USITC Upholds Preliminary Ruling in Reynolds Tobacco Case

Dec.20.2024
USITC Upholds Preliminary Ruling in Reynolds Tobacco Case
USITC upholds administrative judge ruling denying temporary relief for disposable e-cigarette patent infringement case.

On December 18, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced that it had decided not to modify, rescind, or overturn the decision of the presiding Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) concerning the preliminary determination denying RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc. and its affiliated companies' request for temporary relief (known as "ID," or Order No. 28). This decision means that the temporary exclusion order and cease and desist order sought by RAI regarding the import and sale of certain disposable e-cigarette devices and their components were not approved.


The investigation was filed by the British-American tobacco subsidiary Reynolds Tobacco on July 22, 2024, alleging that the importation and sale of certain disposable e-cigarette devices and components by 35 companies violated its US Patent No. 11,925,202. The companies under investigation include several from China, Hong Kong, and the United States.


Reynolds Tobacco has filed a complaint and simultaneously applied for a temporary restraining order and injunction in an attempt to prevent these products from entering or continuing to be sold in the US market during the investigation.


The U.S. International Trade Commission has accepted the case and assigned an administrative law judge to conduct the investigation. However, due to the complexity of the case, the commission deemed the interim relief program as a "complicated" matter on July 29, 2024. Some defendant companies such as Kimsun and Bidi Vapor have ended the investigation by reaching a consent decree, but several defendants have not appeared in response to the lawsuit.


On November 19, 2024, an administrative judge issued a temporary restraining order ("TEO"), denying Reynolds Tobacco's request for temporary relief. The ruling stated:


The claims of patent infringement lack a likelihood of success.


There is a significant dispute over the validity of the patent.


The plaintiff failed to prove that not seeking redress would result in irreparable harm.


Renault subsequently submitted a comment document, but stated that they will not seek a reconsideration of the ruling by the commission.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Altria and NJOY Sue ITC, Claim Judge Appointment Process Is Unconstitutional
Altria and NJOY Sue ITC, Claim Judge Appointment Process Is Unconstitutional
Altria Group and its NJOY subsidiary have filed a lawsuit in Virginia federal court challenging the U.S. International Trade Commission’s process for appointing administrative law judges. The companies allege the system violates the U.S. Constitution and seek to halt an ITC patent investigation initiated by rival Juul.
Nov.10
STMA to Hold Hearing on License Leasing Case in Shenzhen
STMA to Hold Hearing on License Leasing Case in Shenzhen
The State Tobacco Monopoly Administration (STMA) announced a public hearing will be held on Nov. 11 at 9 a.m. in Bao’an District, Shenzhen, regarding Shenzhen Biaogan Zhizao Technology Co., Ltd. accused of leasing its tobacco retail license.
Oct.31 by 2FIRSTS.ai
CNIPA Targets E-Cigarettes as Key Focus in Crackdown on Trademark Violations
CNIPA Targets E-Cigarettes as Key Focus in Crackdown on Trademark Violations
National Intellectual Property Office issued a notice to strengthen management of illegal use of trademarks, promoting fair competition.
Nov.25 by 2FIRSTS.ai
2Firsts Insights | From Limited-Edition Frenzy to Interactive Lead-Gen: The 2025 Halloween Shift in Vape Marketing
2Firsts Insights | From Limited-Edition Frenzy to Interactive Lead-Gen: The 2025 Halloween Shift in Vape Marketing
For Halloween 2025, leading vape brands such as HQD and ELFBAR are running overseas social-media engagement campaigns—covering points programs and UGC giveaways with age/region restrictions. Unlike 2024’s wave of themed devices, no brand-new Halloween limited editions have appeared on major U.S. channels this year; only RAZ has restocked last year’s version.
Oct.31 by 2FIRSTS.ai
BAT Podcast with AACS CEO: Vape Policy Imbalance Fuels Australia’s Billion-Dollar Illicit Market
BAT Podcast with AACS CEO: Vape Policy Imbalance Fuels Australia’s Billion-Dollar Illicit Market
In BAT’s The Smokeless Word podcast, AACS CEO Theo Foukkare warned that high taxes and strict vape bans have fueled Australia’s AUD 10-billion illicit nicotine market and rising retail crime, urging urgent regulatory reform.
Oct.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Philip Morris USA Reaches $66M Settlement With Washington State Over MSA Payment Dispute
Philip Morris USA Reaches $66M Settlement With Washington State Over MSA Payment Dispute
Philip Morris USA has reached a settlement with Washington State and agreed to pay $66 million to resolve disputes over annual payments under the 1998 Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) for the period 2005–2015.
Nov.04 by 2FIRSTS.ai