Bulgaria Parliament Amendments on E-cigarette Ban Proposal

Feb.25.2025
Bulgaria Parliament Amendments on E-cigarette Ban Proposal
Bulgaria parliament revises e-cigarette ban proposal to only include disposable products, sparking debate on tobacco law amendments.

According to a report by Btvnovinite on February 25, a proposed comprehensive ban on e-cigarettes that was initially passed on first reading in the Bulgarian Parliament has been modified. The current focus of discussion is now on only banning disposable e-cigarette products.


During a roundtable discussion at a national conference, officials deliberated on proposed amendments to the Tobacco Products Act. The proposal includes a ban on flavored e-cigarettes and suggestions to expand regulatory agencies' authority.


Kostadin Angelov, Chairman of the National Parliament Health Committee, stated, "Our primary goal is to achieve a effective nationwide ban on e-cigarettes. However, we recognize that if implemented in the current manner, it may take two to three years to notify the legislation, so there will be no immediate changes at the national level.


The European e-cigarette industry association has warned that if disposable e-cigarettes are now banned, the rate of smuggling will at least double or triple. If flavors are banned in e-cigarettes, the rate of smuggling could increase to five or six times the current amount.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Texas college data show rapid shifts in top vaping brands, with Geek Bar/Vape surging by 2025
Texas college data show rapid shifts in top vaping brands, with Geek Bar/Vape surging by 2025
A short communication in Drug and Alcohol Dependence examined changes in the most commonly used nicotine vaping brands among Texas college students from 2023 to 2025. The study analyzed 6,049 students aged 18–25 who reported past-30-day nicotine vaping across three repeated cross-sectional spring surveys. The report found that use of Esco Bar, Elf Bar, JUUL, and Puff Bar declined from 2023 to 2025, while Geek Bar/Vape increased.
Feb.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Global Forum on Nicotine 2026 to explore why prohibition of safer nicotine products risks, and does not protect, public health
Global Forum on Nicotine 2026 to explore why prohibition of safer nicotine products risks, and does not protect, public health
Mar.12
Michigan Governor budget to seek major tax hikes on tobacco, vaping and gaming to address Medicaid gap
Michigan Governor budget to seek major tax hikes on tobacco, vaping and gaming to address Medicaid gap
Governor Gretchen Whitmer’s proposed fiscal year 2027 budget includes significant tax hikes on tobacco and gaming to address a projected $1.8 billion shortfall in Michigan’s Medicaid funding, the report said. The plan calls for raising the per-pack cigarette tax from $2 to $3 and increasing the wholesale tax on other tobacco products from 32% to 57%.
Feb.12 by 2FIRSTS.ai
KT&G Integrates “lil Aible” Dedicated Stick Lineup Under the “AIIM” Brand
KT&G Integrates “lil Aible” Dedicated Stick Lineup Under the “AIIM” Brand
KT&G said it will integrate the Real, Granular and Vapor Stick product lines for its heated tobacco device “lil Aible” under the “AIIM” brand. The company said the brand integration is intended to organize the existing lineup more intuitively and improve consumer accessibility and convenience.
Mar.18 by 2FIRSTS.ai
South Korea online purchasing fuels spread among younger groups; online drug cases share climbs
South Korea online purchasing fuels spread among younger groups; online drug cases share climbs
Police said detections of new drugs disguised as e-cigarettes reached 1,206 cases through September last year, up from 941 in 2022, and the number of detected drug types increased from 26 to 33 over the same period.
Feb.11 by 2FIRSTS.ai
FDA Details Carcinogenicity Tiering and ELCR Framework as Small Manufacturers Press for Predictability
FDA Details Carcinogenicity Tiering and ELCR Framework as Small Manufacturers Press for Predictability
During the “Toxicological Profile” session at FDA’s Feb 10 PMTA roundtable, officials outlined the carcinogenicity tiering system and Excess Lifetime Cancer Risk (ELCR) framework used in ENDS reviews under the APPH standard. Small manufacturers questioned database transparency, exposure assumptions, and the existence of clear compliance benchmarks. FDA reiterated toxicological risk is assessed case by case within a broader population-level determination.
Feb.11