Vape Brand VPR Brands Settles Trademark Lawsuit for $5.3M

May.10.2023
Vape Brand VPR Brands Settles Trademark Lawsuit for $5.3M
Safa Goods to pay $5.3M to VPR Brands to settle "Elf" trademark lawsuit over e-cigarettes in the US.

According to recent public information released by securities regulatory agencies, US wholesaler Safa Goods has agreed to pay VPR Brands, the manufacturer of "Elf" branded e-cigarettes, 5.3 million US dollars in order to settle a patent infringement lawsuit brought against them.


According to reports, Safa Goods is a wholesaler for the Miracle electronic cigarette products in the US. In 2022, the parent company VPR Brands of the "Elf" brand filed a lawsuit against Shenzhen Wepowerloy Technology Co., Ltd., Imiracle Ltd., and other companies, alleging that they infringed on the "Elf" brand trademark.


According to court records, one of the defendants, company "Ai Qi Ji" produced and sold disposable e-cigarettes called "Elfbar", which infringed upon VPR's registered trademark "Elf" in the e-cigarette industry. The initial court ruling found in favor of VPR and issued a preliminary injunction against Shenzhen Wei Bolili, preventing them from marketing or selling disposable e-cigarettes under the name "Elfbar".


Following a preliminary ruling based on legislation, Weipoli changed the name of "Elfbar" to "EBDesign" and continued marketing and sales activities in the United States. However, VPR claims that some defendants have violated the injunction, including retail distribution company Safa Goods, which distributes Elfbar products.


Safa Goods has agreed to pay $5.3 million to VPR within 18 months, and $50,000 to the plaintiff's attorney firm Sriplaw PA.


Although the settlement with VPR marks the end of Safa Goods' lawsuit, litigation between VPR and other defendants is still ongoing.


Reference:


A manufacturer of vaping products has reached a settlement of $5.3 million with a wholesaler in a legal dispute involving the trademark for the film "Elf.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

Malaysian Langkawi marine police seize vape devices and e-liquid worth US$43,902
Malaysian Langkawi marine police seize vape devices and e-liquid worth US$43,902
In Langkawi, Malaysia, the Marine Police seized various vape devices and e-liquid valued at RM178,400 (about US$43,902.99). Authorities believe the goods were intended to be smuggled out to a neighboring country.
Jan.15 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Vape sellers sue to block Texas law banning e-liquids from China and other “foreign adversaries”
Vape sellers sue to block Texas law banning e-liquids from China and other “foreign adversaries”
A group of vape distributors and retailers has sued to block enforcement of a Texas law that criminalizes selling or marketing vape products containing e-liquids made wholly or partly in China or in countries designated as “foreign adversaries” by the U.S. Commerce Secretary. The plaintiffs argue the law violates the U.S. Constitution because only Congress may regulate foreign commerce.
Feb.03 by 2FIRSTS.ai
U.S. Fifth Circuit judges question FDA’s claim it has no de facto ban on flavored refillable e-cigarettes
U.S. Fifth Circuit judges question FDA’s claim it has no de facto ban on flavored refillable e-cigarettes
Law360 reports that a Fifth Circuit panel expressed skepticism about the FDA’s claim that it has no de facto ban on flavored refillable e-cigarette products, noting that only six applications had been approved out of hundreds of thousands and that near-100% denials look like a ban.
Jan.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai
FDA Details Carcinogenicity Tiering and ELCR Framework as Small Manufacturers Press for Predictability
FDA Details Carcinogenicity Tiering and ELCR Framework as Small Manufacturers Press for Predictability
During the “Toxicological Profile” session at FDA’s Feb 10 PMTA roundtable, officials outlined the carcinogenicity tiering system and Excess Lifetime Cancer Risk (ELCR) framework used in ENDS reviews under the APPH standard. Small manufacturers questioned database transparency, exposure assumptions, and the existence of clear compliance benchmarks. FDA reiterated toxicological risk is assessed case by case within a broader population-level determination.
Feb.11
Russia’s Volgograd fines retailer 300,000 rubles for unlabelled nicotine products, orders confiscation and destruction
Russia’s Volgograd fines retailer 300,000 rubles for unlabelled nicotine products, orders confiscation and destruction
Volgograd, Russia say a retailer was caught selling unlabelled nicotine products, including electronic nicotine delivery devices flagged in the national “Honest Sign” tracking system as already withdrawn from circulation. A local court fined the entrepreneur 300,000 rubles and ordered 41 confiscated items to be destroyed, with the decision now in effect.
Feb.05 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Research Summary | NHANES Study: Smoking or E-Cigarette Use Linked to Higher Prevalence of Elevated Blood Pressure and Hypertension
Research Summary | NHANES Study: Smoking or E-Cigarette Use Linked to Higher Prevalence of Elevated Blood Pressure and Hypertension
A cross-sectional analysis based on the US NHANES 2021–2023 cycle, including 6,262 participants aged over 12, found that compared with people who neither smoke nor vape, those who smoke and/or use e-cigarettes had a higher prevalence of elevated blood pressure and hypertension. After full adjustment, smoking/vaping was associated with elevated blood pressure (aOR 1.34) and hypertension (aOR 1.46), and with a 1.05 mmHg higher diastolic blood pressure.
Feb.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai