The Consistent Regulation of E-Cigarette Flavor in the Philippines

Apr.14.2025
The Consistent Regulation of E-Cigarette Flavor in the Philippines
Philippine Justice Secretary clarifies no conflict between RA 11467 and RA 11900 in e-cigarette flavor regulation.

Key points:

The Filipino Justice Secretary emphasized that RA 11467 and RA 11900 do not conflict in regulating e-cigarette flavors.

RA 11467 prohibits e-cigarette products with flavors other than tobacco and mint, while RA 11900 regulates the use of flavor descriptions. Both laws work together to enforce strict regulation of e-cigarette flavors.

Two pieces of legislation jointly regulate the sale and promotion of e-cigarette products.


According to Malaya Business Insight on April 14th, Filipino Justice Secretary Jesus Crispin Remulla stated that the ban on flavored e-cigarette products remains in effect under Republic Act 11467. Despite the implementation of the Vaporized Nicotine and Non-Nicotine Products Act (RA 11900), these two laws do not conflict when it comes to regulating e-cigarette flavors.

 

Remulla stated in a legal opinion publicly released on April 13 that Republic Act 11467 and RA 11900 are consistent in regulating the flavors of e-cigarette products.

 

Two years ago, former President Rodrigo Duterte signed RA 11467 into law, while RA 11900 automatically took effect two years later. Health Minister Teodoro Herbosa has therefore requested legal guidance to clarify the relationship between the two laws regarding the regulation of e-cigarette flavors.

 

Hebosa pointed out that RA 11467 prohibits the use of flavors other than original tobacco and mint, while RA 11900 regulates the use of flavor descriptors. Legal guidance is needed to clarify whether the flavor descriptor ban in RA 11900 conflicts with the flavor ban in another law. The opinion of the Department of Justice on this issue is crucial, as Section 29 of RA 11900 stipulates that any laws inconsistent with it will be repealed or amended.

 

Remulla emphasized that the purpose of the two laws is to regulate the sales and distribution of e-cigarette products, including those containing nicotine and those that do not. RA 11900 provides specific guidelines for the marketing of these products but does not repeal the provisions of RA 11467 regarding the ban on flavors.

 

Remulla pointed out in a four-page legal opinion that,

 

Previously, the ban on e-cigarette products applied to the products themselves, while the new law now regulates the packaging, labeling, display, or marketing of e-cigarette products. Therefore, we can harmonize the regulations of the two laws.

 

Given that there appears to be no contradiction between the two laws, and the legislative body has not clearly indicated an intention to repeal RA 11467, both laws should be appropriately applied.

 

Remulla further stated that the advertising guidelines in RA 11900 complement the prohibitions on the manufacturing, importation, sale, and distribution of products in RA 11467, collectively regulating the sale of products with flavors other than pure tobacco and mint menthol.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Hillsborough County Public Schools to install vaping detection sensors across all high schools
Hillsborough County Public Schools to install vaping detection sensors across all high schools
Hillsborough County Public Schools (HCPS) announced it will install vaping detection sensors across all high schools in Hillsborough County as part of what officials called a “proactive step” toward healthier and safer learning environments. District staff said the sensors are intended to help reduce vaping on campus, support student well-being and encourage positive behavior change.
Feb.26 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Fourth Circuit denies rehearing bid over stay allowing Virginia e-cigarette rules to be enforced
Fourth Circuit denies rehearing bid over stay allowing Virginia e-cigarette rules to be enforced
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has declined to grant en banc or other rehearing of its decision to stay an order that had blocked enforcement of certain Virginia e-cigarette regulations. In a brief order filed Tuesday, the court denied a rehearing petition by Nova Distro Inc. and Tobacco Hut and Vape Fairfax Inc., noting that no judge requested a poll on the petition.
Mar.05 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Reynolds Appeals ITC Defeat in Disposable Vape Section 337 Case to U.S. Federal Circuit
Reynolds Appeals ITC Defeat in Disposable Vape Section 337 Case to U.S. Federal Circuit
On March 13, 2026, R.J. Reynolds and related companies filed an appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, seeking review of the U.S. International Trade Commission’s final ruling in the disposable vape Section 337 investigation.
Mar.16 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Costa Rica’s Constitutional Court Rejects Challenge, New Vape Rules to Take Effect on August 6
Costa Rica’s Constitutional Court Rejects Challenge, New Vape Rules to Take Effect on August 6
Costa Rica’s Constitutional Court has rejected an injunction seeking to stop a new vape regulation from taking effect, ruling that there was no specific harm to constitutional rights. As a result, Technical Regulation RTCR 519-2025, promoted by the Health Ministry, will enter into force on August 6 as originally planned.
Mar.20 by 2FIRSTS.ai
FDA nicotine pouch review delay report knocks tobacco shares lower
FDA nicotine pouch review delay report knocks tobacco shares lower
After Reuters reported before the market open that FDA reviews of nicotine pouch applications could face delays, shares of Philip Morris International, Turning Point Brands and British American Tobacco fell on April 1, underscoring the direct impact of U.S. regulatory signals on major tobacco companies and nicotine pouch expectations.
Apr.02
Reuters: More “Made in America” Vape Products Appear in the U.S. Amid Trump Tariffs and Crackdown
Reuters: More “Made in America” Vape Products Appear in the U.S. Amid Trump Tariffs and Crackdown
According to Reuters, the U.S. vaping market has recently seen an increase in products marketed as “Made in America” amid the Trump administration’s stronger enforcement against unauthorized vape brands and increased trade tariff pressure on Chinese goods. Since October 2025, at least eight new vape brands highlighting American credentials have entered the U.S. market, and none of them has authorization for sale. Brands mentioned by Reuters include Maxus Star and OneTank.
Apr.08