Warning against New Nicotine Product Infiltrating Schools in New Zealand

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Apr.17.2024
Warning against New Nicotine Product Infiltrating Schools in New Zealand
New Zealand health professionals warn about the growing presence of ZYN nicotine pouches in schools, posing addiction risks.

According to a report from The New Zealand Herald on April 17th, health professionals in New Zealand are issuing warnings about a new type of nicotine product that is infiltrating schools in New Zealand. ZYN is a brand of smokeless nicotine pouches that is gradually becoming mainstream through social media influencers on platforms such as TikTok and Instagram.

 

This product, based in Sweden, aims to be a replacement for smoking or e-cigarettes to help users quit nicotine.

 

Richard Edwards, professor at the University of Otago and co-director of Aspire2025, expressed concern to the Pioneer Press about the widespread acceptance of these products among young people.

 

While these products may not be as harmful as smoking, they may still be just as addictive, leading to widespread use among young people and creating a widespread dependency on nicotine.

 

Edwards warned that unlike other nicotine pouch brands such as Snus, ZYN brand does not contain tobacco. These nicotine pouches resemble small tea bags and are placed between the lip and gum. They are typically sold in brightly colored cans of 15 to 20, and come in various flavors including berry, coffee, and citrus.

 

New Zealand banned the sale of nicotine pouches in 2020, but importing them from overseas remains legal as long as they are not sold within the country. Despite the ban, The Pioneer newspaper has learned that these products are now making their way into schools nationwide, with reports of students selling them to their peers.

 

However, Sean Teddy, the head of operations and integration at the Ministry of Education, stated that the schools have not raised any concerns about this issue with the department.

 

He emphasized,

 

According to the revised Smoke-free Environments and Regulated Products (Vaping) Amendment Act 2020, smoking or using e-cigarettes on school grounds, kura kaupapa (Māori language schools), early childhood education centers, and kōhanga reo (Māori language immersion preschools) is illegal.

 

In an earlier statement, Deputy Health Minister Casey Costello hinted that she hopes to introduce oral nicotine products, including snus and chewing tobacco, to provide smokers with more and safer alternative smoking options.

 

However, Edwards believes that the introduction of oral nicotine products may not work as expected. Edwards is concerned that these oral nicotine products may not target the intended demographic. He said, "The biggest users of e-cigarettes are young people...we want 50-year-old smokers." He expressed that allowing these products to enter the market without restrictions could lead to more young people becoming dependent on nicotine.

 

Edwards believes that these products should not be introduced unless there are very strong reasons to do so. He suggests that a distribution model similar to that of pharmacies selling only prescription drugs could be implemented, thereby more strictly regulating distribution. However, if these products are widely available in locations such as convenience stores and gas stations, we may see another product being widely used among young people.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

U.S. Ninth Circuit Upholds FDA Denial of MH Global’s Flavored Vape PMTA Applications
U.S. Ninth Circuit Upholds FDA Denial of MH Global’s Flavored Vape PMTA Applications
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the FDA’s denial of MH Global LLC’s applications to market flavored electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). The court ruled that FDA’s comparative-efficacy framework, which requires applicants to show that flavored products provide greater cessation or switching benefits than tobacco-flavored alternatives, is consistent with the Tobacco Control Act’s “appropriate for the protection of the public health” standard. The court also found that FDA was not required to establish the framework through notice-and-comment rulemaking.
Aug.26
Product | JT Expands Vote-Winning EVO Cacao Mint Crystal to Nationwide Retail in Japan, Adds 22-Stick Limited Pack at Same Price
Product | JT Expands Vote-Winning EVO Cacao Mint Crystal to Nationwide Retail in Japan, Adds 22-Stick Limited Pack at Same Price
Japan Tobacco (JT) will expand EVO Cacao Mint Crystal from limited channels to nationwide retail in Japan from October 6, 2026. The Ploom tobacco stick ranked first in the brand's first consumer voting campaign for new tobacco-stick SKUs held earlier this year. JT will also introduce a limited 22-stick pack at the same JPY 620 price as the standard 20-stick pack. The capsule-format product combines menthol with sweet, bittersweet cacao notes and adds a berry nuance when the capsule is crushed.
Sep.09
Malaysia Withdraws Appeal Against Liquid Nicotine Ruling as Vape Regulation Framework Enters New Phase
Malaysia Withdraws Appeal Against Liquid Nicotine Ruling as Vape Regulation Framework Enters New Phase
Malaysia’s government has withdrawn its appeal against a High Court ruling concerning the regulatory status of liquid nicotine used in vape and e-cigarette products, according to reports by New Straits Times, Free Malaysia Today and CodeBlue on August 18, 2026. The Kuala Lumpur High Court ruled on May 15 that the government’s decision to remove liquid nicotine from the scheduled poisons list under the Poisons Act 1952 was irrational and made without proper consultation with the Poisons Board. The withdrawal ends the government’s appeal process, while the future regulatory framework for nicotine vape products remains under discussion.
Aug.21
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
According to VitalLaw on August 27, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated an FDA marketing denial order (MDO) against NicQuid LLC, ruling that the agency’s comparative-efficacy standard for electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) applications had become a substantive rule requiring notice-and-comment rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The court did not reject FDA’s authority to compare the public health benefits and risks of flavored vapes, but held that the agency could not establish a broadly binding standard through informal adjudications. The case was remanded to FDA for further proceedings.
Aug.28
Major U.S.  Vape Distributor Demand Vape Pays at Least $300,000 for White House Lobbying Amid Enforcement Pressure
Major U.S. Vape Distributor Demand Vape Pays at Least $300,000 for White House Lobbying Amid Enforcement Pressure
New York vape distributor Ecto World, which operates as Demand Vape, hired political consultant Roger Stone to lobby the Executive Office of the President on regulation of vaping and related products while facing state enforcement and multiple lawsuits. Public lobbying disclosures show that Ecto World paid at least $300,000 for the work through June 30, 2026. Separately, New York State announced in March that more than 28,500 pounds of vaping products tied to the company had been seized, while New York City and the state have pursued legal or enforcement actions. Public records do not show that the lobbying directly changed any specific regulatory or enforcement outcome.
Sep.08
STIIIZY Redesign Fails to Escape PAX Labs Patent Import Ban as Section 337 Case Also Involves China ALD
STIIIZY Redesign Fails to Escape PAX Labs Patent Import Ban as Section 337 Case Also Involves China ALD
U.S. Customs and Border Protection ruled that STIIIZY had not shown that the redesigned cannabis-vape products covered by its latest request fall outside an ITC limited exclusion order tied to PAX Labs patents. CBP accepted some of STIIIZY’s claim-construction and non-infringement arguments, but the company did not address two additional claims in the same patent. Earlier STIIIZY redesigned cartridges and certain associated components imported with them had received separate CBP clearance.
Sep.16