The Importance of Naming in the World of E-Cigarettes

Nov.09.2022
The Importance of Naming in the World of E-Cigarettes
With increasing regulation on e-cigarette flavours, manufacturers may need to get creative with names to attract consumers.

According to Neil McKeganey, in the illicit drug world, few substances have become popular as quickly as 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, or MDMA. If you're wondering what this oddly named substance is, you'd likely recognize its street name - ecstasy. Prior to its release, drug developers had considered calling it "empathy," but ultimately decided on "ecstasy" - after all, who could resist the chance to experience it? As it turned out, the drug's sales reached millions worldwide. This anecdote illustrates that every savvy marketer understands: names matter. In fact, when it comes to driving consumer purchases of your product, the name may be more important than the substance itself.


In recent years, the world of electronic cigarettes has faced heavy intervention from regulatory bodies, with a focus on limiting the range of flavors that can be legally sold. Senior health officials, some media outlets, lobbyists, parent groups, and others have strongly advocated for a ban on "kid-friendly" flavors. However, the restrictions on flavors have gone far beyond those considered appealing to vulnerable groups.


Out of approximately 1.6 million tobacco products seeking marketing authorization prior to listing in the United States, not a single flavor has been approved. In a recent statement from Brian King, head of the Tobacco Products Center at the Food and Drug Administration, menthol is now in regulators' crosshairs. Faced with expanding regulatory actions, it's easy to imagine a world where only one electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) flavor - tobacco - remains, making e-cigarette products closer to combustibles and almost certainly weakening their ability to provide a pathway to smoking cessation.


In a world of uniform taste, flavor branding could become a new fertile ground for promising consumers an endless variety of taste, just like the expensive Hi-Fi world where quality differences are almost indistinguishable, yet still attracts consumers seeking unique sensory and taste experiences.


As spices disappear from the market, the next step may be the regulation of their names. Regulators believe that it is the names, rather than the spices themselves, that encourage consumers to purchase these products. In this case, manufacturers will be able to present evidence to regulators to prove that their tobacco-flavored products with specific names do not appeal to young people and that these named flavors are actually helping adults quit smoking. This will become increasingly important.


It is worth noting that US regulatory authorities have already been involved in deciding which words can and cannot be used when referring to tobacco products. Some states have banned the use of food terms when referring to tobacco products, and the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act prohibits the use of terms such as "mild," "light," and "ultra-light" when referring to tobacco products. Faced with such regulatory restrictions, companies have replaced these terms with words like "gold," "silver," and "blue." In a study published in Tobacco Control in 2014, Gregory Connolly and Hillel Alpert found that smokers were still able to identify their preferred products even with these name changes.


In the world of ENDS, some e-liquid manufacturers have decided to move away from flavor-based names. For instance, Bidi Vapor has chosen to use product names such as Winter, Summer, Dawn, and Marigold when describing their product line. A few years ago, e-liquid manufacturer Five Pawns also chose to use vocabulary derived from chess, such as Gambit and Grandmaster, to name their products. These names do not convey any information about flavor or sensory experience.


In due time, anti-e-cigarette lobbying groups may push for further reduction in the variety of tobacco-flavored names, demanding that manufacturers only differentiate their products through numbers. Is this unlikely? Perhaps not for those who remember players of No. 6, No. 10, and No. 555. Flavor names may be the next item on regulatory authorities' hit list.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended for industry communication and learning purposes.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truthfulness or accuracy of the article's content. The translation of this article is intended only for internal industry research and exchange.


Due to the limitations in our translation proficiency, the translated article may not completely reflect the original text. Please refer to the original text for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government regarding any domestic, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan, or foreign issues and positions.


The copyrights of the compiled information belong to the original media and authors. Please contact us for removal if there is any infringement.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Oral Thin-Film Technology Firm CTT Pharma Eyes U.S. Nicotine Product Trials
Oral Thin-Film Technology Firm CTT Pharma Eyes U.S. Nicotine Product Trials
CTT Pharmaceutical Holdings said it has signed a letter of intent with a U.S. company to conduct clinical trials and testing for several potential nicotine products using its patented oral thin-film technology.
Jun.18
VEEV Arrives in South Korea, Completing PMI’s IQOS-ZYN-VEEV Portfolio
VEEV Arrives in South Korea, Completing PMI’s IQOS-ZYN-VEEV Portfolio
Philip Morris Korea has officially launched its VEEV e-vapor brand in South Korea, introducing both the VEEV inPRIME device and VEEBI inPRIME pods. The launch further expands PMI’s smoke-free portfolio in Korea, alongside its IQOS heated tobacco products and ZYN nicotine pouches.
Jun.16
New West Virginia Vape Law Begins, With Packaging and Ad Restrictions Ahead
New West Virginia Vape Law Begins, With Packaging and Ad Restrictions Ahead
West Virginia’s Vape Safety Act will take effect Thursday, requiring vapor products sold in vape and smoke shops to carry health warnings, legal-age notices, manufacturer information and ingredient disclosures, while introducing new licensing and enforcement rules.
Jun.10
Vuse Alto Adds New U.S. Price Tier as BAT Pushes Deeper Into Mass-Market Vaping
Vuse Alto Adds New U.S. Price Tier as BAT Pushes Deeper Into Mass-Market Vaping
British American Tobacco (BAT) subsidiary Vuse Alto has recently adjusted its price tiers in U.S. convenience store channels, leveraging low-cost device kits and pod promotions to reinforce its positioning in the mid-priced closed-system e-cigarette market.
Jun.17
Product | VELO Launches Tomorrowland Limited Edition 2026 as Festival IP Enters Nicotine Pouch Packaging
Product | VELO Launches Tomorrowland Limited Edition 2026 as Festival IP Enters Nicotine Pouch Packaging
BAT’s nicotine pouch brand VELO has introduced the Tomorrowland Limited Edition 2026. Public retail-channel information shows the product has appeared across multiple European online platforms, while Haypp UK has listed related SKUs with a “Coming soon” status. The packaging carries the wording “Official Tomorrowland Partner,” indicating that the collection is part of VELO’s official collaboration with the electronic music festival brand.
Jul.02
AP Questions FDA Rationale as Glas Fruit-Flavored Vapes Won Authorization Without Added Cessation Benefit
AP Questions FDA Rationale as Glas Fruit-Flavored Vapes Won Authorization Without Added Cessation Benefit
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently authorized two fruit-flavored vaping products from Glas, but a newly released agency memo shows the products did not demonstrate greater smoking-cessation benefits than tobacco-flavored e-cigarettes. The Associated Press said the findings are likely to raise further questions about the FDA’s regulatory rationale and standards for flavored vaping products.
Jun.12