and limits on price competition among distributors, amounting to a per se unlawful horizontal conspiracy. The defendants say the alleged conduct reflects ordinary vertical relationships between a manufacturer and its distributors. The court previously dismissed a similar claim, and the latest dispute centers on whether the second amended complaint adds sufficient facts to establish a horizontal agreement.
Sep.14