Study finds e-cigarette users may unknowingly fail sobriety tests

Sep.09.2022
Study finds e-cigarette users may unknowingly fail sobriety tests
Researchers found that vaping with e-liquids containing 20% ethanol can impact initial breathalyzer tests but waiting 15-20 minutes before testing should provide an accurate reading.

Five years ago, researchers led by Dr. Michelle Peace, a forensic science professor at Virginia Commonwealth University, revealed that electronic cigarette liquids - the flavored nicotine solutions used in e-cigarettes - often contain ethanol or alcohol as an undisclosed ingredient.


The presence of ethanol in e-cigarette liquid raises an important concern for public safety and law enforcement: can inadvertently consuming alcohol through vaping cause a sober individual to fail a breathalyzer test?


To answer this question, Peace and Dr. Alison Breland, Chief Research Officer at United Health, teamed up with a professor from the College of Humanities and Sciences' psychology department and the VCU Tobacco Products Research Center to conduct a human clinical study, in collaboration with the Virginia Department of Forensic Science and the VCU Police Department.


Researchers had 13 participants use e-cigarette oils with either 20% ethanol or 0% ethanol concentrations. Prior to and after vaping, Lieutenant Edgar Greer from the VCU Police Department conducted preliminary and evidential breath tests, as well as standardized field sobriety tests - including horizontal gaze nystagmus (HGN), walk-and-turn, and one-leg stand - to replicate roadside procedures used by law enforcement in suspected DUI cases.


They discovered that after inhaling e-liquid containing 20% ethanol, a preliminary breath test can immediately (in less than a minute) detect the concentration of exhaled ethanol.


However, when the police waited the standard 15 to 20 minutes (waiting time for roadside breath testing) the individual had consumed electronic cigarette oil containing 20% ethanol, as predicted, resulting in an inconclusive preliminary breath test. Researchers also found that consuming ethanol did not affect standardized field sobriety testing, evidence that breath testing is completely unaffected by ethanol consumption.


We have reported negative results, and we are very excited about this," said Peace. "During our study, we found that a waiting time of 15 to 20 minutes was consistent. We need to include this in the literature because some lawyers are trying to use e-cigarette use as a defense for avoiding driving under the influence charges. What we can now say is that if a state or jurisdiction maintains a 15 to 20 minute waiting period, e-cigarette use will not affect preliminary breath tests.


Wait for 15 to 20 minutes to allow the ethanol to be reabsorbed and disappear from the mouth. The waiting period is crucial because e-cigarette liquid is sticky and often stays in the mouth shortly after use. We are concerned that the sticky nature may make it more difficult for ethanol to disappear from the mouth," said Peace.


The researchers' findings will have an impact beyond law enforcement. Alaina Holt, a doctoral student in the VCU Integrated Life Sciences program who worked with Peace, explained that these discoveries should be taken into consideration in other contexts of alcohol testing, including workplace screening test sites.


According to Holt, some institutions and industries use preliminary breath testing devices to indicate alcohol consumption. If they are not within a waiting period of 5 to 20 minutes, in this situation, individuals who continuously vape may test positive.


The results of this research will be presented at the annual meeting of the International Association of Forensic Toxicologists in France this week. The study was funded by the National Institute of Justice, a branch of the US Department of Justice, for a project called "Vaping Ethanol on DUI: Investigating the Effects.


In 2018 and 2019, the National Institute of Justice provided two grants totaling approximately $1.8 million to Peace and her collaborators for research on the effects of consuming ethanol.


These experiments are being conducted at the Tobacco Product Research Center, which brings together multidisciplinary faculty from VCU, the American University of Beirut, Johns Hopkins University, the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, the Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, the University of Southern California, as well as other American and international universities and organizations focused on regulating tobacco products.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended for industry exchange and learning purposes only.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truthfulness and accuracy of the article's contents. The compilation of this article is solely for communication and research within the industry.


Due to limitations in translation proficiency, the translated article may not fully express the same meaning as the original text. Please refer to the original text for accuracy.


2FIRSTS is fully aligned with the Chinese government's positions and statements on any domestic, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan, or foreign-related issues.


The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for deletion.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company Launches Flavored Vuse Pro Pods in U.S. Without FDA Marketing Authorization
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company Launches Flavored Vuse Pro Pods in U.S. Without FDA Marketing Authorization
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company has begun selling four flavored Vuse Pro pods — Peach, Berry, Watermelon and Fresh Mint — in Ohio and selected other U.S. markets. According to the Vuse U.S. FAQ, Vuse Pro contains approximately 5.0% nicotine by weight, and Vuse Pro pre-filled pods are intended for use with Vuse Alto devices. Reynolds told 2Firsts that product labeling lists an e-liquid capacity of 2.0 mL per pod. The Vuse Alto Power Unit received FDA marketing authorization in 2024, while the new Vuse Pro pods themselves have not received marketing granted orders. The rollout follows the FDA’s May 2026 revision of enforcement priorities for certain unauthorized vaping products with qualifying pending applications.
BAT
Sep.10
Bret Koplow Takes Permanent Charge of FDA Tobacco Center After Pushing Faster PMTA Reviews, as HHS Emphasizes Innovation and Access to Lower-Risk Alternatives
Bret Koplow Takes Permanent Charge of FDA Tobacco Center After Pushing Faster PMTA Reviews, as HHS Emphasizes Innovation and Access to Lower-Risk Alternatives
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has named Bret Koplow permanent director of the FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products, ending his period as acting chief. Koplow has spent years working on tobacco regulation, law and policy inside the FDA and, while serving as acting director, pushed for faster PMTA reviews and nicotine pouch review pilots. HHS also said CTP will prioritize innovation and access to less harmful alternatives for adult smokers while continuing efforts to protect youth.
Sep.09
Product | R.J. Reynolds Launches Four Flavored Vuse Pro Pods for Vuse Alto Devices in U.S.
Product | R.J. Reynolds Launches Four Flavored Vuse Pro Pods for Vuse Alto Devices in U.S.
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company has introduced Vuse Pro prefilled pods in Peach, Berry, Watermelon and Fresh Mint in selected U.S. states. Vuse’s U.S. website says the pods are intended for use with existing Vuse Alto devices. Each contains 2.0 mL of e-liquid at 5.0% nicotine by weight, uses nicotine salts and is offered in two- and four-pod packs. Reynolds said the rollout includes mandatory ID scanning for every purchase, purchase limits, stronger retailer-accountability requirements and strict age-restricted marketing standards. The four pods have not received marketing authorization from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Sep.10
 $20 Million, a Permanent Injunction and Distributor Controls: Posh Deal Tightens Illinois Vape Compliance
$20 Million, a Permanent Injunction and Distributor Controls: Posh Deal Tightens Illinois Vape Compliance
An Illinois court ordered three companies tied to Posh vapes to pay $20 million and permanently restricted the sale, marketing and distribution in Illinois of products lacking required FDA authorization. The consent order also imposes downstream distributor controls, age-verification measures and social-media marketing limits, creating a new state-level compliance benchmark for disposable vape businesses.
Regulations
Aug.05
Charlie’s Bets on Age-Gating and 678 PMTA Assets as U.S. Vape Enforcement Landscape Shifts
Charlie’s Bets on Age-Gating and 678 PMTA Assets as U.S. Vape Enforcement Landscape Shifts
Charlie’s Holdings said in its latest shareholder letter that it is moving to commercialize PACHA products and monetize its PMTA assets as the FDA changes enforcement priorities for unauthorized ENDS products. Thirty PACHA SKUs were previously tentatively identified for a proposed public list of products that the FDA generally does not intend to prioritize for enforcement. Charlie’s is also preparing test-market sales of age-gated flavored disposables and says it currently holds 678 PMTA-related product assets while seeking additional strategic transactions and partnerships.
Sep.11
Elf Bar Vape Explosion and Amputation Claim Spurs Coverage Suit, U.S. Insurer MUSIC Seeks Ruling It Owes No Duty to Defend or Indemnify Distributor i5
Elf Bar Vape Explosion and Amputation Claim Spurs Coverage Suit, U.S. Insurer MUSIC Seeks Ruling It Owes No Duty to Defend or Indemnify Distributor i5
Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company has asked a federal court in Washington to declare that it has no duty to defend or indemnify vape distributor i5 Distribution in a product liability case involving an Elf Bar BC5000. The plaintiff alleges that the disposable vape caught fire and exploded in his pocket, causing severe burns and ultimately requiring an above-the-knee amputation of his left leg. MUSIC is relying on a tobacco, nicotine or nicotine replacement products exclusion and a premises limitation endorsement. The court has not ruled on the coverage dispute.
News
Sep.10