The Blurred Line of Tobacco Regulations in South Korea

Aug.15.2022
The Blurred Line of Tobacco Regulations in South Korea
The legal definition of tobacco in South Korea does not cover e-cigarettes, which are becoming increasingly popular among smokers.

The definition of tobacco under South Korea's Tobacco Industry Act's Article 2 states that it is made in a state suitable for smoking, sucking, inhaling steam, chewing or smelling tobacco leaves as the entire or partial raw material. This rule is far from reality, as liquid electronic cigarettes that fall into a legal grey area are invading the market among smokers. It has been pointed out that the Tobacco Industry Act urgently needs to be revised, as these alternative products cannot be considered "similar to cigarettes" and require proper regulation.


Currently, the government only officially counts two types of cigarette sales: traditional cigarettes and heated electronic cigarettes. According to market data from the first half of the year released by the Ministry of Strategy and Finance on June 29th, only 1.52 billion packs of traditional cigarettes and 260 million packs of heated electronic cigarettes were sold. The explanation given was that the sales of closed-system vaporizer (CSV) and solid-state electronic cigarettes, which were discontinued last year, are no longer being calculated.


However, there are several e-cigarette products that have escaped the law due to loopholes. If you search on internet portals, you will find liquid e-cigarettes that use nicotine extracted from plant stems and roots, rather than tobacco or chemically synthesized nicotine. It is common to see smokers using these products on the streets. They fall into a category known as "tobacco-like" but are not included in the legal definition of tobacco.


However, I cannot confirm how much they have actually sold. Lee Seong-ki, Director of the Korean Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, stated that "According to estimates, this cigarette-like product accounts for 30-40% of all electronic cigarette products in South Korea." Government market data only tracks cigarettes and heated tobacco products, and does not fully represent the current state of the tobacco industry in South Korea.


Disclaimer: 1. The content of this article is compiled from third-party information and is only intended for exchange and learning within the industry. 2. This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truthfulness or accuracy of the content. The compilation of this article is only for industry exchange and research purposes. 3. Due to limitations in the compilation level, the compiled article may not fully reflect the original text. Please refer to the original text for accuracy. 4. Regarding any domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, or foreign expression and stance, 2FIRSTS fully aligns with the Chinese government. 5. The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for deletion.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
The Ohio Supreme Court is hearing a case involving flavored vape sales and whether state authorities can use consumer protection laws to take action against retailers selling unauthorized vape products. Ohio officials argue that selling unauthorized flavored vapes may constitute consumer deception, while retailers argue that tobacco product regulation falls under federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authority and that states cannot impose additional restrictions through consumer laws. The case could affect the scope of state-level vape regulation across the United States.
Aug.06
Malaysia Police Plan Saliva Tests at Roadblocks to Detect Synthetic Drugs Mixed Into Vape Liquids
Malaysia Police Plan Saliva Tests at Roadblocks to Detect Synthetic Drugs Mixed Into Vape Liquids
Malaysian police plan to use saliva test kits at roadblocks to detect drivers using synthetic liquid drugs marketed as “Piu Piu” and “Magic Mushroom,” substances that authorities say are mixed into vape liquids and inhaled through e-cigarette devices, raising road-safety concerns and adding pressure on vape regulation.
Jun.29
UK Proposes Stricter Vape Packaging Rules as Retailers Warn of £330 Million Impact
UK Proposes Stricter Vape Packaging Rules as Retailers Warn of £330 Million Impact
The UK government has launched a nationwide consultation on vape packaging, appearance and retail displays, proposing tighter rules to reduce youth appeal while industry groups warn of significant compliance costs.
Innovation
Jul.20
Product | PMI Launches Airport-Exclusive IQOS Skylens Limited Edition, Expanding From Japan’s Narita to Travel Retail Markets in 13 Countries Summary
Product | PMI Launches Airport-Exclusive IQOS Skylens Limited Edition, Expanding From Japan’s Narita to Travel Retail Markets in 13 Countries Summary
Philip Morris International (PMI) has introduced the airport-exclusive limited-edition IQOS ILUMA i PRIME Skylens, the company’s first device created specifically for airport travel retail. Inspired by the world of flight and finished in metallic blue, Skylens debuted at Narita International Airport in Japan before expanding into selected airport duty-free and travel-retail channels across 13 countries in Europe, Asia, the Middle East and Africa. The product retains the existing IQOS ILUMA i PRIME platform, with differentiation centered on airport exclusivity, design and travel-retail execution rather than a new heating architecture.
PMI
Aug.19
Chinese Disposable Brands OXBAR, LYCO Challenge Vuse and JUUL: Pennsylvania’s Pending List Offers a Glimpse of the Future Legal Vape Market
Chinese Disposable Brands OXBAR, LYCO Challenge Vuse and JUUL: Pennsylvania’s Pending List Offers a Glimpse of the Future Legal Vape Market
Pennsylvania’s June 26 ENDS Pending Certifications list previews the state’s future legal vape market, placing Vuse, JUUL and Logic alongside Chinese-linked disposable brands OXBAR and LYCO. Shaped by PMTA eligibility and state rules, the list shows competition shifting from market share to market access.
Special Report
Jul.06
Special Report|AIR H1 Revenue Rises 3.7% as Shisha Volumes Fall 9%, Testing Its Shift Beyond Traditional Hookah
Special Report|AIR H1 Revenue Rises 3.7% as Shisha Volumes Fall 9%, Testing Its Shift Beyond Traditional Hookah
AIR’s first half-year results as a listed company offer a new test of how far a traditional hookah business can transform. H1 2026 revenue rose 3.7%, even as Flavored Shisha Molasses shipments fell 9%, with pricing and mix supporting growth. Traditional shisha still generates almost all revenue, while OOKA, Crown Switch, Greentank and U.S. regulatory spending point to accelerating diversification. The next test is whether those investments can become a second business of meaningful scale and profitability.
Capital Markets
Aug.21