The Importance of Naming in the World of E-Cigarettes

Nov.09.2022
The Importance of Naming in the World of E-Cigarettes
With increasing regulation on e-cigarette flavours, manufacturers may need to get creative with names to attract consumers.

According to Neil McKeganey, in the illicit drug world, few substances have become popular as quickly as 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, or MDMA. If you're wondering what this oddly named substance is, you'd likely recognize its street name - ecstasy. Prior to its release, drug developers had considered calling it "empathy," but ultimately decided on "ecstasy" - after all, who could resist the chance to experience it? As it turned out, the drug's sales reached millions worldwide. This anecdote illustrates that every savvy marketer understands: names matter. In fact, when it comes to driving consumer purchases of your product, the name may be more important than the substance itself.


In recent years, the world of electronic cigarettes has faced heavy intervention from regulatory bodies, with a focus on limiting the range of flavors that can be legally sold. Senior health officials, some media outlets, lobbyists, parent groups, and others have strongly advocated for a ban on "kid-friendly" flavors. However, the restrictions on flavors have gone far beyond those considered appealing to vulnerable groups.


Out of approximately 1.6 million tobacco products seeking marketing authorization prior to listing in the United States, not a single flavor has been approved. In a recent statement from Brian King, head of the Tobacco Products Center at the Food and Drug Administration, menthol is now in regulators' crosshairs. Faced with expanding regulatory actions, it's easy to imagine a world where only one electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) flavor - tobacco - remains, making e-cigarette products closer to combustibles and almost certainly weakening their ability to provide a pathway to smoking cessation.


In a world of uniform taste, flavor branding could become a new fertile ground for promising consumers an endless variety of taste, just like the expensive Hi-Fi world where quality differences are almost indistinguishable, yet still attracts consumers seeking unique sensory and taste experiences.


As spices disappear from the market, the next step may be the regulation of their names. Regulators believe that it is the names, rather than the spices themselves, that encourage consumers to purchase these products. In this case, manufacturers will be able to present evidence to regulators to prove that their tobacco-flavored products with specific names do not appeal to young people and that these named flavors are actually helping adults quit smoking. This will become increasingly important.


It is worth noting that US regulatory authorities have already been involved in deciding which words can and cannot be used when referring to tobacco products. Some states have banned the use of food terms when referring to tobacco products, and the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act prohibits the use of terms such as "mild," "light," and "ultra-light" when referring to tobacco products. Faced with such regulatory restrictions, companies have replaced these terms with words like "gold," "silver," and "blue." In a study published in Tobacco Control in 2014, Gregory Connolly and Hillel Alpert found that smokers were still able to identify their preferred products even with these name changes.


In the world of ENDS, some e-liquid manufacturers have decided to move away from flavor-based names. For instance, Bidi Vapor has chosen to use product names such as Winter, Summer, Dawn, and Marigold when describing their product line. A few years ago, e-liquid manufacturer Five Pawns also chose to use vocabulary derived from chess, such as Gambit and Grandmaster, to name their products. These names do not convey any information about flavor or sensory experience.


In due time, anti-e-cigarette lobbying groups may push for further reduction in the variety of tobacco-flavored names, demanding that manufacturers only differentiate their products through numbers. Is this unlikely? Perhaps not for those who remember players of No. 6, No. 10, and No. 555. Flavor names may be the next item on regulatory authorities' hit list.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended for industry communication and learning purposes.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truthfulness or accuracy of the article's content. The translation of this article is intended only for internal industry research and exchange.


Due to the limitations in our translation proficiency, the translated article may not completely reflect the original text. Please refer to the original text for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government regarding any domestic, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan, or foreign issues and positions.


The copyrights of the compiled information belong to the original media and authors. Please contact us for removal if there is any infringement.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

New York’s 75% Wholesale Tax on Nicotine Pouches Takes Effect Sept. 1, With Aug. 31 Inventory Subject to Floor Tax
New York’s 75% Wholesale Tax on Nicotine Pouches Takes Effect Sept. 1, With Aug. 31 Inventory Subject to Floor Tax
New York State will extend its tobacco products tax to “alternative nicotine products,” including tobacco-free nicotine pouches, from September 1, 2026, at a rate of 75% of the wholesale price. Distributors, wholesalers and retailers must also inventory products held as of 11:59 p.m. on August 31 and pay a floor tax. Vapor products are excluded from the new category and remain subject to New York's separate 20% supplemental sales tax on the retail price.
Aug.26
IQOS Enters Kantar BrandZ Global Top 100 for First Time, Valued at $36.6 Billion and Ranked No. 74
IQOS Enters Kantar BrandZ Global Top 100 for First Time, Valued at $36.6 Billion and Ranked No. 74
Philip Morris International’s IQOS has entered the Kantar BrandZ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands for the first time, ranking No. 74 with a brand value of $36.634 billion and becoming one of only three newcomers to the 2026 ranking. Kantar said the combined value of the Global Top 100 reached $13.1 trillion, up 22% year on year, while the threshold for entry rose to a record high. PMI says IQOS has more than 35 million users worldwide and surpassed $10 billion in annual net revenues within a decade of launch.
Sep.03
Kumulus Vape2026 H1 Revenue Falls 8.3% but Profit Rises 24% as B2B Weakens and Consumer Channels Grow
Kumulus Vape2026 H1 Revenue Falls 8.3% but Profit Rises 24% as B2B Weakens and Consumer Channels Grow
French vaping company Kumulus Vape reported first-half 2026 revenue of €25.5 million, down 8.3% year over year, as its core B2B distribution business fell 11% to €21.6 million. B2C and store-network revenue rose 5.6% and 17.8%, respectively. Commercial margin increased to 26.3% from 21.7%, while net profit rose 24.1% to €0.8 million. The company attributed the profitability improvement to catalog optimization, logistics restructuring and the ramp-up of Labster, its in-house production unit for proprietary brands.
Market
Sep.17 by 2Firsts Perspectives
China Tobacco Hubei explores staged nicotine pouch delivery, using dynamic membranes to slow early release and gradient particles to sustain later delivery
China Tobacco Hubei explores staged nicotine pouch delivery, using dynamic membranes to slow early release and gradient particles to sustain later delivery
China Tobacco Hubei Industrial Co., Ltd. disclosed several oral nicotine-related patent applications in August 2026, including two that approach staged nicotine release from different directions. One uses a high-viscosity membrane that forms inside the pouch after contact with saliva to slow rapid early release, while the other uses gradient particles with a faster-disintegrating outer layer and a slower core to create a fast-to-sustained release profile. Together, the filings explore how nicotine pouches could balance initial delivery with release later in use.
Sep.03
PMI Global R&D Chief Meets Chinese Tobacco Regulator as China Advances Heated Cigarette Standards
PMI Global R&D Chief Meets Chinese Tobacco Regulator as China Advances Heated Cigarette Standards
Philip Morris International’s global R&D chief Michele Cattoni met Liu Sanjiang, deputy director of China’s State Tobacco Monopoly Administration, in Beijing on Aug. 27. The meeting comes as China advances mandatory standards for heated cigarettes and nicotine pouches, laying groundwork for their domestic introduction. Cattoni has held senior roles in PMI’s heated tobacco development, while China’s draft standard covers multiple heating architectures, including systems similar in principle to PMI’s IQOS ILUMA technology.
Aug.27
Couche-Tard Posts Double-Digit U.S. Same-Store Growth in Other Nicotine Products, Led by Pouches
Couche-Tard Posts Double-Digit U.S. Same-Store Growth in Other Nicotine Products, Led by Pouches
Alimentation Couche-Tard said U.S. same-store sales in its “other nicotine products” category grew at a double-digit rate in the first quarter of fiscal 2027, led by nicotine pouches, while overall U.S. same-store merchandise revenues increased 1.7%. The company also said its Canadian nicotine business continued to face regulatory pressure and illicit-market headwinds. The U.S. performance coincides with Couche-Tard's participation in efforts to reopen Canadian convenience-store access to authorized nicotine pouches, though the company has not established a direct causal link between the two.
Sep.14