The Consistent Regulation of E-Cigarette Flavor in the Philippines

Apr.14.2025
The Consistent Regulation of E-Cigarette Flavor in the Philippines
Philippine Justice Secretary clarifies no conflict between RA 11467 and RA 11900 in e-cigarette flavor regulation.

Key points:

The Filipino Justice Secretary emphasized that RA 11467 and RA 11900 do not conflict in regulating e-cigarette flavors.

RA 11467 prohibits e-cigarette products with flavors other than tobacco and mint, while RA 11900 regulates the use of flavor descriptions. Both laws work together to enforce strict regulation of e-cigarette flavors.

Two pieces of legislation jointly regulate the sale and promotion of e-cigarette products.


According to Malaya Business Insight on April 14th, Filipino Justice Secretary Jesus Crispin Remulla stated that the ban on flavored e-cigarette products remains in effect under Republic Act 11467. Despite the implementation of the Vaporized Nicotine and Non-Nicotine Products Act (RA 11900), these two laws do not conflict when it comes to regulating e-cigarette flavors.

 

Remulla stated in a legal opinion publicly released on April 13 that Republic Act 11467 and RA 11900 are consistent in regulating the flavors of e-cigarette products.

 

Two years ago, former President Rodrigo Duterte signed RA 11467 into law, while RA 11900 automatically took effect two years later. Health Minister Teodoro Herbosa has therefore requested legal guidance to clarify the relationship between the two laws regarding the regulation of e-cigarette flavors.

 

Hebosa pointed out that RA 11467 prohibits the use of flavors other than original tobacco and mint, while RA 11900 regulates the use of flavor descriptors. Legal guidance is needed to clarify whether the flavor descriptor ban in RA 11900 conflicts with the flavor ban in another law. The opinion of the Department of Justice on this issue is crucial, as Section 29 of RA 11900 stipulates that any laws inconsistent with it will be repealed or amended.

 

Remulla emphasized that the purpose of the two laws is to regulate the sales and distribution of e-cigarette products, including those containing nicotine and those that do not. RA 11900 provides specific guidelines for the marketing of these products but does not repeal the provisions of RA 11467 regarding the ban on flavors.

 

Remulla pointed out in a four-page legal opinion that,

 

Previously, the ban on e-cigarette products applied to the products themselves, while the new law now regulates the packaging, labeling, display, or marketing of e-cigarette products. Therefore, we can harmonize the regulations of the two laws.

 

Given that there appears to be no contradiction between the two laws, and the legislative body has not clearly indicated an intention to repeal RA 11467, both laws should be appropriately applied.

 

Remulla further stated that the advertising guidelines in RA 11900 complement the prohibitions on the manufacturing, importation, sale, and distribution of products in RA 11467, collectively regulating the sale of products with flavors other than pure tobacco and mint menthol.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Multi-State Coalition Urges F1 to End Nicotine Sponsorships, Citing Zyn and Velo
Multi-State Coalition Urges F1 to End Nicotine Sponsorships, Citing Zyn and Velo
Hawaii Attorney General Anne Lopez is co-leading a coalition of 19 states and jurisdictions urging the Fédération Internationale de l’Automobile (FIA) and Formula 1 to end sponsorships involving tobacco and nicotine products, including nicotine pouch brands such as Zyn and Velo.
News
Jun.09
BAT Shares Surge Nearly 6% as FDA Policy Shift Eases Pressure on Vuse and Velo
BAT Shares Surge Nearly 6% as FDA Policy Shift Eases Pressure on Vuse and Velo
British American Tobacco (BAT) shares rose sharply on May 12 after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration signaled it would deprioritize enforcement against certain unauthorized e-cigarette and nicotine pouch products with accepted premarket applications. Investors viewed the move as favoring established players such as BAT’s Vuse and Velo brands.
BAT
May.13
Bringing Tax and Insurance Into Nicotine Regulation: Insights From a Tobacco Harm-Reduction Report
Bringing Tax and Insurance Into Nicotine Regulation: Insights From a Tobacco Harm-Reduction Report
A smoke-free nicotine policy report argues that tobacco harm reduction should move beyond product bans and health warnings into tax policy, insurance pricing and risk-based regulation. While some projections remain open to debate, the report highlights a wider challenge: nicotine products, technologies and consumer behavior have changed sharply over the past decade, and regulatory systems may need new tools to better align tobacco control with harm-reduction goals.
Jun.08
 Zyn Emerges as MAGA Cultural Symbol Amid FDA Policy Shift
Zyn Emerges as MAGA Cultural Symbol Amid FDA Policy Shift
According to The Wall Street Journal, nicotine pouch brand Zyn has rapidly gained popularity across the Trump administration and conservative political circles, including among U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Business
May.20
Reuters: Big Tobacco Emerges as Winner After FDA Regulatory Shift
Reuters: Big Tobacco Emerges as Winner After FDA Regulatory Shift
According to Reuters, major tobacco companies may emerge as key beneficiaries after the U.S. FDA loosened regulations on vaping and nicotine pouch products, a shift that has sparked debate over public health risks.
Industry Insight
May.26
German Environment Minister Plans Bill to Ban Disposable E-Cigarettes This Year
German Environment Minister Plans Bill to Ban Disposable E-Cigarettes This Year
German Federal Environment Minister Carsten Schneider said he is preparing legislation to ban disposable e-cigarettes and will present a bill this year. Industry data estimated that legal e-cigarette sales in Germany rose by about one quarter in 2025 to €2.4 billion. Refillable devices are not expected to be affected by the ban.
May.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai