Study Finds No Statistical Link Between E-Cigarette Use and Smoking Among Youth

Oct.21.2022
Study Finds No Statistical Link Between E-Cigarette Use and Smoking Among Youth
A recent study found no statistical association between e-cigarette use and regular smoking in participants aged 16 to 24.

Many anti-e-cigarette advocates believe that e-cigarettes may serve as a gateway to smoking. A study titled "Smoking Intentions and Progression from e-Cigarette Use to Smoking" claims that the use of e-cigarettes among adolescents who had no prior intention to smoke is associated with an increased risk of future smoking.


Currently, research is being conducted to measure the gateway effect by examining the relationship between electronic cigarette use and overall smoking rates among young people, including non-smokers. If there is indeed a gateway effect, then the change in smoking rates among those who are associated with smoking should increase in tandem with the use of electronic cigarettes. However, the authors of the study found no statistically significant correlation between the use of electronic cigarettes and regular smoking among participants aged 16 to 24.


These research findings indicate that we can rule out the previously reported large gateway effect, especially in the 18 to 24 age group. However, we cannot rule out smaller gateway effects, and we have not studied younger age groups. If the estimates are correct, we estimate that around 7,000 out of 74,000 16 to 17-year-old e-cigarette users in England will become regular cigarette smokers due to e-cigarette use. At the same time, an estimated 50,000 smokers quit smoking each year due to e-cigarette use," said lead researcher Dr. Emma Beard.


In countries and regions where e-cigarettes are recognized, there is no evidence that they are creating a gateway effect.


According to the findings of these investigations, countries such as the UK and New Zealand, which support the use of e-cigarettes as a means of quitting smoking, not only report low smoking rates, but also do not have an increased proportion of teenagers using e-cigarettes. Reports from these countries are consistent with previous studies on these patterns, and a recent article titled "Does the Gateway Theory Justify the Prohibition of Nicotine E-Cigarettes in Australia?" has once again refuted the gateway theory.


Comment authors Colin Mendelsohn and Wayne Hall point out that a more reasonable explanation as to why young people who vape are more likely to smoke is attributed to personality factors. This means that teenagers who vape are more likely to be risk-takers, and therefore more prone to smoking, drinking alcohol, using cannabis and other substances, as well as engaging in unprotected sex. This argument has been emphasized by other experts in several studies.


The major findings reviewed by Mendelsohn and Hall are as follows:


Smoking usually precedes the use of electronic cigarettes. At least 70-85% of teenage smokers try using electronic cigarettes after starting to smoke. Most teenage electronic cigarette users are experimental and regular use of electronic cigarettes among non-smokers is rare. In Australia and international surveys, the proportion of non-smokers who regularly use electronic cigarettes is usually 1% or less. Many teenage electronic cigarette users only use flavorings and do not use nicotine. Nicotine addiction is rare among electronic cigarette users who do not smoke. In the United States, less than 4% of non-smoking youth who use electronic cigarettes have symptoms of nicotine dependence. Some teenagers use electronic cigarettes to quit smoking. Since the introduction of electronic cigarettes, teenage smoking rates have declined rapidly in the United Kingdom and the United States, making it unlikely that electronic cigarettes will increase teenage smoking. Electronic cigarettes are more likely to steer some high-risk teenagers away from smoking and towards safer alternatives.


Statement:


This article is compiled based on third-party information and is intended for industry professionals to exchange and learn from.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the authenticity or accuracy of the content. The compilation of this article is only intended for communication and research within the industry.


Due to limitations in translation ability, the translated article may not fully express the same meaning as the original text. Therefore, please refer to the original text for accuracy.


Regarding any domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, or foreign-related statements and positions, 2FIRSTS fully aligns with the Chinese government.


