Increasing Trend of E-cigarette Usage among Belarusian Students

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Dec.07.2023
Increasing Trend of E-cigarette Usage among Belarusian Students
According to sb.by, experts have warned that Belarusian students are starting to use e-cigarettes at a younger age. Selling these products to minors is strictly prohibited in the country.

According to a report by sb.by, Belarusian media, experts are warning that students in Belarus are increasingly starting to use e-cigarette devices at a younger age.

 

Even though it is strictly prohibited in this country to sell such items to minors, businesses are mandated to take full responsibility. However, many adolescents are not purchasing e-cigarettes from established retail outlets but rather at flea markets. Consequently, it is quite challenging to locate these illicit sales. Law enforcement has initiated efforts to eliminate the allure of e-cigarettes among children.

 

Regular law enforcement personnel will conduct surprise inspections to check whether there are individuals selling e-cigarettes to minors, as well as the e-liquid required for e-cigarettes.

 

Police officer Elena Kupraenok expressed, "Some businesses simply rely on their own judgment to assess the age of customers. They think that if a young person looks like a student, there's no need to ask for their identification. However, we must not forget that modern minors often appear quite mature." Nevertheless, law enforcers must also consider fairness in order to adhere to relevant regulations and codes of conduct.

 

Law enforcement officials have issued a warning reminding the public that selling e-liquids to minors is strictly prohibited. According to the provisions outlined in the Administrative Offenses Act of the Republic of Belarus, offenders will face fines (up to a maximum of 20 [currency]). This measure not only serves as a preventive measure but also as an educational tool, primarily aimed at safeguarding the health of children and adolescents. The reason being that these tobacco products contain nicotine, which is particularly harmful to developing children and teenagers.

 

The chief of the local police department, Larisa Palachanskaya, stated that the age at which teenagers start using e-cigarette devices is significantly declining.

 

It is important to note that selling e-cigarettes and e-liquids to minors is illegal and can potentially cause serious harm to the health of children and adolescents.

 

Parachaniskaya shared some concerning observations, stating, "Some children are starting to use e-cigarettes in elementary school. Adolescents experimenting with e-cigarettes, the effects of tobacco on their bodies, and the potential consequences of this remain unknown at present.

 

The police also mentioned some cases of e-cigarette theft. Teenagers who cannot afford e-cigarettes will find another teenager of similar age who sells e-cigarettes at flea markets and arrange to meet up. They will claim to be checking the authenticity of the e-cigarettes but will run away after receiving the products, hoping that the other child will not report them to the authorities.

 

The situation has been classified as a robbery," warned Larisa Parachaniskaya. She emphasized that, according to the law, a 14-year-old child can be held criminally responsible and may face a maximum sentence of 8 years.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

U.S. Customs Plan to Require Foreign Export Declarations Could Deal ‘Devastating’ Blow to China’s Vape Exports, Logistics gl Expert Says
U.S. Customs Plan to Require Foreign Export Declarations Could Deal ‘Devastating’ Blow to China’s Vape Exports, Logistics gl Expert Says
A U.S. Customs and Border Protection proposal to collect foreign export declarations and other overseas customs documents could expose discrepancies in the value, classification and description of China-made vape shipments entering the United States. A veteran Chinese logistics professional told 2Firsts that the measure, if implemented, could undermine the all-inclusive shipping model used by some unauthorized vape exporters and push parts of the trade toward costlier underground channels. The risk extends beyond higher duties: accurately declared products may also be more readily identified as unauthorized e-cigarettes subject to FDA enforcement.
Special Report
Sep.07
Australia Adds 6-Methylnicotine to Schedule 9 Prohibited Substances, Effective October 1
Australia Adds 6-Methylnicotine to Schedule 9 Prohibited Substances, Effective October 1
Australia's Therapeutic Goods Administration published a final decision on September 25 to classify 6-methylnicotine as a Schedule 9 prohibited substance under the Poisons Standard, effective October 1, 2026. TGA said the chemical has been reported in e-cigarette liquids sold in Australia and marketed as nicotine-free or nicotine alternatives, while evidence also indicates its use in preparations such as oral pouches. The government originally proposed a Schedule 7 classification but ultimately adopted the stricter Schedule 9 designation, citing acute toxicity, dependence risk, use in unapproved consumer products and misleading marketing.
News
Sep.29 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Pennsylvania Vape Directory Enforcement Starts Oct. 19, Barring Retail Sales of Unlisted Products
Pennsylvania Vape Directory Enforcement Starts Oct. 19, Barring Retail Sales of Unlisted Products
Pennsylvania's Act 57 vape directory regime will reach the end of its 120-day inventory transition period on Oct. 19. Nicotine-containing e-cigarettes intended for retail sale in the state that are not listed on the Attorney General's ENDS directory will then be barred from retail sale and treated as contraband subject to seizure, forfeiture and destruction. Manufacturers face annual product certification, brand- and style-based fees and a minimum $50,000 surety bond, while retailers and wholesalers must source through licensed channels and monitor the directory.
Regulations
Oct.08
U.S. Ninth Circuit Upholds FDA Denial of MH Global’s Flavored Vape PMTA Applications
U.S. Ninth Circuit Upholds FDA Denial of MH Global’s Flavored Vape PMTA Applications
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the FDA’s denial of MH Global LLC’s applications to market flavored electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). The court ruled that FDA’s comparative-efficacy framework, which requires applicants to show that flavored products provide greater cessation or switching benefits than tobacco-flavored alternatives, is consistent with the Tobacco Control Act’s “appropriate for the protection of the public health” standard. The court also found that FDA was not required to establish the framework through notice-and-comment rulemaking.
Aug.26
Altria’s USSTC Starts $250 Million Kentucky Expansion, Adding More Than 200 Jobs
Altria’s USSTC Starts $250 Million Kentucky Expansion, Adding More Than 200 Jobs
U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Company, an Altria Group company, has broken ground on an approximately $250 million manufacturing expansion in Hopkinsville, Kentucky. The roughly 270,000-square-foot facility is expected to create more than 200 jobs and absorb processing, manufacturing and packaging operations currently split between Hopkinsville and Nashville, Tennessee. USSTC previously said production at its Nashville facility is expected to wind down by early 2028. The project forms part of Altria’s broader effort to modernize and consolidate its U.S. smokeless tobacco manufacturing network.
Sep.10
JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
Less than a week after JUUL2 received U.S. FDA marketing authorization on August 28, 2026, JUUL Labs was sued for patent infringement in federal court in Delaware. AJ Marketing LLC filed the complaint on September 3, alleging that both JUUL 1 and JUUL2 infringe U.S. Patent No. 8,851,068 B2. The patent covers aspects of programmable electronic vaporization devices, including controls over dose delivery, usage frequency and operating parameters. The plaintiff is seeking reasonable royalties and ongoing royalties tied to the remaining life of the patent. JUUL has not yet publicly responded to the case.
Sep.10