TGA Response: Prohibited Ingredients in E-Cigarettes

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Jun.21.2023
TGA Response: Prohibited Ingredients in E-Cigarettes
Australian authority fines and issues infringement notices to e-cigarette importers for containing banned ingredients.

The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) in Australia had issued 38 infringement notices and imposed fines totalling AUD 588,840 against four importers of e-cigarettes for violating regulations.

 

The TGA laboratory has found prohibited substances in disposable e-cigarette samples from the brands IGET, GUNNPOD, and HQD, as per the therapeutic goods order for nicotine e-cigarette products (TGO 110) for 2021.

 

In response to the incident, 2FIRSTS promptly conducted an email interview with TGA. On June 21st, TGA Spokesperson replied to 2FIRSTS via email. TGA stated in their response that the disposable e-cigarette products IGET Bar, IGET Legend, GUNNPOD, and HQD were found to contain three prohibited ingredients: benzaldehyde, cinnamaldehyde, and ethylene glycol. According to a search on the TGA official website, (Standard for Nicotine Vaping Products) (TGO 110) Order 2021 specifies the three ingredients are prohibited in e-cigarette products.

 

The following response is from a spokesperson for the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration.

 

Please attribute the following response to a spokesperson the Therapeutic Goods Administration.

 

1.Is it possible to announce the prohibited ingredients contained in IGET, GUNPOD and HQD branded vapes referenced in the media release?

 

Testing conducted by Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) Laboratories identified the IGET Bar and IGET Legend disposable pod devices contained benzaldehyde, cinnamaldehyde and ethylene glycol; Gunnpod disposable pod devices were found to contain benzaldehyde and ethylene glycol; and HQD disposable pod devices were found to contain benzaldehyde, cinnamaldehyde and ethylene glycol.

 

2.Will there be other punishments for the enterprises named, such as arrests? Will the enterprises that produce and manufacture these products also be punished?

 

Infringement notices are one of the compliance tools the TGA can use when we believe that a requirement of the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 has been breached. If an entity does not pay the infringement notice, the TGA may take further action such as formal court action.

 

The Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 regulates the import, export, supply, manufacture and supply of therapeutic goods within Australia. As the products subject to the infringement notices are manufactured outside of Australia, the manufacturers are not subject to Australian laws.

 

3.Will TGA strengthen supervision in the future?

 

On 2 May 2023, the Minister for Health and Aged Care announced that the Australian Government is taking strong action to combat the supply of unlawful vaping products. The TGA is working closely with state and territory governments and the Australian Border Force to introduce a comprehensive range of reforms, including:

  • stopping the import of non-prescription vapes;
  • increasing the minimum quality standards for vapes including by restricting flavours, colours, and other ingredients;
  • requiring pharmaceutical-like packaging;
  • reducing nicotine concentrations and volumes;
  • banning all single use disposable vapes; and
  • ending vape sales in convenience stores and other retail settings.

 

Note: The previously mentioned "GUNPOD" should be corrected to "GUNNPOD," as stated by TGA in their email reply.

 

Reference(s):

 

Three TSG stores based in Sydney and Jaradat and Sabbagh Group Pty Ltd have been issued with infringement notices totalling $588,840.


Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Juul Sublicense Reshapes Vuse Alto Patent Bill as Court Ends R.J. Reynolds’ 5.25% Royalty Obligation to Altria
Juul Sublicense Reshapes Vuse Alto Patent Bill as Court Ends R.J. Reynolds’ 5.25% Royalty Obligation to Altria
According to Law360 on August 31, 2026, a federal judge in North Carolina ruled that a patent sublicense between R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co. and Juul Labs Inc. relieves Reynolds of its obligation to continue paying royalties to Altria Client Services LLC over Vuse Alto. A jury had previously found that Vuse Alto infringed three Altria patents and awarded approximately $95.2 million in past damages, after which Reynolds was ordered to pay an ongoing royalty equal to 5.25% of positive net sales. The new ruling finds that a valid sublicense can eliminate future infringement, potentially ending what Altria described as hundreds of millions of dollars in future royalties.
Sep.01
Product | JTI Introduces Fully Dissolvable PERLZ Nicotine Pearls in UK, Expands Range From 30-Pearl Dispensers to 10-Pearl Sachets
Product | JTI Introduces Fully Dissolvable PERLZ Nicotine Pearls in UK, Expands Range From 30-Pearl Dispensers to 10-Pearl Sachets
Japan Tobacco International (JTI) has introduced PERLZ nicotine pearls in the UK, expanding its oral nicotine portfolio beyond conventional nicotine pouches. The fully dissolvable, multi-layer pearls are placed under the tongue and come in Mint and Berry flavors at concentrations of 1mg/g and 2mg/g, equivalent to approximately 0.3mg and 0.5mg of nicotine per pearl. UK retailer Haypp published four 30-pearl dispenser listings on July 31, 2026, followed by three 10-pearl sachet products on August 17. The dispensers retail for £6.50, while the sachets cost £2.50.
product
Oct.12
South Korea Constitutional Court Upholds Volume-Based E-Liquid Tax, With Challenged Rates at KRW 370 and KRW 628 per Milliliter
South Korea Constitutional Court Upholds Volume-Based E-Liquid Tax, With Challenged Rates at KRW 370 and KRW 628 per Milliliter
South Korea's Constitutional Court has upheld fixed taxes on nicotine-containing e-cigarette liquids based on solution volume, ruling that challenged provisions imposing KRW 370 per milliliter in individual consumption tax and KRW 628 per milliliter in tobacco consumption tax do not violate the Constitution. The cases stemmed from historical disputes involving importers that reported nicotine as being extracted from tobacco stems rather than leaves. South Korea has since broadened its tobacco definition to include synthetic nicotine, while current tax laws provide reduced rates for certain products not derived from tobacco.
Sep.18
Spain Cigarette Volumes Fall 5.2% in August, BAT Drops 14.5%, JTI Gains Share; France Down 8.3% on Adjusted Basis
Spain Cigarette Volumes Fall 5.2% in August, BAT Drops 14.5%, JTI Gains Share; France Down 8.3% on Adjusted Basis
Spain's cigarette volumes declined 5.2% year over year in August 2026, according to government data cited by UBS and reported by Investing.com on October 7. British American Tobacco's volumes fell 14.5%, followed by Imperial Brands at 8.8%, Philip Morris International at 6.6% and Japan Tobacco at 4.6%. JTI was the only one of the four companies to gain cigarette market share, rising six basis points to 26.7%. In France, official customs data showed an unadjusted 3.7% decline in cigarette deliveries. Adjusting for the difference in delivery days produces a decline of approximately 8.3%, consistent with the UBS figure. The bank also estimated the earnings exposure of major tobacco companies to both markets.
Market
Oct.13
Special Report | Altria Subsidiaries Sue FDA to Vacate 2021 PMTA Rule as Agency Moves to Speed Reviews
Special Report | Altria Subsidiaries Sue FDA to Vacate 2021 PMTA Rule as Agency Moves to Speed Reviews
2Firsts reviewed the original federal court complaint filed by Altria subsidiaries Helix Innovations and NJOY on Sept. 2 challenging FDA’s 2021 PMTA rule. The lawsuit questions whether FDA’s review process complies with the Tobacco Control Act’s 180-day timeline, even as the agency moves to accelerate PMTA reviews and issues more marketing orders. Drawing on the complaint, FDA records, government audits and recent court rulings, 2Firsts examines the legal arguments, supporting evidence and potential implications for the U.S. tobacco review system.
Regulations
Sep.03
Virginia Tobacco Retail Permit Takes Effect October 1, Covering Vapes as More Than 3,000 Businesses Apply in September
Virginia Tobacco Retail Permit Takes Effect October 1, Covering Vapes as More Than 3,000 Businesses Apply in September
Virginia's new retail tobacco permit system took effect October 1, requiring sellers of vapes, nicotine products and related devices and accessories to obtain a Retail Tobacco Permit for each business location. Virginia ABC said more than 3,000 businesses applied in September alone, creating a processing backlog. Qualifying applicants that filed before October 1 may temporarily operate under a Letter of Authorization. The new store-level permit also sits alongside Virginia's existing vape product directory, where sales of unlisted liquid nicotine or nicotine vapor products can trigger civil penalties starting at $5,000.
Regulations
Oct.03