Thai Police Investigated for Bribery in Electronic Cigarette Case

Sep.16.2022
Thai Police Investigated for Bribery in Electronic Cigarette Case
Thai police under investigation for soliciting bribes from three men carrying e-cigarette devices into Thailand, where they are prohibited.

Thai police are being investigated for allegedly soliciting bribes from three men who carried electronic cigarette devices into Thailand. The incidents took place in Songkhla province, which borders Malaysia.


Thailand has one of the strictest electronic cigarette bans in the world. The sale and importation of e-cigarette products are illegal in Thailand, and possession of these devices can sometimes result in prosecution. Despite the ban and strict enforcement, the country still maintains a thriving black market for e-cigarette products.


There has been a recent debate about loosening Thailand's e-cigarette laws, with one cabinet minister strongly advocating for a regulated market. However, he faces strong opposition from the country's public health agencies who are firmly against liberalization.


The police negotiated the amount of the bribe.


Three men were arrested at a police checkpoint in Songkhla's Hat Yai district for allegedly bringing electronic cigarette products into the country from Malaysia. Local police informed the men that possession of electronic cigarettes carried a fine of 50,000 baht (approximately $1,365) per person, but offered to reduce the amount to 5,000 baht if each person paid a bribe of 10,000 baht (about $273). The final settlement was made at a total of 10,000 baht for all three men, which they agreed to, and they were subsequently released. This information was reported by The Thaiger.


One of the victims of bribery, Pachara Sirithorn, has chosen to warn others by sharing his story on Facebook. The post gained enough attention that police leaders took action, with Akkarawut Thaneerat, the chief of the Hat Yai police, announcing an investigation and temporarily suspending three officers suspected of soliciting bribes.


The history of Thailand's strict law enforcement and corruption.


Thailand has a history of police corruption and overzealous enforcement of electronic cigarette laws, including raids and arrests of sellers, tourists charged with "importing" their own e-cigarette products into Thailand, and other incidents involving alleged bribery. The Thai authorities have taken extremely harsh actions against e-cigarettes, to the point that the official UK government tourism website issued a warning to British tourists in 2017 not to bring e-cigarettes to Thailand.


Of course, corruption within the Thai police is not limited to soliciting bribes from e-cigarette users. There have been numerous recent examples involving Google.


In June, a Bangkok metropolitan police officer was found guilty of 65 counts of soliciting bribes from massage parlors and was sentenced to 50 years imprisonment. Earlier this year, six police officers in Nakhon Phanom province were transferred pending an investigation into bribery by drug dealers. Last year, a man suspected of drug trafficking died from apparent police brutality, with the local police chief being the prime suspect in the death.


The tobacco industry in Thailand is owned and regulated by the Thailand Tobacco Monopoly (TTM), which is the only cigarette producer approved by the government in Thailand.


Statement:


This article is compiled based on third-party information and is intended solely for exchange and learning within the industry.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the authenticity or accuracy of the content. The translation of this article is only intended for industry communication and research purposes.


Due to limitations in the translator's ability, the translated article may not fully express the original text. Please refer to the original text for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government in regards to any domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, or foreign-related statements and positions.


The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and authors. If there is any infringement, please contact us for deletion.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

Dutch Data Show 244 Companies Continued Illegal Vape Sales After Two Fines
Dutch Data Show 244 Companies Continued Illegal Vape Sales After Two Fines
According to RTL Nieuws, citing figures from the Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority (NVWA), hundreds of Dutch shops continue to sell illegal vapes, often even after repeated fines.
Apr.08 by 2FIRSTS.ai
PMTA Manufacturing Panel Sees Small Firms Warn “Unknown Is Death” as FDA Defends Review Boundaries
PMTA Manufacturing Panel Sees Small Firms Warn “Unknown Is Death” as FDA Defends Review Boundaries
During FDA’s Feb 10 PMTA roundtable (manufacturing controls panel), small ENDS manufacturers warned that uncertainty in manufacturing expectations creates existential financial risk. FDA officials reiterated review flexibility is constrained by statutory and scientific boundaries. The panel debated testing standards, documentation requirements, open-system responsibility, supply chain changes, and software updates—highlighting unresolved PMTA challenges for small manufacturers.
Feb.11
Al Fakher Parent AIR Advances U.S. Listing Plan, With Deal Expected in First Half of 2026
Al Fakher Parent AIR Advances U.S. Listing Plan, With Deal Expected in First Half of 2026
AIR Limited and Cantor Equity Partners III, Inc. announced that AIR and AIR Holdings Limited have filed a Form F-4 registration statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with their previously announced proposed business combination. Upon closing, the combined company, AIR Global PLC, is expected to be listed on Nasdaq in the United States under the ticker symbol “AIIR.”
Mar.31 by 2FIRSTS.ai
FDA Authorizes Glas Vape but Flavor Hopes Fall Short
FDA Authorizes Glas Vape but Flavor Hopes Fall Short
The FDA has added Glas products to its authorized electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) list, granting Marketing Granted Orders (MGOs) to the Glas G DEVICE and a BLONDE TOBACCO pod. The decision expands the number of FDA-authorized ENDS products to 41, marking the first new authorization since Juul’s approvals in July 2025. However, widely anticipated non-tobacco flavored products were not approved.
Mar.13
Product | 30ml E-Liquid, 40,000 Puffs, and Three Power Settings: OXBAR Launches New DTL Product ROVOTA
Product | 30ml E-Liquid, 40,000 Puffs, and Three Power Settings: OXBAR Launches New DTL Product ROVOTA
E-cigarette brand OXBAR has launched its new DTL e-cigarette, the OXBAR ROVOTA, on its official website. The product contains 30ml of e-liquid and is officially rated for up to approximately 40,000 puffs. It has a nicotine strength of 6mg and offers around 15 flavor options. The device is equipped with a 1400mAh battery, supports Type-C charging, features a 0.4Ω dual mesh coil, and supports three power settings of 20W, 30W, and 40W.
Mar.31 by 2FIRSTS.ai
New York’s Lawsuit Against Puff Bar and Other Flavored Vape Companies Survives Key Court Challenge
New York’s Lawsuit Against Puff Bar and Other Flavored Vape Companies Survives Key Court Challenge
According to Law360, a federal judge ruled that makers and distributors of flavored vape brands such as Puff Bar cannot escape New York’s lawsuit seeking to hold them responsible for the youth vaping epidemic. The court found that the state had adequately alleged the companies misrepresented how safe vaping is.
Apr.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai