TGA Response: Prohibited Ingredients in E-Cigarettes

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Jun.21.2023
TGA Response: Prohibited Ingredients in E-Cigarettes
Australian authority fines and issues infringement notices to e-cigarette importers for containing banned ingredients.

The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) in Australia had issued 38 infringement notices and imposed fines totalling AUD 588,840 against four importers of e-cigarettes for violating regulations.

 

The TGA laboratory has found prohibited substances in disposable e-cigarette samples from the brands IGET, GUNNPOD, and HQD, as per the therapeutic goods order for nicotine e-cigarette products (TGO 110) for 2021.

 

In response to the incident, 2FIRSTS promptly conducted an email interview with TGA. On June 21st, TGA Spokesperson replied to 2FIRSTS via email. TGA stated in their response that the disposable e-cigarette products IGET Bar, IGET Legend, GUNNPOD, and HQD were found to contain three prohibited ingredients: benzaldehyde, cinnamaldehyde, and ethylene glycol. According to a search on the TGA official website, (Standard for Nicotine Vaping Products) (TGO 110) Order 2021 specifies the three ingredients are prohibited in e-cigarette products.

 

The following response is from a spokesperson for the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration.

 

Please attribute the following response to a spokesperson the Therapeutic Goods Administration.

 

1.Is it possible to announce the prohibited ingredients contained in IGET, GUNPOD and HQD branded vapes referenced in the media release?

 

Testing conducted by Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) Laboratories identified the IGET Bar and IGET Legend disposable pod devices contained benzaldehyde, cinnamaldehyde and ethylene glycol; Gunnpod disposable pod devices were found to contain benzaldehyde and ethylene glycol; and HQD disposable pod devices were found to contain benzaldehyde, cinnamaldehyde and ethylene glycol.

 

2.Will there be other punishments for the enterprises named, such as arrests? Will the enterprises that produce and manufacture these products also be punished?

 

Infringement notices are one of the compliance tools the TGA can use when we believe that a requirement of the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 has been breached. If an entity does not pay the infringement notice, the TGA may take further action such as formal court action.

 

The Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 regulates the import, export, supply, manufacture and supply of therapeutic goods within Australia. As the products subject to the infringement notices are manufactured outside of Australia, the manufacturers are not subject to Australian laws.

 

3.Will TGA strengthen supervision in the future?

 

On 2 May 2023, the Minister for Health and Aged Care announced that the Australian Government is taking strong action to combat the supply of unlawful vaping products. The TGA is working closely with state and territory governments and the Australian Border Force to introduce a comprehensive range of reforms, including:

  • stopping the import of non-prescription vapes;
  • increasing the minimum quality standards for vapes including by restricting flavours, colours, and other ingredients;
  • requiring pharmaceutical-like packaging;
  • reducing nicotine concentrations and volumes;
  • banning all single use disposable vapes; and
  • ending vape sales in convenience stores and other retail settings.

 

Note: The previously mentioned "GUNPOD" should be corrected to "GUNNPOD," as stated by TGA in their email reply.

 

Reference(s):

 

Three TSG stores based in Sydney and Jaradat and Sabbagh Group Pty Ltd have been issued with infringement notices totalling $588,840.


Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Snowplus Enters Japan’s FamilyMart Network With Zero-Nicotine NEO Line and Kishidan Campaign
Snowplus Enters Japan’s FamilyMart Network With Zero-Nicotine NEO Line and Kishidan Campaign
Snowplus distributor H&S said the zero-nicotine, zero-tar NEO vaping line will begin rolling out across FamilyMart stores in Japan from September 14, 2026, excluding some locations. The DASH line will also be sold at selected FamilyMart stores in southern Kyushu and Okinawa. Snowplus simultaneously named Japanese rock band Kishidan as a brand ambassador, combining convenience-store distribution with a broader consumer marketing push in Japan.
Sep.15
Special Report | Can Nicotine Be Replaced? 6-MN Is Already on the Market While Key Human Evidence Is Still Missing
Special Report | Can Nicotine Be Replaced? 6-MN Is Already on the Market While Key Human Evidence Is Still Missing
Nicotine analogues such as 6-methylnicotine are already appearing in e-cigarettes and oral pouches, even as key human evidence remains limited. A new Nixodine-S study adds nonclinical data showing differences from nicotine in cytotoxicity and receptor activity, while independent studies point to a more complex toxicological picture. With supply-chain activity growing and FDA seeking clearer authority over nicotine analogues, the industry now faces a larger question: what evidence is needed before these substances can credibly replace nicotine?
SCIENCE
Sep.23
China STMA Deputy Administrator Meets KT&G COO as Heated Cigarette Rules Advance
China STMA Deputy Administrator Meets KT&G COO as Heated Cigarette Rules Advance
Wang Gongcheng, deputy administrator of China’s State Tobacco Monopoly Administration, met KT&G Chief Operating Officer Lee Sang-hak in Shanghai on September 1, according to Oriental Tobacco News. The meeting comes as China seeks public comment on a draft mandatory national standard for heated cigarettes. The report did not disclose the subjects discussed or indicate whether heated tobacco products or market access were addressed.
News
Sep.02
SMOORE’s DOJO by VAPORESSO to Launch New Global Brand Identity on September 1
SMOORE’s DOJO by VAPORESSO to Launch New Global Brand Identity on September 1
According to recent LinkedIn posts from people at VAPORESSO, SMOORE and a German distribution partner, vape brand DOJO will begin rolling out a new global brand identity on September 1, 2026, led by a redesigned handwritten logo. The new visual system will be gradually applied across product packaging, marketing materials and digital assets over the following months. Fabio Corsaro, Head of Marketing and Purchasing at MG Wesel GmbH, said the rebrand was related to trademark issues, but that explanation has not been publicly confirmed by DOJO, VAPORESSO or SMOORE. DOJO is currently promoting its Blast X product in Germany.
Aug.31
2Firsts Hosts China Market Forum at InterTabac as Global Industry Attention to China’s Tobacco Sector Deepens
2Firsts Hosts China Market Forum at InterTabac as Global Industry Attention to China’s Tobacco Sector Deepens
On September 16, 2Firsts hosted a China-focused industry forum during InterTabac in Dortmund, bringing together more than 30 participants from North America, Europe, India, South Korea and other markets. The session covered traditional tobacco, next-generation products, exports, technology, regulation and supply chains, while examining how China’s tobacco sector operates, where its transformation may be heading, and why its growing role matters increasingly to companies across the global tobacco and nicotine industry.
Sep.21
Juul Sublicense Reshapes Vuse Alto Patent Bill as Court Ends R.J. Reynolds’ 5.25% Royalty Obligation to Altria
Juul Sublicense Reshapes Vuse Alto Patent Bill as Court Ends R.J. Reynolds’ 5.25% Royalty Obligation to Altria
According to Law360 on August 31, 2026, a federal judge in North Carolina ruled that a patent sublicense between R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co. and Juul Labs Inc. relieves Reynolds of its obligation to continue paying royalties to Altria Client Services LLC over Vuse Alto. A jury had previously found that Vuse Alto infringed three Altria patents and awarded approximately $95.2 million in past damages, after which Reynolds was ordered to pay an ongoing royalty equal to 5.25% of positive net sales. The new ruling finds that a valid sublicense can eliminate future infringement, potentially ending what Altria described as hundreds of millions of dollars in future royalties.
Sep.01