USITC Upholds Preliminary Ruling in Reynolds Tobacco Case

Dec.20.2024
USITC Upholds Preliminary Ruling in Reynolds Tobacco Case
USITC upholds administrative judge ruling denying temporary relief for disposable e-cigarette patent infringement case.

On December 18, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced that it had decided not to modify, rescind, or overturn the decision of the presiding Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) concerning the preliminary determination denying RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc. and its affiliated companies' request for temporary relief (known as "ID," or Order No. 28). This decision means that the temporary exclusion order and cease and desist order sought by RAI regarding the import and sale of certain disposable e-cigarette devices and their components were not approved.


The investigation was filed by the British-American tobacco subsidiary Reynolds Tobacco on July 22, 2024, alleging that the importation and sale of certain disposable e-cigarette devices and components by 35 companies violated its US Patent No. 11,925,202. The companies under investigation include several from China, Hong Kong, and the United States.


Reynolds Tobacco has filed a complaint and simultaneously applied for a temporary restraining order and injunction in an attempt to prevent these products from entering or continuing to be sold in the US market during the investigation.


The U.S. International Trade Commission has accepted the case and assigned an administrative law judge to conduct the investigation. However, due to the complexity of the case, the commission deemed the interim relief program as a "complicated" matter on July 29, 2024. Some defendant companies such as Kimsun and Bidi Vapor have ended the investigation by reaching a consent decree, but several defendants have not appeared in response to the lawsuit.


On November 19, 2024, an administrative judge issued a temporary restraining order ("TEO"), denying Reynolds Tobacco's request for temporary relief. The ruling stated:


The claims of patent infringement lack a likelihood of success.


There is a significant dispute over the validity of the patent.


The plaintiff failed to prove that not seeking redress would result in irreparable harm.


Renault subsequently submitted a comment document, but stated that they will not seek a reconsideration of the ruling by the commission.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Arizona’s Operation Counter Strike Conducts 1,882 Tobacco Retailer Inspections in Fiscal 2025, Issues 451 Criminal Citations
Arizona’s Operation Counter Strike Conducts 1,882 Tobacco Retailer Inspections in Fiscal 2025, Issues 451 Criminal Citations
Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes announced the results of the Attorney General’s Office “Operation Counter Strike” program on March 9, 2026.
Mar.11 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Special Report|Disposable Heated Tobacco? A China Tobacco Patent Reimagines the Heated-Tobacco Stick as a Self-Contained Product
Special Report|Disposable Heated Tobacco? A China Tobacco Patent Reimagines the Heated-Tobacco Stick as a Self-Contained Product
A newly published China Tobacco patent proposes a holder-free heat-not-burn stick that integrates the filter, tobacco substrate, heating element, controller and power source into one cigarette-shaped product. It stands out not just for eliminating the external heating device, but for explicitly highlighting two less common goals in heated tobacco: restoring cigarette-like social sharing and enabling post-use recovery through a recoverable component group.
Innovation
Mar.18
ELFBAR Resolves Global Dispute Over "ELF" Trademark with VPR Brands LP
ELFBAR Resolves Global Dispute Over "ELF" Trademark with VPR Brands LP
ELFBAR announces global settlement with VPR Brands LP over "ELF" trademark dispute, covering major markets like US, Canada, UK.
Apr.01 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Scandinavian Tobacco Group releases 2025 results: tariffs and weaker demand weigh on performance, revenue about $1.4 billion
Scandinavian Tobacco Group releases 2025 results: tariffs and weaker demand weigh on performance, revenue about $1.4 billion
Scandinavian Tobacco Group (STG) reported its 2025 results: revenue was 9.036 billion Danish kroner (about $1.407 billion); EBITDA before special items was 1.791 billion Danish kroner (about $278 million); and free cash flow before acquisitions was 595 million Danish kroner (about $92.7 million). Multiple metrics declined year over year, and the company did not meet its Q3-updated guidance for revenue and free cash flow.
Mar.05 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Philippines DOH reiterates: vaping is not safer than smoking, citing irreversible health risks
Philippines DOH reiterates: vaping is not safer than smoking, citing irreversible health risks
The Philippine Department of Health reiterated Saturday that vaping should not be promoted as an alternative to cigarette smoking, Health Secretary Teodoro “Ted” Herbosa said in a radio interview, according to the Tribune. Herbosa said both vaping and smoking pose irreversible health risks and cited E-cigarette or Vaping Product Use-Associated Lung Injury (EVALI), claiming it led to the death of a 22-year-old male with no smoking history in 2025.
Feb.28 by 2FIRSTS.ai
2Firsts Interview with Glas |Why a California ENDS Company Believes Its Age-gated Flavored Vape Could Be Next in Line for FDA Authorization
2Firsts Interview with Glas |Why a California ENDS Company Believes Its Age-gated Flavored Vape Could Be Next in Line for FDA Authorization
As the FDA advances efforts to streamline its PMTA review process, including support for small businesses, expectations are rising that additional product authorizations may follow. Age-verification technology is emerging as a key consideration in future approvals.In this interview, California-based Glas discusses its G2 platform, integrating smartphone-based identity verification, proximity controls and anti-counterfeit systems, and outlines its positioning under the FDA’s PMTA framework.
Mar.02