U.S. ITC Initiates 337 Investigation on STIIIZY and ALD

Regulations by 2FIRSTS, edited by Sophia
Mar.01.2024
U.S. ITC Initiates 337 Investigation on STIIIZY and ALD
ITC launches investigation into e-cigarette companies STIIIZY and ALD for alleged patent infringement based on complaint by PAX Labs.

On February 29, according to the official website of the United States International Trade Commission (ITC), the ITC has decided to conduct a Section 337 investigation on certain atomization devices, their components, and products containing the same products. This investigation involves companies such as STIIIZY and ALD.

 

This investigation is based on a complaint filed by PAX Labs Inc. on January 30, 2024, and supplemented on February 19, 20, and 21, 2024. The complaint alleges infringement of patents claimed by the complainant, involving the import and sale of certain oil vaporization devices, their components, and products containing the same in the United States. The complainant has requested the ITC to issue a limited exclusion order and a cease and desist order.

 

ITC has identified the following respondents in this investigation:

 

  • STIIIZY IP LLC, formerly known as STIIIZY, LLC, located in Los Angeles, California, USA; 
  • ALD Group Limited, based in Guangdong, China; 
  • ALD (Hong Kong) Holdings Limited, located in Hong Kong, China; 
  • STIIIZY Inc., also known as Shryne Group Inc., situated in Los Angeles, California, USA. 

 

The International Trade Commission (ITC) has not made any decisions yet on the substantive issues of the case initiated through investigation (337-TA-1392). The Chief Administrative Law Judge of the ITC will assign this case to an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), who will schedule and conduct an evidentiary hearing. The ALJ will make an initial determination on whether there is a violation of Section 337, which can be reviewed by the Commission.

 

Within 45 days of the investigation being initiated, the ITC will determine the target date for completing the investigation. Remedial orders in ITC Section 337 cases take effect upon publication and become final within 60 days of publication, unless vetoed by the United States Trade Representative for policy reasons within that 60-day period.

 

Previously, according to a report by Bloomberg on January 30th, e-cigarette manufacturer Pax Labs Inc. has filed a lawsuit against its competitor Stiiizy Inc. and its manufacturer ALD Group Ltd (ALD) for infringing on four of its patents.

 

Pax Labs alleges that Stiiizy and ALD, headquartered in Hong Kong, China, are manufacturing and selling vaporization devices, including batteries and pods, in a manner similar to Pax Labs' patented technology.

 

Pax Labs has obtained U.S. patents 11,369,756, 11,369,757, 11,766,527, and 11,759,580, which are related to methods for leak-proof pods and related devices. Pax Labs has alleged that these two companies have infringed upon the aforementioned patents.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Queensland, Australia, has enacted legislation to combat illegal tobacco and e-cigarettes and protect community safety
Queensland, Australia, has enacted legislation to combat illegal tobacco and e-cigarettes and protect community safety
Australia’s Queensland launched the 2025 Tobacco (Unlawful Trading) Amendment Bill to curb illegal tobacco/e-cig trade. The new law lets health authorities shut illegal shops (up to 3 months, extendable to 12), seize contaminated products and do undercover work. Government stresses zero tolerance (higher fines, longer closures, landlord accountability). Australian Shopping Centre Council says it benefits communities. Nov 2024–Aug 2025: Queensland seized illegal tobacco/e-cigs, issued closure ord
Sep.18 by 2FIRSTS.ai
InterTabac 2025 Highlights Europe’s Vaping Dilemma: Tighter Regulation, Constrained Innovation
InterTabac 2025 Highlights Europe’s Vaping Dilemma: Tighter Regulation, Constrained Innovation
According to 2Firsts’ on-site observations, the vaping halls at InterTabac 2025 have visibly cooled: fewer exhibitors, a weaker presence from major brands, and scarce stage activations; new product momentum is weak and homogenization has intensified. Tightening regulation and policy uncertainty are squeezing innovation, pushing companies to replicate proven models—overall, a “cautious showcase.”
Sep.19 by 2FIRSTS.ai
New Poll Shows 80% of Voters Support Strengthening Enforcement Against Illegal E-Cigarettes, Could Impact Swing Districts
New Poll Shows 80% of Voters Support Strengthening Enforcement Against Illegal E-Cigarettes, Could Impact Swing Districts
A new poll shows 80% of voters support stronger enforcement against illegal e-cigarette production, potentially impacting swing districts.
Oct.17 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Two South African students had their scholarships revoked for vaping; court rules the school's punishment invalid
Two South African students had their scholarships revoked for vaping; court rules the school's punishment invalid
Two South African students win court ruling against school's excessive e-cigarette punishment, violating "no double jeopardy" principle.
Sep.15 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Smoking Among Korean Men in Their 30s Plummets as E-Cigarettes Become the Main Substitute
Smoking Among Korean Men in Their 30s Plummets as E-Cigarettes Become the Main Substitute
KDCA reports cigarette smoking among Korean men in their 30s fell from 48% (2015) to 28.5% (2024). Including e-cigarettes, overall use was 40.1% in 2024—just 4.9 points below 2019—suggesting a shift to alternatives.
Oct.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
ICYMI: E-cigarette registrations in the UK drop sharply in the latest MHRA update, with 317 new codes approved from Sept 15-21. Prominent brands like IVG and LOST MARY see new device releases, while pod registrations plummet by 82%, with JUUL making a rar
ICYMI: E-cigarette registrations in the UK drop sharply in the latest MHRA update, with 317 new codes approved from Sept 15-21. Prominent brands like IVG and LOST MARY see new device releases, while pod registrations plummet by 82%, with JUUL making a rar
MHRA publicly announced over 300 e-cigarette registration codes, showing a decrease in pod submissions and new brand devices.
Sep.22 by 2FIRSTS.ai