The Potential Hazards of E-Cigarette and Dual Use: a Cochrane Systematic Review and Secondary Analysis

Dec.01.2022
The Potential Hazards of E-Cigarette and Dual Use: a Cochrane Systematic Review and Secondary Analysis
A study on Cochrane's systematic review found that switching from smoking to e-cigarettes significantly reduces potential harm biomarkers. However, a separate study found that using both traditional and e-cigarettes has the same harmful effect on the heart as smoking alone.

Title: Biomarkers of potential harm from switching from tobacco smoking to e-cigarette use, dual use or cessation: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of secondary analysis of data from randomized controlled trials of electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation. In this study, researchers conducted a secondary analysis of data from randomized controlled trials of electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation in Greece, Italy, Poland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The conclusion drawn was that switching from tobacco smoking to e-cigarette use significantly lowered potential harmful biomarkers.


At the same time, according to a recent study published in the American Heart Association journal "Circulation," using both traditional cigarettes and e-cigarettes poses the same risk to the heart as smoking alone.


A study titled "Association Between Patterns of Cigarette and E-Cigarette Use and Inflammatory and Oxidative Stress Biomarker Levels in U.S. Adults: A Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study" analyzed more than 7,100 U.S. adults aged 18 and over to explore the connection between smoking, vaping, and heart health.


Researchers used data from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study to search for biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress, as these biomarkers are known to indicate predictive factors for heart disease and cardiovascular events, such as heart attacks and heart failure.


After analyzing five biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress, participants were divided into four groups: exclusive smokers, exclusive e-cigarette users, dual users, and non-users of e-cigarettes. Researchers listed the following findings:


Participants who only use electronic cigarettes showed similar levels of inflammation and oxidative stress as those who do not use electronic cigarettes or smoke at all. However, compared to participants who do not use cigarettes or electronic cigarettes, those who smoke exclusively or use both cigarettes and electronic cigarettes had higher levels of all evaluated biomarkers. Participants who only use electronic cigarettes had significantly lower levels of nearly all inflammation and oxidative stress biomarkers compared to those who only smoke. However, participants who use both cigarettes and electronic cigarettes had biomarker levels similar to those who exclusively smoke. 2FIRSTS will continue to report on this issue, with updates available on the "2FIRSTSAPP". Scan the QR code below to download the app.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

UK Vaping Products Duty to Raise £565 Million by 2030/31
UK Vaping Products Duty to Raise £565 Million by 2030/31
The UK will introduce Vaping Products Duty on all vaping liquids from October 1, 2026, with government revenue forecast to rise from £135 million in 2026/27 to £565 million by 2030/31.
Jun.18
South Korea Rejects 16 Trillion Won Tax-Evasion Claim Over Chinese Synthetic Nicotine
South Korea Rejects 16 Trillion Won Tax-Evasion Claim Over Chinese Synthetic Nicotine
The South Korean government rejected allegations that Chinese synthetic-nicotine e-liquids were linked to about 16 trillion won in tobacco tax evasion, saying China does not ban synthetic nicotine exports and the estimate is difficult to verify, while acknowledging that pre-law synthetic-nicotine inventory is effectively difficult to tax.
Market
Jun.25
Virginia Tightens Vape and Tobacco Retail Enforcement, With Fines Up to $15,000 Per Unlisted Product
Virginia Tightens Vape and Tobacco Retail Enforcement, With Fines Up to $15,000 Per Unlisted Product
A new Virginia law that took effect on July 1, 2026, requires retailers to obtain permits to sell liquid nicotine, vape and tobacco products, while directing Virginia ABC to conduct inspections and verify that stores sell only products listed in the state directory.
Jul.20
Product | BAT Launches glo Hyper pro+ in Japan, Upgrading the Hyper Platform With Faster Start and Smart Device Management
Product | BAT Launches glo Hyper pro+ in Japan, Upgrading the Hyper Platform With Faster Start and Smart Device Management
British American Tobacco Japan (BAT Japan) has introduced glo Hyper pro+, an upgraded device within the existing glo Hyper platform. The device adds QuickStart™ rapid heating technology, an EasyView™ display and maintenance notification features to improve daily usability. Launched in Japan on July 13, 2026, glo Hyper pro+ maintains compatibility with existing Hyper-format tobacco sticks, including neo, Lucky Strike and KENT.
Jul.30
Chinese Disposable Brands OXBAR, LYCO Challenge Vuse and JUUL: Pennsylvania’s Pending List Offers a Glimpse of the Future Legal Vape Market
Chinese Disposable Brands OXBAR, LYCO Challenge Vuse and JUUL: Pennsylvania’s Pending List Offers a Glimpse of the Future Legal Vape Market
Pennsylvania’s June 26 ENDS Pending Certifications list previews the state’s future legal vape market, placing Vuse, JUUL and Logic alongside Chinese-linked disposable brands OXBAR and LYCO. Shaped by PMTA eligibility and state rules, the list shows competition shifting from market share to market access.
Special Report
Jul.06
BofA Upgrades Imperial Brands, Says Market Overreacted to Australia Slump
BofA Upgrades Imperial Brands, Says Market Overreacted to Australia Slump
Bank of America upgraded Imperial Brands to “buy” from “neutral,” saying investors have overreacted to the tobacco group’s Australian business downturn and that the share-price pullback has created a more attractive entry point.
Jul.16