Key points:
·Controversy: The focus of controversy is the revision of the health law in the Swiss canton of Vaud, which completely bans the sale of disposable e-cigarettes; Philip Morris International (PMI) has accused the ban of infringing on the right of adult smokers to choose their products.
·Positions: The government believes that e-cigarettes are easy to induce young people to smoke; businesses believe that it hinders the promotion of reduced-harm alternative products.
·Background: Several Swiss cantons have legislated to restrict new tobacco products; the federal parliament has also passed a motion for a nationwide ban; PMI plans to launch a new puffed tobacco product by 2025.
·Judicial impact: The federal court's ruling will clarify the boundaries of local health legislation powers and the regulatory standards for new tobacco products. According to Agefi's report on June 26, Philip Morris International (PMI) has filed an appeal with the Federal Court in Switzerland over the decision to ban the sale of disposable e-cigarettes (puffs) in one canton. The ban, which went into effect on May 1, 2025, is part of the revision of their local health law.
According to a June 26 report by Agefi, Philip Morris International (PMI) has appealed to Switzerland’s Federal Court against a canton-level ban on the sale of disposable e-cigarettes (known as puffs). The ban took effect on May 1, 2025, as part of a revision to the cantonal health law.
Xavier Bertelletto, head of the canton’s public health office, stated that puffs are “playful, attractive, and highly addictive” products that could lead young people to start using tobacco, prompting the decision to prohibit their sale.
PMI, whose Swiss headquarters is located in Lausanne, opposes the ban on legal grounds, arguing that it contravenes federal law. Xavier Ducarroz, Managing Director of PMI Switzerland, questioned whether the canton has the authority to impose such measures in the realm of public health. He added that the ban threatens legal certainty and business stability.
At the same time, PMI is defending its own disposable e-cigarette products, which were launched in early 2025. The company argues that the ban unfairly penalizes adult smokers who are seeking alternatives.
The case has sparked national debate. Other regions in Switzerland, such as Jura, are also considering similar legislative actions. At the federal level, a motion to ban disposable e-cigarettes nationwide has already been adopted by the Council of States. The forthcoming ruling by the Federal Court is expected to be a pivotal case in clarifying the division of regulatory authority over public health between different levels of government in Switzerland.
2Firsts will continue to follow developments in this case and its potential implications for the Swiss and broader European vaping markets.
Notice
1. This article is provided exclusively for professional research purposes related to industry, technology and policy. Any reference to brands or products is made solely for the purpose of objective description and does not constitute an endorsement, recommendation, or promotion of any brand or product.
2. The use of nicotine products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and heated tobacco products, is associated with significant health risks. Users are required to comply with all relevant laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.
3. This article is strictly restricted from being accessed or viewed by individuals under the legal age.
Copyright
This article is either an original work by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with the original source clearly indicated. The copyright and usage rights of this article belong to 2Firsts or the original source. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other unauthorized use of this article by any entity or individual is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally responsible. For copyright-related matters, please contact: info@2firsts.com
AI Assistance Disclaimer
This article may have utilized AI to enhance translation and editing efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, errors may occur. Readers are advised to refer to the sources provided for more accurate information.
This article should not be used as a basis for any investment decisions or advice, and 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any errors in the content.