The copyright of compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for deletion.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Reuters Tracks Big Tobacco’s Shift Beyond Cigarettes as Nicotine Pouches Vie for the Next Growth Curve
Reuters Tracks Big Tobacco’s Shift Beyond Cigarettes as Nicotine Pouches Vie for the Next Growth Curve
As cigarette markets face long-term pressure, major tobacco companies are increasingly turning to nicotine pouches in search of growth beyond combustible tobacco. Reuters has examined whether nicotine pouches can become the next strategic growth platform for companies including Philip Morris International, British American Tobacco and Japan Tobacco. PMI strengthened its position through the acquisition of Swedish Match and its ZYN brand, while BAT and JTI continue expanding their own nicotine pouch portfolios. The category has gained attention because of its smoke-free, device-free format, but regulation, youth-use concerns and market scale will determine whether it can become a long-term growth engine.
Regulations
Aug.18 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Malaysia Withdraws Appeal Against Liquid Nicotine Ruling as Vape Regulation Framework Enters New Phase
Malaysia Withdraws Appeal Against Liquid Nicotine Ruling as Vape Regulation Framework Enters New Phase
Malaysia’s government has withdrawn its appeal against a High Court ruling concerning the regulatory status of liquid nicotine used in vape and e-cigarette products, according to reports by New Straits Times, Free Malaysia Today and CodeBlue on August 18, 2026. The Kuala Lumpur High Court ruled on May 15 that the government’s decision to remove liquid nicotine from the scheduled poisons list under the Poisons Act 1952 was irrational and made without proper consultation with the Poisons Board. The withdrawal ends the government’s appeal process, while the future regulatory framework for nicotine vape products remains under discussion.
Aug.21
Australian Coalition Taskforce Calls for 80% Tobacco Tax Cut to Combat Illicit Market
Australian Coalition Taskforce Calls for 80% Tobacco Tax Cut to Combat Illicit Market
According to SGST on August 26, 2026, Australia’s Coalition Illegal Tobacco Taskforce released a report recommending an up to 80% cut in tobacco excise to reduce the appeal of the illicit tobacco market. The report claimed organised crime groups now control about 80% of Australia’s tobacco market and argued that high excise rates have widened the price gap between legal and illegal products. The recommendation remains a policy proposal and has not been adopted by the Australian government, which said its focus remains on enforcement, compliance and additional resources.
Aug.27
BAT UK Director Tolga Kilic Says Illicit Nicotine Market Squeezes Legal Retailers Amid Rising Compliance Costs
BAT UK Director Tolga Kilic Says Illicit Nicotine Market Squeezes Legal Retailers Amid Rising Compliance Costs
UK retail publication Grocery Trader has published a viewpoint article from Tolga Kilic, Commercial Director for BAT UK & Ireland, discussing the impact of illicit nicotine products on legitimate retail channels. Kilic said illegal vapes and other illicit nicotine products create competitive pressure for compliant retailers and called for stronger market controls and supply-chain oversight. The comments come as the UK advances policies including the disposable vape ban and Vaping Products Duty, creating a more complex operating environment for legal vape retailers.
Jul.28
Altria Smokeable Profit Rises 2.4% as Marlboro Share Falls and U.S. Discounts Gain
Altria Smokeable Profit Rises 2.4% as Marlboro Share Falls and U.S. Discounts Gain
Altria’s second-quarter results show a U.S. nicotine market splitting across price, product and regulation. Smokeable profit rose 2.4% as Marlboro pricing offset lower volumes, while discount brand Basic gained share among value-conscious smokers. In oral nicotine, on! PLUS expanded distribution but faced intensifying competition from ZYN and Velo. NJOY remained off the market as patent and regulatory hurdles delayed its return. The broader lesson: U.S. growth increasingly depends on price-tier strategy, retail execution, authorisation and enforcement readiness across the industry.
Special Report
Jul.31
Elf Bar Vape Explosion and Amputation Claim Spurs Coverage Suit, U.S. Insurer MUSIC Seeks Ruling It Owes No Duty to Defend or Indemnify Distributor i5
Elf Bar Vape Explosion and Amputation Claim Spurs Coverage Suit, U.S. Insurer MUSIC Seeks Ruling It Owes No Duty to Defend or Indemnify Distributor i5
Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company has asked a federal court in Washington to declare that it has no duty to defend or indemnify vape distributor i5 Distribution in a product liability case involving an Elf Bar BC5000. The plaintiff alleges that the disposable vape caught fire and exploded in his pocket, causing severe burns and ultimately requiring an above-the-knee amputation of his left leg. MUSIC is relying on a tobacco, nicotine or nicotine replacement products exclusion and a premises limitation endorsement. The court has not ruled on the coverage dispute.
News
Sep.10