Call for Stricter Penalties on Nicotine and E-Liquid Use in Malaysia

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Nov.21.2023
Call for Stricter Penalties on Nicotine and E-Liquid Use in Malaysia
Several Malaysian groups urge stricter punishments for smoking in schools, while others advocate for nicotine and e-liquid to be classified as poisons.

In recent news, as reported by The Star, several organizations in Malaysia are calling on the Ministry of Health to reclassify nicotine and e-liquid as toxic substances, and impose stricter penalties on students caught smoking on school premises.

 

On the other hand, the Minister of Health, Dr Zaliha Mustafa, revealed in parliament that the removal of these two substances from the list of controlled drugs is a step towards taxing e-cigarettes and nicotine-containing e-liquids.

 

According to the President of educational group PAGE, Noor Azimah, schools should treat smokers and e-cigarette users equally and impose strict community service penalties on those who smoke on school grounds. Parents and retailers should also be subject to the same penalties. Numerous organizations, including the Malaysian Medical Association, have been urging for nicotine and e-liquid to be reclassified as poison under the Poison Act as soon as possible.

 

Meanwhile, the "Smoke Control Products Act" pertaining to public health has been postponed in parliament due to the need to handle government affairs.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

UK Government Officially Confirms Vaping Products Duty and Stamps Scheme, Effective October 2026
UK Government Officially Confirms Vaping Products Duty and Stamps Scheme, Effective October 2026
HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) has officially confirmed that the UK will implement a Vaping Products Duty (VPD) and Vaping Duty Stamps (VDS) scheme from October 1, 2026. The duty will apply to all vaping liquids at a flat rate of £2.20 per 10ml. Businesses must register for approval starting April 1, 2026. The stamps scheme will take effect in October 2026 with a six-month grace period, after which, from April 2027, unstamped products will be prohibited from sale.
Oct.02 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Japan Tobacco launches limited-edition Ploom AURA color “Bronze Royal,” priced at about $27
Japan Tobacco launches limited-edition Ploom AURA color “Bronze Royal,” priced at about $27
Japan Tobacco (JT) announced that Ploom AURA has added a second limited-edition colorway, “Bronze Royal,” which will be available in limited quantities through official channels starting November 11, priced at approximately $27.3.
Nov.12 by 2FIRSTS.ai
California Federal Judge Signals Likely Class Certification in Juul–Altria Antitrust Case
California Federal Judge Signals Likely Class Certification in Juul–Altria Antitrust Case
U.S. District Judge William Orrick of the Northern District of California indicated on Friday that he will likely certify classes of direct and indirect purchasers accusing e-cigarette makers Juul Labs Inc. and former rival Altria Group Inc. of conspiring to limit product variety and violate antitrust laws.
Oct.20 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Spain to Tighten E-Cigarette Regulation: Public-Place Ban, Advertising Limits, Flavour Controls
Spain to Tighten E-Cigarette Regulation: Public-Place Ban, Advertising Limits, Flavour Controls
Spain is advancing a 2025 Anti-Tobacco Law to align e-cigs with tobacco, tighten public-use/advertising/flavour rules, study phasing out disposables; cannabinoid, nicotine-free vapes are rising.
Oct.21 by 2FIRSTS.ai
UK plans law to license vape retailers; unlicensed sales could face heavy fines
UK plans law to license vape retailers; unlicensed sales could face heavy fines
The UK plans a national licensing regime for vape and tobacco sales, making unlicensed retail illegal, and will consult experts on flavours, nicotine strength, packaging and design.
Oct.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Samsung's battery explosion case proceeds as court finds manufacturer maintained “sufficient contacts” with the state
Samsung's battery explosion case proceeds as court finds manufacturer maintained “sufficient contacts” with the state
The Minnesota Court of Appeals has ruled that Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., a South Korean battery manufacturer, is subject to Minnesota jurisdiction in a product-liability case involving a vape battery explosion. The court found the company had “sufficient minimum contacts” with the state through extensive business activity.
Oct.20 by 2FIRSTS.ai