USITC Upholds Preliminary Ruling in Reynolds Tobacco Case

Dec.20.2024
USITC Upholds Preliminary Ruling in Reynolds Tobacco Case
USITC upholds administrative judge ruling denying temporary relief for disposable e-cigarette patent infringement case.

On December 18, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced that it had decided not to modify, rescind, or overturn the decision of the presiding Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) concerning the preliminary determination denying RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc. and its affiliated companies' request for temporary relief (known as "ID," or Order No. 28). This decision means that the temporary exclusion order and cease and desist order sought by RAI regarding the import and sale of certain disposable e-cigarette devices and their components were not approved.


The investigation was filed by the British-American tobacco subsidiary Reynolds Tobacco on July 22, 2024, alleging that the importation and sale of certain disposable e-cigarette devices and components by 35 companies violated its US Patent No. 11,925,202. The companies under investigation include several from China, Hong Kong, and the United States.


Reynolds Tobacco has filed a complaint and simultaneously applied for a temporary restraining order and injunction in an attempt to prevent these products from entering or continuing to be sold in the US market during the investigation.


The U.S. International Trade Commission has accepted the case and assigned an administrative law judge to conduct the investigation. However, due to the complexity of the case, the commission deemed the interim relief program as a "complicated" matter on July 29, 2024. Some defendant companies such as Kimsun and Bidi Vapor have ended the investigation by reaching a consent decree, but several defendants have not appeared in response to the lawsuit.


On November 19, 2024, an administrative judge issued a temporary restraining order ("TEO"), denying Reynolds Tobacco's request for temporary relief. The ruling stated:


The claims of patent infringement lack a likelihood of success.


There is a significant dispute over the validity of the patent.


The plaintiff failed to prove that not seeking redress would result in irreparable harm.


Renault subsequently submitted a comment document, but stated that they will not seek a reconsideration of the ruling by the commission.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

FDA Issues Draft PMTA Guidance for Flavored E-Cigarettes, Maintaining Higher Evidence Bar for Fruit and Sweet Flavors
FDA Issues Draft PMTA Guidance for Flavored E-Cigarettes, Maintaining Higher Evidence Bar for Fruit and Sweet Flavors
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on March 9 released a draft guidance outlining its current thinking on premarket tobacco product applications (PMTAs) for flavored electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). The document reiterates that fruit, candy, dessert, and other sweet-flavored e-cigarettes present a “significant public health risk” to youth and therefore face a higher evidentiary burden if manufacturers seek marketing authorization.
Mar.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai
California Bill Would Let Schools Include Nicotine in Student-Athlete Drug Screens
California Bill Would Let Schools Include Nicotine in Student-Athlete Drug Screens
California lawmakers are advancing a bill that would allow schools with existing student-athlete drug testing programs to include nicotine in those screenings.
Apr.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Alaska AG warns 1,500+ retailers to stop selling unauthorized vapes and nicotine pouches
Alaska AG warns 1,500+ retailers to stop selling unauthorized vapes and nicotine pouches
Alaska’s attorney general has sent warning letters to more than 1,500 retailers and distributors, cautioning them against selling tobacco products — including e-cigarettes and oral nicotine pouches — that lack U.S. Food and Drug Administration authorization.
Mar.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Fontem Sues FDA Over Refusal-to-File Decision for Nicotine Pouch PMTAs
Fontem Sues FDA Over Refusal-to-File Decision for Nicotine Pouch PMTAs
According to a complaint filed on March 17 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fontem US, LLC and Texas retailer OM Investment, LLC sued the Food and Drug Administration and the Department of Health and Human Services over FDA’s refusal-to-file decision for certain Zone nicotine pouch PMTAs.
Mar.19 by 2FIRSTS.ai
UK Vape Distributor JM Wholesale Files Notice to Enter Administration
UK Vape Distributor JM Wholesale Files Notice to Enter Administration
UK vape distributor JM Wholesale filed a notice on March 20 to enter administration. The Leicestershire-based company submitted the notice through Shakespeare Martineau, with Quantuma expected to be appointed as administrator.
Mar.23 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Smoore International Q1 Results: Enterprise-Focused Business Up 48.6% Year-on-Year, Proprietary E-Vapor Brand Business Up 14.3%
Smoore International Q1 Results: Enterprise-Focused Business Up 48.6% Year-on-Year, Proprietary E-Vapor Brand Business Up 14.3%
Smoore International reported its Q1 financial results, with revenue for the period reaching RMB3.856 billion, up 41.7% year-on-year, and net profit (profit for the period) totaling RMB262.5 million, up 36.6% year-on-year. Revenue from its enterprise-focused business was RMB3.2674 billion, representing a 48.6% increase from RMB2.1989 billion in the same period last year. Revenue from its proprietary brand business was RMB588.6 million, up 12.6% from RMB522.6 million a year earlier.
Apr.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai