The Consistent Regulation of E-Cigarette Flavor in the Philippines

Apr.14.2025
The Consistent Regulation of E-Cigarette Flavor in the Philippines
Philippine Justice Secretary clarifies no conflict between RA 11467 and RA 11900 in e-cigarette flavor regulation.

Key points:

The Filipino Justice Secretary emphasized that RA 11467 and RA 11900 do not conflict in regulating e-cigarette flavors.

RA 11467 prohibits e-cigarette products with flavors other than tobacco and mint, while RA 11900 regulates the use of flavor descriptions. Both laws work together to enforce strict regulation of e-cigarette flavors.

Two pieces of legislation jointly regulate the sale and promotion of e-cigarette products.


According to Malaya Business Insight on April 14th, Filipino Justice Secretary Jesus Crispin Remulla stated that the ban on flavored e-cigarette products remains in effect under Republic Act 11467. Despite the implementation of the Vaporized Nicotine and Non-Nicotine Products Act (RA 11900), these two laws do not conflict when it comes to regulating e-cigarette flavors.

 

Remulla stated in a legal opinion publicly released on April 13 that Republic Act 11467 and RA 11900 are consistent in regulating the flavors of e-cigarette products.

 

Two years ago, former President Rodrigo Duterte signed RA 11467 into law, while RA 11900 automatically took effect two years later. Health Minister Teodoro Herbosa has therefore requested legal guidance to clarify the relationship between the two laws regarding the regulation of e-cigarette flavors.

 

Hebosa pointed out that RA 11467 prohibits the use of flavors other than original tobacco and mint, while RA 11900 regulates the use of flavor descriptors. Legal guidance is needed to clarify whether the flavor descriptor ban in RA 11900 conflicts with the flavor ban in another law. The opinion of the Department of Justice on this issue is crucial, as Section 29 of RA 11900 stipulates that any laws inconsistent with it will be repealed or amended.

 

Remulla emphasized that the purpose of the two laws is to regulate the sales and distribution of e-cigarette products, including those containing nicotine and those that do not. RA 11900 provides specific guidelines for the marketing of these products but does not repeal the provisions of RA 11467 regarding the ban on flavors.

 

Remulla pointed out in a four-page legal opinion that,

 

Previously, the ban on e-cigarette products applied to the products themselves, while the new law now regulates the packaging, labeling, display, or marketing of e-cigarette products. Therefore, we can harmonize the regulations of the two laws.

 

Given that there appears to be no contradiction between the two laws, and the legislative body has not clearly indicated an intention to repeal RA 11467, both laws should be appropriately applied.

 

Remulla further stated that the advertising guidelines in RA 11900 complement the prohibitions on the manufacturing, importation, sale, and distribution of products in RA 11467, collectively regulating the sale of products with flavors other than pure tobacco and mint menthol.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

York Traders Could Face Fines of Up to GBP 200 Under New Illegal Vape Enforcement Plans
York Traders Could Face Fines of Up to GBP 200 Under New Illegal Vape Enforcement Plans
City of York Council is considering new plans that would allow fines of up to GBP 200.00 (approximately USD 260.00) for traders caught selling illegal single-use vapes.
Apr.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
2Firsts|Sesh Advances Nicotine Pouch PMTA to Filing Stage, Experts Highlight Regulatory Threshold and Market Window
2Firsts|Sesh Advances Nicotine Pouch PMTA to Filing Stage, Experts Highlight Regulatory Threshold and Market Window
Sesh said its Premarket Tobacco Product Application (PMTA) for 64 nicotine pouch SKUs has been accepted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and advanced to the Filing stage, entering substantive scientific review. Industry experts say the development signals that the application has crossed a key technical and regulatory threshold, while also highlighting growing divergence in regulatory capability and market positioning within the nicotine pouch category.
Special Report
Mar.24 by 2FIRSTS.ai
U.S. Company Seeks Cancellation of “Lost Mary” Vape Trademark
U.S. Company Seeks Cancellation of “Lost Mary” Vape Trademark
North Carolina hemp provider JLT Imports Inc. has filed suit in California federal court seeking cancellation of the “Lost Mary” vape trademark held by Chinese company Imiracle (HK) Ltd.
Mar.30 by 2FIRSTS.ai
BAT AGM Highlights Smokeless Strategy, AI Capability and Regulatory Engagement
BAT AGM Highlights Smokeless Strategy, AI Capability and Regulatory Engagement
BAT Chair Luc Jobin told shareholders at the company’s 2026 Annual General Meeting that BAT delivered on its plans in 2025 despite a challenging external environment, with the U.S. business returning to growth, smokeless consumers increasing by more than 15%, improved New Categories contribution, and GBP 6.3 billion returned to shareholders.
Apr.16 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Austria to Tighten Sales Rules for Nicotine Pouches and E-Liquids From April 1
Austria to Tighten Sales Rules for Nicotine Pouches and E-Liquids From April 1
Austria will introduce new sales rules for nicotine products from April 1, 2026. Under a reform of the tobacco law passed in December 2025, nicotine pouches will in future be sold only through tobacco shops, while e-liquids will be sold only through tobacco shops and licensed specialist stores. Other points of sale will no longer be permitted to sell these products.
Mar.30 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Arizona Lawmaker Pushes Alternative Nicotine Product Bill as Enforcement Concerns Emerge
Arizona Lawmaker Pushes Alternative Nicotine Product Bill as Enforcement Concerns Emerge
Arizona Representative Jeff Weninger’s HB 4001 is being presented as a new tool to crack down on retailers that sell vaping devices and other nicotine products to minors. The bill would create a licensing system for manufacturers and distributors of “alternative nicotine products” and impose fines for sales to people under 21, with penalties reaching USD 10,000 for a fourth violation within 24 months.
Mar.25 by 2FIRSTS.ai