The Potential Hazards of E-Cigarette and Dual Use: a Cochrane Systematic Review and Secondary Analysis

Dec.01.2022
The Potential Hazards of E-Cigarette and Dual Use: a Cochrane Systematic Review and Secondary Analysis
A study on Cochrane's systematic review found that switching from smoking to e-cigarettes significantly reduces potential harm biomarkers. However, a separate study found that using both traditional and e-cigarettes has the same harmful effect on the heart as smoking alone.

Title: Biomarkers of potential harm from switching from tobacco smoking to e-cigarette use, dual use or cessation: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of secondary analysis of data from randomized controlled trials of electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation. In this study, researchers conducted a secondary analysis of data from randomized controlled trials of electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation in Greece, Italy, Poland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The conclusion drawn was that switching from tobacco smoking to e-cigarette use significantly lowered potential harmful biomarkers.


At the same time, according to a recent study published in the American Heart Association journal "Circulation," using both traditional cigarettes and e-cigarettes poses the same risk to the heart as smoking alone.


A study titled "Association Between Patterns of Cigarette and E-Cigarette Use and Inflammatory and Oxidative Stress Biomarker Levels in U.S. Adults: A Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study" analyzed more than 7,100 U.S. adults aged 18 and over to explore the connection between smoking, vaping, and heart health.


Researchers used data from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study to search for biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress, as these biomarkers are known to indicate predictive factors for heart disease and cardiovascular events, such as heart attacks and heart failure.


After analyzing five biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress, participants were divided into four groups: exclusive smokers, exclusive e-cigarette users, dual users, and non-users of e-cigarettes. Researchers listed the following findings:


Participants who only use electronic cigarettes showed similar levels of inflammation and oxidative stress as those who do not use electronic cigarettes or smoke at all. However, compared to participants who do not use cigarettes or electronic cigarettes, those who smoke exclusively or use both cigarettes and electronic cigarettes had higher levels of all evaluated biomarkers. Participants who only use electronic cigarettes had significantly lower levels of nearly all inflammation and oxidative stress biomarkers compared to those who only smoke. However, participants who use both cigarettes and electronic cigarettes had biomarker levels similar to those who exclusively smoke. 2FIRSTS will continue to report on this issue, with updates available on the "2FIRSTSAPP". Scan the QR code below to download the app.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Canada’s Federal Vape Flavor Restrictions Remain Unclear Five Years After Announcement
Canada’s Federal Vape Flavor Restrictions Remain Unclear Five Years After Announcement
Five years after Canada’s federal government announced plans to restrict vaping flavors nationwide, Health Minister Marjorie Michel has not said when or whether the measure will still proceed. In 2021, Health Canada said it planned to limit vaping flavors nationwide to mint, menthol and tobacco, citing evidence that fruity and sweet flavors appeal to youth.
May.11 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Australia Quantifies Black Market for First Time, Illicit Nicotine Products Account for About 80% of Consumption
Australia Quantifies Black Market for First Time, Illicit Nicotine Products Account for About 80% of Consumption
The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) has released its first estimate of the illicit nicotine market, finding that about 80% of cigarettes, vapes and other nicotine products consumed in 2025 came from illegal sources, reigniting debate over tobacco taxation and enforcement policies.
Jun.03
  South Korea Reopens Cigarette Tax Debate as 63% Back Higher Tobacco Taxes
South Korea Reopens Cigarette Tax Debate as 63% Back Higher Tobacco Taxes
South Korea’s cigarette tax debate has resurfaced after the Ministry of Health and Welfare said tobacco price policy needed review, with a poll showing 63% of respondents support higher tobacco taxes.
Regulations
Jun.22
Geneva Court Annuls Ban on Disposable E-Cigarette Sales, Says Power Lies With Federal Authorities
Geneva Court Annuls Ban on Disposable E-Cigarette Sales, Says Power Lies With Federal Authorities
The Geneva Court of Justice on Tuesday upheld appeals filed by four associations and companies active in the tobacco trade and annulled the Geneva legal provision banning the sale of disposable e-cigarettes, commonly known as “puffs.”
Apr.30 by 2FIRSTS.ai
2Firsts Hosts U.S. Compliance Briefing on Building PMTA Support Capabilities Across the Nicotine Supply Chain
2Firsts Hosts U.S. Compliance Briefing on Building PMTA Support Capabilities Across the Nicotine Supply Chain
2Firsts held a U.S. compliance briefing in Shenzhen to help vaping, heated tobacco and nicotine pouch supply chain companies strengthen PMTA support capabilities. The event focused on supplier documentation, quality systems, traceability, TPMF/TPMP pathways, age verification and customer audit readiness as U.S. compliance expectations increasingly extend deeper into the nicotine supply chain.
Events
Jun.12
Special Report | Russian Vape Compromise Faces First Hurdles
Special Report | Russian Vape Compromise Faces First Hurdles
Russia’s regional vape-ban model is facing early legal and political tests, as Perm Krai moves ahead before federal legislation is fully adopted. The case highlights uncertainty over regional authority, concerns from business groups about market fragmentation, and the risk that pressure against regional bans could revive calls for a stricter nationwide prohibition.
Industry Insight
May.28