ITC terminates investigation on Kimsun in e-cigarette dispute

Sep.25.2024
ITC terminates investigation on Kimsun in e-cigarette dispute
ITC terminates investigation on disposable e-cigarette devices, issuing settlement order to Kimsun in 337 case.

On September 23, according to the latest announcement by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), in the 337 investigation case regarding certain disposable e-cigarette devices, the commission decided not to review the initial determination of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). This means that based on a mutually agreed settlement agreement, the investigation into Kimsun Technology (HuiZhou) Co., Ltd. has been terminated.


The investigation case number is 337-TA-1410, which began on July 22, 2024, brought by the plaintiffs RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc., R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, RAI Services Company, collectively known as the plaintiffs. They accused 35 companies, including Kimsun, of violating Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The plaintiffs claim that these companies have imported, sold, and/or sold after importation disposable e-cigarette devices and their components in the United States, infringing on their patents.


On August 16, 2024, Kimsun applied to terminate the investigation against it based on a consent order. On August 22, the Office of Unfair Import Investigations (OUII) supported the motion, with no opposition from other parties. On August 28, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) issued a preliminary ruling to terminate the investigation against Kimsun, stating that the consent order complied with ITC rules 210.21(c)(3) and (4), and that the termination of the investigation would not be against the public interest.


ITC decided not to review the ruling in the vote on September 23 and issued a consent order to Kimsun. This marks the end of the legal dispute for Kimsun in the 337 investigation case.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Fourth Circuit weighs federal preemption challenge to North Carolina’s vape sales restrictions
Fourth Circuit weighs federal preemption challenge to North Carolina’s vape sales restrictions
Vape manufacturers and sellers urged the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to find that the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) preempts North Carolina’s new law restricting the sale of certain e-cigarette/ENDS products.
Feb.03 by 2FIRSTS.ai
PMI U.S. to Host Job Fair for ZYN Nicotine Pouch Factory in Colorado
PMI U.S. to Host Job Fair for ZYN Nicotine Pouch Factory in Colorado
PMI U.S. plans to host a job fair to recruit employees for its ZYN nicotine pouch manufacturing facility currently under construction in Aurora, Colorado. The main position being recruited is Process Technician, responsible for equipment operation and maintenance, quality and safety monitoring, and supporting continuous production improvements.
Mar.12 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Virginia asks Fourth Circuit to stay order blocking parts of its unauthorized-vape sales law
Virginia asks Fourth Circuit to stay order blocking parts of its unauthorized-vape sales law
Virginia has asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to stay a district court order that blocks enforcement of certain provisions of a state law restricting the sale of unauthorized vaping products. The district court held the law was preempted to the extent it enforced federal requirements under the FDCA and the Tobacco Control Act.
Jan.21 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Proposed vaping duty in Jersey: £467,000 forecast for 2026 as it takes effect in the second half of the year
Proposed vaping duty in Jersey: £467,000 forecast for 2026 as it takes effect in the second half of the year
Jersey is proposing a vaping duty. The Treasury Minister said the duty is forecast to raise £467,000 in 2026 because it will take effect in the second half of the year, and £955,000 per year from 2027 to 2029. Implementation is estimated to cost around £400,000 over four years, with an initial cost of £145,000 in 2026. The policy is described as aiming to reduce nicotine consumption and improve public health, while avoiding a shift to smoking.
Feb.26 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Ohio Supreme Court takes up appeal that could define state limits on illegal vape sales enforcement
Ohio Supreme Court takes up appeal that could define state limits on illegal vape sales enforcement
The Ohio Supreme Court has agreed to hear Attorney General Dave Yost’s appeal seeking to revive lawsuits against three Ohio vape retailers. Lower courts dismissed the cases, finding that federal law governs whether vaping products may be marketed and sold.
Mar.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai
France’s ANSES warns vaping carries health risks, urges limiting e-cigarette use to smoking cessation
France’s ANSES warns vaping carries health risks, urges limiting e-cigarette use to smoking cessation
France’s National Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES) says vaping poses health risks because users inhale toxic or harmful substances, even if e-cigarettes are generally considered less harmful than cigarettes.
Feb.04 by 2FIRSTS.ai